Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Speeding Fine Advice Please

135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,658 ✭✭✭✭The Sweeper


    Originally posted by PHB

    Have a look there,
    http://www.garda.ie/angarda/statistics98/2002.html,
    Look at all the people who died because you've decided that its ok to break the law just a little.

    Whitewashman killed all those people?

    /me screams and points and shouts MURDERER!!!!!!


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,698 Mod ✭✭✭✭Silverfish


    I'm so glad you find the death of some of my friends an excuse to try and impress with a display of rapier-sharp wit.


    At the rate deaths are ocurring on the roads, it will be someone you know in the next year or two.

    Bear it in mind while you're sneering at people who take it seriously, yeah?

    Whether they pay the fine or not, I hope your friends learnt a valuable lesson, but by the sneeringly superior tone of your first post, you appear to have fully taken their side and don't think they've done anything wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,099 ✭✭✭✭WhiteWashMan


    Originally posted by PHB


    Because right there you are saying its ok to break the law a little


    could you please quote where i said exactly what you siad there.

    in fact, have i ever condone speeding anywhere?

    did i ever mention it was fine to break the law?

    i think you are making far too many assuptions.

    now, again, i ask, your comparison about murder and speeding, is the speeder going at 71 miles an hour in a 70 mile an hour zone, and if so, then i would like to know what makes 71 miles an hour more dangerous than 70.

    and if you are not talking about that, and you are in fact talking about doing 80 in a 70 mile an hour zone?

    is it the difference between murder (your example, not mine) by shooting them in the head, or stabbing them?

    by the way, since you seem to be a bit of a soothsayer
    Originally posted by PHB



    The reason I said this is because I knew you would say this.


    did you know that i put that in there because i knew you would answer by saying that you knew i would say that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,658 ✭✭✭✭The Sweeper


    Silverfish, get bent. Stop turning a straightforward question into an excuse for a display of amateur dramatics.

    If you've lost someone close to you in a traffic accident, then I am truly sorry for your loss.

    But stop painting horns and a tail on me, it clashes with my outfit.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,698 Mod ✭✭✭✭Silverfish


    Silverfish, get bent. Stop turning a straightforward question into an excuse for a display of amateur dramatics.

    I do so apologise for being overly sensitive about people being killed.

    In the face of your charm and the use of your gentle persuasion, I retract my personal opinions to suit.

    :mad:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,617 ✭✭✭✭PHB


    There has to be limits on speeding, while 71 miles and hour might be only a bit more dangerous than 70 miles and hour, its still gone past the limit.
    You have to set a limit somewhere, and 70 was the decided limit on a motorway.

    There is no better system unfortunatly and despite the fact that you dont seem to agree with it you cant pick and choose the laws that you choose to obey.
    If you want to get it changed, go for it, but for the time being, the laws the law and if you break it, suffer the consequences.

    And yes im perfectly aware that you havn't exactly said that you condone speeding.

    Theres no point in me continuing this since neither of us are going to agree either way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,099 ✭✭✭✭WhiteWashMan


    Originally posted by Silverfish
    I do so apologise for being overly sensitive about people being killed.

    In the face of your charm and the use of your gentle persuasion, I retract my personal opinions to suit.

    :mad:

    i think your signiture is horrific.

    only recently there have been hundreds of american men and women killed and countless iraqi's killed in iraq and i find your signiture inappropriate and totally distatsteful.

    but i guess its ok for you do what you want and put other people down for asking a simple question.

    dont you think you are being incredibly hypocritical?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,099 ✭✭✭✭WhiteWashMan


    Originally posted by PHB
    There has to be limits on speeding, while 71 miles and hour might be only a bit more dangerous than 70 miles and hour, its still gone past the limit.
    You have to set a limit somewhere, and 70 was the decided limit on a motorway.

    There is no better system unfortunatly and despite the fact that you dont seem to agree with it you cant pick and choose the laws that you choose to obey.
    If you want to get it changed, go for it, but for the time being, the laws the law and if you break it, suffer the consequences.

    And yes im perfectly aware that you havn't exactly said that you condone speeding.

    Theres no point in me continuing this since neither of us are going to agree either way.

    so you stop a car that breaks a law and you get out if you are in it right?

    do you make sure it only does 15 miles an hour in a residential estate?

    in fact, im betting you dont actually drive do you.

    anyway, who is to say that 70 miles an hour is safe?
    there is no difference between 70 and 71 miles an hour in danger terms.
    but i would still like to hear why you think it is.


    oh, and strange that DMT hasnt shown his face back around here. can he not explain this exhaust pipe sucking thing he is so fond of.
    id still like to know DMTY, dont be shy, come on now, we are all freinds here.
    really...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,522 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    lol
    :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,617 ✭✭✭✭PHB


    so you stop a car that breaks a law and you get out if you are in it right?

    do you make sure it only does 15 miles an hour in a residential estate?

    Thats never actually happened to me, but if it did I probably would. In my housing estate there are a lot of kids around so you'd be smart to go at about 5 miles an hour to be safe.
    in fact, im betting you dont actually drive do you.

    No I dont, point being?

    anyway, who is to say that 70 miles an hour is safe?
    there is no difference between 70 and 71 miles an hour in danger terms.
    but i would still like to hear why you think it is.

    Theres is very little difference I agree.
    But I ask you when you draw the line?

    Do you have a problem with the law, do you have a better idea?
    I would like to know what you think a better system there is other than the limits?
    I'd be happy to see a new system if it resulted in less road deaths, infact I think the entire world would hail a new system.

    Why do I think the law is set at 70?

    I'd guess it is set at 70 for a motorway, taking into account the assumption that nobody would be walking close by, that there are no fast turns, the breaking distance if somebody suddenly stopped and how fast the reactions are, but to be honest I'm not quite sure.
    Infact I dont know why a lot of the laws are the way they are, however because of this I don't claim that I know more.

    You probably know why the law is set at 70, because you claim there is no difference between 70 and 71? This would suggest you know why they are set this way, and if so perhaps you could inform us?


    And even if you don't agree with the reasons, it does not mean you can't obey them, as majd's friends didn't. And while you might not have they did, and so they should be punished. And majd asked a question,

    What would happen if they did not pay?

    And you came on and gave out to people for saying that they should have to pay the fine, which implys that you think it is ok to break the law, but im sure you could clear it up in the next post what exactly your opinion is?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,099 ✭✭✭✭WhiteWashMan


    Originally posted by PHB
    Thats never actually happened to me, but if it did I probably would. In my housing estate there are a lot of kids around so you'd be smart to go at about 5 miles an hour to be safe.

    you will still kill someone at 5mph....
    Originally posted by PHB
    No I dont, point being?

    my point being that you only have half the experience in this topic, and i have been on both sides, as driver, and as traffic accident victim
    Originally posted by PHB
    Theres is very little difference I agree.

    but you have said that its more dangerous. i dont agree.
    it may be the difference between lawful and illegal, but does it make it more dangerous?
    Originally posted by PHB
    Do you have a problem with the law, do you have a better idea?

    no, i have no problem with the law. at all. period.
    do i have a better idea?
    not really, but at the end of the day, overzelous police officers are a pain in the bum.

    Originally posted by PHB

    Why do I think the law is set at 70?

    no idea. i think its a stupid law. most people speed. sorry, strick that. everybody speeds. not one drive can claim they dont. they do 35 in a 40mph zone, they do 85 on a motorway, and they do 20 in a 15mhp residential zone.

    Originally posted by PHB

    You probably know why the law is set at 70, because you claim there is no difference between 70 and 71? This would suggest you know why they are set this way, and if so perhaps you could inform us?

    there is no difference.
    its a limit.
    a border.
    however, a lot of the people here have screamed speeding kills.
    but seriously, arte you telling me that those people all think that driving at 71 makes it more dangerous than 70?
    i'll be honest and say that no, it doesnt.

    Originally posted by PHB

    And you came on and gave out to people for saying that they should have to pay the fine, which implys that you think it is ok to break the law, but im sure you could clear it up in the next post what exactly your opinion is?

    again, dont turn it on me. i didnt make the assumptions, you did.
    i didnt make any accusations. you did.

    my opinion is that speeding doesnt kill. dangerous driving kills.
    if that means driving aa car that is not roadworthy, driving under the influence of alcophol/drugs, driving faster than commen sense says you should (for instance i wouldnt do 130 on a motorway even though my car could) driving with no lights on in the dark.
    dangerous driving kills.
    and car accidents are not always a drivers fault either.

    i bet as a pedestrian you walk over roads all the time. i bet you dont always wait for the green man to cross do you. i bet you jay-walk. thasts a crime. and you know what, you could walk out on a road, someone could swerve to miss you and crash their car. and you just killed someone.

    so, a few miles an hour extra on a motorway, as opposed to you killing someone by walking ona road.

    6 of one, and half a dozen of the other isnt it?

    by the way, ever notice that most road deaths are in the country. a third of the countries population is in dublin, yet the country has more traffic accidents.
    drink driving.
    but of course, i bet they were speeding as well, and thats why people died......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,522 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    Is jaywalking a crime in ireland? I didn't think it was. :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,617 ✭✭✭✭PHB


    I dont disagree that drunken driving kills, but I think that you have a lot of faith in people to follow their own common sense.

    You will say that you wouldn't drive 130 on a motorway because its just not common sense.
    But the simple fact is that some people will say its perfectly fine to drive at 130.

    Thats why the law is there, because people can't be trusted to follow their own common sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,658 ✭✭✭✭The Sweeper


    Originally posted by Gordon
    Is jaywalking a crime in ireland? I didn't think it was. :confused:

    While in Ireland at Easter I heard it's been reinstated as a criminal offence, and they will prosecute... apparently they were really lax about it for about 20 years but it's back in a big way now.

    I heard it from a taxi driver, and they know everything


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,522 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    Ahhh taxi drivers, "the knowledge" in more ways than one.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,698 Mod ✭✭✭✭Silverfish


    but i guess its ok for you do what you want and put other people down for asking a simple question.

    Well, you seem to think its okay, so why shouldn't I?!!!

    I just said people I knew were killed by people speeding, four people in two years in two seperate accidents, so in fairness, if someone IS caught and fined, OF COURSE its going to be MY PERSONAL OPINION that they don't try and wrangle out of it.

    MY PERSONAL OPINION is MINE, and I DON'T expect people to agree with it. But I DO expect people to let me HAVE my personal opinion on things. Except the music I listen to. :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,926 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Eamo, you are coming across like an over-protective gurrier, protecting his mot. That or an offensive troll. :p
    Originally posted by WhiteWashMan
    you will still kill someone at 5mph....
    Yes you can, but it's quite rare.
    Originally posted by WhiteWashMan
    however, a lot of the people here have screamed speeding kills. but seriously, are you telling me that those people all think that driving at 71 makes it more dangerous than 70? so, a few miles an hour extra on a motorway, as opposed to you killing someone by walking ona road.
    One of the physics students out there will confirm it, but if I remember right, the energy in a body is proportional to the square of the speed, so while going from 70 to 71 and breaking the technical limit in the law (and the law is technical), the energy in the vehicle increases nearly 3%. Part of the reason why there has been a real drop in the number of RTA deaths in Dublin City Council area is because of traffic calming speeds and generally lower speeds.

    Take a look at http://www.nra.ie/RoadSafety/RoadSafetyRecords/ and the associated reports - speed and/or alcohol are the main killers. Drivers are the major and disproportionate cause of accidents.
    Originally posted by Gordon
    Is jaywalking a crime in ireland? I didn't think it was. :confused:
    It was made a specific offence in the last few years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,658 ✭✭✭✭The Sweeper


    Originally posted by Victor
    Eamo, you are coming across like an over-protective gurrier, protecting his mot.

    Oh! I ForGoT, ayE haM an F33BLE WomMin, ne£d pr0teksHUn

    Don't belittle me Victor. I'm well able.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭Spunog UIE


    ha ha,

    f u n n y angry little people.

    GRRRRRRRRR :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    Originally posted by Minesajackdaniels
    Oh! I ForGoT, ayE haM an F33BLE WomMin, ne£d pr0teksHUn

    Don't belittle me Victor. I'm well able.

    It's WWM that's belittling you Minesajackdaniels, but thats our WWM for yeah.*




























































    *Still think your a bítch for the way your acting about this whole issue though


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 491 ✭✭Silent Bob


    You should see the way that causes of road fatalities are labelled. Never is it because of "excessive speed".

    You will find that the official cause of most accidents is "Excessive speed having regard to the conditions" (my emphasis)

    This includes driving below the speed limit, but still too fast for the conditions (e.g. 25mph in really heavy snow).

    Speeding is relative. If speeding kills, everybody who got on an aeroplane would end up dead. The conditions in the air dictate that it is perfectly safe to travel at 400mph plus.
    Just as it could be safe to do 100mph on an empty motorway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,926 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Originally posted by Minesajackdaniels
    Don't belittle me Victor. I'm well able.
    I'm not, I well respect you (well up to this thread anyway). What I said about WWM was about his protecting of the speeder in the way a gurrier would protect his mot, not protecting you (has he come to your defence here?).
    Originally posted by Silent Bob
    Speeding is relative. If speeding kills, everybody who got on an aeroplane would end up dead. The conditions in the air dictate that it is perfectly safe to travel at 400mph plus.
    The thing is how many people survive aircraft crashes at 400mph?
    Originally posted by Silent Bob
    Just as it could be safe to do 100mph on an empty motorway.
    While it could be safe to do 100mph on an empty motorway, the law says it isn't, save in an emergency.

    In any case these roads have a design speed of 120kmh (75mph) and given the variability in speedometers and other factors, this is why the law says 70mph.

    How did we get onto motorway speed limits anyway?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 491 ✭✭Silent Bob


    Originally posted by Victor
    The thing is how many people survive aircraft crashes at 400mph?

    How many crashes have taken place at this speed though. I can only think of one, and ATC were to blame for it.
    Originally posted by Victor
    While it could be safe to do 100mph on a motorway, the law says it isn't, save in an emergency.

    In any case these roads have a design speed of 120kmh (75mph) and given the variability in speedometers and other factors, this is why the law says 70mph.

    I agree with you on this one and I don't have any problem sticking to 70 on motorways. It just annoys me that people spout out "speed kills" without any form of qualification (of the statement, obviously you don't need to be a doctor to have an opinion:)).

    It's like saying motorbikes are dangerous or games make kids go to their schools and shoot people, or the Internet is responsible for people not being able to communicate... umm... :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,873 ✭✭✭Borzoi


    Wow, handbags at 10 paces.

    But to get back on topic TM if the Gards arse themselves processing the offence, it will go to the car hire firm, which will just take the money from the credit card of the hirer - as per most standard hire agreements.

    Nothing you or your friends can do about it either way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,311 ✭✭✭✭Bard


    Seems to me that some people (PHB specifically, for one) have an issue with MAJD wanting to know how her friends could "avoid punishment for breaking the law".

    Seems to me that the original question was, in fact, more along the lines of 'what would happen IF they simply decided not to pay the fine', and that question has been answered.

    Human beings have a talent for blowing things out of proportion. They also have a talent for stating and re-stating the obvious until blue in the face. Oh, and going off at tangents too. Leinster were clearly rubbish yesterday...

    Anyway, it also seems to me that all the petty bickering and squabbling about how MAJD's friends are the spawn of Satan for driving at 10mph over the limit in the first place is on the whole pointless and possibly irrelevant in that from what I can see, the issue isn't really the act of breaking the law by speeding itself - but more so the consequences of not paying the fine.

    Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, of course... and feel free to do it in a calm and intelligent manner (*). :)






    (*: hahahahahahahaha...!)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,446 ✭✭✭✭amp


    Bravo! A marvelous display of shit-stirring.

    Next up for discussion: I^HMy friend killed 14 people with a penknife; what's the best way to dispose of the body?

    [include shit eating grin here]


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Originally posted by Silent Bob
    Speeding is relative. If speeding kills, everybody who got on an aeroplane would end up dead. The conditions in the air dictate that it is perfectly safe to travel at 400mph plus.

    Heh, that's different. It's only safe to have the plane travelling so fast. Any slower and you run the risk of strong winds pulling you out of the sky. I'm no aeronautical engineer, but I'd assume that if a 737 was travelling slower than 250mph in the air, it would drop out of the sky. If your car is doing 25 on the motorway, you're not destined to crash.

    Conditions dictate what's safe, but at the same time, doing 120mph on a single lane country road can never be safe, regardless of conditions. Doing 120mph on the motorway can be safe too, but more from a point of other road users - if you crash on the motorway, you've less chance of taking anyone else to hell with you.

    For the purpose of argument, I usually drive 10-15mph faster than the rest of the traffic, because I can. I'm only going to kill myself if I crash. I won't do anythign stupid. There's a world of difference between speeding and being a complete spa on the roads.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,311 ✭✭✭✭Bard


    Originally posted by seamus
    If your car is doing 25 on the motorway, you're not destined to crash.

    No, but the chances of someone crashing into you may increase.

    Oh, and traffic jams/accidents/emergencies aside, cars are not *allowed* stop or travel under 30mph on a motorway in Ireland.
    For the purpose of argument, I usually drive 10-15mph faster than the rest of the traffic, because I can. I'm only going to kill myself if I crash. I won't do anythign stupid.

    That's a ridiculously cocky argument. You have no way of knowing that if you crash you'll only take yourself out.

    Just don't crash.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,669 ✭✭✭DMT


    wwmansupertroll.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,669 ✭✭✭DMT


    andysbongos.jpg


Advertisement
Advertisement