Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Croke Park II preliminary Talks started today

1107108110112113159

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 392 ✭✭skafish


    Rojomcdojo wrote: »
    Of whom there are less of, leading to less money in the public purse from which to pay teachers, etc. Not only that, but public sector workers have been unfairly (as far as any other industries are concerned) protected throughout this crisis in comparison to their private sector counter-parts. This is a broad comparison, I know, but is generally true.

    As I have said, there is very little public sympathy from where I am standing. So, if we imagine a scenario where CP2 doesn't pass, what do you imagine happening as a public sector employee? Money to appear out of nowhere?

    How do you consider 3 pay cuts, increased and increasing work loads being protected?

    Please let us know what the weather is like up there in cloud cookoo land


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Pete M.


    I know. Unlikely as it would have been, would it have been better to poll the entire PS workforce on Croke Park 2, rather than the subset who choose to join the unions?

    :confused:

    Are you for real or trolling?

    subset? Do you get the whole 'Union' thing at all?

    Anyway, got a provisional count done for my end and it was a dead heat.

    It is going to be very close.
    But I do think that my Branch will vote No....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,326 ✭✭✭Farmer Pudsey


    I have just learned that Impact members in my workplace have narrowly voted in favour of accepting CP2.

    I am actually surprised. My feeling was that it was going to be rejected by about 60/40.

    If this result is repeated in Impact nationally then it might just save CP2 from what I thought was certain defeat.
    Pete M. wrote: »
    :confused:

    Are you for real or trolling?

    subset? Do you get the whole 'Union' thing at all?

    Anyway, got a provisional count done for my end and it was a dead heat.

    It is going to be very close.
    But I do think that my Branch will vote No....

    Pete, Boulevardier taught the same.

    As I said earlier in the thread it may be better if it is as then the government may realize that finally they have to govern the country not be puppets on a string


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Pete M.


    Pete, Boulevardier taught the same.

    As I said earlier in the thread it may be better if it is as then the government may realize that finally they have to govern the country not be puppets on a string

    Ok, so 'thought' is a whole lot different from 'taught'.
    You had me flummoxed there for a moment.
    Personally, and I'm in the know,so to speak, a No vote was not expected at all by any Impact 'in the know' member.
    The fact that it is so close, and even if tis a Yes, changes things.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 392 ✭✭skafish


    Social welfare put a floor under wages. However if we reduce Social Welfare we will not see wages reduced as workers on low wages would be better of on welfare than working at present. It would take a massive cut in welfare to make a low paid unsecure job in the private sector a viable alternative. I cannot see a 10-15% cut in welfare causing a drop in wages.









    Farming is part of a 5 billion food industry. It provides cheap raw material to Irish processors. Irish farmers receive the among lowest price's for product in Europe. Would Kerry Group exist except for them. Would it if it were not an Irish company be building a plant that will provide 2000 well paid jobs. As well Glanbia is another big employer. We have a massive agri-engineering sector which provides a large number of jobs.

    Vissy O do not think that there any 200K tractors in Ireland maybe a combine or two. However even in farming there are idiots.

    Tayto how do farmers rely on PAYE workers, I am a PAYE worker as well as a farmer. And yes there are better paying jobs than farming. I have one as well as a farm which I am paying back for. We all have equal opportunity to a certain extent it is just case of being willing to make sacrifices to better your situation not just to sit back and expect to be handed everything on you lap. It is easy to sit back and be an angry man.

    How do farmers not rely on PAYE workers? Please give an example of one single farm that could survive without various payments from Europe. And who provides thes payments?

    PAYE workres and their EU wide counterparts.

    And lets not forget who makes sure you get your cheque in the post...... those very PS workers you villify at every opertunity


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,818 ✭✭✭Tea drinker


    MMAGirl wrote: »
    My salary increased by 200% from 2000 and 2008. And since 2008 another 100%. And thats not including any allowances I got or employers pension contributions.
    Lots of people I know had similar increases. Nobody I know has had a decrease in the private sector. Fair enough some have lost their jobs, but they have nobody to blame for not having a job but themselves to be fair. Its up to them to make themselves employable.

    Did anyone in the PS get salary increases anything like that, even including benchmarking?
    No one I know has had this sort of pay rise. You seem to be trying to link PS pay to your own rise in pay? How have you become the benchmark now? Loads of businesses have closed because rents rose too much too fast. Look in sandyford industrial estate tech and engineering gone, in dundrum centre retail gone, all over town restaurants are closing due to cash problems.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,187 ✭✭✭ParkRunner


    No one I know has had this sort of pay rise. You seem to be trying to link PS pay to your own rise in pay? How have you become the benchmark now? Loads of businesses have closed because rents rose too much too fast. Look in sandyford industrial estate tech and engineering gone, in dundrum centre retail gone, all over town restaurants are closing due to cash problems.

    Continuing austerity in the domestic economy will only add to those cash problems.
    Public/civil servants have little to fear from a No vote in my opinion, the cuts will be imposed one way or another. Leaving the vote on legislation to make those cuts to a divided and shaken Labour Party is the best that can be hoped for.
    Either the government or the public sector are going to be split down the middle as a result of CP2!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,326 ✭✭✭Farmer Pudsey


    skafish wrote: »
    How do farmers not rely on PAYE workers? Please give an example of one single farm that could survive without various payments from Europe. And who provides thes payments?

    PAYE workres and their EU wide counterparts.

    And lets not forget who makes sure you get your cheque in the post...... those very PS workers you villify at every opertunity

    As a counter balance consumer but food of the highest quality in the world both hormone and GM free compared to anywhere in the world. The main reasons for payments is that farmers have to farm at standards higher than anywhere in the world.

    As for relying on PAYE workers the same with PAYE workers they rely on the jobs and taxes created by low cost farm produce. If you wish to start a thread on the value or otherwise to the economy.

    The other issue is that Ireland is a net recipient of EU funds because of our high agri o/p compared to out population base. We export 90% of the produce earning revenue from abroad that helps pay for public services and employs PAYE workers.

    Also agriculture is noted world wide for it roll over effect in the any economy as the money regenerated more times in the economy than income from other sources.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 425 ✭✭Dreamertime


    Monday's the big day when the results come rolling in.

    Already its great to see the Lab technicians, TUI and TEEU reject this rotten deal convincingly...:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,187 ✭✭✭ParkRunner


    Monday's the big day when the results come rolling in.

    Already its great to see the Lab technicians, TUI and TEEU reject this rotten deal convincingly...:)

    The whole voting system needs to be revised after this vote. The members of the largest union, Siptu, will be largely unaffected by CP2 as a result of its majority private sector membership and civil servants are voting on issues only relevant to emergency & health workers and teachers. It's bordering on farcical!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 481 ✭✭MMAGirl


    No one I know has had this sort of pay rise. You seem to be trying to link PS pay to your own rise in pay? How have you become the benchmark now? Loads of businesses have closed because rents rose too much too fast. Look in sandyford industrial estate tech and engineering gone, in dundrum centre retail gone, all over town restaurants are closing due to cash problems.


    Im linking the public sectors across the board cuts to widespread pay rises in the private sector. Just using myself and people I know as examples of how some people complain about what the public sector get while they get it and more at the same time.

    You are talking about people who have lost jobs.
    People who have lost jobs and cant get new ones is another story. It has nothing to do with with pay cuts. Most people I know who lost jobs got new jobs very quickly because they are employable. Its only a couple of people I know who are still unemployed and tbh I wouldnt employ them either if i was looking to hire people. It takes a lot to be at the bottom of the pile for jobs when there are so many working compared to unemployed.
    Everyone goes on about the huge unemployment when really to be in that pool you have to be pretty much unemployable. But thats for a different thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 481 ✭✭MMAGirl


    EF wrote: »
    Continuing austerity in the domestic economy will only add to those cash problems.
    Public/civil servants have little to fear from a No vote in my opinion, the cuts will be imposed one way or another. Leaving the vote on legislation to make those cuts to a divided and shaken Labour Party is the best that can be hoped for.
    Either the government or the public sector are going to be split down the middle as a result of CP2!


    There is a solution to this.
    The PS will probably agree to the pay cuts if the government come back and throw out all the other conditions in the deal.
    This should be no problem if all of these extra changes to conditions dont really mean anything, as people in this thread have been saying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,818 ✭✭✭Tea drinker


    MMAGirl wrote: »
    Im linking the public sectors across the board cuts to widespread pay rises in the private sector. Just using myself and people I know as examples of how some people complain about what the public sector get while they get it and more at the same time.

    You are talking about people who have lost jobs.
    People who have lost jobs and cant get new ones is another story. It has nothing to do with with pay cuts. Most people I know who lost jobs got new jobs very quickly because they are employable. Its only a couple of people I know who are still unemployed and tbh I wouldnt employ them either if i was looking to hire people. It takes a lot to be at the bottom of the pile for jobs when there are so many working compared to unemployed.
    Everyone goes on about the huge unemployment when really to be in that pool you have to be pretty much unemployable. But thats for a different thread.
    Well aren't we just perpetuatiing the cycle of begrudgery and me feinism that partly defines Irish people if we don't try to change mindset? Yeah of course you need to stay on the ball and that's why I keep studying and getting IT certs all while I have a stable job. But the state should be there to help people, as we should help the state, but it seems that both sides are trying to screw one another over, while the Nation was treasonously sabotaged by a banking and political caste into a World War style epic loss, the war reparations which will have to be paid for generations. The other strong defining factor of Irish is the sense of victimhood, and "who has been hurt the most here" . Again this is rife on welfare, but it's also present in a lot of society outside, both PS and Private. I probably do it myself unknowingly.

    Re the unemployed:
    Some people have chosen to be unemployed as they can't afford to take a lower paid "job" than the dole. Some are just unfortunate. And some are unemployable through poorly educated anti-social and anti emmployment attitudes. But for sure I don't agree the current live register is unemployable, and TBH I don't think you believe that either.
    We need reform of the entitlements to stop the PAYE workers being taken for a ride, the true most vulnerable in society.

    There's little use you or I taking our salaries, raises etc and comparing them to PS, there are well researched mechanisms to do that far more accurately than anecdotally. Sure didn't we have de benchmarking ;-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 481 ✭✭MMAGirl


    Well aren't we just perpetuatiing the cycle of begrudgery and me feinism that partly defines Irish people if we don't try to change mindset? Yeah of course you need to stay on the ball and that's why I keep studying and getting IT certs all while I have a stable job. But the state should be there to help people, as we should help the state, but it seems that both sides are trying to screw one another over, while the Nation was treasonously sabotaged by a banking and political caste into a World War style epic loss, the war reparations which will have to be paid for generations. The other strong defining factor of Irish is the sense of victimhood, and "who has been hurt the most here" . Again this is rife on welfare, but it's also present in a lot of society outside, both PS and Private. I probably do it myself unknowingly.

    Re the unemployed:
    Some people have chosen to be unemployed as they can't afford to take a lower paid "job" than the dole. Some are just unfortunate. And some are unemployable through poorly educated anti-social and anti emmployment attitudes. But for sure I don't agree the current live register is unemployable, and TBH I don't think you believe that either.
    We need reform of the entitlements to stop the PAYE workers being taken for a ride, the true most vulnerable in society.

    There's little use you or I taking our salaries, raises etc and comparing them to PS, there are well researched mechanisms to do that far more accurately than anecdotally. Sure didn't we have de benchmarking ;-)


    But people are constantly justifying cuts to the public sector by pointing to the hardship of the private sector. Then when it suits them they say the private sector salaries have nothing to do with public sector salaries. :rolleyes:

    You are right in this though. In Ireland its always someone elses fault if you are doing badly. And its always someone else that should take a larger proportion of the cuts isnt it. That will never change.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,547 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    MMAGirl wrote: »
    Everyone goes on about the huge unemployment when really to be in that pool you have to be pretty much unemployable.
    In a thread about PS pay, you come to expect the most ludicrous and nonsensical unsubstantiated generalisations but with that comment you have managed to bring it to a new low. I didnt think that was possible. It is kind of impressive, in a way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,818 ✭✭✭Tea drinker


    EF wrote: »
    Continuing austerity in the domestic economy will only add to those cash problems.
    Public/civil servants have little to fear from a No vote in my opinion, the cuts will be imposed one way or another. Leaving the vote on legislation to make those cuts to a divided and shaken Labour Party is the best that can be hoped for.
    Either the government or the public sector are going to be split down the middle as a result of CP2!
    There needs to be more cuts to PS and welfare as there is only a little more $$$ to be extracted from Joe Public. Gov footprint needs to get smaller and leaner so Joe can pay his debts. If some stimulus can come from capital projects - great, but don't forget PS were in favour of austerity when it meant capital projects got cut rather than their wages.
    yeah yeah sure yeah on the capital projects.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 481 ✭✭MMAGirl


    There needs to be more cuts to PS and welfare as there is only a little more $$$ to be extracted from Joe Public. Gov footprint needs to get smaller and leaner so Joe can pay his debts. If some stimulus can come from capital projects - great, but don't forget PS were in favour of austerity when it meant capital projects got cut rather than their wages.
    yeah yeah sure yeah on the capital projects.

    They are Joe public too.
    Take 5% from everyone. or take 10% from the PS and 0% from everyone else.
    Extreme example, but thats what attacking one sector boils down to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 481 ✭✭MMAGirl


    Pete_Cavan wrote: »
    In a thread about PS pay, you come to expect the most ludicrous and nonsensical unsubstantiated generalisations but with that comment you have managed to bring it to a new low. I didnt think that was possible. It is kind of impressive, in a way.

    Are you hurt? Dont be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,818 ✭✭✭Tea drinker


    MMAGirl wrote: »
    They are Joe public too.
    Take 5% from everyone. or take 10% from the PS and 0% from everyone else.
    Extreme example, but thats what attacking one sector boils down to.
    Not exactly, if they were then we could give 90% of our wage to PS and the economy could still be likely to recover.
    It's a blend, and we have it wrong right now. Yes, PS are indispensable, but we will just have to live with lower services, while PS reform to higher efficiency. The money is no longer there, it's gone, totally gone, I mean gone-gone, and it isn't coming back soon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 481 ✭✭MMAGirl


    Not exactly, if they were then we could give 90% of our wage to PS and the economy could still be likely to recover.
    It's a blend, and we have it wrong right now. Yes, PS are indispensable, but we will just have to live with lower services, while PS reform to higher efficiency. The money is no longer there, it's gone, totally gone, I mean gone-gone, and it isn't coming back soon.

    Yes we do have it wrong now, because the PS have been hit much, much harder than anyone else. While the private sectors salaries are actually increasing we want to decrease the salaries of the PS.
    The money is no longer there isnt really an argument. Of course its there. Its in all our pockets. But of course we dont want to spend it. We would rather we get the same services but at the expense of the people providing the services, instead of our own expense.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,463 ✭✭✭Mr Cumulonimbus


    I have just learned that Impact members in my workplace have narrowly voted in favour of accepting CP2.

    I am actually surprised. My feeling was that it was going to be rejected by about 60/40.

    If this result is repeated in Impact nationally then it might just save CP2 from what I thought was certain defeat.

    More than 2 to 1 in favour of a yes vote in mine. Similar feeling here. The Impact rep thought it would be a very tight vote with the chance of it being rejected a possibility.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,818 ✭✭✭Tea drinker


    MMAGirl wrote: »
    Yes we do have it wrong now, because the PS have been hit much, much harder than anyone else. While the private sectors salaries are actually increasing we want to decrease the salaries of the PS.
    The money is no longer there isnt really an argument. Of course its there. Its in all our pockets. But of course we dont want to spend it. We would rather we get the same services but at the expense of the people providing the services, instead of our own expense.
    Again we are back to discussing your specific pocket..... weren't you just telling us all about your 100% raise? You are deluding the more easily deluded sector of the PS with your talk of the "undisclosed huge raises" that everyone has been hush hush about. Anecdotally on boards it seems There's another 10 guys for every one guy who says he can pay more. And that's just on people who are earning 100K plus, I guess it's higher for lower paid.
    Let me put it another way, we just had the largest drop in PC sales in history, hows about the odds of Intel and HP pulling out of Leixlip?

    So how much do you want to rise my tax by/ I mean you are saying no more PS cuts how much more do you expect to pay to compensate?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 481 ✭✭MMAGirl


    Again we are back to discussing your specific pocket..... weren't you just telling us all about your 100% raise? You are deluding the more easily deluded sector of the PS with your talk of the "undisclosed huge raises" that everyone has been hush hush about. Anecdotally on boards it seems There's another 10 guys for every one guy who says he can pay more. And that's just on people who are earning 100K plus, I guess it's higher for lower paid.
    Let me put it another way, we just had the largest drop in PC sales in history, hows about the odds of Intel and HP pulling out of Leixlip?


    well to be fair im talking about everybodys pockets. It doesnt matter about mine specifically. As I keep saying to you, I just mentioned mine and my friends raises to show that private sector salaries are increasing a lot more than PS salaries. Not hard to figure out to be fair, as PS salaries went down and its clear that private sector salaries are increasing.
    Even Ryanair have had to give in and give their staff a 10% raise.

    You seem to want the PS to pay more so you dont have to tbh.
    You are not alone though. I would guess that 99% of people who are not PS want the same. Why stop there though. Perhaps they should pay more for the TV license too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,219 ✭✭✭woodoo


    There needs to be more cuts to PS and welfare as there is only a little more $$$ to be extracted from Joe Public.

    What a surprise... take the money of somebody else and leave me alone :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 481 ✭✭MMAGirl


    woodoo wrote: »
    What a surprise... take the money of somebody else and leave me alone :D

    Shouldnt be a surprise. Turkeys dont vote for christmas. Irish turkeys vote for the other turkeys to go on the dinner plate though :eek:

    Probably not unique to irish turkeys though to be fair.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 425 ✭✭Dreamertime


    More than 2 to 1 in favour of a yes vote in mine.


    Amazing how blind people are :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,686 ✭✭✭barneystinson


    Amazing how blind people are :(

    So people who don't agree with your view are blind..? Even when they're half of people (give or take 10%).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,419 ✭✭✭Count Dooku


    woodoo wrote: »
    What a surprise... take the money of somebody else and leave me alone :D
    This is precisely what PS workers want


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,219 ✭✭✭woodoo


    This is precisely what PS workers want

    PS workers get the same money taken off them as you do when there is changes to tax, new charges and cuts etc. We get all the charges and cuts that you have got and then we get some more of our own.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,419 ✭✭✭Count Dooku


    woodoo wrote: »
    PS workers get the same money taken off them as you do when there is changes to tax, new charges and cuts etc. We get all the charges and cuts that you have got and then we get some more of our own.
    PS workers want everybody to pay for their inability to reform public sector. Government had time and money to cut all non-critical services and afford 15-20% redundancies.


Advertisement