Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The disappeared

15791011

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 392 ✭✭grainnewhale


    timthumbni wrote: »
    What? That they don't agree with the majoririty opinion in Northern Ireland that we want to remain part of the UK.

    Are you suggesting that we all vote for a united Ireland to stop the dissidents killing us? That would be one solution I suppose but not a realistic expectation of the facts.

    This bull**** state was created to give the unionist a majority. One which they abused, indeed if they hadn't the P.I.R.A would not even exist. Luckily its a quickly decreasing majority.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,292 ✭✭✭tdv123


    timthumbni wrote: »
    What? That they don't agree with the majoririty opinion in Northern Ireland that we want to remain part of the UK.

    Are you suggesting that we all vote for a united Ireland to stop the dissidents killing us? That would be one solution I suppose but not a realistic expectation of the facts.

    The majority of the people on this island where forced into accepting partition to stop Carson's UVF from killing them.

    I think the people of the island acting as a single unit to decide their faith is a more practical solution than letting dissidents on either side calling shots from the barrels of their guns


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭timthumbni


    This bull**** state was created to give the unionist a majority. One which they abused, indeed if they hadn't the P.I.R.A would not even exist. Luckily its a quickly decreasing majority.

    Really. You think the majority of Northern Ireland voters want a united ireland? In your wet dreams perhaps.

    The IRA existed to drive out the British. Epic fail.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭SoulandForm


    timthumbni wrote: »
    Really. You think the majority of Northern Ireland voters want a united ireland? In your wet dreams perhaps.

    The IRA existed to drive out the British. Epic fail.

    No I dont.

    I think a lot of the "CNR" is licking their lips at the chance to get back at the "Prods" once they become a majority and believe (very probably correctly) that intergration into the 26 counties would spoil that "fun". I think most of the "PUL" dont want one because in their minds ending Partition would be "themuns" winning. So no I dont.

    I do however think that only chance of civic as opposed to tribal society developing is in ending dissolving Northern Ireland into the 26 counties.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,292 ✭✭✭tdv123


    timthumbni wrote: »
    Really. You think the majority of Northern Ireland voters want a united ireland? In your wet dreams perhaps.

    The IRA existed to drive out the British. Epic fail.

    The original IRA under their Irish Volunteers guises was set-up to safe guard Home Rule from the threat of loyalist terrorists. It wasn't until the majority of the people on the island decided they wanted independence that their duty was to drive the British out.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 392 ✭✭grainnewhale


    timthumbni wrote: »
    Really. You think the majority of Northern Ireland voters want a united ireland? In your wet dreams perhaps.

    The IRA existed to drive out the British. Epic fail.

    Epic fail. The RUC disbanded in shame. The army away home with its tail between its legs. Loyalist terrorist fighting the police and each other, over drug wars. I think the only losers are the ones whose political ambition revolves around fleg protests.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭timthumbni


    No I dont.

    I think a lot of the "CNR" is licking their lips at the chance to get back at the "Prods" once they become a majority and believe (very probably correctly) that intergration into the 26 counties would spoil that "fun". I think most of the "PUL" dont want one because in their minds ending Partition would be "themuns" winning. So no I dont.

    I do however think that only chance of civic as opposed to tribal society developing is in ending dissolving Northern Ireland into the 26 counties.

    You think that "dissolving" Northern Ireland into the south is really a solution.???

    The problem is that the "CNR" community don't necessarily all vote the way you would expect them to. Many would lose the British pound and despite having a pipe dream they might not really be prepared to take their losses.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭SoulandForm


    timthumbni wrote: »
    You think that "dissolving" Northern Ireland into the south is really a solution.???

    The problem is that the "CNR" community don't necessarily all vote the way you would expect them to. Many would lose the British pound and despite having a pipe dream they might not really be prepared to take their losses.

    You are correct that at the moment the Civil Service has a larger proportion of those from a CNR background in high positions than the private sector which is still largely controlled by the other tribe (but this seems in the process also of changing). That isnt the point I was making though.

    Yes it would offer a real probable solution because it force the tribal bear pit to engage to a larger polity and so grow up. If Britain had really intergrated Northern Ireland into the mainland in the 20s than there is a possibility we wouldnt be having this disscussion- a possibility and not a certainty mind you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭timthumbni


    Epic fail. The RUC disbanded in shame. The army away home with its tail between its legs. Loyalist terrorist fighting the police and each other, over drug wars. I think the only losers are the ones whose political ambition revolves around fleg protests.

    You keep telling yourself that. Lol. The ira and their loyalist mates all lost the war. Everyone lost. the bitterness is flying out of you but you are not alone. I've noticed a lot of republicans on here who never seem to have never visited Norn iron but yet seem to be experts in the place.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭SoulandForm


    timthumbni wrote: »
    You keep telling yourself that. Lol. The ira and their loyalist mates all lost the war. Everyone lost. the bitterness is flying out of you but you are not alone. I've noticed a lot of republicans on here who never seem to have never visited Norn iron but yet seem to be experts in the place.

    Their Loyalist mates WON their war.

    I spent the first 18 years of life in NI.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭timthumbni


    You are correct that at the moment the Civil Service has a larger proportion of those from a CNR background in high positions than the private sector which is still largely controlled by the other tribe (but this seems in the process also of changing). That isnt the point I was making though.

    Yes it would offer a real probable solution because it force the tribal bear pit to engage to a larger polity and so grow up. If Britain had really intergrated Northern Ireland into the mainland in the 20s than there is a possibility we wouldnt be having this disscussion- a possibility and not a certainty mind you.

    You lost me at the Civil Service tbh. What are you going on about exactly???


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭SoulandForm


    timthumbni wrote: »
    You lost me at the Civil Service tbh. What are you going on about exactly???

    A large percentage of the Civil Service in Northern Ireland now comes from Catholic backgrounds, I think its a majority now. This is where the idea of Catholics voting to keep the Union comes from (and some of the reality behind the positions of "Unicorns").


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,678 ✭✭✭Crooked Jack


    Richard wrote: »
    I'm not sure what you mean by a "dirty war". Republicans killed over 2,000 people during the troubles and the forces of law and order in the UK and Ireland were trying to stop them. Of course, various enquiries have shown this wasn't always done in the best way by the governments, but don't try and turn this into something it isn't.

    This type of idiocy is why a Truth Commission is so necessary


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,292 ✭✭✭tdv123


    Epic fail. The RUC disbanded in shame. The army away home with its tail between its legs. Loyalist terrorist fighting the police and each other, over drug wars. I think the only losers are the ones whose political ambition revolves around fleg protests.

    Exactly.

    The real victory for Republican freedom fighters was the social changes made to a corrupt & sectarian state. And the freedom to achieve freedom peacefully.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭SoulandForm


    timthumbni wrote: »
    You lost me at the Civil Service tbh. What are you going on about exactly???

    Pretending that Northern Ireland is not a dysfunctional tribal society- and that dysfunctional tribalism has both supported its existence and undermined also by leading to widespread violence is pure foolishness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭timthumbni


    Their Loyalist mates WON their war.

    I spent the first 18 years of life in NI.

    The loyalists may have won the war in terms of us still remaining within the uk. However they and their ira counterparts succeeded in torturing the normal people with their endless hypocritical bull****.

    I never fell for the loyalist crap so you can understand why I don't appreciate the republican nonsense either.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭SoulandForm


    Mainstream Unionism and the British State were both well capable of hypocritical cow waste. Loyalist can well argue that their campaign was very important during the first serious PIRA ceasefire in the mid-70s and in bringing places like Tyronne into the "Peace Process". Have you ever General Frank Kitson's book?

    timthumbni wrote: »
    The loyalists may have won the war in terms of us still remaining within the uk. However they and their ira counterparts succeeded in torturing the normal people with their endless hypocritical bull****.

    I never fell for the loyalist crap so you can understand why I don't appreciate the republican nonsense either.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭SoulandForm


    Read Gangs and Counter Gangs aswell Low Intensity Operations by him. He makes a lot of things clear.

    And to deny he wasnt a very important figure in the Troubles would be silly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,689 ✭✭✭Karl Stein


    timthumbni wrote: »
    The loyalists may have won the war in terms of us still remaining within the uk. However they and their ira counterparts succeeded in torturing the normal people with their endless hypocritical bull****.

    I never fell for the loyalist crap so you can understand why I don't appreciate the republican nonsense either.

    Loyalists were the storm troopers for Unionist bull****ters. I can't remember what Unionist politician said that many Unionist people would have had sneaking regard for loyalist murder gangs' killing of innocent Catholics. Maybe you do?

    Stop pretending that Unionists were above it all and that dirty loyalists and republicans were responsible for the mayhem. The mad dogs of Unionism knew they had loyalist attack dogs on their leash. You cannot separate Unionism from Loyalism no more than you can separate SF from the IRA.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,292 ✭✭✭tdv123


    Richard wrote: »
    I'm not sure what you mean by a "dirty war". Republicans killed over 2,000 people during the troubles and the forces of law and order in the UK and Ireland were trying to stop them. Of course, various enquiries have shown this wasn't always done in the best way by the governments, but don't try and turn this into something it isn't.

    How was murdering 14 people on Bloody Sunday, 11 people in the Ballymurphy Massacre, 5 in the Springhill massacre & 4 during the falls curfew stopping Republicans?

    Not to mention colluding with loyalists to murder politicians, lawyers & oh yeah a show band.

    Their goal was to destroy the IRA & their supporters (to them anybody who was a Catholic) which they failed at & even acknowledged the fact they should have sought a political settlement much sooner than they did.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭SoulandForm




  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭SoulandForm


    Loyalists were the storm troopers for Unionist bull****ters. I can't remember what Unionist politician said that many Unionist people would have had sneaking regard for loyalist murder gangs' killing of innocent Catholics. Maybe you do?

    Stop pretending that Unionists were above it all and that dirty loyalists and republicans were responsible for the mayhem. The mad dogs of Unionism knew they had loyalist attack dogs on their leash. You cannot separate Unionism from Loyalism no more than you can separate SF from the IRA.

    Outside of the Ulster Nationalists Loyalism and Unionism was the same thing basically- though obviously Alliance voters did not support the UVF while they were still Unionist.

    There were differences between Republicanism and Nationalism but they faded away after 1986.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,689 ✭✭✭Karl Stein


    Loyalism and Unionism was the same thing basically

    How do we let our Unionist/loyalist high horsers (who sit atop Shetland ponies) know that they don't fool anyone?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭SoulandForm


    How do we let our Unionist/loyalist high horsers (who sit atop Shetland ponies) know that they don't fool anyone?

    There could be genuine self-deception involved. Among the Unionist middle to upper middle class there was the wish that they were not really involved and the troubles was only skangers killing each other. There is a certain type of Unionist moderate who just doesnt do history.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,819 ✭✭✭Hannibal


    I see a letter in An Phoblacht from the sister of one of the disappeared whos body is yet to be found... nice to see responses from those not featured in the programme


    "IN RESPONSE to the recent BBC/RTÉ programme concerning those people shot and secretly buried by the IRA, Breige Wright, the sister of Belfast man Seamus Wright – in a letter to An Phoblacht – wishes to clarify a number of points.
    These particularly concern interventions and accusations attributed to Dolours Price and Brendan Hughes."
    _______________________________________________________

    By Breige Wright

    "MY BROTHER, Seamus Wright, an IRA Volunteer, was killed and secretly buried by the IRA in 1972.


    They have said why they killed him. They have identified the location where they buried his body.

    In 2010, for the first time, my family made a public intervention following comments by Dolours Price in relation to the disappearance and death of our brother Seamus.

    At that time we challenged her to either bring forward information that could help recover Seamus’s remains or to stop using his death in pursuit of her own political agenda. We asked her to engage with the Independent Commission for the Location of Victims Remains (ICLVR).

    Contrary to what some media reports have said, she did not engage with the ICLVR. Others, including Brendan Hughes, sought to use Seamus’s death and the circumstances surrounding it in a similar fashion.

    None of these people brought forward any information that has been of help in the search for Seamus’s remains.

    Following Seamus’s disappearance there were many rumours and stories. Some suggested that he had gone into hiding with those who had recruited him as their agent – British Military Intelligence; others suggested that he had been killed and buried by the IRA.

    In 1999, the IRA publicly accepted its responsibility for killing Seamus.

    My family has grieved as any other family. Our loss is no greater or no less than anyone else’s.

    I have met with the ICLVR. I have met with republicans. I accept the difficulties outlined by the ICLVR and by republicans. These include: the deaths of some of those directly involved in the actual event; the impact of time on people’s memories; major physical changes at the site; and the hostility of some, who might have information, to those republicans trying to bring closure. All of these points are a matter of public record.

    I know there is a strong concern that previous digging at the site might have disturbed the grave and the remains.

    Mr Geoff Knupfer of the ICLVR has recently acknowledged this in relation to another site (The Irish Times, 1 October 2013).

    Only the small number of people involved in the killing and burial of my brother have information that might help. Everything else is speculation and rumour. I am satisfied that information has been passed onto the ICLVR in good faith.

    I ask those who have genuinely engaged with the ICLVR to continue to do so. I would call on anyone else with genuine information that might help locate the remains of any of those whose bodies have not yet been recovered to pass that information to the ICLVR through whatever conduit they choose.

    I would like to thank all of those who have been trying to help our family achieve closure: Gerry Adams, Fr Alex Reid, Fr Brendan O’Callaghan, the ICLVR, Geoff Knupfer and his team, and others who have been working quietly over the past 14 years.

    All we as a family want is to be able to bury our brother’s remains beside our father, mother and sister."


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    Hannibal wrote: »
    I see a letter in An Phoblacht from the sister of one of the disappeared whos body is yet to be found... nice to see responses from those not featured in the programme


    It was a programme 'without a specific agenda' don't ya know!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    It was a programme 'without a specific agenda' don't ya know!

    Are you quoting someone there, or it that just a regular straw-man?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    alastair wrote: »
    Are you quoting someone there, or it that just a regular straw-man?

    Quotes used to emphasise the argument I have been making, that by leaving out a whole raft of information, this programme revealed it's true agenda, exploiting the suffering of a family to have a failed pop at Gerry Adams.
    The above letter is more grist to the mill in that context.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,819 ✭✭✭Hannibal


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    Quotes used to emphasise the argument I have been making, that by leaving out a whole raft of information, this programme revealed it's true agenda, exploiting the suffering of a family to have a failed pop at Gerry Adams.
    The above letter is more grist to the mill in that context.
    That is something that was obvious from the get go. A family like in the above letter acknowledging the difficulties that republicans have in locating the bodies and also thanking Gerry Adams for his help was never going to be aired in this programme. Also in the letter they show more evidence of how Price and Hughes never offered anything more than politically motivated accusations


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    Quotes used to emphasise the argument I have been making, that by leaving out a whole raft of information, this programme revealed it's true agenda, exploiting the suffering of a family to have a failed pop at Gerry Adams.
    The above letter is more grist to the mill in that context.

    So - straw man it is.

    The letter says nothing about the programme - despite An Phoblacht's creative headline. Price and Hughes weren't going to help the ICLVR, given that they were opposed to the whole process in the first place. The programme didn't suggest that they had. Their relationship to Adams - and what information they had in relation to the specific murder of Jean McConville - even if they didn't choose to help the ICLVR (or indeed, agreed with her 'disappearance' at the time) is certainly relevant to a documentary that deals with the subject.

    The programme was also quite clear on the difficulties involved in recovering the bodies - including the passing of time, clouded memories, shifting bog, etc. There was no 'raft of information' left out.


Advertisement