Rangers FC On Field Gossip & Rumour Thread 2017 Mod Note in OP(Updated 14/08)

Broxi_Bear_Eire · 23-11-2012 08:06PM

Mr_Spaceman wrote: »

At least the Elgin game was called off well in advance. Although you'll always have fans inconvenienced to some extent.
Looks like it's grim up north!

Nothing to do with the weather they actually did sell to many tickets numbers range but people seem to reckon it was oversold by something in the region of 1100 tickets. In a ground like Elgins that is a disaster waiting to happen.

BhoscaCapall · 23-11-2012 08:12PM

Can't really blame the Elgin fans, if I had a chance to see my team go top of the Third Division I'd be along to the game too :pac:

Broxi_Bear_Eire · 23-11-2012 08:23PM

BhoscaCapall wrote: »

Can't really blame the Elgin fans, if I had a chance to see my team go top of the Third Division I'd be along to the game too :pac:

Humour from a tic fan whatever next :rolleyes::p

Jelle1880 · 01-12-2012 12:09PM

From the Times:

At least one broker appears to be busy in these trying times. Not only is Cenkos Securities putting the finishing touches to a multimillion-pound fundraising for Rangers FC, it also has been marshalling support for those pressured British companies prospecting for oil and gas off the Falkland Islands.

Well-informed sources suggested that institutional investors had agreed to buy nearly £20 million of shares in Rangers at 70p each as part of its AIM flotation.

Supporters of the Glasgow football club, relegated from the Scottish Premier League to the country’s fourth tier after being bought out of administration in June, will be able to buy another £10 million of shares at the same price for the next month or so, with a minimum investment of £500.

Brilliant news if true.

Eirebear · 01-12-2012 12:52PM

Is our full title now "Rangers, relegated to the fourth tier of scottish football FC" or a variation of that?

A Dub in Glasgo · 01-12-2012 01:07PM

Rangers were not relegated though, they had to apply to become members of the SFA at the bottom tier of Scottish football as they did not have a football share

Broxi_Bear_Eire · 01-12-2012 01:30PM

A Dub in Glasgo wrote: »

Rangers were not relegated though, they had to apply to become members of the SFA at the bottom tier of Scottish football as they did not have a football share

I think you will find our share was transferred from the SPL. If it had happened the way you say we wouldn't be there as we didn't have accounts for three years.

I know your not going to accept the fact but there you go

BhoscaCapall · 01-12-2012 02:24PM

....Transferred from the SPL club to the new SFL club starting in the Third Division.

Rangers were not relegated, that is also a fact and not one that should ever be met with debate.

Broxi_Bear_Eire · 01-12-2012 02:43PM

BhoscaCapall wrote: »

....Transferred from the SPL club to the new SFL club starting in the Third Division.

Rangers were not relegated, that is also a fact and not one that should ever be met with debate.

Your right we were demoted to the third. And share was transferred to the new holding company also a simple fact which should never be net with debate

BhoscaCapall · 01-12-2012 02:53PM

Okay then, in your world where your club was "demoted to the third", what was it for?

Broxi_Bear_Eire · 01-12-2012 03:05PM

BhoscaCapall wrote: »

Okay then, in your world where your club was "demoted to the third", what was it for?

No Comment as you pointless debate I will never agree with you because you are wrong. You most likely think I am so we will go round in circles. The bottom line is our share was transferred to the third its is easy enough to find the details

BhoscaCapall · 01-12-2012 03:13PM

Funnily enough I'm not looking to argue with you, as I said it's not something which should or can be met with debate. It would be like you telling me Celtic aren't SPL champions.

I am genuinely interested though, in your school of thought, what was it 'Rangers' were "demoted" for? What crime is it that gets punished by a demotion to the bottom tier of Scottish football?

I'm not trying to change your mind, any Rangers fan who hasn't already jumped at the opportunity for a fresh start without the tainted history obviously isn't going to do so now - I'm just curious as to how you've arrived at that conclusion.

Eirebear · 01-12-2012 03:33PM

Yawn.

BhoscaCapall · 01-12-2012 04:16PM

Obviously a touch subject, didn't realise we couldn't talk about it. What is this, the Scottish Media :pac:

Eirebear · 01-12-2012 04:22PM

BhoscaCapall wrote: »

Obviously a touch subject, didn't realise we couldn't talk about it. What is this, the Scottish Media :pac:

Don't be daft, we wouldn't stop you from talking about your favourite team.

BhoscaCapall · 01-12-2012 04:26PM

Aha yes, that old deflection. Everyone is obsessed with Rangers or else they wouldn't pick apart our bollocks

Eirebear · 01-12-2012 04:29PM

BhoscaCapall wrote: »

Aha yes, that old deflection. Everyone is obsessed with Rangers or else they wouldn't pick apart our bollocks

Not a deflection in the slightest - mention a little pattern in the habit of reporting on rangers, and lo and behold, two Celtic fans appear to tell us "The Truth".
While drawing on tired lines such as "tainted history" etc.

it's boring.

You know you're lot are currently drawing 0-0 right?

Jelle1880 · 01-12-2012 04:32PM

http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/hearts/203638-templeton-cash-to-help-hearts-settle-450000-tax-bill-with-hmrc/

Well well well.

BhoscaCapall · 01-12-2012 04:55PM

Eirebear wrote: »

Not a deflection in the slightest - mention a little pattern in the habit of reporting on rangers, and lo and behold, two Celtic fans appear to tell us "The Truth".

I'm more interested in getting an answer to my question than telling "the truth" to some people whose delusion knows no bounds.

While drawing on tired lines such as "tainted history" etc.

Does the phrase ring any bells :rolleyes:

You know you're lot are currently drawing 0-0 right?

No sure Rangers are my favourite team :pac:

1-0 btw

Jelle1880 · 01-12-2012 04:57PM

BhoscaCapall wrote: »

Obviously a touch subject, didn't realise we couldn't talk about it. What is this, the Scottish Media :pac:

We could perhaps talk about how one of your own players was seen at a RIRA party ?

Or how the reporter that broke the story received death threats ?

But I'm sure that would be 'nothing to do with Celtic', right ?

BhoscaCapall · 01-12-2012 05:02PM

Jelle1880 wrote: »

We could perhaps talk about how one of your own players was seen at a RIRA party ?

Or how the reporter that broke the story received death threats ?

But I'm sure that would be 'nothing to do with Celtic', right ?

So you don't want to talk about Rangers/Sevco in a Rangers thread but you do want to talk about a Celtic player?

Jelle1880 · 01-12-2012 05:08PM

What's there to talk about then ?

Apart from the fact we're doing well ?

BhoscaCapall · 01-12-2012 05:09PM

Jelle1880 wrote: »

What's there to talk about then ?

Apart from the fact we're doing well ?

:pac::pac::pac::pac:

I'll leave you to it

Jelle1880 · 01-12-2012 05:12PM

BhoscaCapall wrote: »

:pac::pac::pac::pac:

I'll leave you to it

No debts, top of the league, likely to get a massive cash influx,...

At least we're not Hearts :pac:

Btw, looks like the Cup is well and truly alive among your fans

What's that, 7000 or so there ?

BhoscaCapall · 01-12-2012 05:36PM

Jelle1880 wrote: »

Btw, looks like the Cup is well and truly alive among your fans
What's that, 7000 or so there ?

What can I say, its truly dark times to support Celtic. If only we could swap places

Broxi_Bear_Eire · 01-12-2012 05:40PM

BhoscaCapall wrote: »

Obviously a touch subject, didn't realise we couldn't talk about it. What is this, the Scottish Media :pac:

Not a touchy subject, but within a couple of posts it's clear to see there is no point in discussing it. You mention Rangers fans and there accptence of the truth I think about 99.9 % of us already know what the truth is so why do we need to explain ourselves to you

BhoscaCapall · 01-12-2012 05:43PM

So, any chance of answering my question or should we just change the subject?

Pompey Magnus · 01-12-2012 05:47PM

Jelle1880 wrote: »

No debts

Apart from the £8.5 million + interest owed to the Sevco consortium...

Broxi_Bear_Eire · 01-12-2012 06:30PM

BhoscaCapall wrote: »

Funnily enough I'm not looking to argue with you, as I said it's not something which should or can be met with debate. It would be like you telling me Celtic aren't SPL champions.

I am genuinely interested though, in your school of thought, what was it 'Rangers' were "demoted" for? What crime is it that gets punished by a demotion to the bottom tier of Scottish football?

I'm not trying to change your mind, any Rangers fan who hasn't already jumped at the opportunity for a fresh start without the tainted history obviously isn't going to do so now - I'm just curious as to how you've arrived at that conclusion.

Sorry our thoughts are so far apart starting with your tainted history garbage that there would be no point in giving you my reasons behind it. To be fair it has nothing to do with you and your curiosity can find out elsewhere as I have no interest in getting into a long drawn out discussion with you, only to find myself back at square one.

BhoscaCapall · 01-12-2012 06:33PM

I find it odd that someone so convinced is not able to explain such a simple facet to their argument. I'm not even trying to prove you wrong here, I could well be wrong, it's why I'm asking.

Rangers FC On Field Gossip & Rumour Thread 2017 Mod Note in OP(Updated 14/08)

Comments