Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

I reported a video on Youtube for the first time.

  • 13-11-2013 01:06PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭


    To give context to the video here it is.

    NSFW
    This is the only copy of Budd Dwyer's press conference that is known to exist. During the making of "Honest Man", a feature length film about Dwyer's life, I attempted to acquire footage of his entire speech (Just the speech, NOT his suicide) but was denied by every news station in Pennsylvania. Oddly enough his suicide was, and still is, fully available to license from several news archives for a fee.

    To me this is a testament to the power of Dwyer's words and a reminder of the continued cowardice by the local media within Pennsylvania.

    Kids are supposed to be 13 years of age to watch content hosted on its site and I simply think that is too young an age to be exposed to videos of this nature. I have no issue with this video being hosted on other websites that would cover the 'darker' more 'adult' part of the internet but think Youtube isn't the place for it.

    I also find it strange that Youtube will remove videos that have female boobies in a video yet can leave up a video of Miley Cyrus having sex with a giant cannonball. I get this is a separate point but there seems to be a weird line where breasts = banned, yet gyrating naked in a highly sexually charged manner = not banned.

    Anybody agree or disagree with this?


«134

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,094 ✭✭✭wretcheddomain


    Who are you to tell YouTube what to do?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭wazky


    If you have a problem with your child seeing things they shouldn't on youtube then supervise them on the internet.

    Maybe parents should be responsible not the internet?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,335 ✭✭✭splashthecash


    The link doesn't work for me and doesn't seem to point to youtube (or is it just redirecting?)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,052 ✭✭✭Matt_Trakker


    Wait, so you have a problem of a video of someone making a speech?

    Plus your link doesn't work.

    Also have you ever heard of a firewall? Watch a youtube video on how to set one up so your sheltered kid won't see the anything of the real world.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Tangatagamadda Chaddabinga Bonga Bungo


    The link doesn't work for me and doesn't seem to point to youtube (or is it just redirecting?)
    Wait, so you have a problem of a video of someone making a speech?

    Plus your link doesn't work.

    Also have you ever heard of a firewall? Watch a youtube video on how to set one up so your sheltered kid won't see the anything of the real world.

    Link works now.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    Link works now.

    Urrgh............. reported to the Mod of Afterhours.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,075 ✭✭✭fenris


    He was thinkin of the chizllers, Joe

    Seriously though control your own kids access to the web instead of trying to turn it into sesame street for everybody else. Actually that chap in the bin might scare some one somewhere, so you better report that too.
    Report on facebook or YouTube should only be used for genuine problems like dodgy kiddie stuff or suicide pact videos etc. I.e. Where there is actual danger to someone rather that notional potential danger to someone's sensibility, when you use these mechanisms frivolously you tie up resources that could be needed to sort something or in real time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,179 ✭✭✭hfallada


    To give context to the video here it is.

    NSFW and contains graphic real violence.



    Kids are supposed to be 13 years of age to watch content hosted on its site and I simply think that is too young an age to be exposed to videos of this nature. I have no issue with this video being hosted on other websites that would cover the 'darker' more 'adult' part of the internet but think Youtube isn't the place for it.

    I also find it strange that Youtube will remove videos that have female boobies in a video yet can leave up a video of Miley Cyrus having sex with a giant cannonball. I get this is a separate point but there seems to be a weird line where breasts = banned, yet gyrating naked in a highly sexually charged manner = not banned.

    Anybody agree or disagree with this?

    There is a thing call free speech and expression. We fortunately live in a country were you can say whatever you want in media without it being censored. But in places like the middle east the media is often censored. Youtube gives you access to news you wont hear.

    OP why should your values affect someones access to a video? You might not agree with Miley Cyrus but most twenty somethings see nothing wrong with it. It should be up to the viewer to choose whether or not to view something. If you are afraid of your child seeing something you should have a net nanny or whatever that BS program is.

    A racist and often homophobic news story on RTE is going to have a greater negative affect on your childs development , than a pop artist singing in a slutty outfit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,423 ✭✭✭cml387


    If that's the video of Bud Dwyer shooting himself, then it's best not to click on the link.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Tangatagamadda Chaddabinga Bonga Bungo


    Who are you to tell YouTube what to do?

    They have a report a video function so I used it, it's the first time I have. I'm not starting a grass roots campaign or a movement involving my newly found organisation to try bring down Youtube as an entity.
    wazky wrote: »
    If you have a problem with your child seeing things they shouldn't on youtube then supervise them on the internet.

    Maybe parents should be responsible not the internet?

    Parents protecting their children from bad content on the internet goes beyond what either parties 'responsibility' is in my opinion.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,570 ✭✭✭Mint Aero


    I think the first time I saw that video I was a kid and it was on tv, the news even if I recall correctly, graphic and all. :rolleyes: People are so soft nowadays.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,052 ✭✭✭Matt_Trakker


    Link works now.

    OK, watched it and while I feel sorry that he killed himself he was obviously plagued with guilt and regret.
    The video doesn't show anything graphic.
    He gives his final speech and at the end takes out a gun, then the video ends.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Tangatagamadda Chaddabinga Bonga Bungo


    hfallada wrote: »
    There is a thing call free speech and expression. We fortunately live in a country were you can say whatever you want in media without it being censored. But in places like the middle east the media is often censored. Youtube gives you access to news you wont hear.

    OP why should your values affect someones access to a video? You might not agree with Miley Cyrus but most twenty somethings see nothing wrong with it. It should be up to the viewer to choose whether or not to view something. If you are afraid of your child seeing something you should have a net nanny or whatever that BS program is.

    A racist and often homophobic news story on RTE is going to have a greater negative affect on your childs development , than a pop artist singing in a slutty outfit.

    Can you give any examples of RTE being racist and homophobic 'often'?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,208 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    It's a video of a guy making a speech. Says in the description it doesn't contain the shot at the end, it says at the start of the video that it doesn't contain the graphic violence at the end, and if you watch the video, it cuts off before he shoots himself.
    Youtube isn't a babysitter


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,194 ✭✭✭eviltimeban


    Yeah it doesn't show him actually doing it.

    By the way, Kurt Cobain had that press conference on VHS and used to watch it endlessly... apparently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,626 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    To give context to the video here it is.

    NSFW and contains very graphic and real violence.


    He doesn't actually shoot himself in that video. It ends when he pulls the gun out of the envelope. What's the problem exactly?

    The Budd Dwyer case is unique anyway given that millions of people actually saw it live.. it's no more gruesome than the countless videos of serious car accidents and people being attacked by animals etc on YouTube.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 502 ✭✭✭Jarrod


    I haven't clicked the link but, it being Budd Dwyer, I assume it's when he shot himself. TBH, I've no idea why anyone would want to watch that. Having said that, it's not up to Youtube to parent people's kids for them. If you don't want your kids seeing this stuff then monitor their internet use more closely.

    As for that Miley Cyrus video, am I the only one that doesn't consider it to be sexual? Yes, she's naked in it but unless you go in for some pretty obscure 'sexual imagery' or consider nudity in itself to be sexual then I don't really see how it could be considered sexual.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Tangatagamadda Chaddabinga Bonga Bungo


    OK, watched it and while I feel sorry that he killed himself he was obviously plagued with guilt and regret.
    The video doesn't show anything graphic.
    He gives his final speech and at the end takes out a gun, then the video ends.

    I put that up to be fair to the man. There are videos up there that show him actually pulling the trigger. Videos that have 100,000's of views and have been up for years which would strongly indicate Youtube have no issue with them being hosted on their site.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,052 ✭✭✭Matt_Trakker


    Link works now.
    Can you give any examples of RTE being racist and homophobic 'often'?

    I can, the pretty much every decade up to and including the 1970s, then it kinda went down..... very gradually.

    Oh and Jimmy McGee, he's pretty famous for his casual racism when commentating on sport.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,778 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover




    Parents protecting their children from bad content on the internet goes beyond what you either parties 'responsibility' is in my opinion.

    I'm sorry, I can't understand what you are saying here. Are you saying that it's not a parent's responsibility to protect their child from the Internet?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,443 ✭✭✭loveisdivine


    The video specifically states that it does not contain any graphic images. So what exactly are you getting you're knickers in a twist about?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,052 ✭✭✭Matt_Trakker


    I put that up to be fair to the man. There are videos up there that show him actually pulling the trigger. Videos that have 100,000's of views and have been up for years which would strongly indicate Youtube have no issue with them being hosted on their site.

    Oh, well then that's different.
    Of course they shouldn't have videos showing someone blowing their brains out.
    That's what gore galleries are for.

    Not nice places at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭mutley18


    I also find it strange that Youtube will remove videos that have female boobies in a video yet can leave up a video of Miley Cyrus having sex with a giant cannonball.

    "I CAME IN LIKE A CAAANNONBALL"

    Still works I guess.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,554 ✭✭✭✭Sir Digby Chicken Caesar


    i hate you op and everybody like you


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,235 ✭✭✭returnNull


    I put that up to be fair to the man. There are videos up there that show him actually pulling the trigger. Videos that have 100,000's of views and have been up for years which would strongly indicate Youtube have no issue with them being hosted on their site.

    maybe re-edit your post and change the tag to SFW because it makes you look like a liveline regular.

    Oh and good luck with policing the internet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Tangatagamadda Chaddabinga Bonga Bungo


    I can, the pretty much every decade up to and including the 1970s, then it kinda went down..... very gradually.

    Oh and Jimmy McGee, he's pretty famous for his casual racism when commentating on sport.

    Children today are not 'exposed' to 1970's RTE now though are they.

    The fact that the worlds largest video web hosting site has no issue with showing extreme, graphic, real violence to a 13 year old is much more worrying than what Jimmy McGee does or doesn't say to be honest.


  • Posts: 26,920 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm more offended by Miley Cyrus tbh.

    Also - YouTube has age rated videos, the same as many other places. They can't be held responsible for parents not monitoring their children's activity online correctly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,485 ✭✭✭✭Khannie


    cml387 wrote: »
    If that's the video of Bud Dwyer shooting himself, then it's best not to click on the link.

    There is no shooting in the video. I wasn't aware of this and it is interesting (and sad).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭Tangatagamadda Chaddabinga Bonga Bungo


    I'm sorry, I can't understand what you are saying here. Are you saying that it's not a parent's responsibility to protect their child from the Internet?

    It's everyone's responsibility to protect children I would have thought, well, anybody that has an interest that is.

    I'm not saying parents aren't responsible for their children, just that society has some duty of care. Like not putting advertisements on tv for local swinger spots in between Peppa Pig and Ben and Holly's Little Kingdom. :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,068 ✭✭✭Specialun


    He said boobies

    Hehehe

    ** Runs out of room all red,Giggling like a girl ***


Advertisement
Advertisement