Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Pregnant woman dies in UCHG after being refused a termination

13468999

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 518 ✭✭✭otto_26


    Stheno wrote: »
    Or possibly according to the Medical Council guidelines I've quoted "giving due consideration to the health of the baby"

    I do believe doctors here in this field are extremely cautious as a result of the ambiguous wording of the guidelines they have and the lack of clear law.

    Look the simple facts are that the doctor's job is the safety of his patents it is legal for the doctor to perform a medical intervention to save the life of the mother and that's what he should have done.

    Medical intervention to save the life of the mother has been done thousands of times in Ireland without a problem.

    My point is we should be taking about a doctor who did not do his job properly not laws because as I said it is not illegal for him to have terminated in the situation.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,300 ✭✭✭✭Seaneh


    Sarky wrote: »
    This kind of response is shameful.

    "Well screw you with your sensible ideas and disgust at our crappy system! F*ck off and let us have a crappy system in peace!"

    Attitudes like yours are the reason the X Case hasn't been legislated for in twenty years. Perhaps you could get off your arse and actually try to make the country a bit better instead of moaning all the damn time?

    Oh **** off and grow up.

    She basically claimed Ireland and it's people were some land of evil women oppressing misogynists who want nothing more than to kill poor sick pregnant women.

    She get back on the boat and go home if she really believes that, why the **** would she stay if she actually felt that way?


    And when have I moaned about the country exactly?

    First way I'd make the country better if I could would be to tell all the self loating west brits (not dubs in general, west brits exist all over the island) they can go back to mother england if Ireland is really so **** and take people like herself above with them.


    Less bitching and self depreciation would be a great start.

    Beyond that, the voluntary work I already do is enough for me to fill me "make great the nation" quota.

    Mod: banned


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,685 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    otto_26 wrote: »
    Look the simple facts are that the doctor's job is the safety of his patents it is legal for the doctor to perform a medical intervention to save the life of the mother and that's what he should have done.

    Medical intervention to save the life of the mother has been done thousands of times in Ireland without a problem.

    My point is we should be taking about a doctor who did not do his job properly not laws because as I said it is not illegal for him to have terminated in the situation.

    You still haven't pointed out the legislation that covers that that supercedes the offenses against the person act? Which clearly call out abortion as being illegal?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,734 ✭✭✭seenitall


    Seaneh wrote: »
    Oh **** off and grow up.

    She basically claimed Ireland and it's people were some land of evil women oppressing misogynists who want nothing more than to kill poor sick pregnant women.

    She get back on the boat and go home if she really believes that, why the **** would she stay if she actually felt that way?

    Ever heard of hyperbole? That's what you used, above (basically); and the woman has a point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 518 ✭✭✭otto_26


    seenitall wrote: »
    Again, just LOL. But have it your way, I always say denial is one of the most powerful things there is.

    Again, just LOL. But have it your way, I always say denial is one of the most powerful things there is!!!!!!!!!!!:rolleyes:

    Go look up Section 21 of the Medical Council guidelines and then tell me it's illegal.....:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

    Oh and chin up you still did really well! Proud of you!!!;)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 595 ✭✭✭tony81


    FFS.

    Ireland, it's time to put your big kid pants on and deal with this once and for all. No more cowardice or can kicking or winking at ferry terminals, we cannot pretend there are no consequences to the Irish Solution we've been trying to hide behind.

    What bull****! There's now an abortion clinic in belfast and any number of "family planning" advice clinics in ireland. Anyone callous enough to have an abortion doesn't need to go to too much effort to find one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭seb65


    Seaneh wrote: »
    I didn't say that either, I am saying that the Hospital didn't just let a woman die, and everyone on here saying they did is just spreading nonsense, without knowing the actual details of the case, nobody can make any judgements on what happened.

    There are a million and one reasons why this could have went wrong and without knowing which reason that is you cannot assign blame to anyone.


    This is how witch hunts start and peoples reputations and lives are ruins because of baying mobs on uninformed idiots.

    no there are not a million and one reasons. Her husband is clear in his recollection of what happened - his wife in agony, asking for a termination of a baby - that was wanted - but was not going to survive, left to writhe in pain for three days, informed that Ireland was a Catholic country and they could not help her.

    Her blood is on the hands of all those healthcare professionals who stood by and let her suffer. Cloaking themselves in the catholicism of their country....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 563 ✭✭✭PaddyORuadhan


    Protest called for tomorrow about the lack of legislation on X case
    Tomorrow
    6pm@the Dail
    https://www.facebook.com/events/306835169430369


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,300 ✭✭✭✭Seaneh


    seenitall wrote: »
    Ever heard of hyperbole? That's what you used, above (basically); and the woman has a point.

    I am perfectly aware of the hyperbole in my post, the thing is, as far as I could tell from her posts she wasn't trying to use any in her post.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,300 ✭✭✭✭Seaneh


    seb65 wrote: »
    no there are not a million and one reasons. Her husband is clear in his recollection of what happened - his wife in agony, asking for a termination of a baby - that was wanted - but was not going to survive, left to writhe in pain for three days, informed that Ireland was a Catholic country and they could not help her.

    Her blood is on the hands of all those healthcare professionals who stood by and let her suffer. Cloaking themselves in the catholicism of their country....

    :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: x inifinty.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,685 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    otto_26 wrote: »
    Again, just LOL. But have it your way, I always say denial is one of the most powerful things there is!!!!!!!!!!!:rolleyes:

    Go look up Section 21 of the Medical Council guidelines and then tell me it's illegal.....:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

    Oh and chin up you still did really well! Proud of you!!!;)
    Medical council guidelines are not law, and very clearly call out that equal consideration has to be given to the health/life of the foetus, does not countermand section 58/59

    I quoted it earlier if you need to check it.
    tony81 wrote: »
    What bull****! There's now an abortion clinic in belfast and any number of "family planning" advice clinics in ireland. Anyone callous enough to have an abortion doesn't need to go to too much effort to find one.

    So fine, go into hospital and be told, off up to Belfast with you when you are in serious ill health?

    Or are you implying our family planning clinics will provide an abortion? I can assure you that is not the case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭seb65


    Seaneh wrote: »
    Oh **** off and grow up.

    She basically claimed Ireland and it's people were some land of evil women oppressing misogynists who want nothing more than to kill poor sick pregnant women.

    She get back on the boat and go home if she really believes that, why the **** would she stay if she actually felt that way?


    And when have I moaned about the country exactly?

    First way I'd make the country better if I could would be to tell all the self loating west brits (not dubs in general, west brits exist all over the island) they can go back to mother england if Ireland is really so **** and take people like herself above with them.


    Less bitching and self depreciation would be a great start.

    Beyond that, the voluntary work I already do is enough for me to fill me "make great the nation" quota.

    I'm not a Brit, I'm Canadian.....of course, lots of pure bred Irish escaping to my country already.

    And nope, I don't think all Irish are misogynistic. I love one of them enough to stay here with him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 518 ✭✭✭otto_26


    Stheno wrote: »
    You still haven't pointed out the legislation that covers that that supercedes the offenses against the person act? Which clearly call out abortion as being illegal?

    The 1992 High court decision dictate that if the mother's life is at risk an abortion is allowed without any malpractice or illegality.

    Section 21 of the Medical Council guidelines state:
    21.1 Abortion is illegal in Ireland except where there is a real and substantial risk to the life (as distinct from the health) of the mother.

    ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,897 ✭✭✭MagicSean


    otto_26 wrote: »
    Look the simple facts are that the doctor's job is the safety of his patents it is legal for the doctor to perform a medical intervention to save the life of the mother and that's what he should have done.

    Medical intervention to save the life of the mother has been done thousands of times in Ireland without a problem.

    My point is we should be taking about a doctor who did not do his job properly not laws because as I said it is not illegal for him to have terminated in the situation.

    It is not legal. It is constitutional. The doctors hands were tied because in two decades no government has seen fit to make it legal. Every government since the x case has this womans blood on their hands.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,300 ✭✭✭✭Seaneh


    seb65 wrote: »
    I'm not a Brit, I'm Canadian.....of course, lots of pure bred Irish escaping to my country already.

    And nope, I don't think all Irish are misogynistic. I love one of them enough to stay here with him.


    I wasn't calling you a west brit, you were one of "the people like herself above" I wish them to take with them.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,685 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    seb65 wrote: »
    no there are not a million and one reasons. Her husband is clear in his recollection of what happened - his wife in agony, asking for a termination of a baby - that was wanted - but was not going to survive, left to writhe in pain for three days, informed that Ireland was a Catholic country and they could not help her.

    Her blood is on the hands of all those healthcare professionals who stood by and let her suffer. Cloaking themselves in the catholicism of their country....

    No let us be clear for about the tenth time in this thread.

    Her blood is on the hands of the five plus governments who have failed to provide clarity to the medical profession by legislating on this issue for over 20 years.

    Even Citizens information cite Medical Council guidelines and not law in proclaiming that the life of the mother can take precedence.

    Those Medical Council guidelines cite equal attention to the health of the child.

    I'd bet a fair wedge of cash that several of her medical team were non nationals shocked at the situation in which they found themselves.

    It's the government at fault here, not the medics, not the church etc.

    If you feel that strongly about it, protest, contact your tds etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,734 ✭✭✭seenitall


    otto_26 wrote: »
    Section 21 of the Medical Council guidelines state:
    21.1 Abortion is illegal in Ireland except where there is a real and substantial risk to the life (as distinct from the health) of the mother.

    ;)

    The above is NOT THE LAW, and is CONTRADICTED BY LAW (Law trumps Guidelines, btw). How many times will you have to be told??

    Still, as long as you're proud of me! ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 595 ✭✭✭tony81


    Protest called for tomorrow about the lack of legislation on X case
    Tomorrow
    6pm@the Dail
    https://www.facebook.com/events/306835169430369
    The X case? That girl had a miscarriage. She didn't even need an abortion. God works in mysterious ways. ;)

    Also I wonder where X is now. Did she have a normal life? Family? Kids? What are her views on abortion now? She's being used as a poster child for abortion and i guess the pro-choicers don't care anyway now that they have an even sadder story that they can twist and skew.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    Seaneh wrote: »
    Oh **** off and grow up.

    [further BAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWW ensues]

    Does your voluntary work come with an official certificate or something giving you the express right to tell others to get back on the boat and f*ck off out of your country when they point out its flaws?

    You're doing yourself and this country no favours with this attitude. I'd prefer to keep the folks who can get annoyed at sh*tty things happening and send those with attitudes like yours off on a boat to "off foreign".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 518 ✭✭✭otto_26


    Stheno wrote: »
    Medical council guidelines are not law, and very clearly call out that equal consideration has to be given to the health/life of the foetus, does not countermand section 58/59

    But it does not make it illegal. Thousands of medical interventions to save the life of the mother have been done in Ireland without problem.

    Therefore its the doctor not law we should be looking at because his job is the safety of his patient. It was not illegal for him to do his job.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,685 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    otto_26 wrote: »
    The 1992 High court decision dictate that if the mother's life is at risk an abortion is allowed without any malpractice or illegality.

    Section 21 of the Medical Council guidelines state:
    21.1 Abortion is illegal in Ireland except where there is a real and substantial risk to the life (as distinct from the health) of the mother.

    ;)
    MagicSean wrote: »
    It is not legal. It is constitutional. The doctors hands were tied because in two decades no government has seen fit to make it legal. Every government since the x case has this womans blood on their hands.

    Thank you MagicSean

    Can I also point out that those guidelines include equal consideration for the health/life of the foetus as I pointed out earlier.

    I suspect the doctors here didn't realise there was a risk to the life of the mother, and overly focused on the foetus, given there is no real clarity to guide them, and they tend to the conservative side.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,300 ✭✭✭✭Seaneh


    Sarky wrote: »
    rabble, rabble, rabble.

    Sarky, That's all I read.

    Bye.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,685 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    seenitall wrote: »
    The above is NOT THE LAW, and is CONTRADICTED BY LAW (Law trumps Guidelines, btw). How many times will you have to be told??

    Still, as long as you're proud of me! ;)

    A lot it seems :)


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,685 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    otto_26 wrote: »
    But it does not make it illegal. Thousands of medical interventions to save the life of the mother have been done in Ireland without problem.
    .

    And how many terminations to save the mother as you are so knowledgeable?

    Intervention is one thing, terminating the life of a foetus to save a mother is another?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭seb65


    Stheno wrote: »
    No let us be clear for about the tenth time in this thread.

    Her blood is on the hands of the five plus governments who have failed to provide clarity to the medical profession by legislating on this issue for over 20 years.

    Even Citizens information cite Medical Council guidelines and not law in proclaiming that the life of the mother can take precedence.

    Those Medical Council guidelines cite equal attention to the health of the child.

    I'd bet a fair wedge of cash that several of her medical team were non nationals shocked at the situation in which they found themselves.

    It's the government at fault here, not the medics, not the church etc.

    If you feel that strongly about it, protest, contact your tds etc.

    And as a doctor, "you set the leg"

    If these doctors used this woman as some sort of example over their displeasure at a lack of proper legislation on when they can legally terminate a pregnancy, they should not be doctors. Lord knows the HSE has no problem running to the court every time a Jehovah Witness refuses a blood transfusion, why not some court action in this case? If a fetus is dying and is not feasible and a woman is enduring a three day miscarriage, surely that is endangering her health and not treating her health equally?


  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Lot of silliness really. This has nothing to do with our laws on abortion, whatever one's opinion may be of them, if a pregnant woman was suffering from septicemia I doubt she'd be told "We don't do abortion, this is a catholic country" and then just manage to recount the tale to a journalist as she died. If most of the facts are as presented it's malpractice/negligence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,069 ✭✭✭irishfeen


    seenitall wrote: »
    The above is NOT THE LAW, and is CONTRADICTED BY LAW (Law trumps Guidelines, btw). How many times will you have to be told??

    Still, as long as you're proud of me! ;)

    Yes but it is the position of the Irish High Court meaning any conviction would be overturned by the High Court/European Court of Human rights?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,300 ✭✭✭✭Seaneh


    seb65 wrote: »
    And as a doctor, "you set the leg"

    If these doctors used this woman as some sort of example over their displeasure at a lack of proper legislation on when they can legally terminate a pregnancy, they should not be doctors. Lord knows the HSE has no problem running to the court every time a Jehovah Witness refuses a blood transfusion, why not some court action in this case? If a fetus is dying and is not feasible and a woman is enduring a three day miscarriage, surely that is endangering her health and not treating her health equally?

    More conjecture and nonsense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 739 ✭✭✭flynnlives


    tony81 wrote: »
    The X case? That girl had a miscarriage. She didn't even need an abortion. God works in mysterious ways. ;)

    Also I wonder where X is now. Did she have a normal life? Family? Kids? What are her views on abortion now? She's being used as a poster child for abortion and i guess the pro-choicers don't care anyway now that they have an even sadder story that they can twist and skew.

    your some sick ****

    the x case girl was only 14 and she was raped by a neighbour

    The girl was suicidal and planned to have an abortion. The family asked the Gardai if dna taken from the aborted foetus could be used as evidence to convict her rapist.

    When they learned she was going to england the Attorney General got an injunction to stop her.

    the sick **** who raped her got only 4 years.

    A young womens life ruined by not only rape but a constitution heavenly influenced by the church.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 518 ✭✭✭otto_26


    seenitall wrote: »
    The above is NOT THE LAW, and is CONTRADICTED BY LAW (Law trumps Guidelines, btw). How many times will you have to be told??

    Still, as long as you're proud of me! ;)

    But it's not illegal to perform a medical intervention to save the life of the mother. So asking me about what's written into law has nothing to do with what happened.

    Also since I answered your question! please show me where it is written into law that it is illegal for a doctor to perform a medical intervention to save the life of the mother... considering

    The 1992 High court decision dictate that if the mother's life is at risk an abortion is allowed without any malpractice or illegality.

    Section 21 of the Medical Council guidelines state:
    21.1 Abortion is illegal in Ireland except where there is a real and substantial risk to the life (as distinct from the health) of the mother.

    Still, as long as you're proud of me!;)


Advertisement