Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

If there was a referendum tomorrow - how would you vote?

1246789

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    Even if i were to subscribe to the ridiculous notion that Ireland is just the 26 counties, Ireland is most certainly not fine.
    It faces the same problems as the north and in many cases has worse one.
    For example, sectarian violence in the north is reprehensible but in terms of sheer numbers it doesn't come close to the body count from gangland killings.
    Ireland the island is 32 counties but Ireland the state is 26, that's an irrefutable fact put down in the constitution. And not sure what Ireland's gangland killings have to do with unification?


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    gurramok wrote: »
    Any up to date figures? Since Cameron came to power, he has set deep cutbacks to all parts of UK. NI is enduring £4bn in spending cuts from 2010 to 2014.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-11590420

    Surely that £4bn reduction will reduce that £7bn deficit?

    Assuming tax receipts are the same, yes. I'd like to see up to date figures too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,064 ✭✭✭gutteruu


    If it did unite, the first tiny bit of violence would kill the tourism industry that the whole left side of the country depends upon! It will also mean unionists bringing violence to the south. So no! Make it a free state maybe and come back to the issue when this generation have moved on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,387 ✭✭✭✭super_furry


    It wouldn't be a small bit of violence. It'd be a full scale civil war.

    Do you honestly think that even moderate Unionists would just sit back?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 337 ✭✭TheTwiz


    In the ideal world we'd all love a united Ireland but unfortunately I don't think it's feasible. Anyone who believes it is just has a romantic view of it all.
    Last month we saw the Union flag democratically voted to be taken down for the majority of the year. Look what happened. Absolute uproar in Northern Ireland.
    Can you imagine if the North was reunited with Ireland. There would be murder on the streets of Dublin, Waterford, Dundalk etc. I for one don't want our peaceful nation under that threat.
    The people of "Northern Ireland" are fully entitled to get an Irish passport. In sport they're allowed represent Ireland in every single sport if they wish to do so. They're as Irish as me or as anyone from Mayo to Kerry. I for one one think the current imaginary border remaining is an ideal situation for everyone involved.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 329 ✭✭BlatentCheek


    I thought that due to the GFA it'd only be people in NI who could vote on it?

    Anyway we couldn't afford to run it, we can't afford to run the 26 counties we have.
    Unionists wouldn't support it, polls indicate a majority of Catholics there wouldn't either.
    Would we want hundreds of thousands of Unionists who at best wouldn't want to be in Ireland and at worst would resort to violence?

    I think it would be imprudent to end partition without some form of qualified majority vote in any referendum held in NI anyway, passing it with 51% would just open a can of worms


  • Administrators Posts: 56,570 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I thought that due to the GFA it'd only be people in NI who could vote on it?

    Anyway we couldn't afford to run it, we can't afford to run the 26 counties we have.
    Unionists wouldn't support it, polls indicate a majority of Catholics there wouldn't either.
    Would we want hundreds of thousands of Unionists who at best wouldn't want to be in Ireland and at worst would resort to violence?

    I think it would be imprudent to end partition without some form of qualified majority vote in any referendum held in NI anyway, passing it with 51% would just open a can of worms

    Not quite. People in NI will vote and people in the ROI will vote but it's two separate votes. People down here are of course going to get a say as to whether they want to take on the funding of another 6 counties, 5 of which will offer very little to any new 32 county state.

    Both must vote yes for it to happen.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    Assuming tax receipts are the same, yes. I'd like to see up to date figures too.

    Review of the budget by Queens University here https://www.qub.ac.uk/schools/media/Media,236375,en.pdf.
    QUB wrote:
    For all these reasons, the public sector is estimated to be responsible for around 70 per cent of N. Ireland’s GDP

    http://www.dfpni.gov.uk/northern-ireland-net-fiscal-balance-report-09-10-10-11.pdf (they had a housing crash too though)

    2011
    Revenue - 23.2bn
    Expenditure - 12.7bn


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭deman


    DrumSteve wrote: »
    Id take a poo in the ballot box to let them know how I really feel.

    That you give a sh....?


  • Administrators Posts: 56,570 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    gurramok wrote: »
    Review of the budget by Queens University here https://www.qub.ac.uk/schools/media/Media,236375,en.pdf.



    http://www.dfpni.gov.uk/northern-ireland-net-fiscal-balance-report-09-10-10-11.pdf (they had a housing crash too though)

    2011
    Revenue - 23.2bn
    Expenditure - 12.7bn
    Those sound plausible, NI has a large number of public sector employees. Much larger than any of the other UK constituents. AFAIK, there are a few UK-wide public sector departments run from NI.

    It's a bloated mess, and a lot of these people would be out of the job (as there's no way the ROI could afford to prop it up).


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,766 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If a united Ireland means a 2nd republic, this time incorporating the six counties, with a new constitution fit for the 21st century - then I am all for it. I see that as an opportunity.

    If it's just shoe-horning the North into an unchanged ROI it's a missed opportunity and would never happen anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,485 ✭✭✭dj jarvis


    where is keightAFC when you need him ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,369 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    The cheap shopping would be screwed, we'd all get robbed, not just the people down here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17 Paranoid1


    Lets be realistic, a united Ireland will never ever ever happen


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 959 ✭✭✭guttenberg


    awec wrote: »
    Not quite. People in NI will vote and people in the ROI will vote but it's two separate votes. People down here are of course going to get a say as to whether they want to take on the funding of another 6 counties, 5 of which will offer very little to any new 32 county state.

    Both must vote yes for it to happen.

    Got to ask, which is the goldmine county in NI in your view?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,232 ✭✭✭ITS_A_BADGER


    At this stage we cant afford them. It would make more sense for a referendum if they were not separeted from the south for so long its been how many years since the brits took the north


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,455 ✭✭✭Where To


    guttenberg wrote: »
    Got to ask, which is the goldmine county in NI in your view?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,006 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    At this stage we cant afford them.
    yes we can

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,232 ✭✭✭ITS_A_BADGER


    yes we can

    How so? we would need to borrow more money from our bailout to support another 2 million people, putting us into more debt? i dont think the time is right yet


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,387 ✭✭✭✭super_furry


    yes we can

    We can't afford the increase to our policing and military budget it would take to even attempt to quell the inevitable violence and terrorism.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,679 ✭✭✭Crooked Jack


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    Ireland the island is 32 counties but Ireland the state is 26, that's an irrefutable fact put down in the constitution. And not sure what Ireland's gangland killings have to do with unification?

    Well I refute it, ergo it is not irrefutable. Ireland is Ireland. 26 counties can no more claim the name than cork and Kerry could club together and decide they are Ireland. And I mentioned the killings to show that all of Ireland has issues with violence. The south is not some bastion of peace and love and the north a violent cesspit threatening to spill across the border. The whole country faces the same problems and the best way to face them is together.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,162 ✭✭✭Augmerson


    Right now? No. Too many obstacles, the major being that the Republic isn't even in charge of it's own finances right now.

    In the future though yes. And maybe not a 32 county Republic. Maybe some kind of Federation?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,643 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    This poll is basically asking me would I rubber-stamp and endorse an injustice against my ancestors by continuing to divide the Irish people in the 6 counties from the rest of the Irish people in the 26 counties. Well no, I would not endorse it and would vote for reunification.

    The majority of the people of this island in 1918 voted for a party which put forward a republican agenda and the response of the British state was to ignore the vote; to prevent the Irish case being put forward at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 at a time when they were supposed to be keen on helping the freedom of small nations; to declare the Dáil illegal and subsequently partition the country in order to satisfy the demands of a minority in the north-east of the island against the wishes of the overall majority of the island; so I'm not sure why any Irish person would give the seal of approval to this action.

    Even if one is of the view that partition was a reasonable solution to the difficulties, the manner in which it was conducted was not reasonable. As J.J. Lee points out, there were more Catholics to Protestants in Tyrone and Fermanagh than there were Protestants to Catholics in Armagh and Derry. The entire purpose of partition was to give a parliament to a people that had hitherto threatened to oppose democracy through violence in order to get their way.

    In my view it was a terrible moment in history that set the island up for a century of bitterness and hostility and I would gladly love to have my say in undoing it once and for all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,565 ✭✭✭losthorizon


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    Boards isn't realistic of the population as a whole but it is representative of the young urban college educated mostly male class who are the policy makers of the future.


    The countrys ****ed. I'm leaving.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14 SillyIrish


    A united ireland definitely,stop all this division malarky and just get the country the way it should be


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,162 ✭✭✭Augmerson


    This poll is basically asking me would I rubber-stamp and endorse an injustice against my ancestors by continuing to divide the Irish people in the 6 counties from the rest of the Irish people in the 26 counties. Well no, I would not endorse it and would vote for reunification.

    The majority of the people of this island in 1918 voted for a party which put forward a republican agenda and the response of the British state was to ignore the vote; to prevent the Irish case being put forward at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 at a time when they were supposed to be keen on helping the freedom of small nations; to declare the Dáil illegal and subsequently partition the country in order to satisfy the demands of a minority in the north-east of the island against the wishes of the overall majority of the island; so I'm not sure why any Irish person would give the seal of approval to this action.

    Even if one is of the view that partition was a reasonable solution to the difficulties, the manner in which it was conducted was not reasonable. As J.J. Lee points out, there were more Catholics to Protestants in Tyrone and Fermanagh than there were Protestants to Catholics in Armagh and Derry. The entire purpose of partition was to give a parliament to a people that had hitherto threatened to oppose democracy through violence in order to get their way.

    In my view it was a terrible moment in history that set the island up for a century of bitterness and hostility and I would gladly love to have my say in undoing it once and for all.

    Very well put.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    Well I refute it, ergo it is not irrefutable. Ireland is Ireland. 26 counties can no more claim the name than cork and Kerry could club together and decide they are Ireland. And I mentioned the killings to show that all of Ireland has issues with violence. The south is not some bastion of peace and love and the north a violent cesspit threatening to spill across the border. The whole country faces the same problems and the best way to face them is together.
    You can refute it but you'd be wrong. Ireland is the name of this state. Northern Ireland is one of four home countries of the UK, a foreign state.
    The name of the State is Éire, or, in the English language, Ireland.
    Funnily enough the wording of the paragraph means Éire is the official name in every language except English. So when the Irish government was complaining about the British using the name Éire for Ireland the British could have just drawn up the agreement in French and continued to use Éire.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 172 ✭✭shootie


    No.

    It would open up a massive can of worms. Ever since the formation of the free state that question has caused more harm than good. It's best to move on and just live and let live. That said, I bet Westminster would love to cut NI loose.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,226 ✭✭✭Solair


    gurramok wrote: »
    Any up to date figures? Since Cameron came to power, he has set deep cutbacks to all parts of UK. NI is enduring £4bn in spending cuts from 2010 to 2014.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-11590420

    Surely that £4bn reduction will reduce that £7bn deficit?

    BBC 2011 puts the NI deficit at £9 billion.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-14845296

    There are a few stark quotes too:

    "While there are just over 60,000 people claiming Job Seekers Allowance, there are more than 180,000 people on Disability Living Allowance - that's one in ten of the population"

    "Figures for 2011 reveal more than 50,000 on Incapacity Benefit and around 260,000 people receiving a mixture of these disability related benefit payments."

    Doesn't sound like the actual unemployment stats and reality are necessarily connected at all if that % of the population is claiming disability allowances/benefits.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 47 maithanfear


    I say shame on the people who say 'we couldn't afford it'. There's a moral obligation to repeal partition. Think of all the Irish people who died under British rule. It would do those people injustice to vote any other way.


Advertisement
Advertisement