Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Ireland Team Talk/Gossip/Rumour Thread II

19394969899327

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,668 ✭✭✭Mahatma Geansai


    Not sure how happy I am with that team. Mike Sherry dropping out for Cronin - who didn't even make the squad - is disappointing, but he might he one of the players to catch a bug. Boss playing again is a wasted opportunity to see if one of the other lads is up to it. In the backline, the centre partnership is slow and absent of any spark, but I'm happy to see Downey get a cap. The back three isn't the most exciting we'll field, but I'd imagine its composed of the three hardest working backs in the country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    What is the point of playing Boss in both games?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    What is the point of playing Boss in both games?

    One would have to assume Marmion is one of the ill players given his absence from both match day squads. I assume the rationale is that it's more important to develop an outhalf on this tour than give Paul Marshall a start in the light of him being very unlikely to ever feature in a proper game. Marshall makes a great impact on a game when you need to create something from nothing but I wouldn't want any developing outhalf to play outside him from the off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,264 ✭✭✭✭Fireball07


    Quite irritating that Marmion didn't start in the first test now... if he is indeed one of the sick players.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,953 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    think this will be a very close match , Ireland need to be at ther best to win

    Canada will be very physical , and Boss is good in these type of games , plus his experience will be invaluable in a tight game, I can see why Marmion is not risked.


  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 43,733 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    thebaz wrote: »
    think this will be a very close match , Ireland need to be at ther best to win

    Canada will be very physical , and Boss is good in these type of games , plus his experience will be invaluable in a tight game, I can see why Marmion is not risked.

    Agreed, and on the downey selection, the canadians are big powerful men. They have two centres over 100 kg and one who's about 6 1/2 foot and 125 kg.
    Perhaps we're simply seeing a team selection to win the match....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭ScissorPaperRock


    I wonder what Joe Schmidt's input has been.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,059 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    thebaz wrote: »
    think this will be a very close match , Ireland need to be at ther best to win

    I think we'll lose to be honest. In saying that usually when I feel like that, whether it be Ireland or Ulster, the team I'm supporting usually turns it on so fingers crossed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 776 ✭✭✭dtpc191991


    I wonder what Joe Schmidt's input has been.

    Unless its illness then its not in selection. There is an article in the Irish Times where he comments on how much he likes the look of Olding and Henshaw.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,442 ✭✭✭its_phil


    Marmion isn't sick he was training yesterday and at Niagara Falls according to Inpho.

    Baffling is the only word. He should have been left at home resting. He started 28 games last year and three weeks more rest would have served him better than most. If he wasn't going to be getting a cap he should have been left at home.

    What's the point of playing a 33 year old ahead of a 23 year old who could be around for three more World Cups?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    I wonder what Joe Schmidt's input has been.

    According to him this week, he has purely been in the camp as an observer and has no input into the selection yet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 395 ✭✭Beery Eyed


    Buer wrote: »
    According to him this week, he has purely been in the camp as an observer and has no input into the selection yet.

    If that's the case, it must be incredibly hard for a guy like him to bite his tongue and not have a say about selections. Especially considering that he'll be the one seeing the benefits (or lack thereof) of the backups/younger guys getting exposure on the tour


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,264 ✭✭✭✭Fireball07


    If Marmion is fit, I'm very annoyed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    its_phil wrote: »
    Marmion isn't sick he was training yesterday and at Niagara Falls according to Inpho.

    Baffling is the only word. He should have been left at home resting. He started 28 games last year and three weeks more rest would have served him better than most. If he wasn't going to be getting a cap he should have been left at home.

    What's the point of playing a 33 year old ahead of a 23 year old who could be around for three more World Cups?
    He'll be rested when he comes back. The experience will have been fantastic for him. And he got a chance to play in front of Schmidt.

    Not a chance he would have wanted to stay at home resting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭mohawk


    Why bring Sherry and give him 4 mins against the Eagles??? We all know what Cronin brings.

    Pity for Marmion, but I guess the number 2 OH will be brought up to speed faster with someone he has played alongside before.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,234 ✭✭✭trouttrout


    Sherry and Marmion should feel very pissed off if they're not sick. He only got four minutes last week despite Strauss having a mare with his darts and now he drops completely out of the squad


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,234 ✭✭✭totallegend


    trouttrout wrote: »
    Sherry and Marmion should feel very pissed off if they're not sick. He only got four minutes last week despite Strauss having a mare with his darts and now he drops completely out of the squad

    TBH, I'm not that concerned about either Sherry or Marmion. Both would be 4th choice in a fully-fit side so it's not like we need them to get game-time asap.

    What does irk me a little bit is Mike Ross starting both tests; if there's a position in which we need depth, it's most definitely TH prop - Hagan finished the season like a train and if Fitzpatrick is fit, they should give him game time before he gets injured again, so I would really like to have seen them start one game each.

    Both the Times and the Indo this morning are saying the whole squad was available for selection...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,017 ✭✭✭Leslie91


    TBH, I'm not that concerned about either Sherry or Marmion. Both would be 4th choice in a fully-fit side so it's not like we need them to get game-time asap.

    What does irk me a little bit is Mike Ross starting both tests; if there's a position in which we need depth, it's most definitely TH prop - Hagan finished the season like a train and if Fitzpatrick is fit, they should give him game time before he gets injured again, so I would really like to have seen them start one game each.

    Both the Times and the Indo this morning are saying the whole squad was available for selection...

    If this is true (and I'm not sure it is) then not playing someone instead of Boss is a joke. Also starting Mike Ross is a waste, I'd love to have seen Hagan get the start. I am in agreement ref Sherry too, yes he might be 4th choice hooker but I wouldn't mind seeing him tested at a decent level. Glad to be seeing TOD getting a run. Roll on Schmidt time!.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    If that is really true, there are some genuinely awful selections that will not benefit the team in the long or short term. None of Boss, Downey or Ross should be in consideration for the starting XV. Downey and Boss are particularly ridiculous selections considering both are getting on and not in consideration for the full side with two highly promising youngsters out there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭Tox56


    Buer wrote: »
    If that is really true, there are some genuinely awful selections that will not benefit the team in the long or short term. None of Boss, Downey or Ross should be in consideration for the starting XV. Downey and Boss are particularly ridiculous selections considering both are getting on and not in consideration for the full side with two highly promising youngsters out there.

    If it is true part of me really really hopes the stuff about Schmidt only being an observer is also true.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,883 ✭✭✭shuffol


    I wonder if its a case of Kiss being fearful of the result and his own reputation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,953 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    Leslie91 wrote: »
    If this is true (and I'm not sure it is) then not playing someone instead of Boss is a joke. Also starting Mike Ross is a waste,

    do we not want to win match ? A tight physical match is ideal for Boss - and if Canada are a big physical team we need Ross - playing Marmion , is a risk , if he has a bad game in a tight game , it will do him more harm than good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,264 ✭✭✭✭Fireball07


    TBH, I'm not that concerned about either Sherry or Marmion. Both would be 4th choice in a fully-fit side so it's not like we need them to get game-time asap.

    Whatever about Sherry (who will be assessed by Schmidt, I'm sure), I'd have Marmion much higher than 4th. In fact.....based on form from last season, I'd say he's the no. 2 SH behind Murray. Now whether he's capable of bringing that performance to the international stage over international veterans like Reddan, I don't know..... but he should have been given the chance to prove himself.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,234 ✭✭✭totallegend


    Canada team:

    15. James Pritchard (Bedford Blues)
    14. Matt Evans (Cornish Pirates)
    13. Ciaran Hearn (Castaway Wanderers/Atlantic Rock)
    12. Harry Jones (Capilano/BC Bears)
    11. Taylor Paris (SU Agen Lot-et-Garonne)
    10. Nathan Hirayama (UVIC Vikes/BC Bears)
    9. Phil Mack (UVIC Vikes/BC Bears)
    1. Hubert Buydens (Saskatoon Wild Oats/Prairie Wolf Pack)
    2. Ray Barkwill (Niagara Wasps/Ontario Blues)
    3. Jason Marshall (Atlantique Stade Rochelais/BC Bears)
    4. Jebb Sinclair (London Irish)
    5. Tyler Hotson (London Scottish)
    6. Tyler Ardron (James Bay AA/Ontario Blues)
    7. John Moonlight (James Bay AA/Ontario Blues)
    8. Aaron Carpenter (Cornish Pirates) (capt)

    Replacements:
    16. Ryan Hamilton (Capilano/BC Bears)
    17. Andrew Tiedemann (Castaway Wanderers/Prairie Wolf Pack)
    18. Doug Wooldridge (Lindsay/Ontario Blues)
    19. Jon Phelan (Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue/Atlantic Rock)
    20. Nanyak Dala (Castaway Wanderers/Prairie Wolf Pack)
    21. Sean White (James Bay AA/BC Bears)
    22. Nick Blevins (Calgary Hornets/Prairie Wolf Pack)
    23. Connor Braid (Doncaster Knights/BC Bears


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,773 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Tox56 wrote: »
    If it is true part of me really really hopes the stuff about Schmidt only being an observer is also true.

    Given his Kidney-esque use of the bench against the USA I'd imagine this really is all Kiss. The sooner he is moved out of this role and back into defense the better IMO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,442 ✭✭✭its_phil


    thebaz wrote: »
    do we not want to win match ? A tight physical match is ideal for Boss - and if Canada are a big physical team we need Ross - playing Marmion , is a risk , if he has a bad game in a tight game , it will do him more harm than good.

    Sure we want to win but I don't see the balance of winning and losing being based on Boss playing.

    I've never bought that argument that it can damage players unless it is throwing them completely way in over their heads. But Canada is not over Marmions head (all short jokes aside :D). I do believe you learn more in defeat than victories though.

    Even if he did have a bad game, he'd probably learn more and that he needs to step it up another notch. Marshall too. Instead Marmion has just been a glorified waterboy for this tour. A real shame.

    I might add, I do like Boss but when you have two good young scrumhalves on a tour of North America, surely they should be playing with the bigger picture in mind.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭ScissorPaperRock


    I think Schmidt was supposed to take a more 'hands-on' role for the Canada match though. Maybe the illness in camp put paid to that plan though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,773 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    I think Schmidt was supposed to take a more 'hands-on' role for the Canada match though. Maybe the illness in camp put paid to that plan though.

    He has said a few times that he is there to observe only. I doubt he's getting involved. That would only serve to wind up Kiss who is going to be his defense coach from July onwards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭ScissorPaperRock


    molloyjh wrote: »
    He has said a few times that he is there to observe only. I doubt he's getting involved. That would only serve to wind up Kiss who is going to be his defense coach from July onwards.

    Found the article I was thinking of, but I guess there are no direct quotes from Schmidt or Kiss saying that he would have a more hands-on role.

    http://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/international/incoming-coach-joe-schmidt-to-take-hands-on-role-during-second-week-of-north-american-tour-1.1409285


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,668 ✭✭✭Mahatma Geansai


    I'm not much of a fan of Kiss'. Ever since he started double-jobbing, everything he is responsible for has gone to crap. His period as a head-coach appears to be following suit. Even a great performance against Canada won't hide the poor selections and use of the bench. Hopefully Schmidt hasn't been involved in any of the selection.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement