Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Rampage: Jon Jones' oblique kick should be banned

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,045 ✭✭✭✭scudzilla


    O.P.H wrote: »

    Dampage should be banned


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 52 ✭✭The Dublin Whale


    Rampage is a coward and sore loser. He must have a mental disease, what the hell is he talking about bending the rules?! Its a perfectly legal kick. The interviewer is a joke too, talking about how it could damage someones career, the whole point of UFC is to injure and hurt your opponent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,045 ✭✭✭✭scudzilla


    Rampage is a coward and sore loser. He must have a mental disease, what the hell is he talking about bending the rules?! Its a perfectly legal kick. The interviewer is a joke too, talking about how it could damage someones career, the whole point of UFC is to injure and hurt your opponent.

    Hurt Yes

    Injure, No

    That's my take on it.

    IMO no fighter wants to go out there and snap someone's arm, or bust there leg so bad it'll take 18 months to be right


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,503 ✭✭✭adamski8


    Except paul harris


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,449 ✭✭✭✭El Guapo!


    Saying that it should be banned is a stupid statement to make.
    Only moves that are inherently dangerous/life threatening should be banned. And I think the current rules pretty much cover everything that falls in that category, such as spiking somebody on their head etc.

    Banning the oblique kick is beyond stupid.
    Yes, it could potentially cause a nasty injury, but so can the majority of strikes/submissions but they're perfectly legal because the risk is deemed relatively low.
    By Rampages logic, a punch to the face could potentially smash an orbital bone, or cause retinal damage, or even cause nerve damage....so should punches be banned too? Not a hope.
    Rampage is becoming more and more outspoken, negative and bitter as the years go on. He's better off just slinking away quietly and stop saying stuff that makes him sound dumb.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 732 ✭✭✭Xlami


    I'm not saying they should be banned and I'm not agreeing with Rampage. All I'm saying is I've seen Jon Jones, along with other fighters throw spinning back elbows which connect with the back of the head. Would like to see referees more stringent with this rule. Just because it was a flashy exciting move doesn't mean it's not connecting with the back of the head in an illegal manor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,198 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    ... the whole point of UFC is to injure and hurt your opponent.

    It's called MMA not UFC.
    And the point is not to injury your opponent. A bit of common sense goes a long way.
    Xlami wrote: »
    I'm not saying they should be banned and I'm not agreeing with Rampage. All I'm saying is I've seen Jon Jones, along with other fighters throw spinning back elbows which connect with the back of the head. Would like to see referees more stringent with this rule. Just because it was a flashy exciting move doesn't mean it's not connecting with the back of the head in an illegal manor.

    That line stood out for me too. Got any links to gifs or videos. I've heard that criticism before, but the videos I seen were to the side of the head.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,404 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    Mellor wrote: »
    It's called MMA not UFC.
    That line stood out for me too. Got any links to gifs or videos. I've heard that criticism before, but the videos I seen were to the side of the head.

    I seem to remember Jones vs Bonner at UFC 94 landing pretty far back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 826 ✭✭✭Jason McCabe


    Rampage slamming Arona on the back of his scone was way more dangerous

    He is full of $hit

    And yes fighters do want to injure but not maim their opponents


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 813 ✭✭✭Shazbot


    Mellor wrote: »
    That line stood out for me too. Got any links to gifs or videos. I've heard that criticism before, but the videos I seen were to the side of the head.

    Here's the gif of Bones vs Bonnar
    jon1.gif

    I've always thought it was to the back of the head.

    I always cringe when I see the oblique kicks land flush on the knee and I was skeptical about them when Silva was doing it to Leites.
    Here's the worst one I've seen. It's easy to see how it could cause an injury.

    knee.gif

    They seem to be more utilized now but I don't think they should be banned any more than a punch to the face should.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,468 ✭✭✭✭Ush1


    Rampage should just go do boxing. He moaned about Ryan Bader taking him down, does he want any sort of wrestling banned also?

    Reminds of Lavar Johnson before his fight with Struve saying, "Lets leave the jiu jitsu to the jiu jitsu tournaments"!:eek:

    Yeah, armbar first round mate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭Be like Nutella


    That oblique kick reminds of Royce's iconic big step forward knee stamp thing he did from the first UFC which worked really well to close distance. Jones throws his one to hurt the guy and own the bubble... make them pay an entrance fee kinda thing.

    You both agree to get in there and abide by the rules.... winning by clean tapped out RNC in the first 30 seconds or tearing somebodies knee completely asunder while alligator rolling for knee bar attempt or heel hook or toe hold is just as valid and acceptable a win and there is no dishonor in it although of course it is sad to see a fighter sidelined for a year from the injury (after the fact) but that is merely part of fighting. I hate the way people apply the same thinking from watching other sports to MMA - which IMO is absolutely different. Jones never truly knows where that spinning elbow is going to land - but it's a great technique and he throws it better than anyone. You can't rule change for that. MMA is just fighting - with enough rules (primarily and originally for marketing purposes and business reasons first... and as a result safety) to make us have to apply the term 'sport' to it for want of a better term.... but it really has nothing whatever to do with any other sport or even other combat sports and it'll never be truly clean nor safe, ever. Repeated knockouts will cause brain damage, knees will get destroyed and retinas detached but in such a tiny number compared to the total number of fights each year that we accept it and fighters accept it. I don't feel bad for them because it is their decision to fight pro rules MMA and the risks are blatant. That Jones can execute techniques with so much torque and power that he can and does really hurt people a lot when he fights them just shows the evolution of fighting - to use what works and drop what doesn't. The rules are fine as they are. It is amazing in a way that somebody hasn't died in the UFC looking from the outside in from an ignorant perspective - people get picked up and supplexed on to their heads and it's only luck that in the heat of a fight that they don't do it slightly illegally and break the guys neck (it would seem) and the sport comes to a very abrupt and immediate stop and so forth.... given the thousands of fights which have happened in the UFC, Pride etc we haven't had what is theoretically a likely occurrence given the nature of the sport at some point or so somebody would think watching their first UFC. Truth is, I think it's the 'level' of fighters themselves which the UFC 'allows' to compete, which makes it inherently non-life threatening - in that all these guys, every one of them goes in 100% and with incredible physical strength and so the slams or the kick or an armbar or kimura even when applied with vicious power doesn't often cause serious injury because these guys can take massive punishment! It's self regulating because everybody has gotten so much better than they were 15 years ago. And still Silva and Jones and GSP have daylight between them and their challengers... that's what's amazing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,659 ✭✭✭unknown13


    No because there is no real serious case or injury to go by that resulted from a kick.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,558 ✭✭✭RoboRat


    As someone who has done both his cruciates in, I hate that kick but there is no need to ban it. MMA is a contact sport and you expect to get injured, if you don't want to get injured take up something else like tiddlywinks.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,352 ✭✭✭gallag


    If you ban the oblique kick it opens the flood gates, heel hooks/knee bars would be next, kicks to the head with the shin I.e belfort on bisping are probaly the most dangerous aspect of the sport but without these aspects it woulb be diluted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,404 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    Just watching the Fight Club Q&A with Jones, recorded prior to the weigh ins for this weekend's Fox event.

    Someone asked him about the push kicks to the knee. Jones said "If someone is trying to give me brain damage, I think me trying to make them limp for the rest of their life is a fair trade"!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭Be like Nutella


    You step in with Jones and you could easily be fighting the last fight of your career that's how dangerous the guy is, knee stamps, Spinning elbows, vicious loaded knees in the clinch, huge ridiculous slams, constant side kicks to the ribs, feckin jabbing elbows to the face for fun... the guy's a complete animal you'd have to be pure mental to step in there with him. So respect to Chael but it's so mental to think he has a half a chance. I genuinely hope he doesn't get injured right out of MMA coz Jones could dismember the lad live on TV for 5 rounds and Chael will never ever give up. I hope he's not just doing it for the money and that he actually is mental enough to believe he's going to beat Jones... that's the only way to understand why he's doing it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,558 ✭✭✭RoboRat


    I can never understand why opponents don't go after his legs... they are like flippin toothpicks... give them a couple of good chops and you would do significant damage. I understand that its hard to get in his range but surely somebody has to test them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 732 ✭✭✭Xlami


    RoboRat wrote: »
    I can never understand why opponents don't go after his legs... they are like flippin toothpicks... give them a couple of good chops and you would do significant damage. I understand that its hard to get in his range but surely somebody has to test them.

    The person I want Jon to fight most is Pat Barry. Think that would be fantastic to see.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,549 ✭✭✭✭cowzerp


    RoboRat wrote: »
    I can never understand why opponents don't go after his legs... they are like flippin toothpicks... give them a couple of good chops and you would do significant damage. I understand that its hard to get in his range but surely somebody has to test them.


    He has long leg's but they're not that thin-more give off the appearance of been thin due to him been lanky

    I think he needs to be ko'd cleanly or if someone can get him down and keep him down, And Belfort nearly arm barred him from his back so a good BJJ lad can certainly be a risk

    But like all the best-its easier said than done

    Rush Boxing club and Rush Martial Arts head coach.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,449 ✭✭✭✭El Guapo!


    I think the trick to beating Jones is someone with good boxing and good speed. If they can get inside, get off decent combinations, and then get back out again they'll be able to wear him down. If someone can catch him clean with a good power shot, I reckon they can stretch him.
    His chin hasn't been truly tested imo.

    As Cowzerp said, a good bjj guy could have some success against him if they do it right. It'll be tough to take him down due to his wrestling, but if you can get him down there are options for you once you're there. But even if he takes you down, he has nice long arms that he tends to leave out there, open for an armbar.
    The problem is surviving the ground n pound with those vicious elbows though.

    I'd actually love to see someone just dive on a leg, Palhares style, and see how he copes with that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,468 ✭✭✭✭Ush1


    El Guapo! wrote: »
    I'd actually love to see someone just dive on a leg, Palhares style, and see how he copes with that.

    Same here.

    I think standing with him is very tricky and while his ground and pound is dangerous he does give a lot of opportunites to get submissions. He leaves himself extended a lot and long limbs are easier to submit.

    Flying scissor heel hook like Joe Lauzon attempted on Miller, it worked against Anderson Silva anyway!

    Not many LHWs that are very submission oriented though. Vinny Magalhaes if he keeps winning?


Advertisement
Advertisement