Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Max Clifford arrested on sex charges

2»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,944 ✭✭✭✭4zn76tysfajdxp


    --Kaiser-- wrote: »
    He's not forcing anyone to buy those newspapers is he?

    Well, we'll see what emerges in court.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,496 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    sfwcork wrote: »
    I bt he knows alot of sh!t about high figures.

    What is he, a mathematician?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,861 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    --Kaiser-- wrote: »
    He's not forcing anyone to buy those newspapers is he?

    No.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    --Kaiser-- wrote: »
    He's not forcing anyone to buy those newspapers is he?

    He forced a copy of the daily male on me once......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,461 ✭✭✭--Kaiser--


    Penn wrote: »
    No.

    Well, there you are. Perhaps you want all the consumers of tabloid/heat/OK/Hello/whathaveyou arrested?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,861 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    --Kaiser-- wrote: »
    Well, there you are. Perhaps you want all the consumers of tabloid/heat/OK/Hello/whathaveyou arrested?

    Of course not.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,702 ✭✭✭squod


    Shryke wrote: »
    "Historic"? Did he molest the Queen or something?

    Post of the day. Nearly split my sides....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,461 ✭✭✭--Kaiser--


    Penn wrote: »
    Of course not.

    I don't see why a man should be excoriated for making money off the prying and vacuous nature of the proletariat


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,605 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    --Kaiser-- wrote: »
    I don't see why a man should be excoriated for making money off the prying and vacuous nature of the proletariat

    Haven't heard those words for a while.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,861 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    --Kaiser-- wrote: »
    I don't see why a man should be excoriated for making money off the prying and vacuous nature of the proletariat

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Clifford

    Some choice sentences:
    The story was one of the first examples where, rather than PR agents managing what went into the media or confirming a journalist's storyline, Clifford created a fast-selling story which he sold to the media, and its counter line follow-up.

    In light of Clifford's view of the deteriorating state of the NHS, and the moral difference with members of the John Major government, Clifford worked to expose stories to help the Labour Party in to power.

    Clifford invented the story which claimed Mellor made love in Chelsea F.C. football kit, though he was blocked from mentioning it in his memoirs.

    Shortly after Fayed retained Clifford, Hamilton and his wife Christine were both arrested on rape charges which were later found to be false... However, the judge in the case pointed out that Clifford had offered the offender £80,000 in connection with the claims.

    Liverpool left-wing politician Derek Hatton, for whom Clifford created an affair in order to change his image.

    During filming, it appeared that Clifford was trying to set up Theroux during a PR stunt in Sainsbury's. It backfired after Clifford was heard on his microphone lying, unaware it was still on.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,296 ✭✭✭Frank Black


    Jesus, much as I despise the príck, I wouldn't have had him down as a perv.



    This whole thing is getting worse and worse, how was it kept secret for so long?

    Not sure he's been convicted of anything yet.

    There's a whole judicial process to be gone through.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,461 ✭✭✭--Kaiser--


    Penn wrote: »
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Clifford

    Some choice sentences:
    The story was one of the first examples where, rather than PR agents managing what went into the media or confirming a journalist's storyline, Clifford created a fast-selling story which he sold to the media, and its counter line follow-up.

    In light of Clifford's view of the deteriorating state of the NHS, and the moral difference with members of the John Major government, Clifford worked to expose stories to help the Labour Party in to power.

    Clifford invented the story which claimed Mellor made love in Chelsea F.C. football kit, though he was blocked from mentioning it in his memoirs.

    Shortly after Fayed retained Clifford, Hamilton and his wife Christine were both arrested on rape charges which were later found to be false... However, the judge in the case pointed out that Clifford had offered the offender £80,000 in connection with the claims.

    Liverpool left-wing politician Derek Hatton, for whom Clifford created an affair in order to change his image.

    During filming, it appeared that Clifford was trying to set up Theroux during a PR stunt in Sainsbury's. It backfired after Clifford was heard on his microphone lying, unaware it was still on.

    PR man does some PR stunts. Shock horror


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,327 ✭✭✭Madam_X


    Couldn't happen to a nicer person, he is such a know all gob****e. Lets see him talk his way out of this.
    well... if he's guilty.

    Him being a prick and people wanting him to be guilty of these charges... doesn't mean he definitely is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,861 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    --Kaiser-- wrote: »
    PR man does some PR stunts. Shock horror

    But that's not what PR used to be. PR people didn't used to manipulate the media to such an extent. There wasn't a demand from the "prying and vacuous proletariat" for these types of stories, he and his kind invented it.

    To be honest, whenever I think of Max Clifford, I think of the Ricky Gervais speech from Extras.
    What are we doing? Selling ourselves. Selling everything. The happiest day of my life - oh, quick, I'll do the invites and bake a cake and get a press tent. Must have a press tent - it's a wedding. I must see pictures of meself with other people I'm in the programme with. Oh, now I'm pregnant - we must televise the birth. Quick, see if Ryan Seacrest will present it. Maybe it'll make E! channel's "100 Greatest Caesarians". I'm not having a go at you. I'm just sick of these celebrities just living their lives out in the open all the time. Why would you do that? It's like these pop stars who choose the perfect moment to go into rehab. They call their publicist before they call a taxi. Then they come out and they do their second autobiography - this one's called "Love Me or I'll Kill Myself". Well, kill yourself then. And the papers lap it up. They follow us around and that makes people think we're important, and that makes us think we're important. If they stop following us around, taking pictures of us, those people wouldn't take to the streets going "Oh quick, I need a picture of Cameron Diaz with a pimple". They wouldn't care; they'd get on with something else. They'd get on with their lives. You open the paper and you see a picture of Lindsay Lohan getting out of a car, and the headline is "Cover Up Lindsay, We Can See Your Knickers". Of course you can see her knickers - your photographer is lying in the road, pointing his camera up her dress to see her knickers! You're literally the gutter press. And **** you, the makers of this show, as well. You can't wash your hands in this. You can't keep going "Oh, it's exploitation, but it's what the public want". No, the Victorian freak show never went away. Now it's called "Big Brother" or "American Idol", where, in the preliminary rounds, we wheel out the bewildered to be sniggered at by multimillionaires.

    You cannot deny that Max Clifford hasn't had a huge impact on this type of thing.

    Besides which, some of the lines from Wikipedia I quoted were not simply "PR stunts". How he possibly paid someone to lie about having an affair with an MP. PR stunt? No, because it could have ruined that man's life. Worked to expose stories to help the Labour party into power. A PR stunt? Seriously?
    Madam_X wrote: »
    well... if he's guilty.

    Him being a prick and people wanting him to be guilty of these charges... doesn't mean he definitely is.

    I don't want him to be found guilty if he didn't do it. Again, my first comment was a flippant remark to show my dislike for him and what he's done career-wise, not about whether or not he should be found guilty as a result of whatever allegations have been made against him, the details of which are unknown.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,461 ✭✭✭--Kaiser--


    Penn wrote: »
    You cannot deny that Max Clifford hasn't had a huge impact on this type of thing.

    He has undoubtedly had a huge impact on these types of thing. Do I care? No.
    I don't read tabloid newspapers or gossip mags. I couldn't care less. If he can make money off of people who do subscribe to this bilge, let him off, that's capitalism. Most of the stuff he does is perfectly legal


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 809 ✭✭✭frankosw


    This is just the top lid on a very nasty can of worms..there will be people in the public eye ****ting themselves the length and breatdh of the UK...this will get messy!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,861 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    --Kaiser-- wrote: »
    He has undoubtedly had a huge impact on these types of thing. Do I care? No.
    I don't read tabloid newspapers or gossip mags. I couldn't care less. If he can make money off of people who do subscribe to this bilge, let him off, that's capitalism. Most of the stuff he does is perfectly legal

    I agree. It's mostly because I dislike the result of what he does that makes me dislike him personally which I'll freely admit. I have to buy The Mirror every day (for my mother) and just looking at the front page annoys me. Worst I saw was a huge front page headline about how Jedward almost died in birth due to complications.

    The front page story of a national newspaper was about something which almost happened 18 years earlier to two celebrities.

    It's incredible that any publication can be called "news" with stories like that, and it's largely as a result of PR men like Clifford. But like I said in the beginning, my dislike for him is due to my opinion on what he has done rather than anything of any significant importance.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,489 ✭✭✭Yamanoto


    mikom wrote: »
    The real question is............. Who is next to be receive the Louis Theroux kiss of death.

    Orville or Christine Hamilton, filthy birds the pair of 'em :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,995 ✭✭✭take everything


    --Kaiser-- wrote: »
    He has undoubtedly had a huge impact on these types of thing. Do I care? No.
    I don't read tabloid newspapers or gossip mags. I couldn't care less. If he can make money off of people who do subscribe to this bilge, let him off, that's capitalism. Most of the stuff he does is perfectly legal

    Maybe i didn't read the other post properly but i think your man just said he was a prick, not that promoting and selling stupid stories to morons was illegal.

    So yeah he's odious.
    And people think he's odious.


  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If he didn't do it then obviously very few people would want him convicted. However there's very few people who aren't already known killers or sexual abusers (can't say rapists :pac: ) who I would be glad to hear about getting caught out.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,190 ✭✭✭✭Latchy


    Mr Blobby will be shaken in his boots ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,184 ✭✭✭3ndahalfof6


    I can not see him hanging anyone out to dry, unless he has done something himself and brokers a deal for information.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,327 ✭✭✭Madam_X


    Penn wrote: »
    I don't want him to be found guilty if he didn't do it. Again, my first comment was a flippant remark to show my dislike for him and what he's done career-wise, not about whether or not he should be found guilty as a result of whatever allegations have been made against him, the details of which are unknown.
    Oh I know - I was directing my comment to the people who are speaking as though he's been found guilty already.

    I agree too it's disingenuous to say the fabrications he's created are mere PR stunts - they're smear campaigns, dirty tricks tactics. And so what if people don't have to read them/watch them. Shur you could say that about anything that ruins people's lives but I fail to see how that makes it ok.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,184 ✭✭✭3ndahalfof6


    Latchy wrote: »
    Mr Blobby will be shaken in his boots ...

    Do you think it is possible he had a go at a young aunt sally, worzel will be sticking on his sniper head.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    A PR stunt is Michael O'Leary saying he'll charge people for going to the jacks. A lot of what Clifford did went beyond that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,190 ✭✭✭✭Latchy


    Do you think it is possible he had a go at a young aunt sally, worzel will be sticking on his sniper head.
    The police as we speak are probably examining the complete wardrobe set at the BBC from last 4 decades for DNA samples , even the Daleks will be ****ting themselves ...

    exterminate ...exterminate


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,893 ✭✭✭Hannibal Smith


    Holy ****. See how he spins his way out of this one . I bet he does too the slimy git .
    i wonder half his clients are pooping themselves, wondering if the many secrets he has on them will become public


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 69 ✭✭TheFisherKing


    Short statement after being released last night:



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92,394 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    His trial has started, he is accused of 11 counts of indecent assault against 7 females


  • Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement