Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Munster Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread II

1205206208210211326

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,883 ✭✭✭shuffol


    Rightwing wrote: »
    Yes and No.

    2 teams from our group are in the semi's. That can't be deemed easy group. I admit we were lucky to get Quins, but other teams may not have been able to turn them over.

    Yes but you didnt have to play yourselves.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    shuffol wrote: »
    Yes but you didnt have to play yourselves.

    But that makes it hard to judge the other teams in the group because they were up against 2 semi-finalists.

    Any group with 2 semi finalists, possible finalists can't be judged easy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Rightwing wrote: »
    But that makes it hard to judge the other teams in the group because they were up against 2 semi-finalists.

    Any group with 2 semi finalists, possible finalists can't be judged easy.

    Edinburgh have been absolutely rubbish this season. Fact. Coaches have gotten the boot.

    Racing were average to poor up until January, been in great form since then: http://www.racing-metro92.com/Calendrier___Resultats-9.html?journee=0

    Before the season began, the group looked difficult on paper. However both Edinburgh and Racing grossly underperformed both in the Heineken Cup and domestically during that time period of October to January. I was there in Paris (where Munster were dire outside of the first twenty minutes and Zebo's individual score) and Edinburgh (where Munster couldn't get a bonus point against an Edinburgh side that offered nothing).

    Considering the low expectation before the season began, making a semi-final is a great achievement. However if you're evaluating a season long result/performance output, you should look more at the overall scheme of things i.e. Munster's path to the semi-final and how they performed along the way. None of the performances in the group stages filled me with much hope for the quarter final.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 13,286 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Rightwing wrote: »
    But that makes it hard to judge the other teams in the group because they were up against 2 semi-finalists.

    Any group with 2 semi finalists, possible finalists can't be judged easy.

    In Euro 2012 two teams from Irelands group got to the final. Didn't mean Ireland were any less sh1te though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    Edinburgh have been absolutely rubbish this season. Fact. Coaches have gotten the boot.

    Racing were average to poor up until January, been in great form since then: http://www.racing-metro92.com/Calendrier___Resultats-9.html?journee=0

    Before the season began, the group looked difficult on paper. However both Edinburgh and Racing grossly underperformed both in the Heineken Cup and domestically during that time period of October to January. I was there in Paris (where Munster were dire outside of the first twenty minutes and Zebo's individual score) and Edinburgh (where Munster couldn't get a bonus point against an Edinburgh side that offered nothing).

    I know but what made Leinster's group tough for instance was 2 v good teams in it. Now, both Sarries and oursleves have also proven ourselves as v good in the H Cup this season. Dealing with Sarries as Ulster found out was not easy.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    In Euro 2012 two teams from Irelands group got to the final. Didn't mean Ireland were any less sh1te though.

    I've had many a discussion with people about that very point. I think if you put teams like England in that group, they wouldn't have got a point either.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,234 ✭✭✭totallegend


    Rightwing wrote: »
    I know but what made Leinster's group tough for instance was 2 v good teams in it. Now, both Sarries and oursleves have also proven ourselves as v good in the H Cup this season. Dealing with Sarries as Ulster found out was not easy.

    The difference was that Scarlets and Exeter gave it their best shot while Edinburgh were officially the weakest team in the pool stages and Racing sent their second string to Thomond in round six.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 26,687 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Changes Aplenty For Dragons

    Only three of those who started against Leinster last weekend remain in the Munster starting XV for the away trip to Rodney Parade on Friday, ko 7pm.The trio are Denis Hurley, Ian Keatley and Damien Varley who are included in a side comprised mostly of those players who played in the British & Irish Cup win over Cornish Pirates a fortnight ago.
    With their interest in the RaboDirect PRO12 understandably superceded by involvement in the Heineken Cup Semi-Final Coach Rob Penney has rested most of his frontliners.

    Academy player Ronan O'Mahony will make his RaboDirect PRO12 debut on Friday night while his academy colleague Cian Bohane named in the replacements is also in line for his first Munster senior cap.

    Marcus Horan, Munster's most capped forward, is included on the bench.

    Munster: D Hurley; R O’Mahony, I Dineen, JJ Hanrahan, J Murphy; I Keatley, C Sheridan; W du Preez, D Varley, S Archer; D Foley, B Holland; Dave O’Callaghan, N Ronan, P Butler.

    Replacements: S Henry, M Horan, J Ryan, I Nagle, CJ Stander, D Williams, C Bohane, D Barnes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,721 ✭✭✭Otacon


    Does this mean we won't have Earls or Howlett for Clermont? I doubt we would throw them in cold.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    Howlett you could no bother. He's a bit like Isa in that regards. Oddly enough I'd almost pick Hurley over Earls for the clermont fixture...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,234 ✭✭✭trouttrout


    .ak wrote: »
    Howlett you could no bother. He's a bit like Isa in that regards. Oddly enough I'd almost pick Hurley over Earls for the clermont fixture...

    Hope to god Penney ain't thinking like you Ak!

    We need every game breaker on our team if we're to stand a chance, I can see the logic that Hurley is a stockier defender but Earls is a far superior player and far more likely to make something happen

    No point in taking a safe option, we've got nothing to lose


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,721 ✭✭✭Otacon


    .ak wrote: »
    Howlett you could no bother. He's a bit like Isa in that regards.

    Possibly.
    Oddly enough I'd almost pick Hurley over Earls for the clermont fixture...

    I wouldn't. If we go out there just looking to defend, then we may as well not leave at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    trouttrout wrote: »
    Hope to god Penney ain't thinking like you Ak!

    We need every game breaker on our team if we're to stand a chance, I can see the logic that Hurley is a stockier defender but Earls is a far superior player and far more likely to make something happen

    No point in taking a safe option, we've got nothing to lose

    True, but if there's any game where Munster should try to keep it tight it's this one... Munster shouldn't be aiming to out-score Clermont on the try sheet anyhow. Winning 3-0 would do nicely.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    .ak wrote: »
    True, but if there's any game where Munster should try to keep it tight it's this one... Munster shouldn't be aiming to out-score Clermont on the try sheet anyhow. Winning 3-0 would do nicely.

    Exactly. I think POC will be telling him the same thing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,234 ✭✭✭trouttrout


    .ak wrote: »
    True, but if there's any game where Munster should try to keep it tight it's this one... Munster shouldn't be aiming to out-score Clermont on the try sheet anyhow. Winning 3-0 would do nicely.

    I see where you're coming from but even taking that approach, which I wouldn't, I still think Earls is a better option. Hurley is a very average winger and his defense isn't even that much better than Earls


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,664 ✭✭✭opinionatedfan


    Earls or Hurley, its not going to make much a difference when your facing a in form sivivatu


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    Earls or Hurley, its not going to make much a difference when your facing a in form sivivatu

    I agree it doesn't really matter, but I would also prefer Earls & Howlett in there because they may sneak a try out of nowhere. But the key is not to be throwing it around wildly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Munster:
    D Hurley; R O’Mahony, I Dineen, JJ Hanrahan, J Murphy; I Keatley, C Sheridan; W du Preez, D Varley, S Archer; D Foley, B Holland; Dave O’Callaghan, N Ronan, P Butler.

    Replacements: S Henry, M Horan, J Ryan, I Nagle, CJ Stander, D Williams, C Bohane, D Barnes.

    The seconds being sent as expected. First senior appearances for both ROM and Bohane.

    One slight gripe: Sean Henry is leaving for Connacht and we have both Casey and Scannell being promoted to development contracts next season. Surely we would better off giving one of them gametime over a player who is leaving?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,234 ✭✭✭totallegend


    Earls or Hurley, its not going to make much a difference when your facing a in form sivivatu

    Yes, but if Munster have the ball, I'd rather have Earls running at Sivivatu than Hurley.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 491 ✭✭flyingoutside


    Hi lads, i'm unfortunately stuck in Edinburgh for the semi any one know any good pubs over there to watch it in?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 607 ✭✭✭ed7890


    Hurley might be better at defending if they try to go through him, but if they try to go around him and get a lead on him, he'll get burned for pace. Overall i'd prefer to have Earls in there without doubt. It's starting to look unlikely though, if he's not involved this week.


  • Posts: 24,798 ✭✭✭✭ Alvin Mushy Typographer


    Hi lads, i'm unfortunately stuck in Edinburgh for the semi any one know any good pubs over there to watch it in?

    Malones on Forrest Road


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    No Howlett or Earls is worrying. Earls won't have played for six weeks, four for Howlett.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,264 ✭✭✭✭Fireball07


    Munster:
    D Hurley; R O’Mahony, I Dineen, JJ Hanrahan, J Murphy; I Keatley, C Sheridan; W du Preez, D Varley, S Archer; D Foley, B Holland; Dave O’Callaghan, N Ronan, P Butler.

    Replacements: S Henry, M Horan, J Ryan, I Nagle, CJ Stander, D Williams, C Bohane, D Barnes.

    The seconds being sent as expected. First senior appearances for both ROM and Bohane.

    One slight gripe: Sean Henry is leaving for Connacht and we have both Casey and Scannell being promoted to development contracts next season. Surely we would better off giving one of them gametime over a player who is leaving?

    I like the team tbh...but yeah, I'd have Scannell in there.

    Foley starts ahead of Nagle, Stander still only on the bench, Horan returns ahead of Cronin...but good to see Hanrahan and Dineen. ROM on the wing aswell, interested to see how he'll do, he's scored a good few tries at A level.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,650 ✭✭✭ssaye


    Dragons team for Munster
    Tom Prydie, Matthew Pewtner, Ross Wardle, Lewis Robling, Tonderai Chavhanga, Steffan Jones; Jon Evans; Aaron Coundley, Hugh Gustafson, Nathan Buck, Andrew Coombs ©, Rob Sidoli,Dan Lydiate, Nic Cudd, Toby Faletau.

    Sam Parry, Owen Evans, Tim Ryan, Adam Jones, Jevon Groves, Ieuan Jones, Wayne Evans, Andy Tuilagi.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    No Howlett or Earls is worrying. Earls won't have played for six weeks, four for Howlett.

    That's a big pity. Neither will be in the starting line-up now, the bench at best.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭Junior


    I haven't been scanning this thread in a while, who has Stander pissed off he's fallen so far down the pecking order ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,668 ✭✭✭Mahatma Geansai


    Junior wrote: »
    I haven't been scanning this thread in a while, who has Stander pissed off he's fallen so far down the pecking order ?

    He's not in the HEC squad, so little point starting him. Same reason why Nagle is behind Foley I'd imagine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    He's not in the HEC squad, so little point starting him. Same reason why Nagle is behind Foley I'd imagine.

    Ah c'mon, if it was a case of letting players get game time before the H-Cup then Munster wouldn't be sending out their 2nds.

    This is an ideal game for Stander.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 607 ✭✭✭ed7890


    .ak wrote: »
    Ah c'mon, if it was a case of letting players get game time before the H-Cup then Munster wouldn't be sending out their 2nds.

    This is an ideal game for Stander.

    3 HEC registered guys starting ahead of him for this game. They might be playing to see who gets that bench spot.

    It is a shame he hasn't gotten more gametime. He's looked good I think when he's played.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement