Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Off The Ball Official Thread <Mod Note - Post #1, #533, #6651>

11819212324334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 669 ✭✭✭whatstherush


    heybaby wrote: »
    This doesnt make sense at all. Newstalk breakfast confirming newspaper reports that the Off the Ball lads approached Newstalk management last year about moving the show to an earlier timeslot of 6pm and eventually a 5pm slot. Apparently the Off The Ball lads blinked first when demands werent met and they resigned en masse, taking their twitter account @secondcaptains with them, its been deleted. I cant understand why they would walk away from an award winning show that has been so well respected and popular after running it for ten years. Theres no doubt they could have pulled in more than their 39,000 listeners had they moved to an earlier slot but is it not completely counterproductive to walk away because they didnt have demands met ? or is there more to this story ?
    My guess is money, in that with only 39,000 listeners there is only so much pay they can expect/demand. With the earlier start, they'd automatically pickup a lot more listeners and hence could demand greater pay. At the 7-10 slot, they will always be fighting with 'prime time' tv for listeners.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,113 ✭✭✭✭Xavi6


    heybaby wrote: »
    This doesnt make sense at all. Newstalk breakfast confirming newspaper reports that the Off the Ball lads approached Newstalk management last year about moving the show to an earlier timeslot of 6pm and eventually a 5pm slot. Apparently the Off The Ball lads blinked first when demands werent met and they resigned en masse, taking their twitter account @secondcaptains with them, its been deleted. I cant understand why they would walk away from an award winning show that has been so well respected and popular after running it for ten years. Theres no doubt they could have pulled in more than their 39,000 listeners had they moved to an earlier slot but is it not completely counterproductive to walk away because they didnt have demands met ? or is there more to this story ?

    Incorrect, it's just been renamed @offtheballnt


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,125 ✭✭✭heybaby


    Xavi6 wrote: »
    Incorrect, it's just been renamed @offtheballnt

    I just saw that damn. What an awful shame. Its the end of an era lads. All I need now is to hear Cooper is leaving Today fm and i wont be listening to radio at all!! :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,856 ✭✭✭✭Dave!


    The Irish Times are saying:
    Newstalk had put a number of alternatives on the table in recent weeks, including an additional Saturday morning show.

    That's pretty interesting. It's a great show, but you'd want to have big balls demanding a 4 hour daily sport show, particularly taking an hour off the station's most popular show.

    Would like to hear more about it. There's probably more to it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,766 ✭✭✭JM Skipton


    I would have loved the show to start at 6pm, it would be perfect to listen while driving home from work.Not everybody wants to listen to current affairs at that time. Matt Cooper does a great sports hour from 6-7 on Fridays I would love something similar from the OTB lads every night


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,341 ✭✭✭✭Cartman78


    The Curse of Gift Grub :eek:

    Very disappointed to hear the news last night....the kind of chemistry they had going isn't something that can be recreated easily (as similar sports shows on RTE have shown).

    Didn't always agree with the opinions expressed (particularly Ken's penchant for verbal diarrhea) but always enjoyed hearing the debate.

    Had the banter become a bit too smug and self-referential lately? Maybe. A shake up/refresh was likely to be needed but a mass resignation seems like the nuclear option. Will be interested to hear what the actual reasons are :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭glennhysen


    I've been listening to Off The Ball since 2002 and I've always enjoyed it. When Ger was presenting it in the early days it was good but I felt that Eoin and the lads took it to another level. So much sports reporting is soundbite nonsense but these guys had some brilliant contributors on their show which meant that you learned a lot by listening to them Will really miss listening to them in the evenings but hopefully we will hear (or see) them in the not too distant future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,852 ✭✭✭Dr.Winston O'Boogie


    Won't somebody please please think of Ken Burley!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭IRE60


    Regardless of its ’cult’ status, you can’t ask a station to take an hour pulling in average 131,000 and replace it with a program with the potential to pull in 39,000 – a 92,000 drop!

    For the lads to think that simply occupying the 6pm slot they would get the 131,000 was commercial frailty in thinking on their behalves.

    Down to the nitty gritty – the demographic of the GH audience and OtB are completely different and is wouldn’t be a simple handover

    http://www.ilevel.ie/media-blog/radio/102474-off-the-ball-resignations


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 676 ✭✭✭Darsad


    niallo24 wrote: »
    Won't somebody please please think of Ken Burley!!!!

    Sad to see them go ! however i certainly wont miss Ken Burleys monotone live match commentary but then Ger gilroy is not exactly electrifying either.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,341 ✭✭✭✭Cartman78


    Darsad wrote: »
    Sad to see them go ! however i certainly wont miss Ken Burleys monotone live match commentary but then Ger gilroy is not exactly electrifying either.

    Yeah...the Newstalk commentators are dire. As a child of the 80's I was brought up on listening to the excellent BBC 5 Live coverag....Ken droning on and yer man McIntyre don't come anywhere close to that (albeit very high) standard


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,914 ✭✭✭✭tbh


    Cartman78 wrote: »
    Will be interested to hear what the actual reasons are :(

    At a guess - 10 years of reading texts from the public telling the lads how great they were lead to them having an inflated sense of their own worth.

    That's not me having a pop at them, btw, I love the show and I can understand how it happens. They figured if they went to management and made a demand, management would be so keen to keep them that they would acquiesce, and they were wrong.

    The format is responsible for at least 50% of the show's success, and the people the other 50% (and that's being generous to the lads, tbh).

    There's no shortage in Ireland of lads who can chat about sports. I know there's more to it than that, but that's the requirement at its core, everything else can be learned. I think the lads will find it much harder to find a show than the show will to find new lads.

    shame, but these things happen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 669 ✭✭✭whatstherush


    @SecondCaptains twitter account backup with following bio "Just a Twitter handle looking to be returned to its owners."


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,863 ✭✭✭seachto7


    Ken Earleys football commentary was rubbish compared to BBC etc, but you kind of knew what you were getting tuning into him...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,125 ✭✭✭heybaby


    tbh wrote: »
    At a guess - 10 years of reading texts from the public telling the lads how great they were lead to them having an inflated sense of their own worth.

    That's not me having a pop at them, btw, I love the show and I can understand how it happens. They figured if they went to management and made a demand, management would be so keen to keep them that they would acquiesce, and they were wrong.

    The format is responsible for at least 50% of the show's success, and the people the other 50% (and that's being generous to the lads, tbh).

    There's no shortage in Ireland of lads who can chat about sports. I know there's more to it than that, but that's the requirement at its core, everything else can be learned. I think the lads will find it much harder to find a show than the show will to find new lads.

    shame, but these things happen.

    I think you are being a bit unfair and presuming alot. First of all you only have one side of the story here, Newstalks, there was been total silence from the off the ball lads so far, so i think its a bit premature to put it down to ego.

    Eoin and the lads crafted the most highly respected sports show on irish radio not purely because they were lovers of sport but also because of their natural chemistry on air, you cant just acquire or learn chemistry.

    You also have to remember these lads have proven themselves to be very bright and Im sure they have analysed the situation, Id be very surprised if they were demanding an earlier slot and threw their toys out of the pram because they didnt get what they wanted.

    Might i say , i have rarely heard such an outpouring of affection about a radio show, right now, Darcy's reading out listeners texts expressing their sadness that the Off the Ball lads have left. Its a very unsual occurance for one radio station to cover staff departures at another, this shows just how good the guys were.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,443 ✭✭✭InchicoreDude


    .Not everybody wants to listen to current affairs at that time.

    Well not everyone wants to listen to sports either....

    I think there may be more to this story than we are hearing. I remember Dunphy criticising NT a couple of years back when he left and he specifically stated that the OTB lads were being exploited there. So maybe they just had enough.....

    To be honest, I can see NT's stance if OTB did want an extra hour. OTB already have 3 hours airtime,more than any of the other programmes on NT.

    Personally, I would love an extra hour of OTB rather than listening to Hook & the Boston politics guy drivel on about Obama. But giving OTB a 4 hour slot does seem extreme.....


  • Site Banned Posts: 194 ✭✭andym1




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,443 ✭✭✭InchicoreDude


    I would love to know OTB's rationale for wanting the extra hour.

    I did feel that the format of the show was getting a little tired (In fact, the whole NT schedule is getting tired). But I am sure OTB could have revamped it in 3 hours.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,182 ✭✭✭GSF


    OTB already have 3 hours airtime,more than any of the other programmes on NT.

    Breakfast & Moncrieff are also 3 hours duration - five days a week


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,443 ✭✭✭InchicoreDude


    GSF wrote: »
    Breakfast & Moncrieff are also 3 hours duration - five days a week

    oh yeah, thats right! Sorry, thought Moncrieff was just 2 hours!

    I think the breakfast show (7-10), it is reasonable to have 3 hours.

    But there was probably some potential to cut Moncrieffs show by 30 minutes and Hooks by 30 minutes too....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,007 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Starting at 6pm wouldn't have been a good move, their listening demographic are still working, shopping, créching, cooking at that time and you would loose the hook of the opening 20 mins of the show at 7 which does the headlines and previews. Personally I loved clearing the decks and sticking the radio on in the kitchen tidying up while Mrs LB rang her friends or watched the telly.

    The best thing about OTB was the volume of broadcast time allowed them to get in depth about sports that wouldnt normally get the coverage. The features and biographies as well as the politics and incidents of sport were fascinating.

    The feeling I have is a bit like Saipan or Sexton leaving Leinster, nobody really wanted it to happen but people boxed themselves in to absolute positions and bluffs were called and in the end its a lose/lose.

    Gilroy and Co. may continue with a show in the evenings, but I think they should retire Off The Ball as a title.

    "Those boys, they never go home........."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,165 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    I agree with heybaby on this one. A lot of people are coming on here talking about the listenership figures as if the off the ball lads don't know them. Of course they did. We need to hear their side of the story first.
    The blog IRE60 posted is pretty arrogantly written (ken would be proud) considering we don't know their side of the story either.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,914 ✭✭✭✭tbh


    heybaby wrote: »
    I think you are being a bit unfair and presuming alot. First of all you only have one side of the story here, Newstalks, there was been total silence from the off the ball lads so far, so i think its a bit premature to put it down to ego.

    Yes - that's fair, I am presuming a lot, but I'm basing my assumption on what we've been told. As you point out, we might find out new information later.
    Whatever way you look at it tho, it *is* down to ego - the lads made some requests [whatever those were], those requests weren't met and so they left. There's nothing wrong with a bit of ego, by the way, especially in a radio presenter.


    Whether it was too much ego remains to be seen - if they are back on the air with another station or with a better deal, then their ego paid off. If not, then it didn't.
    Eoin and the lads crafted the most highly respected sports show on irish radio not purely because they were lovers of sport but also because of their natural chemistry on air, you cant just acquire or learn chemistry.

    I accept everything you say, but I'd hazard a guess that there will be some new faces on the show over the next few months and it's a good bet that the show will be as entertaining.
    You also have to remember these lads have proven themselves to be very bright and Im sure they have analysed the situation, Id be very surprised if they were demanding an earlier slot and threw their toys out of the pram because they didnt get what they wanted.
    well - we'll have to see what happens. I think it'd be very dodgy for newstalk to claim something publicly if what they are claiming didn't happen. I am surprised at the reason given, but not shocked. It happens.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,000 ✭✭✭wonderboysam


    Wouldn't mind listening to them on talksport with special guest: NOEL GALLAGHER!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 116 ✭✭kevmy85


    People are talking about listenership figures here but surely having the largest listenership between 7-10 of a national radio station has to count for something.

    Hook has a bigger listenership in pure numbers but not in percentage terms. We also don't see the breakdown per hour - he could get a big bump towards the end of hihs show leading into OTB which maybe loses listeners the further it goes on due to it not being prime time radio.

    They say a sports show starting at 6 won't work? Both Hook and Matt Cooper, if/when they do sport, do it in that hour. They also said 4 guys sitting around talking about sport from 7-9, and later 7-10 wouldn't work but it did. Probably because for a long time they were left to their own devices to build up a great show without outside interference.

    If 2fm are looking for a proper sports show give it to the lads and give them free rein. Ditto for RTE if setting up a sports station. Or TV3 - even on that 3e channel.

    In some ways I would love to see them go the internet route completely - could really shake-up Irish broadcasting.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 354 ✭✭The Guardian


    I would love to know OTB's rationale for wanting the extra hour.

    I did feel that the format of the show was getting a little tired (In fact, the whole NT schedule is getting tired). But I am sure OTB could have revamped it in 3 hours.

    dont think they wanted an extra hour, just wanted to start an hr earlier.
    brings them into a whole new territory. the 5-7pm timeframe is golden, on many different levels

    having a sports programme on during this window (on a station that purports itself to be a current affairs outfit primarily) would be nuts


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,125 ✭✭✭heybaby


    Im telling you the lads will have a plan, theyve had long enough to think about this, considering according to reports they first approached management about a schedule change late last year. I just cant see 5 bright guys who have been working together for ten years on an award winning radio show packing it in without having an alternative option. Mind you I cant see the internet being a viable option there wouldnt be enough money in it for it to pay for itself.


    I see their twitter Handle is active again : ‏ @SecondCaptains


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,833 ✭✭✭✭ThisRegard


    kevmy85 wrote: »
    In some ways I would love to see them go the internet route completely - could really shake-up Irish broadcasting.

    I don't think that would work as a lot of people listen while say doing and eating the dinner, out in the car, at work or while out running or cycling, basically activities in which you can have the radio on in the background. Not many will sit down and watch/listen on a computer for 3 hours or so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,165 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    heybaby wrote: »
    I see their twitter Handle is active again : ‏ @SecondCaptains
    Ken is following it too.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,466 ✭✭✭nc6000


    I thought the show last night was pretty good with Ger Gilroy presenting.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement