Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Higgins sets out his vision of multicultural Ireland

2

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,775 ✭✭✭Death and Taxes


    juan.kerr wrote: »
    I don't remember being given the opportunity to vote against it.

    Maybe Michael D should push for a referendum before he jumps to conclusions.

    What conclusions was he jumping to?

    We dont need a referendum, in this country we tend to have referendums to change the constitution, mulitculturalsim does not require such constitutional change.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,453 ✭✭✭Shenshen


    conorhal wrote: »
    Where did I say headscarves?

    It absolutely constitues whataboutery. I didn't suggest for a moment that other cultures don't have undesirable traits, what I said was, multiculturalism has, for too long, been an excuse not to address them in minority comunities.


    "...recognising that there is no need to demand assimilation of others is a first step."

    You've gone from 'two way street' there to 'no need to integrate' in one short step. I never said they had to give up everything, but I do want the obviously incompatible elements of Islamic culture to clearly addressed.

    You do realise that there is a vast difference between integrate - as in, live together, interact in a positive way - and assimilate, which would mean stop doing everything you've done so far, drop your style of clothes, your language, your religion, your heritage, the lot.

    I do advocate integration, and I do see it as a two way street. I don't expect people to dress the way I prefer, and by the same token I expect them to respect my own choice of garment in exactly the same way. I do want people to communicate, to interact, to live together in the community, but integration means that just as the newcomers have to accept and respect the locals, so the locals should accept and respect newcomers.

    I think there are several realities out there : There is the official side, where as you rightly pointed out people in charge might turn a blind eye to crimes and unacceptable behaviour as the individual in question belongs to a minority, be it Muslim or Traveller or what have you. Unacceptable.
    Then there is public opinion, demanding that minorities and people from different backgrounds dress a certain way and live a certain way. Again, unacceptable.
    And finally, you've got the minorities and ethnic groups themselves. Some of them are making an effort to integrate and may have a hard time coming to terms with the demands of public opinion.
    Others may not try at all, and may be accommodated in that by the authorities.
    Ideally, neither should happen.

    And I think it's high time to stop using multi-culturalism as an excuse or a bad word. Fact is, the world is more mobile than it ever was, and immigration will not stop just because people don't like it.
    Trying to force people to assimilate, as has been done in the past in several European countries, will turn them into a ticking time bomb.

    It's up to us to handle it like responsible adults and not like spoiled children.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,453 ✭✭✭Shenshen


    juan.kerr wrote: »
    :eek: Lock up your daughters.

    At least there will be less traffic on the roads.

    If I remember that last census correctly, it may be the fastest growing religion, but Atheism had grown even more.
    So your daughters ought to be quite safe, unless Richard Dawkins comes to visit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,096 ✭✭✭conorhal


    You seem to be focussing on Muslims here. Higgins was talking about Multiculturalism yet you focus on Muslims. Why?

    Because
    A) Higgins made his speech at the Islamic Center in Dublin
    and
    B) Islamic migrants tend to be one the least integrated section of society in Europe.
    Lol.

    It's not funny, it's actually shocking how far we bend over backwards to be accomodating, here have a good 'LOL' at this.

    http://www.independent.ie/opinion/co...e-1326485.html

    In this case a suspended sentence was handed down to a butcher that allowed a child bleed to death during a ritual circumcision, what was the response to this?

    "The trial judge, Kevin Haugh, told the jury not to bring their "white, western values" to bear upon their deliberations. Describing the case as a clash between two cultures, he added: "This is a relatively recent matter that Ireland will have to deal with now that we have a significant migrant population. You are not asked whether this form of procedure is acceptable in Ireland. If you start thinking on those lines, you are doing Mr Igbinidion a great injustice."

    Who's saying they are? Most people in Ireland are extremely uncomfortable with genital mutilation of both boys and girls.

    We don't seem that concerned actually:

    http://www.irishhealth.com/article.html?id=14486
    "More than 2,500 women and girls living in Ireland are estimated to have undergone female genital mutilation (FGM), according to new research by AkiDwA, a national network of African women living in Ireland.

    The number was described as a ‘conservative estimate’

    Number of prosectuions for the brutalization and mutilation of young girls?.... nil.
    Source?

    Eh... Bradford? Or any of the multitudes of Bradfords across Europe.
    The vast majority of non-typical Irish are integrated.

    Yes they are. Why though?

    I'd argue that it's down to the common points of interest and interaction that successfully integrate these immigrants, some seamlessly like UK migrants.
    Others like the Poles integrate fairly well also because they have many common points of interaction with the social institutions of our nation which helps to foster integration. You see them in the churches, the pubs, the workplace at the match, and all the places you rarely if ever see Islamic migrants who have very few points of interaction with the rest of broader society, especially if they are women.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    250k salaried multi pension holder calls for multi culturalism.

    As a cynic might read it.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,002 ✭✭✭bijapos


    GalwayGuy2 wrote: »
    Didn't he call a far-right republican a "typical American wanker?"

    Does that not count as bigotry:S

    No, he just called him a "wanker". He actually had a lot of god things to say about the Americans, short version is here, long version is next to it on youtube. And Higgins was right, Graham is a wanker.





  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,029 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    conorhal wrote: »
    B) Islamic migrants tend to be one the least integrated section of society in Europe.

    You do know that there are 13 Million Muslims in the EU? Germany and France have large Muslim populations and yet they are relatively stable, free places.
    It's not funny, it's actually shocking how far we bend over backwards to be accomodating, here have a good 'LOL' at this.

    http://www.independent.ie/opinion/co...e-1326485.html

    Leaving aside that Kevin Myers is a professional troll you've plucked an awful tragedy and what seems like an injustice (that the cunt who killed the child got away with it) and are trying to present it as evidence of institutional 'bending over backwards'.

    Fwiw I'd imagine the vast majority of people are against genital mutilation (GM). How to prevent GM or reduce the harm of it is the problem. Outlawing it would surely drive it underground resulting in more deaths of innocent children. GM is a tricky subject but the fact that it happens is in no way evidence of wholesale 'bending over backwards'.
    Eh... Bradford? Or any of the multitudes of Bradfords across Europe.

    London.

    There. I just named a city too.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 510 ✭✭✭LivelineDipso


    Nice to the President taking the lead on this issue.

    "President Michael D Higgins has said the Government should, during its EU presidency, encourage “a long overdue understanding” necessary to remove ignorance and misunderstanding that can lead to “incipient forms of racism”.

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2012/1129/1224327258954.html


    The secret to integration is to leave everyone alone and allow it to happen natually. You do not need to enforce it. Look at Australia, Canada and the USA. The people merge into the nation over time.

    It is when they create a political agenda to FORCE it that we get problems which are never solved.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,096 ✭✭✭conorhal


    You do know that there are 13 Million Muslims in the EU? Germany and France have large Muslim populations and yet they are relatively stable, free places.

    Yeah.... there's no real tensions at all between the Islamic community and the rest of the state in places like France or Germany.....:rolleyes:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/17/angela-merkel-german-multiculturalism-failed

    Nor, I think you will find is their stability enhanced by or dependent on islamic ghettos.

    Leaving aside that Kevin Myers is a professional troll you've plucked an awful tragedy and what seems like an injustice (that the cunt who killed the child got away with it) and are trying to present it as evidence of institutional 'bending over backwards'.

    How much more institutional then a judge can you get?
    Multiculturalism has been enshrined by every quango and institution in the state.
    Fwiw I'd imagine the vast majority of people are against genital mutilation (GM). How to prevent GM or reduce the harm of it is the problem. Outlawing it would surely drive it underground resulting in more deaths of innocent children. GM is a tricky subject but the fact that it happens is in no way evidence of wholesale 'bending over backwards'.

    FGM is a tricky subject?... eh, no it's not.
    Drive it 'underground', where else is it?
    Regards preventing it, prosicuting the parents and removing their children from their care would be a start. Something tells me that if it was blatently and explicitly stated that this is what would happen, then FGM wouldn't.
    London.

    There. I just named a city too.

    Well done, yes you did. Facetiously. Or are you trying to suggest that Bradford isn't problematic primarily due to a total failure of integration?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭biko


    You do know that there are 13 Million Muslims in the EU? Germany and France have large Muslim populations and yet they are relatively stable, free places.
    Both Merkel and Sarkozy declared multiculturalism a failure in Germany and France. Both countries have massive problems and many many no-go areas. Same in Sweden/Denmark but they are too stubborn to accept failure.
    El Weirdo wrote: »
    He was speaking at the Islamic Cultural Centre.
    That is what prompted my question. You never really hear of similar speeches to Travellers, Polish or other groups.
    It seems to me that the term "multiculturalism" means (or have come to mean) Western culture vs Muslim culture.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,298 ✭✭✭✭later12


    conorhal wrote: »
    I think you've misunderstood me. Multiculturalism does not imply any integration, it implies the recognition of seperate cultures existing side by side in one society, 'seperate but equal'. That ethos creates ghettos.

    That might be your understanding, but nobody is actually calling for that; least of all Higgins. If you read the article, he specifically addressed ghettoisation.
    He said there were dangers in “allocating a separate and segregated space to individual cultures” and the “ghettoising of ethnic groups and the erection of cultural barriers, built on fear, prejudice or ignorance” was to be “avoided at all costs”.

    He also said this was a two way process.

    I really can't see what you're getting so upset about; surely you should be delighted that Higgins is calling for integration instead of mere co-existence, which anti immigration commentators inevitably and invariably and erroneously and ignorantly dismiss as being the meaning of multiculturalism.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,029 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    conorhal wrote: »
    Yeah.... there's no real tensions at all between the Islamic community and the rest of the state in places like France or Germany.....:rolleyes:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/17/angela-merkel-german-multiculturalism-failed

    "Yesterday's speech is widely seen as a lurch to the right designed to placate that element in her party."

    Merkel placates 'that element'. Just because Merkel is placating the fringe of her Christian conservative party does not what she says fact.
    Nor, I think you will find is their stability enhanced by or dependent on islamic ghettos.

    If there are Islamic ghettos who's fault is it? From personal experience I found that Germans have a very different way of perceiving what being German entails. Second and third generation Turks, Italians, French etc are still considered not really German and in fairness this appears to be a two way street.
    How much more institutional then a judge can you get?
    Multiculturalism has been enshrined by every quango and institution in the state.

    For the moment genital mutilation (at least of boys) is not illegal. If it were illegal and then was legalised your argument might have more weight.
    FGM is a tricky subject?... eh, no it's not.

    I said GM (genital mutilation) and avoided separating male and female. I personally don't think male GM is any less barbaric than female.
    Drive it 'underground', where else is it?

    For the moment it's not illegal (male GM at least) so it is not done covertly and people can seek help if something goes wrong. Making it illegal might worsen the chances of an injured child surviving if the people involved were more concerned with avoiding getting caught.
    Regards preventing it, prosicuting the parents and removing their children from their care would be a start. Something tells me that if it was blatently and explicitly stated that this is what would happen, then FGM wouldn't.

    A sure fire way of sending it underground. I'm against GM for both males and females but I'm not sure an outright ban and snatching children from parents would help reduce the harm. Nor can you say it would.
    Well done, yes you did. Facetiously.

    You got the answer you deserved. I could name any number of cities in the world where different cultures live cheek-by-jowl.
    Or are you trying to suggest that Bradford isn't problematic primarily due to a total failure of integration?

    Bradford's problems are attributable primarily to lack of integration?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    biko wrote: »
    Both Merkel and Sarkozy declared multiculturalism a failure in Germany and France. ..............

    Multiculturalism has never, ever been practised in France.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    conorhal wrote: »
    ..............


    Well done, yes you did. Facetiously. Or are you trying to suggest that Bradford isn't problematic primarily due to a total failure of integration?

    Do please explain in detail what the problems in Bradford are, how they're down to a "total failure of integration" and where "multiculturalism" comes into it....


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 510 ✭✭✭LivelineDipso


    I can't get over the judge told the jury not to bring Western Values into the case. Regardless of how you feel - his job is to uphold the laws of the land he is employed to be a judge in.

    Well we are a Banana Republic when it comes to justice for the polticians and rich. So maybe he was just being honest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭biko




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,269 ✭✭✭GalwayGuy2


    No, he just called him a "wanker". He actually had a lot of god things to say about the Americans, short version is here, long version is next to it on youtube. And Higgins was right, Graham is a wanker.

    Thanks, had typical stuck in my head for some strange reason.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    biko wrote: »

    People just presumed he was talking about France, when he was actually just getting a dig in at the rest of them....which of course presumed his own knickers were whiter than white with regards "race relations".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭biko


    I suppose it's good that France does assimilation but the problem is that if the immigrants themselves prefer not to integrate then assimilation just won't happen.
    So in essence multiculturalism exist in France anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 300 ✭✭Luca Brasi


    Nice to the President taking the lead on this issue.

    "President Michael D Higgins has said the Government should, during its EU presidency, encourage “a long overdue understanding” necessary to remove ignorance and misunderstanding that can lead to “incipient forms of racism”.

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2012/1129/1224327258954.html


    Instead of talking rubbish perhaps he could get Saint Mary Robinson to give back her big pension seeing she didnt even finish her stint as President or is she protected from criticism. Of course being a Labour Party supporter herself and Higgins are always correct in their opinions and feel free to lecture the rest of us.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    biko wrote: »
    I suppose it's good that France does assimilation but the problem is that if the immigrants themselves prefer not to integrate then assimilation just won't happen.

    So in essence multiculturalism exist in France anyway.

    1 - You're putting the blame entirely on the immigrants
    2 - You're wrongly labelling lack of integration multiculturalism


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,298 ✭✭✭✭later12


    biko wrote: »
    I suppose it's good that France does assimilation but the problem is that if the immigrants themselves prefer not to integrate then assimilation just won't happen.
    So in essence multiculturalism exist in France anyway.
    I really dislike the word assimilation; it's reminiscent on a big bird digesting a smaller bird, assimilating it.

    For one thing, that's impossible. For another thing, a homogenous society is utterly undesirable and quite a bore. What Higgins was suggesting, is that we should encourage solidarity - you can do your thing, and I can do mine, but lets have a common thread of values and social norms that bind us to each other; we shouldn't fear change or put our society on a pedestal, so they can be mainly my old norms or your old norms, which ever works better. But lets be having them in the name of solidarity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,499 ✭✭✭✭DEFTLEFTHAND


    GalwayGuy2 wrote: »
    Thanks, had typical stuck in my head for some strange reason.

    Aye he let himself down badly. Michael Graham is an intelligent man, I've got no time for his politics but I respect his intellect, he believes in what he says and articulates himself well in debate.

    Higgins godfather of psuedo intellectuals everywhere was made to look foolish and had to resort to insults. Graham to his credit was a gentleman and didn't engage in childish namecalling, he showed great restraint, I would have lashed out at him and brought up the NY Times review of his book of poetry. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,453 ✭✭✭Shenshen


    biko wrote: »
    I suppose it's good that France does assimilation but the problem is that if the immigrants themselves prefer not to integrate then assimilation just won't happen.
    So in essence multiculturalism exist in France anyway.

    Multiculturalism is in its infancy in France.
    They have multiple cultures, yes, but very little by ways of integration.
    And in all honesty, I don't think either the immigrants nor the indigenous population are blame-free on this.

    The native French have for decades adopted a type of ostrich-strategy when it came to immigration : They dug their heads into the sand, hoping that if they didn't see the immigrants, then there were no immigrants.
    They've only fairly recently allowed themselves to recognise that these people came to France, and are not going anywhere anytime soon.
    So now, slowly, the "ignore them, don't rent them good quarters, don't give them jobs, don't try and educate them" approach is changing, but an awful lot of damage has been done.

    And the exact same is true for Germany.
    Up until some 10 or so years ago, you could not obtain German citizenship if you weren't born to German parents.
    Your parents could have lived in Germany for decades, your own parents could have been born there, none of this was enough to allow you to obtain citizenship.
    However, should you happen to be from one of the former Russian Republics and be able to prove that your great-great-great-great-great-...grandmother had moved there some 300 or 400 years ago, you could get citizenship instantly.
    So, not only was there resentment between native Germans and immigrants, the system generated resentment between different groups of immigrants, and between German citizens. Divide and conquer, essentially.
    To this day, no politician in Germany will call immigrants immigrants. They are referred to as guest workers, or simply as foreigners.

    There's no attempt at multiculturalism, let alone at integration of any kind.


  • Site Banned Posts: 385 ✭✭pontia


    if i as a christian decide to go to live in a muslim country what will they do to help me integrate ? will i be made feel welcome and treated the same as muslim people


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,269 ✭✭✭GalwayGuy2


    if i as a christian decide to go to live in a muslim country what will they do to help me integrate ? will i be made feel welcome and treated the same as muslim people

    I hate to bring any wiff of "we versus them" into this, but how can we complain about how other societies act towards difference if we don't embrace it? If you want to feel welcome in a muslim country, why don't you welcome a muslim into our country first?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    pontia wrote: »
    if i as a christian decide to go to live in a muslim country what will they do to help me integrate ? will i be made feel welcome and treated the same as muslim people


    ....your point?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,386 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    pontia wrote: »
    if i as a christian decide to go to live in a muslim country what will they do to help me integrate ? will i be made feel welcome and treated the same as muslim people
    So? We should be better than that and such countries like Saudi Arabia.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 385 ✭✭pontia


    so you want us to integrate with people who come to our country and on the other hand we get nothing in return if we go to them,as their fond of saying its a 2 way street


Advertisement
Advertisement