Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Gay Marriage poll reveals that Ireland still has a depressing amount of morons in it

  • 17-07-2013 09:09PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,547 ✭✭✭


    http://www.thejournal.ie/poll-how-will-you-vote-on-gay-marriage-997136-Jul2013/

    At the time of posting this, 45% or 3551 people have indicated that they intend to vote against giving gay people the right to be as miserable in matrimoney as the rest of us.

    I just can't believe this many people, on that site of all sites, could be still living in backwards land...


«13456726

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 240 ✭✭Pai Mei


    Don't underestimate the height of human stupidity...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,487 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    A journal poll is not a poll in much the same fashion as a journal report is not actually reported. the site is a haven for every form of extremist (left and right wing) nutjob with an internet connection. I wouldn't get too worried about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,695 ✭✭✭December2012


    It surprised me too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,820 ✭✭✭Sir Osis of Liver.


    Here we go.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 927 ✭✭✭AngeGal


    An online poll is open to manipulation and not a reliable indicator.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    Pai Mei wrote: »
    Don't underestimate the height of human stupidity...

    Or the power of certain interest groups to swarm certain polls. I'd say there's definitely more than 50% of the Irish population in favour.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭Sh1tbag OToole


    If its so miserable then is it really worth it?

    I would happily give my right to marry away to some gay lad who has been campaigning for it for years, because I honestly don't see the point anymore and cant imagine myself ever using that right.

    The people who are able to do the long term commitment necessary for marriage must be in the minority in todays selfish "me, me, me, must upgrade my partner to a better model", "live for the moment", "here today, gone tomorrow" world.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,446 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Are they simply stupid because they do not agree with your viewpoint?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,304 ✭✭✭Lucena


    I'd have expected more people to be against gay marriage to be honest. I think it's progress.

    Although having said that, since gay marriage came in in France, you can't move for assless chaps! :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,163 ✭✭✭Zhane


    It genuinely frightens me that the Irish people will vote no on this. :(


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Are they simply stupid because they do not agree with your viewpoint?

    No, because they have such an over-inflated opinion of their own viewpoint that they feel the need to make everyone else adhere to it. That's a pretty stupid attitude to have.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 240 ✭✭Pai Mei


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Are they simply stupid because they do not agree with your viewpoint?

    Not what I was saying. However I am yet to meet a genuinely smart person give an intelligent reason for opposing gay marriage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,293 ✭✭✭1ZRed


    Tbh I never understood what right they think they have to decide my rights and whether or not I'm allowed to marry.

    I'm not surprised though, there's still a massive heap of backward morons in the country, they scuttled out of the woodwork with the abortion legislation and I doubt they'll be ****ing off any time soon unfortunately.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Are they simply stupid because they do not agree with your viewpoint?

    Sometimes yes. There's no non stupid reason to oppose gay marriage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,547 ✭✭✭Foxhound38


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Are they simply stupid because they do not agree with your viewpoint?

    They're stupid because they wish to prevent 2 people who are minding their own business from doing something that would not affect them or anyone else in the slightest, but would make the 2 involved much happier.

    I can't even believe we're still having this debate in 21st Century Ireland...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,628 ✭✭✭Femme_Fatale


    lazygal wrote: »
    There's no non stupid reason to oppose gay marriage.
    Some people have no problem with civil partnership but believe marriage should only be between a man and a woman. I completely disagree with that but I'm not sure it's stupid.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭omahaid


    Feckin democracy :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,446 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    @Niallsparky, they were asked their opinion and gave it. How you can infer that it is either over-inflated or that they are forcing others to adhere to it I don't know.

    A time will come when we will be asked to vote on it, and everyone will have their voice. Just because people disagree with your viewpoint doesn't make them stupid or indeed wrong. If these things were black and white then we would never have a division in the 1st place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,910 ✭✭✭✭padd b1975


    A journal poll is not a poll in much the same fashion as a journal report is not actually reported. the site is a haven for every form of extremist (left and right wing) nutjob with an internet connection. I wouldn't get too worried about it.
    After Hours on the other hand......


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭Sh1tbag OToole


    Foxhound38 wrote: »
    They're stupid because they wish to prevent 2 people who are minding their own business from doing something that would not affect them or anyone else in the slightest, but would make the 2 involved much happier.

    I can't even believe we're still having this debate in 21st Century Ireland...

    Maybe its for their own good.

    Maybe straight people should be relinquishing their right to marry. People move around too much, are always looking for something better, people change. As "progress" progresses it will be easier to get divorced. People will get married on a whim like they do in the States. What is the point of it all?

    If 2 people truly want to stay together they don't need the State (who are a worthless pack of bastards anyway) to approve, or recognise or otherwise acknowledge that fact. It should be none of their business


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 197 ✭✭theSHU


    Some people have no problem with civil partnership but believe marriage should only be between a man and a woman. I completely disagree with that but I'm not sure it's stupid.

    That would be their own definition though. Why don't we all just allow each other to define our own happiness in life.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    Some people have no problem with civil partnership but believe marriage should only be between a man and a woman. I completely disagree with that but I'm not sure it's stupid.

    I'm sure it is stupid. I've heard no non stupid reason to oppose gay marriage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53 ✭✭Jamie Cal


    I always think it's funny when the anti-equality crew say s**t like "well, if can marry a man, what can you do next, marry your dog?" like that wouldn't be the most fun thing in the world.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 960 ✭✭✭cletus van damme


    omahaid wrote: »
    Feckin democracy :mad:

    terrible thing - should be taken away from us and given to the Burmese - we clearly don't deserve it cos of some people had the cheek to voice an opinion against to the "accepted" view.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    Jamie Cal wrote: »
    I always think it's funny when the anti-equality crew say s**t like "well, if can marry a man, what can you do next, marry your dog?" like that wouldn't be the most fun thing in the world.

    And where gay marriages take place no straight people get married any more, and straight people get divorced because their marriages are now worthless.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    Jamie Cal wrote: »
    I always think it's funny when the anti-equality crew say s**t like "well, if can marry a man, what can you do next, marry your dog?" like that wouldn't be the most fun thing in the world.

    I like when people stoop to that level of stupidity, it's a nice red flag to indicate they're beyond rational thought and can just be ignored.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,293 ✭✭✭1ZRed


    Maybe its for their own good.

    Maybe straight people should be relinquishing their right to marry. People move around too much, are always looking for something better, people change. As "progress" progresses it will be easier to get divorced. People will get married on a whim like they do in the States. What is the point of it all?

    If 2 people truly want to stay together they don't need the State(who are a worthless pack of bastards anyway) to approve, or recognise or otherwise acknowledge that fact. It should be none of their business

    They do if they want legal protection for their children as one example, otherwise if parent dies the children have no legal guardian and will lose both in one fell swoop. It's not for their own good at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 269 ✭✭Derpington95


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Are they simply stupid because they do not agree with your viewpoint?

    It depends on the reasons as to why they don't agree with the viewpoint :cool:


  • Posts: 168 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    150 years ago in this country most marriages were arranged. I know people from my parents generation (getting married in the 1970's) who didn't marry a boyfriend/girlfriend because they were Protestant and the families were against it. Until 1995 1st cousins could marry in Ireland.

    If you're straight you can marry someone because they're a millionaire or because they have a boob job and if that doesn't work out you can marry someone else. Marriage isn't a sacred institution it's only as strong as the two people involved.

    It's no one elses business if those two people happen to be a man and a man or a woman and a woman.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭Sh1tbag OToole


    1ZRed wrote: »
    They do if they want legal protection for their children as one example, otherwise if parent dies the children have no legal guardian and will lose both in one fell swoop. It's not for their own good at all.

    That could be done with a simple form that states who 'owns' the child. Could have multiple backups on it incase more than one person dies. Without commiting two people to a lifetime of misery together


Advertisement
Advertisement