Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Loyalist mobs attacking Alliance Party offices and homes.

191012141521

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    And now it's only flown on certain days, just like the rest of the UK. SF and the SDLP seem to be making NI more like the rest of the UK than Loyalists want it to be.

    Well...

    The question is why do they want to? - I'd be interested in seeing a comparison between UK cities on this or what the source is for that though?

    I suspect to conform to other UK cities isn't the full reason for SF in particular, and probably the SDLP in this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 792 ✭✭✭Ziegfeldgirl27


    philologos wrote: »
    Why is it such a big deal that the Union Jack come down from City Hall?

    I'm not advocating the violence, I think it is plainly wrong, and in a way this has shown there still to be far more loyalist bigotry than perhaps was previously thought, but I honestly don't get the rationale for taking the flag down. Why does it matter? Why care?



    To keep things more neutral, obviously.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    To keep things more neutral, obviously.

    How does removing it make it more neutral?

    Belfast is a UK city. It's entirely reasonable that the union flag can be flown there. In much the same way as London is a UK city, or Edinburgh, or Cardiff.

    What do you mean by neutral in terms of state sovereignty? Irrespective of how "neutral" people want to be, the reality is that Belfast is still in the UK.

    I'm confused. My position is I don't care what jurisdiction the people of Northern Ireland want to be under, but at the moment that's evidently UK rule.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,712 ✭✭✭neil_hosey


    to resolve the problem with peaceful protests turning into riots, they should put pink permanent ink spray in the water cannons and anyone rioting should be doused..

    then later that day or evening, round up all the people who are pink and hit them with a huge fine.

    The ones that get away might escape a fine, but they'll certainly look like sissies for a few days, and lets be honest, nobody wants that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,690 ✭✭✭ElChe32




  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,352 ✭✭✭gallag


    Listing to a pup man on the radio earlier he was saying the unionist community feel under attack, he said in the last few months Sinn fine has tabled a motion to rename the royal Victoria hospital, block a home coming parade for the royal Irish coming home from Afghanistan, name a children's play park after an IRA man that killed 13 innocent protestants and remove the union flag from the city hall.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 792 ✭✭✭Ziegfeldgirl27


    Yes, it is a UK city, but is it fair that half the population of northern ireland are Irish citizens and the tricolour is not flown above the city hall?

    Not that I really care, but last night there was a "protest" in my town in which a a pub was vandalised, now I feel it's not really about a flag any more, just causing disturbances towards certain members of the community.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,352 ✭✭✭gallag


    Yes, it is a UK city, but is it fair that half the population of northern ireland are Irish citizens and the tricolour is not flown above the city hall?

    Not that I really care, but last night there was a "protest" in my town in which a a pub was vandalised, now I feel it's not really about a flag any more, just causing disturbances towards certain members of the community.
    Half of ni are not Irish citizens. Look at today's census.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,029 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    philologos wrote: »
    Why is it such a big deal that the Union Jack come down from City Hall?

    This question exposes your ridiculous façade of being a neutral observer in that you direct this question towards people who democratically elected SF/SDLP/AP and not those who are getting butt-hurt about it the flag.

    You don't fool me one bit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    gallag wrote: »
    Half of ni are not Irish citizens. Look at today's census.

    What's also very interesting is although 45% of Northern Ireland's population identify as Roman Catholic, only 25% of people in Northern Ireland identify solely as Irish.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    philologos wrote: »
    The question is why do they want to? - I'd be interested in seeing a comparison between UK cities on this or what the source is for that though?
    It's pretty common knowledge, been mentioned on many news reports etc.
    I suspect to conform to other UK cities isn't the full reason for SF in particular, and probably the SDLP in this.
    No but it's an ironic effect of the vote. The city is in the UK and the city council have decided to not fly the flag at all times. It'll soon get to the point in Belfast that there'll be a majority of voters who'll want rid of it altogether but why listen to them if it's not directly harming anyway.

    I do wonder how deliberately obtuse you're being or whether you genuinely think that a few scumbags rioting is reason for people not to express their opinions or carry out the policies they were democratically elected to carry out.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 920 ✭✭✭Border-Rat


    philologos wrote: »
    How does removing it make it more neutral?

    Belfast is a UK city. It's entirely reasonable that the union flag can be flown there. In much the same way as London is a UK city, or Edinburgh, or Cardiff.

    What do you mean by neutral in terms of state sovereignty? Irrespective of how "neutral" people want to be, the reality is that Belfast is still in the UK.

    I'm confused. My position is I don't care what jurisdiction the people of Northern Ireland want to be under, but at the moment that's evidently UK rule.

    We have taken a Democratic decision to remove the flag. Are you an opponent of Democracy?
    gallag wrote: »
    Half of ni are not Irish citizens. Look at today's census.

    The census actually reflects the removal of the flag. According to the census, only 40% of people in the 06 consider themselves British. And, democratically, a decision was taken to remove the British flag from city hall in Belfast.

    I love how Unionists and West Britons only advocate Democracy when it goes in their favor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭Sound of Silence


    philologos wrote: »
    Whether or not a flag is put up is really a non-issue as far as I can tell.

    As far as you can tell from what? The riots.
    I don't believe it is a "Nationalist conspiracy", I do think it is a non-issue as to whether the Union Jack flies over City Hall in Belfast. I think it was opportunistic politics by SF and SDLP for sure.

    Perhaps you could explain how it was an opportunistic move by SDLP and SF instead of making a vague accusation. By simply putting forward a proposal in local Government none of these Parties warrant the label of Political "opportunists".
    I don't agree that they are "as guilty". In fact the only people I've claimed to as being "as guilty" are dissident republicans.

    Claiming that this whole shitstorm happened to originate from a petty and opportunistic move by SF and SDLP to frustrate Unionists would imply that these two Parties are somehow guilty by association. I'm sure you will argue otherwise, but I can't mistake your original sentiment.

    It must be said that neither SF or the SDLP, nor the Alliance Party, are in any way responsible for the actions of Loyalist mobs over these last few days. There simply has to be a sense of accountability here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89 ✭✭glenkeeran


    philologos wrote: »
    Why is it such a big deal that the Union Jack come down from City Hall?

    I'm not advocating the violence, I think it is plainly wrong, and in a way this has shown there still to be far more loyalist bigotry than perhaps was previously thought, but I honestly don't get the rationale for taking the flag down. Why does it matter? Why care?

    Because the Union Jack provokes one side of the divide, While the Tri-colour provokes the other.... Unionist/Loyalist bigots will need to get their heads out of the 70s and get with the times and start living together in peace as i am afraid you have no choice only too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,210 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    philologos wrote: »
    Why is it such a big deal that the Union Jack come down from City Hall?

    I'm not advocating the violence, I think it is plainly wrong, and in a way this has shown there still to be far more loyalist bigotry than perhaps was previously thought, but I honestly don't get the rationale for taking the flag down. Why does it matter? Why care?

    So trying to have a shared future don't you think it is a fair compromise to have the capital city council to follow the rest of the UK and fly the flag on certain days and be less intimidating to 45% of the population

    ******



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    Border-Rat wrote: »
    We have taken a Democratic decision to remove the flag. Are you an opponent of Democracy?

    I'm not an "opponent of democracy". I can still question the wisdom behind decisions taken, or their respective values. The democracy of City Hall is highly representative rather than direct though.
    Border-Rat wrote: »
    The census actually reflects the removal of the flag. According to the census, only 40% of people in the 06 consider themselves British. And, democratically, a decision was taken to remove the British flag from city hall in Belfast.

    The census doesn't. The question wasn't directly asked.

    It's also a dishonest rendering of the Northern Irish census results.

    40% - British only
    21% - Northern Irish (which is considered a part of "White British" in the England and Wales census).
    25% - Irish only

    So in short we have 40% British only, and 21% Northern Irish which is considered a part of White British in the England and Wales census. So that's 61% and then 25% and then other of 9%.

    I'd be interested to see how many would put down Irish and British, but unfortunately the census didn't put that option down. Much in the same way one can be Welsh and British, or Scottish and British it would be fascinating to see how many would have selected that option in NI were it on the form.
    Border-Rat wrote: »
    I love how Unionists and West Britons only advocate Democracy when it goes in their favor.

    "West Britons" lol. Honestly, use whatever ad-hominems you like, but they have no place in a rational discussion :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,210 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    philologos wrote: »
    The question is why do they want to? - I'd be interested in seeing a comparison between UK cities on this or what the source is for that though?

    I suspect to conform to other UK cities isn't the full reason for SF in particular, and probably the SDLP in this.

    How many times have you been told

    SF and SDLP wanted the flag down altogether so they did not want to be like other UK cities.

    The Alliance party then came with the compromise of following Storment and flying the flag on certain days which is what was voted in by the council

    ******



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    How many times have you been told

    SF and SDLP wanted the flag down altogether so they did not want to be like other UK cities.

    The Alliance party then came with the compromise of following Storment and flying the flag on certain days which is what was voted in by the council

    I suspect that's not the full reason. I'd be interested to see something as to what they do in other UK cities.

    I think the Alliance party are reasonable for sure, but I do think it was opportunism on the part of SF and SDLP especially considering their original proposal.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,300 ✭✭✭✭Seaneh


    philologos wrote: »
    I'm not an "opponent of democracy". I can still question the wisdom behind decisions taken, or their respective values. The democracy of City Hall is highly representative rather than direct though.



    The census doesn't. The question wasn't directly asked.

    It's also a dishonest rendering of the Northern Irish census results.

    40% - British only
    21% - Northern Irish (which is considered a part of "White British" in the England and Wales census).
    25% - Irish only

    So in short we have 40% British only, and 21% Northern Irish which is considered a part of White British in the England and Wales census. So that's 61% and then 25% and then other of 9%.

    I'd be interested to see how many would put down Irish and British, but unfortunately the census didn't put that option down. Much in the same way one can be Welsh and British, or Scottish and British it would be fascinating to see how many would have selected that option in NI were it on the form.



    "West Britons" lol. Honestly, use whatever ad-hominems you like, but they have no place in a rational discussion :)


    The 21% who picked Northern Irish picked "Northern Irish Only", not Northern irish as consdiered british....

    So 46% of the population don't consider themselves British in any way.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    glenkeeran wrote: »
    Because the Union Jack provokes one side of the divide, While the Tri-colour provokes the other.... Unionist/Loyalist bigots will need to get their heads out of the 70s and get with the times and start living together in peace as i am afraid you have no choice only too.

    How? - One can't escape the reality that most people in Northern Ireland including most people who would identify as Roman Catholic want Northern Ireland to stay in the UK.

    This talk of "one side of the divide" is nonsense. There are a lot of greys inbetween, perhaps far more than we give credit for.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 920 ✭✭✭Border-Rat


    philologos wrote: »
    I'm not an "opponent of democracy". I can still question the wisdom behind decisions taken, or their respective values. The democracy of City Hall is highly representative rather than direct though.

    Evidently exception has been taken with the presence of the flag.


    The census doesn't. The question wasn't directly asked.

    It's also a dishonest rendering of the Northern Irish census results.

    40% - British only
    21% - Northern Irish (which is considered a part of "White British" in the England and Wales census).
    25% - Irish only

    So in short we have 40% British only, and 21% Northern Irish which is considered a part of White British in the England and Wales census. So that's 61% and then 25% and then other of 9%.

    I'd be interested to see how many would put down Irish and British, but unfortunately the census didn't put that option down. Much in the same way one can be Welsh and British, or Scottish and British it would be fascinating to see how many would have selected that option in NI were it on the form.

    Yes it does. If you want to stretch it, it's 46%. Another option of 'British and Northern Irish' was included, that amounted to 6%. 54% have rejected being labelled as British.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,352 ✭✭✭gallag


    Seaneh wrote: »


    The 21% who picked Northern Irish picked "Northern Irish Only", not Northern irish as consdiered british....

    So 46% of the population don't consider themselves British in any way.
    Would it not be logical that most that are northern Irish would be pro UK. What with northern Ireland being in the UK? I am amazed that only 25% relate as Irish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,210 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    philologos wrote: »
    I suspect that's not the full reason. I'd be interested to see something as to what they do in other UK cities.

    I think the Alliance party are reasonable for sure, but I do think it was opportunism on the part of SF and SDLP especially considering their original proposal.

    Taken from Wiki

    Until July 2007, the Union Flag was only flown on Government buildings on a limited number of special days each year. The choice of days was managed by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS).[3] Government buildings are those used by civil servants, the Crown, or the armed forces. They were not applicable to private citizens, corporations, or local authorities.[3]
    On 3 July 2007, the Justice Secretary Jack Straw laid a green paper before Parliament entitled The Governance of Britain.[4] Alongside a range of proposed changes to the constitutional arrangements of the UK was a specific announcement that there would be consultation on whether the rules on flag-flying on Government buildings should be relaxed.

    Two days later, Prime Minister Gordon Brown announced that with immediate effect the Union Flag would fly from the flag pole above the front entrance of 10 Downing Street on every day of the year. The intention was to increase feelings of 'Britishness'. Other Government departments were asked to follow this lead, and all Government buildings in Whitehall did so.[9][10][11][12][13][14][15]

    Scotland Yard however stated that they would follow the previous rules until they are formally abolished by DCMS.[16]

    James Purnell, Culture Secretary from June 2007 to January 2008 in Brown's administration, subsequently concurred with the abolition of the restrictions – pending consultation on longer term arrangements.

    Until July 2007, the Union Flag was only flown on days marking the birthdays of members of the Royal Family, the wedding anniversary of the Monarch, Commonwealth Day, Accession Day, Coronation Day, The Queen's official birthday, Remembrance Sunday and on the days of the State Opening and prorogation of Parliament. The flag days when the Union Flag should be flown from government buildings all over the UK were

    20 January: birthday of The Countess of Wessex
    6 February: anniversary of The Queen's accession in 1952
    19 February: birthday of The Duke of York
    Second Sunday in March: Commonwealth Day
    10 March: birthday of The Earl of Wessex
    21 April: The Queen's birthday
    9 May: Europe Day
    2 June: anniversary of The Queen's 1953 coronation
    10 June: birthday of Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh
    A Saturday in June: The Queen's Official Birthday
    17 July: birthday of The Duchess of Cornwall
    15 August: birthday of The Princess Royal
    Second Sunday in November: Remembrance Sunday
    14 November: birthday of The Prince of Wales
    20 November: anniversary of the wedding of The Queen and The Duke of Edinburgh

    In addition, the flag should be flown in the following areas on the specified days:
    Wales – 1 March: Saint David's Day
    Northern Ireland – 17 March: Saint Patrick's Day
    England – 23 April: Saint George's Day
    Scotland – 30 November: Saint Andrew's Day
    Greater London: The day of the opening or proroguing of Parliament

    Some non central government bodies still continue to follow the flag days.
    In Scotland, the Scottish Government has decreed that the Flag of Scotland ("the Saltire") will fly on all its buildings every day from 8 am until sunset, but there is no specific policy on flying the Union Flag and as such it is sometimes flown alongside the Saltire and sometimes omitted. An exception is made for "national days". On these days, the Saltire shall be lowered and replaced with the Union Flag. These are the same as the flag days noted above with the exception of:
    3 September: Merchant Navy Day

    Another difference is that on Saint Andrew's Day, the Union Flag can only be flown if the building has more than one flagpole – the Saltire will not be lowered to make way for the Union Flag if there is only one flagpole.[17]

    Flag Days in Northern Ireland

    In Northern Ireland, the Union Flag is flown from buildings of the Northern Ireland Office as decreed by Regulations published in 2000.[18] The Regulations were amended in 2002 to remove the requirement to fly the flag on the birthdays of Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother and Princess Margaret, Countess of Snowdon who both died that year.[19] The current flag days are now the same as the United Kingdom government days noted above with the exception of the Duchess of Cornwall's birthday, which was only added to the UK flag days after her wedding to the Prince of Wales in 2005, and has not yet been extended to Northern Ireland.

    The Police Service of Northern Ireland is the only body in the United Kingdom that is not permitted to fly the Union Flag, and is only permitted to fly its service flag or the Royal Standard in the event of a visit by the Sovereign.[20]

    ******



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,300 ✭✭✭✭Seaneh


    gallag wrote: »
    Would it not be logical that most that are northern Irish would be pro UK. What with northern Ireland being in the UK? I am amazed that only 25% relate as Irish.

    I don't think it's logical at all.
    And even still, they have a national identity, not a unionistic one.
    They don't see themselves as British. That's the only logical conclusion you can get from it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    Seaneh wrote: »
    The 21% who picked Northern Irish picked "Northern Irish Only", not Northern irish as consdiered british....

    So 46% of the population don't consider themselves British in any way.

    This is from the Census 2011 website as to how they calculate "White British":
    91.0 per cent of the usual resident population identified with at least one UK national identity (English, Welsh, Scottish, Northern Irish, and British) in 2011.

    Notes for Key Points

    1 White British census tick box is labelled as ‘White English/Welsh/Scottish/Northern Irish/British.

    It's considered a part of "White British". See here.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 920 ✭✭✭Border-Rat


    gallag wrote: »
    Would it not be logical that most that are northern Irish would be pro UK. What with northern Ireland being in the UK? I am amazed that only 25% relate as Irish.

    It's logical, untill you consider the options. An additional option was 'Northern Irish and British'. Also, I don't know of a single person who has been offered this census. Plenty of Protestants as well who associate with Scotland but not the Union or Republic of Ireland. Some people say 'Northern Irish' as a gesture of reconciliation as well.

    There are Nationalists who will call themselves Northern Irish to be polite, just as there are Unionists who will call LondonDerry 'Derry' to do the same.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,300 ✭✭✭✭Seaneh


    philologos wrote: »
    This is from the Census 2011 website as to how they calculate "White British":


    It's considered a part of "White British". See here.

    It's considered that way by the census office for statistical reasons, the question was not put that way on the census. They ticked "Northern Irish Only".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    Border-Rat wrote: »
    It's logical, untill you consider the options. An additional option was 'Northern Irish and British'. Also, I don't know of a single person who has been offered this census. Plenty of Protestants as well who associate with Scotland but not the Union or Republic of Ireland. Some people say 'Northern Irish' as a gesture of reconciliation as well.

    There are Nationalists who will call themselves Northern Irish to be polite, just as there are Unionists who will call LondonDerry 'Derry' to do the same.

    The findings of the Life and Times Survey in Northern Ireland give us more light on this:
    The Life and Times survey claimed 52% of Catholic respondents wanted to remain in the United Kingdom, with just 33% admitting to wanting a united Ireland.

    In contrast, just 19% of Catholics questioned by the same survey team in 1998 favoured the UK connection, while 49% claimed they wanted a united Ireland.

    The survey, which was carried out by Ark, a joint project by Queen’s University and the University of Ulster, also found that 90% of Protestants questioned said they wanted Northern Ireland to remain in the United Kingdom. The poll was carried out between October and December last year and over 1,205 adults were questioned.

    I just think that the debate of having a United Ireland should wait until most people on both sides of the border want it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 257 ✭✭Edg3


    Note: before you read this realize I messed up the entire thing due to lack of sleep and coffee. I apologize for any offense and later on in the posts I correct myself for 99% of what I said here.

    I'm sorry but the north belongs to the British, its signed and sealed and its theirs, sure they wanna give it back NOW because they cant afford it but come on!
    Just look at it this way, its British land no matter if some of us like it or not, I love Belfast, its a clean beautiful city and I try and visit it once or twice a year if possible. Yes it has its assorted past and its terrible but we handed it over, so let them run it if they want. If your an Northern Irelander then your living in Britannia! You have no choice in the matter and if they want to fly their flag then they are quiet entitled to.
    I dont want to get into a big hoohaa with anyone or a political debate but we're talking land boundaries and they're pretty clear. It'd be like half of Dublin City moving to London and complaining they were flying the Union Jack there and then rioting. Its not right and for god sake, if we're ever going to get by all this crap we should put the petty differences aside. Whats done is done, I hate to say it but its true, rioting now wont change the past, it just makes us look worse. I'd like to see the North a happy peaceful place, as would most people, but like anywhere you have the people who take it to heart and have to riot to cause hassle when there is NO NEED.

    No matter if 46% or 6% of the population considers themselves British or not its a moot point, they are living in an English owned country. Why do they have to keep poking at a wound that could have been closed years ago. By the way, that goes for both sides not just one of the other. In this day and age we have way more important things to worry about then a ****ing flag for god sake.

    They should be ashamed of themselves for how they're acting, it will change nothing and they are destroying innocent peoples lives and homes for this crap! Trying to petrol bomb a police officer over a piece of cloth? Leave this **** in the past and move on its the only way we'll ever see peace, and thats all we want.

    Other choices include, moving out of the North? Sure its your home, treat it that way instead of an occupied country, your not rebels, your living in and were born into a British country, you can be Irish but your passport says British because your ****ing British. (I assume thats what it says Ive never seen one to be honest). Its time to stop fighting, stop bickering and just get on with our lives. Am I the only one who sees this? Obviously not.


    Note: I apologize for getting my facts arseways in this, my point remains the same but during my rant I mixed up what I was saying. I'm aware the flag is being taken down not flown and thats what its over. Most of what I said was a broad term about the North and its current state, but the way I wrote my comment was backways and I apologize.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    Edg3 wrote: »
    Other choices include, moving out of the North? Sure its your home, treat it that way instead of an occupied country, your not rebels, your living in and were born into a British country, you can be Irish but your passport says British because your ****ing British. (I assume thats what it says Ive never seen one to be honest). Its time to stop fighting, stop bickering and just get on with our lives. Am I the only one who sees this? Obviously not.

    No you're not at all. I think Northern Ireland should make up its own mind as to whether it wants to be reunified with the Republic. Honestly, I don't see it happening any time soon, but as long as liberty and freedom are given to all people there, I don't see why it is a huge issue. What odds let them at it.


Advertisement
Advertisement