50 shades of grey. No shame!

flutterflye · 15-10-2012 09:02PM

I would be extremely embarrassed to be seen reading that in public.
Not because of the pornographic content, but because I've seen excerpts from it, and it seems like the worst, cringiest piece of 'English literature' I've ever cum (:)) across!

Madam_X · 15-10-2012 09:03PM

My friend in London was saying there were rows of women on the Tube reading it over the summer. "Oh look everyone, I'm so sexually liberated! I'm reading a book nearly everyone's reading and not shocked by!"
Now if they were reading a book called Tales Of Cum-Guzzling with a picture of a woman sporting a pearl necklace on the front, THAT would be sexually liberated.

pickarooney · 15-10-2012 09:04PM

otto_26 wrote: »

I have nothing against pornographic novels or anything but I went swimming today in my local pool, they have seats where people can relax and read a book or newspaper. This place is also a hotel.

Went over to read a newspaper today and saw a women that must have been in her late 40's with what must of been her daughter of about 15 sitting in the area, the women was reading 50 shades of grey.

I mean I'm all for we live in the 21st century and stuff but surely their is a more appropriate place to read a pornographic novel than in public and in front of a 15 year old girl.

Am I missing something here but some people could just have a small bit of tact or is it because it's so popular it's ok to read in public?. How would that women feel if I was reading a pornographic magazine with just a women in her bikini on the front cover. Would she not think that would be inappropriate of me, as in younger people around and in a public area?

Fair enough the book doesn't have any pictures but the front cover (which is all anyone would be able to see) of my mag would have a women in a bikini no more different that any ladies mag?

A picture of a woman in just a bikini? At a swimming pool? It's like the last days of Sodom all over again.

BBDBB · 15-10-2012 09:04PM

Madam_X wrote: »

My friend in London was saying there were rows of women on the Tube reading it over the summer. "Oh look everyone, I'm so sexually liberated! I'm reading a book nearly everyone's reading and not shocked by!"
Now if they were reading a book called Tales Of Cum-Guzzling with a picture of a woman sporting a pearl necklace on the front, THAT would be sexually liberated.

is that a "How to" guide?

its just she cant be a very good guzzler if she's sporting a pearl necklace

Madam_X · 15-10-2012 09:06PM

BBDBB wrote: »

is that a "How to" guide?

its just she cant be a very good guzzler if she's sporting a pearl necklace

Like, duh... some people can do other stuff you know. :rolleyes:

Internet Hero · 15-10-2012 09:06PM

MagicMarker wrote: »

What's the big deal, me and me da watch barely legal creampies together all the time.

ah gross

one of my friends once sent me a vid that was newly legal creampies. it was criminal in everything but the eyes of the law. they said it was the night before the girls birthday and they timed it down to 12 o clock with there boners ready and when it hit 12 they put it in the girls ass. was scarey

BBDBB · 15-10-2012 09:06PM

Madam_X wrote: »

Like, duh... some people can do other stuff you know. :rolleyes:

ahh, yer a dribbler so

FanadMan · 15-10-2012 09:09PM

otto_26 wrote: »

No the issue is I'm aware its a pornographic novel and how she was reading it in a public place in front of a 15 year old girl... Is that the reason people would feel its inappropriate for people to read porn mags in public because they are popular not the content?

Hey I don't mind its her daughter would just have a bit more tact myself but everyone to there own I guess.

There is a massive difference between a book that has nothing graphic on the cover and a pornographic magazine. As someone else here said, you only know what the book's about because of all the hype

Pompey Magnus · 15-10-2012 09:11PM

otto_26 wrote: »

I mean I'm all for we live in the 21st century and stuff but surely their is a more appropriate place to read a pornographic novel than in public and in front of a 15 year old girl.

You really need an update on the modern world. Let me help:

Man leaving a standard sex shop: Pervert.
Woman leaving an Ann Summers store: Liberated woman.

Man pinching a girl's bum in nightclub: Pervert.
Woman pinching a man's bum in nightclub: Just having a laugh.

Man looking at erotic material in public: Pervert and most probably mentally ill.
Woman looking at erotic material in public: Not afraid of showing she is sexually liberated.

TV advert using busty ladies in low cut tops: Pervy ad made by perverts for fellow perverts.
TV advert using a good looking guy with no shirt on: A bit of harmless fun.

weisses · 15-10-2012 09:21PM

Did you ask if she was 15 ?? ... More swimming less assuming me think

Eggy Baby! · 15-10-2012 09:37PM

say_who_now? wrote: »

50ml of fapping juice

I thought jizzly was only produced at 12+ ?

(You measured it?)

say_who_now? · 16-10-2012 12:14AM

Eggy Baby! wrote: »

I thought jizzly was only produced at 12+ ?

(You measured it?)

All joking aside and all- nope, once you hit puberty, etc, the very same way as a girl can be an early developer.

And no, lol, I didn't measure, it just fitted in with the theme of the thread. Your average man will produce about a teaspoon, or 5ml in an ejaculation.

Unless you're Peter North, but he's definitely not your average man!

I probably shouldn't be answering these questions when I have a few drinks down, damn touch site is far too handy, kudos for the pm notifications btw, about time!

ArtSmart · 16-10-2012 12:49AM

otto_26 wrote: »

I have nothing against pornographic novels or anything but I went swimming today in my local pool, they have seats where people can relax and read a book or newspaper. This place is also a hotel.

Went over to read a newspaper today and saw a women that must have been in her late 40's with what must of been her daughter of about 15 sitting in the area, the women was reading 50 shades of grey.

I mean I'm all for we live in the 21st century and stuff but surely their is a more appropriate place to read a pornographic novel than in public and in front of a 15 year old girl.

Am I missing something here but some people could just have a small bit of tact or is it because it's so popular it's ok to read in public?. How would that women feel if I was reading a pornographic magazine with just a women in her bikini on the front cover. Would she not think that would be inappropriate of me, as in younger people around and in a public area?

Fair enough the book doesn't have any pictures but the front cover (which is all anyone would be able to see) of my mag would have a women in a bikini no more different that any ladies mag?

has thinly veiled 'should i buy a copy' been done yet?

if not, i call it

ArtSmart · 16-10-2012 12:53AM

pickarooney wrote: »

A picture of a woman in just a bikini? At a swimming pool? It's like the last days of Sodom all over again.

nonsense.

bikinis were a Greek invention - they never reached that part of the world, until the 1950s.

1ZRed · 16-10-2012 01:25AM

Internet Hero wrote: »

ah gross

one of my friends once sent me a vid that was newly legal creampies. it was criminal in everything but the eyes of the law. they said it was the night before the girls birthday and they timed it down to 12 o clock with there boners ready and when it hit 12 they put it in the girls ass. was scarey

Easy there tayto, and throw me the link!

billybudd · 16-10-2012 01:33AM

The most important issue with this lame story is: who the fcuk goes to a swimming pool to read? lazy ****.

hatrickpatrick · 16-10-2012 01:35AM

ArtSmart wrote: »

nonsense.

bikinis were a Greek invention - they never reached that part of the world, until the 1950s.

Feckin' Greeks! THEY INVENTED GAYNESS!!!!!

ArtSmart · 17-10-2012 02:15PM

hatrickpatrick wrote: »

Feckin' Greeks! THEY INVENTED GAYNESS!!!!!

Yes. Yes they did.

The Bikinis were used 2776 years ago by the athletes in the games to allow ease of movement. Or at least, that was the excuse they gave.

Boskowski · 17-10-2012 02:24PM

What's the story with this shame thing anyway? What should people be ashamed of exactly?

The only thing one should be ashamed of - if anything - would be that one apparently got hooked on the latest fad which has been widely acknowledged as harmless frustrated housewife drivel.

AnonoBoy · 17-10-2012 02:31PM

She should have been ashamed for reading any book in public!

Does't she have a mobile phone that she can go on Facebook on instead of reading a book? :mad:

SunnyDub1 · 17-10-2012 02:35PM

OP for real ? :eek:

The woman is entitled to read what she wishes, and where she likes!
Maybe you should just mind your own business.

Not like she was sitting there with a porn video playing for everyone to see:rolleyes:

otto_26 · 17-10-2012 08:50PM

SunnyDub1 wrote: »

OP for real ? :eek:

The woman is entitled to read what she wishes, and where she likes!
Maybe you should just mind your own business.

Not like she was sitting there with a porn video playing for everyone to see:rolleyes:

Who said the women wasn't entitled to read it? :rolleyes: I did mind my own business!!

Can I read playboy in front of a 15 year girl if she's not going to be able to see the inside of what i'm reading? My point is the women could have a bit of tact about her that's all.

I wouldn't read playboy in public because it's inappropriate not because i'm not entitled to. Reading a pornographic novel in front of a child that knows well what it is! that's just someone with no tact! in my opinion! but i guess everyone to their own

GalwayGuy2 · 17-10-2012 08:58PM

Any Boardsies up for an experiment:P

A man and a woman go to the same swimming pool,adults going to a children's one is not going to end well, the woman reads fifty shades of grey, and the man reads a black hardcover with the Playboy insignia on it and "Tales" written underneath. See what happens and what looks the people get.

flutterflye · 17-10-2012 09:03PM

The difference though is that porn has only one purpose, whereas 50 shades is a novel, just like any other novel - to be read for entertainment - it would also have the same purpose as playboy.
Most women don't read it to be turned on, that would just be a a bonus I guess!

shopaholic01 · 17-10-2012 09:13PM

otto_26 wrote: »

Who said the women wasn't entitled to read it? :rolleyes: I did mind my own business!!

Can I read playboy in front of a 15 year girl if she's not going to be able to see the inside of what i'm reading? My point is the women could have a bit of tact about her that's all.

I wouldn't read playboy in public because it's inappropriate not because i'm not entitled to. Reading a pornographic novel in front of a child that knows well what it is! that's just someone with no tact! in my opinion! but i guess everyone to their own

The cover of Playboy is a lot more suggestive than the cover of 50 shades. Playboy also has photos which would be clearly visible.

Are you really that repressed that this offends you?

shopaholic01 · 17-10-2012 09:14PM

flutterflye wrote: »

The difference though is that porn has only one purpose, whereas 50 shades is a novel, just like any other novel - to be read for entertainment - it would also have the same purpose as playboy.
Most women don't read it to be turned on, that would just be a a bonus I guess!

Miracle more like, it's woeful

!

flutterflye · 17-10-2012 09:24PM

shopaholic01 wrote: »

Miracle more like, it's woeful !

Ha! I haven't read it - and I don't plan to!

holystungun9 · 17-10-2012 09:45PM

admiralofthefleet wrote: »

yeah i used to watch anal cum swappers 3 with my granda

I didn't know they made a third one! Cheers!

Pottler · 17-10-2012 10:21PM

50 shades of grey sounds like a feckin weather bulletin for Leitrim. Anyway, it's not porn, it's Literature. Just not good literature. Or good porn, even. Apparently..

PizzamanIRL · 17-10-2012 10:28PM

Oh no, a book about sex! You do know that two people had sex in order for you to be born OP.

Whats the big deal about a book with a bit of sex talk in it, since when is sex the devil's activity?

50 shades of grey. No shame!

Comments