Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Health Minister James Reilly wants a tobacco-free Ireland by 2025

  • 25-07-2013 04:12PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,444 ✭✭✭✭Skid X


    Enjoy it while you can

    http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/minister-seeks-tobaccofree-ireland-29448384.html
    Health Minister James Reilly has declared war on smoking, saying he wants a tobacco-free Ireland by 2025.

    "It's the only product I know that is legally, freely available that will kill you if you use it, according to the manufacturers and so on," Dr Reilly said. "It's a fight that we cannot turn away from and that we can't afford to lose. It's a battle that will continue until it's won and it will be won."


«13456789

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,038 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    They could do it tomorrow if they really wanted to


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,967 ✭✭✭Synode


    They could do it tomorrow if they really wanted to

    There would be chaos. It has to be phased out.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,424 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    What's with the thread title? Nowhere does it say anything about banning smoking :confused:
    He revealed that a document had been passed by Government, entitled Tobacco-Free Ireland, which aims to have less than 5% of the population smoking within the next 12 years. Ireland's smoking population is currently 29%

    Good. Full support but I think 12 years is a bit ambitious.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    "It's the only product I know that is legally, freely available that will kill you if you use it, according to the manufacturers and so on,"

    He's either a complete spoofer or a complete idiot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,730 ✭✭✭✭CianRyan


    Burn it, burn it all!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭Irishcrx


    Hahahahahahaha sure they will...sure , they wouldn't dare loose that tax.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,511 ✭✭✭Outkast_IRE


    It would be like prohibition in the US.
    It would cause a lot of everyday law abiding people to start handing their cash over to the underworld in order to get it.

    Him coming out with these sort of statements, on the back of the EU banning or trying to ban E-Cigarettes is stupid.

    If they had any sense they would do some proper research into E-cigarettes and see are they a viable alternative for people trying to stop smoking etc and incentivise the **** out of people changing over if they seem ok.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,730 ✭✭✭✭CianRyan


    He's either a complete spoofer or a complete idiot.

    What other products spring to mind?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    Skid X wrote: »


    Who does he honestly think he's kidding with that one? :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,682 ✭✭✭Gumbi


    In fairness. Alcohol does a lot, LOT more damage than cigs. If people wanna smoke in their own let em shmoke. Christ, ****ing nanny state.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,430 ✭✭✭Ilik Urgee


    With all this progression towards free choice in other areas of society, would it be too much to let people themselves decide if they want to smoke or not?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,059 ✭✭✭Uriel.


    As a non-smoker, I can't say I'd have a problem with it as such.
    But is it really a realistic goal.

    How will they replace the tax revenue? It'll be a double whammy - loss of revenue plus additional expenditure to combat the illegal trade. I suspect the long-term would probably show reduced costs in healthcare expenses, but that might take an enture generation. How is the funding gap filled in the mean time.

    plus some of the healthcare cost reductions would be offset against people living longer so more money paid out on state pensions and associated benefits.

    The smoking ban has been a brilliant success, if you ask me, and if they dealt harshly with people who dispose of their butts in an inconsiderate way, then I am not sure what else we can expect that is realistic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 109 ✭✭Daidy2011


    ......and watch the tax rate go up to 65%+ to cover the loss in excise duties they get from tobacco products........

    Laudable objective (and I am a smoker) - don't ever see it happening.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    CianRyan wrote: »
    What other products spring to mind?


    Alcohol.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,730 ✭✭✭✭CianRyan


    Gumbi wrote: »
    In fairness. Alcohol does a lot, LOT more damage than cigs. If people wanna smoke in their own let em shmoke. Christ, ****ing nanny state.

    Alcohol abuse does a lot of damage, drinking responsibly isn't comparable with tobacco.
    Tabacco is a very serious drug, it's just been legal for so long that banning it sounds ridiculous. If it were only discovered today there is no way it would make it to the shelves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,730 ✭✭✭✭CianRyan


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    Alcohol.

    See above.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,094 ✭✭✭jd007


    Sure lets just ban everything. Fuckin muppets


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,180 ✭✭✭EyeSight


    i am not a smoker and i disagree with it. Ban on porn, ban on smoking what's next?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    CianRyan wrote: »
    Alcohol abuse does a lot of damage, drinking responsibly isn't comparable with tobacco.
    Tabacco is a very serious drug, it's just been legal for so long that banning it sounds ridiculous. If it were only discovered today there is no way it would make it to the shelves.

    Same with alcohol.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,310 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    People will just continue to smoke the dodgy Chinese smokes.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,424 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    jd007 wrote: »
    Sure lets just ban everything. Fuckin muppets
    EyeSight wrote: »
    i am not a smoker and i disagree with it. Ban on porn, ban on smoking what's next?
    the_syco wrote: »
    People will just continue to smoke the dodgy Chinese smokes.
    They're not banning smoking. They're aiming to reduce the number of smokers to 5%.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,038 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    Synode wrote: »
    There would be chaos. It has to be phased out.

    Remove all cigarettes from shops and make them only available from chemists on prescription

    i am a smoker


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,153 ✭✭✭everdead.ie


    Daidy2011 wrote: »
    ......and watch the tax rate go up to 65%+ to cover the loss in excise duties they get from tobacco products........

    Laudable objective (and I am a smoker) - don't ever see it happening.
    Smoking related illness' cost more than the revenue generated I thought?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,114 ✭✭✭✭wp_rathead


    Prohibition NEVER works

    EDIT: just read it, doesn't say anything about banning smoking?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,730 ✭✭✭✭CianRyan


    Same with alcohol.

    No, alcohol has health benefits when the user is responsible and doesn't binge, where as having even 1 cigarette is bad for you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,310 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    If he bans porn and smokes, people will be dropping dead from stress related illness left, right and centre!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,154 ✭✭✭Rented Mule


    Remove all cigarettes from shops and make them only available from chemists on prescription

    i am a smoker


    There will be truckloads of 'chemists' setting up shop all over the country.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    Health Minister James Reilly has declared war on smoking, saying he wants a tobacco-free Ireland by 2025.

    "It's the only product I know that is legally, freely available that will kill you if you use it, according to the manufacturers and so on," Dr Reilly said. "It's a fight that we cannot turn away from and that we can't afford to lose. It's a battle that will continue until it's won and it will be won."

    Did he say this with a lump of burger sauce stuck to the side of his beard?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    CianRyan wrote: »
    No, alcohol has health benefits when the user is responsible and doesn't binge, where as having even 1 cigarette is bad for you.

    Bull.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,444 ✭✭✭✭Skid X


    Nimrod 7 wrote: »
    What's with the thread title? Nowhere does it say anything about banning smoking :confused:

    It's in the Independent Headline, also in this Newstalk story

    https://www.newstalk.ie/Reilly-wants-a-smoke-free-Ireland-by-2025


Advertisement
Advertisement