Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Fluoride endgame approaches....

1…161718192022»

Comments

  • #632
    Genghiz Cohen
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,182 ✭✭✭Genghiz Cohen


    opinion guy wrote: »
    This thread has become a farce. Mods kill it or ship it to conspiracy forum please

    Nah, it's doing more good for the anti-bull**** brigade than any amount of reasoned debate ever could.


  • #633
    AnonoBoy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,559 ✭✭✭✭AnonoBoy


    darkhorse wrote: »
    If I, or anyone else for that matter, think it is wrong to ingest fluoride in large amounts, I am hardly going to want to ingest heroin or cocaine, making your analogy a bit silly.

    My point still stands no matter how silly the examples I used. Aquarius34 stated that laws about what he can/cannot ingest into his body do not apply to him. But quite clearly they do. This has nothing to do with fluoride and everything to do with the fact that the law applies to him whether he likes it or not.

    Simply stating that a law does not apply to you does not make it so.
    Aquarius34 wrote: »
    The same way that I deal with you. It's not acceptable. I keep it simple and I make it clear as to what I will not accept from others.

    You deal with it by arguing pointlessly on a message board?
    It calcifies the pineal gland and causes brain damage.

    Link to evidence that shows brain damage and how fluoride in the pineal gland can be used to control people please?
    Why do you think the Nazis used it in concentration camps and why people are so docile in the western world.

    I'm pretty sure the Nazis didn't have to rely on the slow build up of substances in the glands of the people they put in the concentration camps for them to control them. They had them in camps already.


  • #634
    hooradiation
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭hooradiation


    AnonoBoy wrote: »
    I'm pretty sure the Nazis didn't have to rely on the slow build up of substances in the glands of the people they put in the concentration camps for them to control them. They had them in camps already.


    Also, the Nazi's didn't use flouride in concentration camps.
    It's another lie that gets told again and again by Aquarius34, and he has no apparent compunction about spinning any tale to suit his unfounded beliefs.

    Reductio ad Hitlerum at it's most basic, really.


  • #635
    humanji
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    Whatever this thread had to offer when it started, it's long gone now, and descended into circular arguments. For all our sake's I'm locking this.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement