Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

revenue issues threat to every homeowner in the country.

1343537394048

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 57,077 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Ah yes double taxation.
    Nice to see Mads change sides and join us.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭bgrizzley


    Ah yes double taxation.
    Nice to see Mads change sides and join us.


    more like one rule for them and one rule for us...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,730 ✭✭✭Bullseye1


    MadsL wrote: »
    Who pays the troika debt then? The leprechauns?

    Overborrowing for inflated property prices was the petrol on the flames of the bubble. Therefore a property tax is more appropriate than an income tax.

    Explain to me why everyone should pitch in to make life easier for those who overborrowed?

    Eh I think your missing a vital point. The Troika bailout is to cover money pumped into the banks and to pay the deficit currently being run by government. It has nothing to do with bailing out home owners. So how are home owners any more guilty of causing the bailout than those who rented?

    It was caused by poorly regulated banking, governments over reliance on Stamp Duty all the while paying public sector workers more money and Bertie's obsession of having 100% employment by boosting public sector numbers instead of leaving job creation to the private sector.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 57,077 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Bullseye1 wrote: »
    Eh I think your missing a vital point. The Troika bailout is to cover money pumped into the banks and to pay the deficit currently being run by government. It has nothing to do with bailing out home owners. So how are home owners any more guilty of causing the bailout than those who rented?

    It was caused by poorly regulated banking, governments over reliance on Stamp Duty all the while paying public sector workers more money and Bertie's obsession of having 100% employment by boosting public sector numbers instead of leaving job creation to the private sector.

    Ah now leave Mads alone. He has come over from the Dark Side and is one of us now. He is against double taxation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    Bullseye1 wrote: »
    So how are home owners any more guilty of causing the bailout than those who rented?
    They were (many) participants in the bubble property market. I'd hardly call them 'guilty', but they did contribute to it.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,370 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    Bullseye1 wrote: »
    Eh I think your missing a vital point. The Troika bailout is to cover money pumped into the banks and to pay the deficit currently being run by government. It has nothing to do with bailing out home owners. So how are home owners any more guilty of causing the bailout than those who rented?

    It was caused by poorly regulated banking, governments over reliance on Stamp Duty all the while paying public sector workers more money and Bertie's obsession of having 100% employment by boosting public sector numbers instead of leaving job creation to the private sector.

    Im still waiting on his emails he sent, warning of the trouble home buyers are causing. If he was not able to tell at the time, and only in hindsight, then how could people buying homes know?

    I await his answer with interest.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,730 ✭✭✭Bullseye1


    Phoebas wrote: »
    They were (many) participants in the bubble property market. I'd hardly call them 'guilty', but they did contribute to it.

    But the property market is not being bailed out. The government is being bailed out as have the banks. The home owner if they default will not be bailed out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    Bullseye1 wrote: »
    But the property market is not being bailed out.
    The question was the cause of the bailout, not the result of it
    Bullseye1 wrote: »
    The government is being bailed out as have the banks. The home owner if they default will not be bailed out.
    I presume you mean the State, not the Government. I suppose the property market was bailed out to some extent, as it is likely that the property crash would be more severe at least in the short term without the bailout. But youre right, I don't see home owners being bailed out at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭MadsL


    Surely you are aware of some people in council houses who have never contributed anything. Never worked, never will, always able to go drinking. I see it everyday.

    And they get "free houses", tell me how that works.
    Bruthal wrote: »
    A but surely it will only be the fault of people who actually vote for them. Is`t that right?

    And those who allow it to happen. All this posturing about can't pay is playing right into FF hands.
    If you are going to expect me to pay because I have the "amenity of a house" then I suggest that they tax you on the capital you have saved as a result of not buying a house. That might sound silly and is probably as silly as your argument.

    You never heard of capital gains tax, we did get taxed on capital invested outside of the property market. :confused:


    Bruthal wrote: »
    Well then, people who were paying huge stamp duties were propping you up then, where they not? Where are the warning emails you sent, complaining that you were obviously paying too little tax, due to house buyers paying huge amounts?

    Why would I complain about people voluntarily paying too much tax? I thought they were idiots, but why would I try and stop them? I did try and stop colleagues throwing money away, but they knew better than me and laughed when I showed them The Economist articles predicting 30% - 40% price drops.

    Stamp Duty propped up mortgage interest relief did it not, I was not fortunate enough to have a Govt helping me pay my rent with a monthly tax refund of that magnitude. I think it was about €500 a year relief for renters.
    Similar to above mentioned stamp duty payers paying the property tax is it?

    Stamp duty and rates have always existed, Jack Lynch chose to make developers pay rates on property owners behalf. You have always had two taxes on property.
    Ah yes double taxation.
    Nice to see Mads change sides and join us.

    EDIT: You do not have double taxation. You obviously misunderstand what double taxation is, it is not one person paying two taxes, it is two people both paying the same tax liability. Double taxation would be both a landlord AND the renter paying LPT. You have ALWAYS had Stamp Duty AND rates. The Landlord is liable for both and the cost of them is effectively factored into the rent. That is why renters should NOT pay the LPT.
    Bullseye1 wrote: »
    Eh I think your missing a vital point. The Troika bailout is to cover money pumped into the banks and to pay the deficit currently being run by government. It has nothing to do with bailing out home owners. So how are home owners any more guilty of causing the bailout than those who rented?

    It was caused by poorly regulated banking, governments over reliance on Stamp Duty all the while paying public sector workers more money and Bertie's obsession of having 100% employment by boosting public sector numbers instead of leaving job creation to the private sector.

    EDIT: How did the banks get in that mess? Largely through lending money for unsustainable mortgages.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,730 ✭✭✭Bullseye1


    I see you quoted be but have not answered.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 57,077 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Bullseye1 wrote: »
    I see you quoted be but have not answered.

    Same with the double taxation.
    Doesn't want it but doesn't mind others having it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,686 ✭✭✭barneystinson



    Same with the double taxation.
    Doesn't want it but doesn't mind others having it.

    What double taxation?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,380 ✭✭✭✭Banjo String


    ezra_pound wrote: »
    50 years?

    Now I cannot believe that I'm sorry.

    I paid 6% stamp duty when we bought this house.

    What's hard to believe about that may I ask?

    Do the sums...........


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭MadsL


    Bullseye1 wrote: »
    I see you quoted be but have not answered.

    Edited


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,730 ✭✭✭Bullseye1


    MadsL wrote: »
    EDIT: How did the banks get in that mess? Largely through lending money for unsustainable mortgages.

    The banks got themselves in trouble and have been bailed out not the home owner. Not a single penny from the Troika has been paid to bail out the home owner.

    So how exactly have they contributed to our deficit or bailout? Why are they being singled out? The majority of mortgage holders are continuing to pay off their mortgage. The fact that the banks were stupid enough to offer those 110% mortgages and the fact that the majority of the mortgages are on loss making tracker mortgages. They have been bailed out not the people.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭MadsL


    Bullseye1 wrote: »
    The banks got themselves in trouble and have been bailed out not the home owner. Not a single penny from the Troika has been paid to bail out the home owner.

    So how exactly have they contributed to our deficit or bailout? Why are they being singled out? The majority of mortgage holders are continuing to pay off their mortgage. The fact that the banks were stupid enough to offer those 110% mortgages and the fact that the majority of the mortgages are on loss making tracker mortgages. They have been bailed out not the people.

    Homeowners always paid two taxes, stamp duty and property tax (rates) - rates were abolished and the Development Levy replaced it. You are not being singled out, you are just being asked to pay the taxes for which property was always liable. The boom era levy was a nice holiday from rates. Now it is back to reality.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,380 ✭✭✭✭Banjo String


    http://www.rte.ie/news/business/2013/0319/377389-boi-richie-boucher/
    Bullseye1 wrote: »
    The banks got themselves in trouble and have been bailed out not the home owner. Not a single penny from the Troika has been paid to bail out the home owner.

    So how exactly have they contributed to our deficit or bailout? Why are they being singled out? The majority of mortgage holders are continuing to pay off their mortgage. The fact that the banks were stupid enough to offer those 110% mortgages and the fact that the majority of the mortgages are on loss making tracker mortgages. They have been bailed out not the people.

    And even after they got bailed out, which the homeowner will pay the cost of, this crap still happens.
    Bank of Ireland CEO Richie Boucher received a total package of pay and benefits of €843,000 last year.

    The bank's annual report says he had a salary of €690,000, pension contributions of €186,000 and benefits-in-kind, such as a car allowance, of €34,000.

    This brought his total package to €910,000; however, Mr Boucher opted to waive €67,000.

    The annual report states that the voluntary waiver has been extended until 31 December this year.

    The bank's chairman Archie Kane is paid €394,000 for his role.

    The company's annual report adds: "In addition he has a consultancy arrangement with Bank of Ireland (UK) plc in respect of which he receives an annual fee of €59,000.

    "He also receives an accommodation, utilities and car allowance of €37,000 per annum."The bank's group chief financial officer Andrew Keating has an annual salary of €390,000.



    The govt received bailout funds, that they in turn passed on to banks.

    But you lads think it's homeowners fault?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,730 ✭✭✭Bullseye1


    So how are they any more responsible for the trouble we are in? You have suggested the homeonwner is responsible and not the renter? Yet without the renter there would be no buy to let market? So how are they any more responsible for the countries collapse?

    The banks are responsible for the collapse, the governments reliance on stamp duty is responsible for the countries collapse and running a huge deficit with the loss of 300,000 jobs has resulted in the Troikas entry. You also blamed the property market bubble for your leaving Ireland. I'd like an explaination how myself and others buying a house has resulted in people having to emigrate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭MadsL


    Bullseye1 wrote: »
    So how are they any more responsible for the trouble we are in? You have suggested the homeonwner is responsible and not the renter? Yet without the renter there would be no buy to let market? So how are they any more responsible for the countries collapse?

    Do you really think that Ireland had a mature buy-to-let market? Even in this thread we have seen people facing up the fact that they ought to register as landlords.

    As to a buy-to-let market, the boom created an artificial one - buying apartments to let to immigrants coming to build apartments to let to immigrants.

    Normal renters were in no way part of that madness.
    The banks are responsible for the collapse, the governments reliance on stamp duty is responsible for the countries collapse and running a huge deficit with the loss of 300,000 jobs has resulted in the Troikas entry.[/QUOTE]

    Who fed the Govt their Stamp Duty? Certainly not renters.
    You also blamed the property market bubble for your leaving Ireland. I'd like an explaination how myself and others buying a house has resulted in people having to emigrate.

    Really not that hard to understand the events of the past few years, did you never hear of a Folie à deux? the relationship between the willingness of people to pay overinflated prices and a Government hell-bent on staying popular meant that the round and round she goes nature of the boom spiralied out of control.

    If you put all of that on the banks, god love ya.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,765 ✭✭✭flutered


    i was speaking with one of these farmer blokes today, he is in long fills constituncy, i asked him will he pay the household charge, he said that he had it paid already, i asked his why so early, he claimed that unless he paid the household charge he would not recieve the single farm payment, he also claimed that it had already being put to farmers.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭MadsL


    flutered wrote: »
    i was speaking with one of these farmer blokes today, he is in long fills constituncy, i asked him will he pay the household charge, he said that he had it paid already, i asked his why so early, he claimed that unless he paid the household charge he would not recieve the single farm payment, he also claimed that it had already being put to farmers.

    Maybe if those refusing to pay the LPT were subject to losing their mortgage interest relief we might see a different tune being sung.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,370 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    MadsL wrote: »
    Why would I complain about people voluntarily paying too much tax? I thought they were idiots, but why would I try and stop them?
    Well because you are blaming them for you having to leave the country. So what did you do to stop it? Nothing by the look of it.
    EDIT: You do not have double taxation. You obviously misunderstand what double taxation is, it is not one person paying two taxes, it is two people both paying the same tax liability.
    That`s your version. Paying tax twice on the same asset or source of income would be double taxation in my version.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,730 ✭✭✭Bullseye1


    Still haven't shown how we home owners are guilty of causing the collapse since we haven't been bailed out. I haven't put the blame all on the banks. But 60 billion has been borrowed to bail them out. Not one cent has been borrowed to bail out mortgage holders.

    So those people who paid stamp duty are responsible for the mess? I've heard it all now.

    God help yourself if your still blaming everyone else for your emigrating.


    MadsL wrote: »
    Do you really think that Ireland had a mature buy-to-let market? Even in this thread we have seen people facing up the fact that they ought to register as landlords.

    As to a buy-to-let market, the boom created an artificial one - buying apartments to let to immigrants coming to build apartments to let to immigrants.

    Normal renters were in no way part of that madness.

    The banks are responsible for the collapse, the governments reliance on stamp duty is responsible for the countries collapse and running a huge deficit with the loss of 300,000 jobs has resulted in the Troikas entry.

    Who fed the Govt their Stamp Duty? Certainly not renters.



    Really not that hard to understand the events of the past few years, did you never hear of a Folie à deux? the relationship between the willingness of people to pay overinflated prices and a Government hell-bent on staying popular meant that the round and round she goes nature of the boom spiralied out of control.

    If you put all of that on the banks, god love ya.[/QUOTE]


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭MadsL


    Bruthal wrote: »
    Well because you are blaming them for you having to leave the country. So what did you do to stop it? Nothing by the look of it.

    I have already outlined what I did to try and stop over-development and the corrupt relationship between developers and local authorities, I was very active within a number local and national groups drawing attention and making submissions on the overdevelopment and overzoning going on. That's on a local and national scale.At a personal level, why would I try and stop people overpaying tax voluntarily?

    That`s your version. Paying tax twice on the same asset or source of income would be double taxation in my version.

    Tell me how you protested paying VRT and Motor Tax on a new car.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,370 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    MadsL wrote: »
    Tell me how you protested paying VRT and Motor Tax on a new car.

    By not buying new cars.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭MadsL


    Bullseye1 wrote: »
    Still haven't shown how we home owners are guilty of causing the collapse since we haven't been bailed out.

    Yet. Haven't been bailed out, yet. Plenty of cries for debt-forgiveness though.
    I haven't put the blame all on the banks. But 60 billion has been borrowed to bail them out. Not one cent has been borrowed to bail out mortgage holders.

    I'd like to see you try to make the case that they should.
    So those people who paid stamp duty are responsible for the mess? I've heard it all now.

    Well if you blame the Government for using Stamp Duty to prop up the tax system, then who volunteered to let them do it? Not one person was coerced to pay that tax.
    God help yourself if your still blaming everyone else for your emigrating.
    Who is responsible for unemployment in your view?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,730 ✭✭✭Bullseye1


    Why pay any more taxes than necessary by buying a new car. Never a good investment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭MadsL


    Bruthal wrote: »
    By not buying new cars.

    Now you are getting the idea, similar to me avoiding Stamp Duty and LPT by not buying an overpriced house.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭MadsL


    Bruthal wrote: »
    By not buying new cars.

    So do you not tax it or not put fuel in it? Being as how you are so opposed to "double" taxes?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,370 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    MadsL wrote: »
    Now you are getting the idea, similar to me avoiding Stamp Duty and LPT by not buying an overpriced house.

    Yea, but I got a 10 year old car. Could you not get a 10 year old house, since you see some comparison here?

    I mean, I did buy a car.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement