Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Whats your MPG?

1235716

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,306 ✭✭✭Mycroft H


    Slidey wrote: »
    Some of the figures being quoted are fanciful at best..


    Just a point to note, pumping tyres to max pressure is a dumb thing to do. Firstly, it wears the tyre out quickly. Secondly it gives you a harsher ride and thirdly and most importantly it reduces the footprint of the tyre on the road, in wet conditions this will increase your stopping distance.


    It's worth nothing that this is the max pressure on the sidewall of the tyre. The pressure you want is the one on the jamb of the door or in the manual


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,034 ✭✭✭Amprodude


    Slidey wrote: »
    Some of the figures being quoted are fanciful at best..


    Just a point to note, pumping tyres to max pressure is a dumb thing to do. Firstly, it wears the tyre out quickly. Secondly it gives you a harsher ride and thirdly and most importantly it reduces the footprint of the tyre on the road, in wet conditions this will increase your stopping distance.

    you will use more fuel when they arent pumped up though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,925 ✭✭✭✭challengemaster


    Amprodude wrote: »
    you will use more fuel when they arent pumped up though.
    And you'll spend a lot more money than what you saved on fuel when you crash


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,649 ✭✭✭gyppo


    Citroen C5 Tourer 1.6hdi - 57/58 mpg every tankfull


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,572 ✭✭✭thecomedian


    My latest fill up, got me 20.8 mpg
    Goes to show it can vary a bit


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 371 ✭✭Cerbera


    111R - 40


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 634 ✭✭✭cabb8ge


    Series 11 Primera (1995), 1.6 petrol, do above 30mpg for me on mix of driving, mainly not stop and start.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,940 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    My wife's 1.4 fabia does about 40 to 45 mpg on general runs, (according to the trip computer) on long runs if the speed is minded it'll do 51 mpg...
    Easier to get good milage on ordinary N roads, than on motorways at speed.

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,007 ✭✭✭✭Cuddlesworth


    2005 Forester 2.5xt, 25mpg on a even mix on city and motorway. I could try driving with a lighter foot, but don't think it would be worth it.
    2006 Kawasaki Er6n 650cc(motorbike), 65mpg while driving like a asshole.

    I drive the bike during the summer to cut down on cost. Don't have much choice in the matter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,263 ✭✭✭BlackWizard


    That's very good out of that 650cc engine!

    I've a Fazer 600cc and get 50mpg driving into town and 55 on motorway. Spirited driving on both.

    My Seat Ibiza 1200cc which I haven't started in 4 months usually gets 34mpg all round. Pretty bad for an engine of that size. But cheap tax and insurance and only 1000km a year means I don't care.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85 ✭✭N17er


    Slidey wrote: »
    Some of the figures being quoted are fanciful at best..


    Just a point to note, pumping tyres to max pressure is a dumb thing to do. Firstly, it wears the tyre out quickly. Secondly it gives you a harsher ride and thirdly and most importantly it reduces the footprint of the tyre on the road, in wet conditions this will increase your stopping distance.
    Im sorry but Im afraid I disagree here on two points.

    In my opinion, pumping tyres nearer to max sidewall px will result in a more even tread wear, also it will increase the footprint of the tyre in contact with the driving surface resulting in shorter braking distances in most conditions.

    It will vastly improve handling on most cars.

    You are right on the harshness though and this is the only negative aspect of it.

    Not a dumb thing to do at all. After all, this is the manufacturers max safe working pressure and is well within the actual limits of the tyre.

    Modern good quality tyres do not bulge in the centre at higher pressures like tyres of the past. Stiffer sidewalls at higher pressures will decrease tyre deflection resulting in more even wear. All this info is freely available on the net.

    Imo not pumping your tyres to or near max sidewall is dumb but maybe some people value ride comfort over better handling and fuel and tyre economy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,851 ✭✭✭langdang


    N17er wrote: »
    Im sorry but Im afraid I disagree here on two points.

    In my opinion, pumping tyres nearer to max sidewall px will result in a more even tread wear, also it will increase the footprint of the tyre in contact with the driving surface resulting in shorter braking distances in most conditions.

    It will vastly improve handling on most cars.
    Doubt it.
    Might not be noticeable on day to day use on a decent straightish road, but wouldn't fancy it on the average Irish country road. (going on tyre pressure experiments I've done myself - biased toward handling rather than economy) You could live with up to 60kph maybe, but then you'd be THAT langer at the top of the convoy. And most of your savings would be from less drag at that speed, I'd guess.

    Shur, by extension - I'd improve the grip, braking and handling of my mountain bike by going from 32psi to 55psi. Not a hope.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,940 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    langdang wrote: »
    Doubt it.
    Might not be noticeable on day to day use on a decent straightish road, but wouldn't fancy it on the average Irish country road. (going on tyre pressure experiments I've done myself - biased toward handling rather than economy) You could live with up to 60kph maybe, but then you'd be THAT langer at the top of the convoy. And most of your savings would be from less drag at that speed, I'd guess.

    Shur, by extension - I'd improve the grip, braking and handling of my mountain bike by going from 32psi to 55psi. Not a hope.

    On most country roads you probably shouldn't be doing more than 60 /65 kph anyway.. You can easily do more than that until you come round a bend to meet a tractor and couple of pedestrians trying to use the same bit of road that you need ... Been there, done that ... Too many that was close moments...

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,811 ✭✭✭✭Slidey


    That maximum pressure on your tyre is for when the axle is fully loaded. Check the load rating on your tyre, by law they have to equal or be higher than the maximum weight of your axle so unless you are running overweight your tyre is over inflated. On the rear, in the wet under braking this is a dangerous combination.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,851 ✭✭✭langdang


    Markcheese wrote: »
    Been there, done that ... Too many that was close moments...
    Try running a more suitable tyre pressure ;):D I can't recall having any of those rounda-a-corner-oh-sheet moments. Probably had one or two (I'm no saint like) but it's so long long now I can't remember them.

    I'm tempted to try it for a full tank of petrol, more because I like experiments more than anything else. Must see what the max pressure is on mine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,717 ✭✭✭ARGINITE


    2006 RX8 - city driving 15 MPG, but on a 100 mile run last weekend I got 22 MPG (the M25 was crawling along at 30 MPH) :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 866 ✭✭✭renofan


    1998 Nissan Micra 1.0, last mpg check 2 months ago 52.4 mpg
    1997 Laguna 1.8, 41 mpg
    2005 Focus II 1.4, approx 40 mpg
    1986 BMW 318i, approx 25 mpg
    1986 BMW 520i, approx 28 mpg.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,306 ✭✭✭Mycroft H


    N17er wrote: »
    Im sorry but Im afraid I disagree here on two points.

    In my opinion, pumping tyres nearer to max sidewall px will result in a more even tread wear, also it will increase the footprint of the tyre in contact with the driving surface resulting in shorter braking distances in most conditions.

    It will vastly improve handling on most cars.

    You are right on the harshness though and this is the only negative aspect of it.

    I'm going to need proof to believe that. As far as I know, slidey is right. Sure if it was the case, why do manufacturers just say pump up to max pressure?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,833 ✭✭✭✭Armin_Tamzarian


    People should really be more careful before dispensing shoddy motoring advice.
    The consequences could be fatal.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,851 ✭✭✭langdang


    BX 19 wrote: »
    I'm going to need proof to believe that. As far as I know, slidey is right. Sure if it was the case, why do manufacturers just say pump up to max pressure?

    Indeed, they are quite happy to specify thinner and lighter oils to increase economy, reduce emissions, so you'd think pumping tyres to max psi would be easier and cheaper than a lot of the tricks they use?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,451 ✭✭✭Ronnie Beck


    N17er wrote: »
    In my opinion, pumping tyres nearer to max sidewall px will result in a more even tread wear, also it will increase the footprint of the tyre in contact with the driving surface resulting in shorter braking distances in most conditions.


    That sentence is completely wrong on all three points. It increases you MPG by reducing friction. The same friction you use to accelerate and brake. Greater pressure results in greater wear as the tyre has to work harder to maintain grip due to a smaller footprint. It also increases the heat produced when driving, which further increases pressure. This causes the pressure to rise above the max limit which may lead to a blow out.

    I know it's only your opinion your giving but it's a dangerous one.
    It will vastly improve handling on most cars.

    If you want stiffer cornering from your car buy an uprated suspension, don't over inflate your tyres like a tool.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 293 ✭✭El Kabong!


    1995 Citroen AX 1.5D non turbo
    75MPG every tank measured on actual readings.

    Previous car was 1999 Honda Insight
    ~75MPG every tank, but my best trip reading was 96MPG.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,882 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    2011 Golf 2.0TDi

    Driving mix: 60% Motorway, 20% N-road, 20% urban, consistent 5.8l/100km and theres over 124k km on it now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭September1


    That sentence is completely wrong on all three points. It increases you MPG by reducing friction. The same friction you use to accelerate and brake. Greater pressure results in greater wear as the tyre has to work harder to maintain grip due to a smaller footprint. It also increases the heat produced when driving, which further increases pressure. This causes the pressure to rise above the max limit which may lead to a blow out.

    I know it's only your opinion your giving but it's a dangerous one.

    .

    I think you might be confusing static friction that is responsible for traction and higher is better with rolling resistance which increases mpg and lower is better. Static friction is not area dependent in classic physics.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,451 ✭✭✭Ronnie Beck


    September1 wrote: »
    I think you might be confusing static friction that is responsible for traction and higher is better with rolling resistance which increases mpg and lower is better. Static friction is not area dependent in classic physics.

    I know it's not literally the same friction but I was more just trying to get a point across about road safety without getting all molecular on it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,773 ✭✭✭Ded_Zebra


    Sorry to disappoint you guys but he is right. On RADIAL tyres pumping them harder increases the print of the tyre of the road but also causes less internal friction within the rubber. This friction within the rubber is what makes a soft tyre hot.

    It's all to do with the direction that the belts run in :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,811 ✭✭✭✭Slidey


    El Kabong! wrote: »
    1995 Citroen AX 1.5D non turbo
    75MPG every tank measured on actual readings.

    Previous car was 1999 Honda Insight
    ~75MPG every tank, but my best trip reading was 96MPG.
    I believe you are either crediting a gallon with more than 4.5L or your speedo is highly innaccurate. That or you live at the top of a big hill and only travel one way


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 992 ✭✭✭Time


    17.7 mpg was the average i got out of my last full tank. Mostly city driving in a 03 350z, i get around 26mpg on a motorway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭robertxxx


    72 mpg 1976 triumph spider


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,451 ✭✭✭Ronnie Beck


    Ded_Zebra wrote: »
    Sorry to disappoint you guys but he is right. On RADIAL tyres pumping them harder increases the print of the tyre of the road but also causes less internal friction within the rubber. This friction within the rubber is what makes a soft tyre hot.

    It's all to do with the direction that the belts run in :)


    Tyres have an optimal pressure for grip depending on tyres, car, roads surface etc.. Raising the pressure above this point will decrease grip as will dropping it below. To say that you just inflate them to the max rated pressure on the side to achieve this is ridiculous.

    Do you have any links to support this inflate it to the max pressure claim.


Advertisement