Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.
Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/
Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.
Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/
Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum
Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Arsenal Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 2013
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
Marty McFly wrote: »I honestly don't think it is, if a player at you club becomes hate figure which Suarez to a certain degree or has become for some people its going to discourage kids to follow said club loss in future revenue and it will keep sponsors away and make deal harder, Tiger Wodds was a bad example his earnings still are quite a bit off from what they were in the height of his fame and fortune
kinda proving my point :P.
John Terry hasn't stopped kids supporting Chelsea or them getting a good 10 year kit deal - hate figure right there, Giggs antics off field didn't stop Man U getting great deals. Real Madrid have a few unlikeable players they're hardly in taters financially
Of course Woods' earnings aren't the same as the height of his fame - why would they be if he's not at the top anymore?
this thing about it effecting income is being blown out of all proportion, companies want to be associated with winning teams, kids start supporting winning teams, something Saurez could push arsenal towards0 -
Advertisement
-
-
-
batistuta9 wrote: »John Terry hasn't stopped kids supporting Chelsea or them getting a good 10 year kit deal - hate figure right there, Giggs antics off field didn't stop Man U getting great deals. Real Madrid have a few unlikeable players they're hardly in taters financially
Of course Woods' earnings aren't the same as the height of his fame - why would they be if he's not at the top anymore?
this thing about it effecting income is being blown out of all proportion, companies want to be associated with winning teams, kids start supporting winning teams, something Saurez could push arsenal towards
:pac::pac: talk about blowing my words out of proportion were did I say "taters financially"? I said it would effect financial matters not leave them in taters huge difference.
Giggs isn't a hate figure nor is Terry for that matter to the same degree as Suarez either and to try say they are is naive. As for Real I wouldn't say they have a few unlikable players.
As for Tiger Woods I never said he was I answered an argument that was aimed at my point
I don't watch golf find watching paint dry more entertaining.
Suarez could do yes hence why I said I'd take him as second choice but give me Higauin anyday of the week over him. 0 -
-
-
Marty McFly wrote: »:pac::pac: talk about blowing my words out of proportion were did I say "taters financially"? I said it would effect financial matters not leave them in taters huge difference.
Giggs isn't a hate figure nor is Terry for that matter to the same degree as Suarez either and to try say they are is naive. As for Real I wouldn't say they have a few unlikable players.
As for Tiger Woods I never said he was I answered an argument that was aimed at my point I don't watch golf find watching paint dry more entertaining.
Suarez could do yes hence why I said I'd take him as second choice but give me Higauin anyday of the week over him.
i wasn't blowing your word out of proportion, i used that term myself, not saying you said it
It would effect sfa if Saurez led arsenal to the top trophies (PL or CL) or any fúcking trophy
You know the deal L'pool signed with Warrior, one of the biggest in the league was signed after the the whole Saurez-Evra incident & after the FA charges against him & after the next league meeting with the handshake stuff
terry isn't a hate figure, are you serious, he's probably the most hated person playing the PL
Pepe & Ramos everyones favourite loveable rouges :pac:
Giggs may not be a hate figure, actually i think hate figure is way too strong a term to apply to any footballer mentioned including Saurez but what he did wasn't the best of things to be associated to one of your players, a supposed role model but did it effect the finances - nope
I don't watch golf either but know he's not as successful as he was - so it's not surprise if he's not doing as well financially on the commercial side of it0 -
batistuta9 wrote: »i wasn't blowing your word out of proportion, i used that term myself, not saying you said it
It would effect sfa if Saurez led arsenal to the top trophies (PL or CL) or any fúcking trophy
You know the deal L'pool signed with Warrior, one of the biggest in the league was signed after the the whole Saurez-Evra incident & after the FA charges against him & after the next league meeting with the handshake stuff
terry isn't a hate figure, are you serious, he's probably the most hated person playing the PL
Pepe & Ramos everyones favourite loveable rouges :pac:
Giggs may not be a hate figure, actually i think hate figure is way too strong a term to apply to any footballer mentioned including Saurez but what he did wasn't the best of things to be associated to one of your players, a supposed role model but did it effect the finances - nope
I don't watch golf either but know he's not as successful as he was - so it's not surprise if he's not doing as well financially on the commercial side of it
Well then maybe you should use it at more appropiate times, tater financially means your fcuked which I never implied.
I'd put Terry behind Suarez and to be honest I wouldn't want Arsenal as a club associated with either of them if I had a choice both terrific players but if there players of equal talent available I'd always pick them players above them.
Generally the only people I know who hate Ramos and Pepe are those that side on the Barca side when it comes to Spain.
How can you say it didn't for sure? How do you know in negotiations for the shirt deal with Warrior it wasn't mentioned? You can bet your ass they used that as leverage to get a better deal every multinational company with half a brain would when it comes to deals of that magnitude.
Fine on the Woods thing I don't really care I just answered something that was brought against me I don't really care about Woods or his money this is the Arsenal thread so be best of leaving Woods in the golf forum if there is one :cool:.0 -
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
Marty McFly wrote: »:pac::pac: talk about blowing my words out of proportion were did I say "taters financially"? I said it would effect financial matters not leave them in taters huge difference.
Giggs isn't a hate figure nor is Terry for that matter to the same degree as Suarez either and to try say they are is naive. As for Real I wouldn't say they have a few unlikable players.
.
hate to break it to you but thats because Terry and Giggs are british. Had either been foreign they would get slaughtered just like surez.
Remember when Eduardo dived against Celtic? **** me the way the media went on about it, it was as if Eduardo slapped the player and while the player was on the floor, shouted racial abuse0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
![[Deleted User]](/applications/dashboard/design/images/defaulticon.png)
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement