Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Property Tax (MOD REMINDER: Don't get too personal)

11213151718137

Comments

  • Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 28,866 Mod ✭✭✭✭oscarBravo


    Are you condoning lying?

    As in the end justifies the means, for personal political gain, ie, votes?
    No. You can tell that I'm not condoning it by the fact that I haven't condoned it.

    Discussions go so much more smoothly when people stop reading things into other people's posts that they didn't write in order to get annoyed about them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    Dear Phoebas, include the above in your "Extreme cases", as i am sure they won't be near as offended as carers.
    I fit into your criteria of what is poor, given that I have childcare costs.
    Where do I sign up for my property tax exemption?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭cageyeuclid


    Phoebas wrote: »
    It is.
    A single high earner is going to find it much easier to pay for pretty much anything than an out of work family.

    That is what is most unjust about LPT no ability to pay content.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 56,719 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    oscarBravo wrote: »
    Leaving aside the fact that lying is demanded by our electorate as a prerequisite of getting elected (and then rewarded with outrage when the lies we demand as the price of power are shown to be such), it's just a tad harsh to accuse someone of lying when they change their position on something over two decades, particularly when the facts on which they base that position change rather dramatically in that period. If principles could pay for our public service payroll and social welfare, I'd be more tolerant of the demand for principles. As it is, the only principles the Irish people seem interested in are whichever ones involve someone else paying.

    I voted for them to my shame now. I didn't demand lies either and know nobody who did. I voted for the "honest politics" they promised actually.

    BUT please explain how something " unjust and unfair" can become just and fair in those 19 years? I can't begin to imagine how this can happen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    That is what is most unjust about LPT no ability to pay content.
    What other taxes have this exemption?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭cageyeuclid


    Phoebas wrote: »
    I fit into your criteria of what is poor, given that I have childcare costs.
    Where do I sign up for my property tax exemption?

    So you are suffering an injustice too??? ... but I bet you already claim tax relief WA.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,380 ✭✭✭✭Banjo String


    oscarBravo wrote: »
    I'm saying that every politician lies to get elected, and that's not OK, but it's the price we've set for election in this country, so - as tends to be the case in democracies - we are governed precisely as well as we deserve.

    Well I for one haven't ever demanded to be lied to by a politician. I think more if myself tbh.

    What else could enda be lying about?

    Is this the reason why, found in those uncomfortable positions on 'thorny questions' in the Dail from time to time, he'll revert to a script, and say something about inheriting a mess, or Jean McConville or northern bank?

    Apparently you 'can trust a thief but you can't trust a liar' btw.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭cageyeuclid


    Phoebas wrote: »
    What other taxes have this exemption?

    PAYE is related to earnings, company tax is related to profits and even VAT is related to spending .. the poor pay much less VAT, as their spending is necessarily low.

    Bin Charges used to have a waiver for the poor until the City Manager did his undemocratic thing.

    LPT is UNJUST, UNFAIR and CRUEL .. even Enda said so.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭darkhorse


    Well aside form the fact that owning your own house provides notional revenue.

    Could you envisage your bank advancing you a loan on the basis that your family home provides notional income.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,224 ✭✭✭Going Forward


    SamHall wrote: »
    Well I for one haven't ever demanded to be lied to by a politician. I think more if myself tbh.

    What else could enda be lying about?

    Is this the reason why, found in those uncomfortable positions on 'thorny questions' in the Dail from time to time, he'll revert to a script, and say something about inheriting a mess, or Jean McConville or northern bank?

    Apparently you 'can trust a thief but you can't trust a liar' btw.

    Mobile phone licence case coming up soon?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    PAYE is related to earnings, company tax is related to profits and even VAT is related to spending .. the poor pay much less VAT, as their spending is necessarily low.
    None of these is an ability to pay exemption.

    Some are more discretionary than others (like VAT), but even the LPT is somewhat discretionary (people can trade down or rent)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    LPT is UNJUST, UNFAIR and CRUEL .. even Enda said so.
    I thought that was about RPT or some other xPT.

    tbh, misquoting a 20 year old Edna Kenny position probably isn't the killer argument you were looking for.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭darkhorse


    The discussion was about whether the property tax was somehow uniquely unjust in itself. Which it clearly isn't given that plenty of other countries manage to do it.

    Your posts almost seem to suggest that the people like to pay it in other countries.

    Other countries manage to do it, you say. Maybe they don't have a choice.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,224 ✭✭✭Going Forward


    oscarBravo wrote: »
    No. You can tell that I'm not condoning it by the fact that I haven't condoned it.

    Pardon? To put that a little differently-

    One can tell that I'm not condoning it by the fact that I haven't condoned it.

    It was unclear from your post.

    If some expect their politicians to lie and do u turns it doesnt mean that everyone does, at least not on the biggest topic of discussion in recent years, so I think it will be what he will be mainly remembered for.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭cageyeuclid


    Phoebas wrote: »
    None of these is an ability to pay exemption.

    Some are more discretionary than others (like VAT), but even the LPT is somewhat discretionary (people can trade down or rent)

    I never mentioned the word exemption.
    "trade down or rent"? get real. ... another of your "extreme cases" ... Have you any idea of carers' plight.

    VAT (with none on food ) is discretionary as it is related to income wherever from.
    Car tax is discretionary especially for OAP (where there is a bus service) and most DA. I just used it as an example of how LPT would eventually be extortionate.
    But LPT is not discretionary and deferral at 4% only makes things worse ... imagine a lazy govt earning 4% from the poor.
    LPT is Unjust, Unfair and Cruel ..... hasn't changed since Enda agreed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭cageyeuclid


    Phoebas wrote: »
    No. ....
    The tax doesn't get transferred to offspring and there are personal insolvency and excessive hardship amendments written into the act to deal with some of your more extreme examples.
    QUOTE]

    “Extreme example” is infuriating and in line with your heartless LPT ..... how many carers have a family home to pass on to Special Needs offspring? ... have you any idea how hurtful your “extreme example” suggestion is to those tens of thousands of carers? I guess you will be as heartless about those “extreme example” words as you are about CRUEL LPT.

    According to you, revenue will take deferred LPT from the estate of the poor .. that’s passing it on to offspring; and may I remind you that that is an offspring unable to defend itself (or even fill out a revenue form).

    From later posts about whether LPT is just or not I repeat the above posts and ask you all to please consider the attitudes involved.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,473 ✭✭✭Le_Dieux


    oscarBravo wrote: »
    You've never changed your mind about anything whatsoever over a 19-year period?

    Without wishing to speak for Sam Hall OB, I am in the same 'camp' as Him, and wish to give my opinion on Your question enclosed:

    I'm not a politician, so any u-turn I make doesn't affect 1.6(?) million others in the country.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,473 ✭✭✭Le_Dieux


    Sam, You mention U-Turns earlier? Here we go AGAIN, more of the same from FG ( and of course, nothing is mentioned about what happens should this bunch of liars not be re-elected in the meantime):

    http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/fears-bus-unrest-may-spark-wave-of-public-sector-strikes-29261369.html

    Allison Bray and Michael Brennan– 13 May 2013
    THE Government fears that the Bus Eireann strike, which has already left thousands stranded, will motivate workers across the public sector to mount industrial action.

    Up to 70,000 passengers face major disruption today as 1,000 members of the National Bus and Rail Union continue an all-out strike at the state-owned transport company.
    Bus Eireann said that 95pc of its services were hit yesterday as staff from other unions refused to cross the picket lines, but today will see busy weekday services affected for the first time.
    The Government is desperate to resolve the impasse quickly amid concern that an ongoing strike among the bus workers could encourage others on to the pickets.
    The Coalition is especially sensitive because industrial relations troubleshooter Kieran Mulvey is currently locked in talks with public sector unions in order to strike a deal on making €300m in savings.
    But if those talks break down without a deal, then the Government has insisted it will legislate for pay cuts across the board. Frontline workers including nurses and gardai have warned of industrial action if this takes place.
    A senior government source admitted it was pressing hard to get the Bus Eireann dispute resolved – given the potential for it to be followed by industrial action by other public sector workers.
    "No one wants the bus strike to take off in terms of a showcase dispute," he said.
    Meanwhile, in a significant move to try and get Croke Park II over the line, public servants earning between €65,000 and €100,000 have been given a commitment that their pay cuts will be fully reversed within five years.
    Those public servants earning between €65,000 and €100,000 were due to get a pay cut of between 5.5pc and 8pc under the Croke Park II deal.
    But they have now been given a guarantee that their salaries will be restored to their original levels in two phases – half of it in April 2017 and the remaining half in January 2018.
    Tourists
    The Bus Eireann strike action, which began yesterday morning, centres on the implementation of a €5m cost-cutting plan and is expected to cost the firm €200,000 each day.
    The strike is affecting 300 rural and intercity bus routes nationwide, with scores of tourists being turned away from depots and directed towards rail or coach companies.
    Michael Faherty, NBRU general secretary, claimed the bus firm had forced the action by implementing a cost-cutting plan which he described as a breach of employment contract.
    Bus Eireann's plan includes a 20pc cut to a range of allowance and expense payments, a reduction of overtime rates, longer working hours and a cut in shift payments.
    The proposals were backed by the Labour Court, and the the company says the NBRU strike action is unofficial and illegal. It maintained it had not received any credible or viable alternatives from the trade unions.
    As the tense stand-off continued, Transport Minister Leo Varadkar urged a resolution – and subtly warned workers they were gambling with the future of their own jobs.
    Resolution
    "The unions should immediately engage with the company in talks to bring this matter to resolution," he said.
    Heaping on the pressure for the strike to end, his colleague, Children's Minister Frances Fitzgerald, said: "The company's very viability is under threat at present.
    The Government has also warned that the state-subsidised bus firm lost €27m over the past five years and will not be financially viable if it does not impose cuts.
    But while both sides in the dispute said they were willing to talk, little progress was evident.
    Bus Eireann spokesman Andrew McLindon told the Irish Independent: "It's an all-out strike. Our concentration at the moment is to get back to service as soon as possible and keep our customers informed."
    About 40,000 passengers were affected on the first day of the strike and this is expected to swell to 70,000 today as workers return from the weekend.
    However, parents can breathe a sign of relief as SIPTU – which represents the majority of part-time school bus drivers – said it didn't anticipate any disruption to school bus services operated by Bus Eireann.
    None of SIPTU's 650 drivers took part in the strike as the union awaits the outcome of balloting on May 16, although they are refusing to cross picket lines.
    croke park move: page 12 john downing
    Irish Independent


  • Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 28,866 Mod ✭✭✭✭oscarBravo


    BUT please explain how something " unjust and unfair" can become just and fair in those 19 years? I can't begin to imagine how this can happen.
    Your question is premised on the belief that if Enda Kenny says something is so, it therefore is so, and that his opinions have the weight of fact.

    He changed his mind. It's what many people do when faced with a different set of circumstances. You don't seem to consider the possibility that he was wrong in 1994.
    Le_Dieux wrote: »
    Without wishing to speak for Sam Hall OB, I am in the same 'camp' as Him, and wish to give my opinion on Your question enclosed:

    I'm not a politician, so any u-turn I make doesn't affect 1.6(?) million others in the country.
    You are not a politician, so you have the luxury of being able to stick to your guns without bankrupting the country. It's the same luxury you would enjoy as a politician in opposition.

    Politicians in government, unlike politicians in opposition or commenters on websites, have to make unpopular decisions when the country is teetering on the verge of bankruptcy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,775 ✭✭✭Death and Taxes


    PAYE is related to earnings, company tax is related to profits and even VAT is related to spending .. the poor pay much less VAT, as their spending is necessarily low.

    Bin Charges used to have a waiver for the poor until the City Manager did his undemocratic thing.

    LPT is UNJUST, UNFAIR and CRUEL .. even Enda said so.

    The poor, pro rata pay much much more of their income on VAT than the rich actually.
    The Property Tax may need some tweeking but it is essentially a necessary and valid form of taxation.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 425 ✭✭barrackali


    The poor, pro rata pay much much more of their income on VAT than the rich actually.
    The Property Tax may need some tweeking but it is essentially a necessary and valid form of taxation.

    Agreed....it is necessary and valid.


  • Posts: 5,249 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    A tax is a tax, nobody particularly likes paying taxes but they are necessary to run a modern state.

    Repeating quotes from twenty years ago isn't going to change that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,442 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    barrackali wrote: »
    Agreed....it is necessary and valid.

    Necessary to fund the unnecessary spending?
    A tax is a tax, nobody particularly likes paying taxes but they are necessary to run a modern state.

    Repeating quotes from twenty years ago isn't going to change that.

    If taxes were used efficiently to run a modest state then the people wouldnt be of the opinion that they are being taken advantage to fund gravy trains.


  • Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 28,866 Mod ✭✭✭✭oscarBravo


    Hijpo wrote: »
    If taxes were used efficiently to run a modest state then the people wouldnt be of the opinion that they are being taken advantage to fund gravy trains.
    If people wanted a modest state, they'd elect a government that promised to slash and burn public expenditure. They haven't, because they don't.

    That is, they don't want a modest state; they just want to pay for one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,644 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    oscarBravo wrote: »
    That is, they don't want a modest state; they just want to pay for one.

    To be fair, people voted in the current Government. Both Labour and Fine Gael were up front about the fact that we are in the poo, and tax rises and/or spending cuts were inevitable.

    If people really wanted to vote for a party which promised more spending and less tax, they could have voted Sinn Féin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,442 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    oscarBravo wrote: »
    If people wanted a modest state, they'd elect a government that promised to slash and burn public expenditure. They haven't, because they don't.

    That is, they don't want a modest state; they just want to pay for one.

    Enda Kenny said that the second major point in his 5 point plan was to fix the deficit by prioritising an end to waste instead of raising taxes. Have you seen him tackle waste yet? The only public expenditure he is slashing and burning are essential services that the public, who fund them, avail of. While phil hogan eats lunches worth €800 :rolleyes: its a f***ing lunch!! LUNCH!!

    he said raising taxes is not reaonsable, he said we cannot fix our finances by continuing a policy of writing blank cheques irrespective of circumstances for banks and said its immoral(lol yeah hes still using that ole chestnut, seriously),
    he said the peoples money will be spent wisely on vital public services by abolishing quangos etc

    All a load of horse ****, all people want is a decent return for the taxes, charges and levies they cough up. Christ sake the swiss voted to RAISE taxes, why? because they see a return for the money they pay. why do they see a return? because the government have consequences to face if they did what the politicians are free to do here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 56,719 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    oscarBravo wrote: »
    Your question is premised on the belief that if Enda Kenny says something is so, it therefore is so, and that his opinions have the weight of fact.

    He changed his mind. It's what many people do when faced with a different set of circumstances. You don't seem to consider the possibility that he was wrong in 1994.

    I wouldn't believe anything from him now. Once bitten, twice shy.

    How do you know he changed his mind? He could just be a hypocrite who pretends to change his mind as he is enjoying the good life. He is probably just the same as the Labour hypocrites who also seemed to change their minds and renege on their party's principles.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,473 ✭✭✭Le_Dieux


    Hijpo wrote: »
    Enda Kenny said that the second major point in his 5 point plan was to fix the deficit by prioritising an end to waste instead of raising taxes. Have you seen him tackle waste yet? The only public expenditure he is slashing and burning are essential services that the public, who fund them, avail of. While phil hogan eats lunches worth €800 :rolleyes: its a f***ing lunch!! LUNCH!!

    he said raising taxes is not reaonsable, he said we cannot fix our finances by continuing a policy of writing blank cheques irrespective of circumstances for banks and said its immoral(lol yeah hes still using that ole chestnut, seriously),
    he said the peoples money will be spent wisely on vital public services by abolishing quangos etc

    All a load of horse ****, all people want is a decent return for the taxes, charges and levies they cough up. Christ sake the swiss voted to RAISE taxes, why? because they see a return for the money they pay. why do they see a return? because the government have consequences to face if they did what the politicians are free to do here.

    So well said Hijpo...TOTALLY concur with every word You say here.

    One other thing that really galls me is that bully from Kilkenny - Hogan. He comes on the media here, and throws his threats around about making sure people MUST pay their HHC/LPT, yet he is refusing to do the exact same on his 2nd home in Portugal. Oh and while on the hogan gravy train, I wonder how many other jaunts the leech goes on, and slaps the drinks bill to US, the taxpayers? What a trollop!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,473 ✭✭✭Le_Dieux


    A tax is a tax, nobody particularly likes paying taxes but they are necessary to run a modern state.

    Repeating quotes from twenty years ago isn't going to change that.

    He lied period. And now we have the scenario, of taking between 5.5 & 8% off those higher paid PS's and giving it back in 2 insalments in 4-5 years time??? FFS, who knows a) who will be in power then & b) what the state of the economy will be in 4-5 years. More lies/deceptions in the offing???


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    Le_Dieux wrote: »
    One other thing that really galls me is that bully from Kilkenny - Hogan. He comes on the media here, and throws his threats around about making sure people MUST pay their HHC/LPT, yet he is refusing to do the exact same on his 2nd home in Portugal.
    Hardly the exact same thing. He was in dispute about a management fee to a private management company in Portugal. That's a just a little bit different to refusing to pay your taxes, isn't it?


Advertisement
Advertisement