Where did the towers go - directed free energy

Juicee wrote: »

All relevant questions have been answered previously.

Eh, no they haven't.

This video was a collaborative effort between Myself (WHENDASHTF), Charlie Pound (THECHARLYPOUND), Dr. Judy Wood & Andrew Johnson (CHECKTHEEVIDENCE) among others. I try to show how Steven Jones who was receiving funding from the Dept of Energy,manipulated the LENR Technology (coined Cold Fusion) and put a halt to a safe workable alternative to HOT Nuclear Energy. We see the dangerous side of that now in FUKUSHIMA. The Gatekeepers of the '911 Truth Movement' are now manipulating and distracting anyone from further TRUTH with the Nano-Thermite myth and are controlled by their own and others agendas. These buildings were indeed destroyed, not by planes or fire as the official Government story tells you, or by explosives. Look at the evidence with your own eyes and logic.

Gatekeepers
music, lyrics, and vocals by Charlie Pound © 2012
(Full Use Permission Granted)

So there you go, following them
But you don't know your just a means to an end
The truth you seek, they want to hide
That's why they keep you close by their side. They're the gatekeepers And they hold all the keys They're the gatekeepers Information disease

Pie in the sky, is all you've been fed
I think that is why you forgot your own head
Sometimes you need to be cruel to be kind
That makes me believe you've lost your own minds -- To the gatekeepers They hold all the keys They're the gate keepers Information disease

The late great John Lennon comes to mind when I hear The Gatekeepers by Charlie Pound. The still images are from a Baltimore American Physical Society press conference, May 1-2, 1989, where Steven E. Jones orchestrated a vote about whether or not Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions or LENR (aka "Cold Fusion") is bogus and the researchers who brought it forward should be made fools of. Jones holds his hand up and then coerces the others to hold up their hand. Science by press conference vote? However, LENR is NOT Fusion! Steven E. Jones coined the term "Cold Fusion" so that it could be debunked. Dr. Edmund Storms makes reference to this misnomer. (see page 365 of WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?) LENR is real....and very related to what happened on 9/11.

The Jones "Vote" Against Fleischmann and Pons
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/StevenEJones/JonesVote.shtml

Cold Fusion: Fire From Water
(At 0:18:50 minutes tritium in LENR is discussed. See pages 372 to 376 of WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?)
http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/cold-fusion-fire-from-water/

Physicists Debunk Claim Of a New Kind of Fusion
(New York Times article of Jones debunking "cold fusion.")
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/05/03/us/physicists-debunk-claim-of-a-new-kind-of-fusion.html?scp=136&sq=%22cold+fusion%22&st=nyt

WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?
http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/

Dr Judy Wood - "Where Did the Towers Go?" - Holland / UK Presentations - November 2012
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=360&Itemid=60

911 and Crop Circles - Connecting the Evidence
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/39104/911_and_Crop_Circles___Connecting_the_Evidence/

"People trust their eyes above all else - but most people see what they wish to see, or what they believe they should see; not what is really there" - Zoë Marriott, Shadows on the Moon

"When one feels no shame in telling a deliberate lie, there is no evil, I tell you, he will not do." - Buddha Gotama, Unknown Book

There is a lot of deception, distraction, and diversion going on, both intentional and otherwise, leading people to climb on to popular "theories" or "band wagons". Truth is not established by popularity, although agenda-driven political campaigns are. So we need to establish a better way to sort through the information we find by improving our problem-solving skills.

There are various groups on the internet lead by nefarious figures such as Richard Gage and Jim Fetzer, each with their own set of beliefs and objectives, promoting how it was done, or who did it or why they did it. But none of them have taken the first step of an investigation which is to determine what it is that was done, that is, to first determine WHAT happened. Until they have done that, they are merely speculating or theorizing or hypothesizing or guessing. This is essentially assuming what happened and then proving the assumptions through biased observations (i.e. "cherry-picking" data). Promoting beliefs distracts away from determining WHAT happened. This is why the order of problem solving is so important. Remember, you must first determine WHAT happened BEFORE you can determine HOW it happened and independent of knowing how it happened.

Remember how a cover-up works. Get people to theorize and speculate about an imagined problem (i.e Mini-Neutron Bombs), then get them to argue opinions with others. Everyone will be arguing about opinions of speculations of theories of opinions of guesswork, and they'll just go round and round and round and get nowhere. It is amazingly easy to keep a cover up in place! The only way out of that vicious cycle is to deal with the facts and only the facts (empirical evidence).

If you read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?, you would know from the EVIDENCE that the Twin Towers turned to dust in mid-air never hitting the ground.

Bombs do not do that.
Mini-neutron bombs do not do that.
Thermite does not do that.
Thermate does not do that.
Nano-enhanced thermite does not do that.
Nano-thermite does not do that.
New-and-improved super-duper mini-micro-nano thermite does not do that.
Firecrackers do not do that.
Fire does not do that.
Nukes do not do that.
Megga nukes do not do that.
Milli-nukes do not do that.
Mini-nukes do not do that.
Nano-nukes cannot do that.
A wrecking ball cannot do that.
A slingshot cannot do that.
Missiles cannot do that.

We know this because we know those things above involve Kinetic Energy and we know that the "dustification" was done without Kinetic Energy. That is, dustification was not done with high heat nor with some other form of Kinetic Energy (wrecking ball, projectile, gravity collapse). The building was not cooked to death nor was it beaten to death. So Kinetic Energy Weapons (KEW) did not destroy the buildings. But we know that Energy was Directed somehow and controlled within fairly precise boundaries only destroying buildings with a WTC prefix to cause them to turn to dust in mid air. That is, some kind of (cold) Directed Energy Weapon (cDEW) had to have done this. (i.e. LENR) Energy was directed and manipulated within the material such that it came apart without involving high heat and without having something fly through the air and hit it (bullets, missile, bombs, wrecking ball, a giant hammer, many micro hammers...)

If this technology can manipulate energy to do something like this, it can also be manipulated to provide us with "free energy" (i.e. "off the grid"). Simply by looking at the cover of Dr. Wood's book you can realize there must be a technology that can do this. This is evidence that such technology does exist. This is evidence that a technology capable of providing "free energy" ("off the grid") exists. The whole world witnessed this which means the whole world can know that "free-energy technology" exists. This realization will change the world. This is probably the biggest reason why there is so much effort spent misrepresenting, distorting, and suppressing Dr. Wood's research.

Our educational systems typically "teach the test" and it is usually a multiple-choice test. We are not taught very good problem-solving skills. So it is very easy to manipulate a population with poor problem-solving skills. Get them to focus on the HOW or the WHO and they will never be able to solve the problem. That is the secret. Look at how the official story was designed. We were told "Bin Laden did it." But what is "it" that he did? And look at how the Truther Movement is managed. Well meaning people, looking for answers, are directed to focus on HOW or WHO (i.e. mini-neutron bombs did "it", thermite did "it", the Jooos did "it", "9/11 was an inside job" ). Truthers are also conditioned to attack anyone addressing Dr. Wood's research and are told "she has a bogus theory" when Dr. Wood has no theory, only EVIDENCE. It keeps the well-meaning Truthers from looking at the EVIDENCE like a rodeo clown distracts a bull.

Why? Look at what the EVIDENCE tells us. It tells us the truth. "Empirical evidence is the truth that theory must mimic."

The empirical EVIDENCE tells us that the majority of the building turned into dust in mid air. Therefore, something that can do this (turn it into dust in mid air) must exist. That is the proof that it exists. It happened. You don't need the serial numbers for the gizmo to know what happened. When "white man" first arrived on the American continent with firearms, indigenous people did not need to know the serial numbers of their weapons to know what they can do. They didn't need to have seen such weapons in order to know that there exists a weapon that can fire a piece of metal fast enough to kill their brother. Likewise, by the end of the day on August 6, 1945, the people living near Hiroshima, Japan, did not need to understand how a nuclear bomb works in order to know that there exists a technology that can produce enormous amounts of heat or to know that there exists a super-duper Kinetic Energy Weapon (KEW) that is capable of destroying an entire city.

Dew Drops wrote: »

Why? Look at what the EVIDENCE tells us. It tells us the truth. "Empirical evidence is the truth that theory must mimic."

The only evidence here is that there are people in the world who have this type of mindset and they can be exploited. Fortune tellers, tarot cards, TV shows about ghosts, Loch Ness paraphernalia, Scientology, Judy Wood books and conferences.

It's all the same category, so go sell crazy somewhere else.

Brown Bomber wrote: »

...killing terrorist leaders and then dumping them into the sea...Gadaffi handing out viagra...etc

Those are your personal opinions based on your own personal beliefs. How they are formed is up to you.

Despite overwhelming evidence some people don't believe the Holocaust happened.. some don't believe man landed on the moon.. and so on. Again, that's up to them.

Others just have a blindingly obvious loathing and partisan paranoia of a certain country or race of people.. and that drives their own personal beliefs (hint hint)

In this case, it's an energy weapon that doesn't exist. Usually with a conspiracy theorist there's some sort of evidence at least, something they cling on to, but in this case there's absolutely nothing.

With no evidence we are into the purest form of faith based belief. About an event that happened just over 10 years ago and was widely filmed. So there's no point in arguing it any more with real world rules.

My magic space-fairy vs this guys magic energy weapon.

Brown Bomber wrote: »

Are you referring to the black Libyans who were ethnically cleansed, massacred, lynched, hung, tortured, had their throats slit etc by the NATO-backed terrorists that you labelled as foriegn mercenaries in your anti-black Libyan CT?

A wild demonstration of my point appears.

This is hilarious. I can't really say anything that loads of people haven't already said here, but I have to say something.

OP, are you absolutely foolish? Photos? Anyone can prove anything with a bloody photo, and it's as easy to misinterpret 100 as it is just 1. Come off it, man. And I know you were on about other stuff too but your analytical faculties are seriously compromised long ago. That said, one incorrect assumption doesn't mean all your ideas are wrong but you've been acting like a fool when people question your posts.

I only read as far as page 5 of this thread but I'm getting the idea. Yeah, I think that there are serious unanswered questions about 9/11, but as I wasn't there, and I'm not an engineer or scientist who studied the actual evidence (as in being there and working on it full time for a good deal afterwards) any ideas I might have are total conjecture.

But how about just one: If there was a great energy device that could be used as a weapon it would surely have been built on years upon years of experimentation and development which may have started out as something completely different, possibly not a weapon at all. In which case surely loads of different people around the world would have some idea of its construction, possible uses/misuses, before it was all hushed over simultaneously by every government in the world at some late stage (which could still have been 60 years ago), and eventually put to use by a good number of heartless Americans who presumably had no friends, family, extended family, ex-college buddies, etc to get killed or injured in this wild act of murder unless they all live in some sort of isolated community somewhere.

If that were true, and this is pure conjecture, surely the 2nd world war was entirely staged after massive planning by a one world oligarchy to convince the population of Earth that our global social and economic fabric is driven, balanced and unbalanced by various nations, geniuses of various natures and lunatics acting in their own self-interest, and as a result there can simply be no sane connection whatsoever between the occurences of Sept 11 (whoever the perpetrators) and a mysterious energy weapon that no one seems to know anything about.

I'm not saying it's untrue, just highly unlikely. I don't say it's untrue because I don't take photos, videos, theories and opinions as fact.

Sorry, had to be said. I still say bravo for questioning it.