Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Kissinger: Obama Will Create A New World Order

124

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Sarky wrote: »
    run_to_da_hills, is there any chance you could film yourself a few years from now when Obama leaves office without becoming the antichrist devil-worshipping baby eater you claim he is? I know you'll retcon your theories to fit whoever succeeds him within minutes, but I'd just like to see that one moment in your eyes when reality collides with belief.
    TBH, I don't think this man will simply "leave" office.

    Hitler didn't :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    TBH, I don't think this man will simply "leave" office.

    Hitler didn't :)
    Yes, but Clinton did. And Clinton has as much in common with Hitler as your friend Obama does.

    I'm still puzzled as to why he spent 4 years as a perfectly normal president before suddenly planning to change into a mad, murderous dictator in his second term - and allowing amateur internet detectives to discover his plans.

    Have you thought of any good reason for this yet?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills



    I'm still puzzled as to why he spent 4 years as a perfectly normal president before suddenly planning to change into a mad, murderous dictator in his second term - and allowing amateur internet detectives to discover his plans.

    Have you thought of any good reason for this yet?
    I will explain it metaphorically.

    When a fly will lands on a piece of meat it will lay its eggs, after a while the eggs will hatch out and maggots will form and devour the piece of meat

    This is exactly how Obama operates, Like a bluebottle he spent the four years laying his eggs discretely on a piece of rotting meat (America) , (The eggs are all his executive orders ) the maggots will hatch out in due course, ie his second term of office. They will devour this rotten piece of flesh and anything that gets in their way. .

    At the moment this piece of meat looks perfectly normal but not for long. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,843 ✭✭✭weisses


    I will explain it metaphorically.

    When a fly will lands on a piece of meat it will lay its eggs, after a while the eggs will hatch out and maggots will form and devour the piece of meat

    This is exactly how Obama operates, Like a bluebottle he spent the four years laying his eggs discretely on a piece of rotting meat (America) , (The eggs are all his executive orders ) the maggots will hatch out in due course, ie his second term of office. They will devour this rotten piece of flesh and anything that gets in their way. .

    At the moment this piece of meat looks perfectly normal but not for long. :)

    Use a different metafoor ;):D

    http://supervegan.com/blog/entry.php?id=1044


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    I will explain it metaphorically.

    When a fly will lands on a piece of meat it will lay its eggs, after a while the eggs will hatch out and maggots will form and devour the piece of meat

    This is exactly how Obama operates, Like a bluebottle he spent the four years laying his eggs discretely on a piece of rotting meat (America) , (The eggs are all his executive orders ) the maggots will hatch out in due course, ie his second term of office. They will devour this rotten piece of flesh and anything that gets in their way. .

    At the moment this piece of meat looks perfectly normal but not for long. :)
    Why did he not introduce these important executive orders in his first few weeks in power when he was hugely popular?

    Why take years to introduce them, and risk a whole new election cycle while steadily losing support?

    Your explanation - with bluebottles and all - still does not work, does it?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Why did he not introduce these important executive orders in his first few weeks in power when he was hugely popular?

    Why take years to introduce them, and risk a whole new election cycle while steadily losing support?

    Your explanation - with bluebottles and all - still does not work, does it?
    It takes time to pass anything through congress, legal challenges etc. I thought you would know about that.

    Obama has a quick way around this though, problem _ reaction _ solution etc.
    Create a false flag void to give a reason for his new executive powers. Worked well with his so called underwear bombers.

    Only those with a bit of cop on would understand these executive orders, the rest of his followers would be only have their minds set on getting his free cell phones. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    It takes time to pass anything through congress, legal challenges etc. I thought you would know about that.

    Obama has a quick way around this though, problem _ reaction _ solution etc.
    Create a false flag void to give a reason for his new executive powers. Worked well with his so called underwear bombers.

    Only those with a bit of cop on would understand these executive orders, the rest of his followers would be only have their minds set on getting his free cell phones. :)
    This still makes no sense - if his executive orders are subject to challenge from congress (and only 2 orders in US history have been overturned by the courts) then surely he should have initiated them on day one of his presidency? Instead, his first order was used to increase public access to presidential records.

    If he was worried about delays, why did he wait a couple of years to introduce his evil plans?

    Still makes no sense, does it?

    (by the way, the free phones come from a programme introduced by...Ronald Reagan - but of course you get your info from far-right sources in the US)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 330 ✭✭gibraltar


    It takes time to pass anything through congress, legal challenges etc. I thought you would know about that.

    Obama has a quick way around this though, problem _ reaction _ solution etc.
    Create a false flag void to give a reason for his new executive powers. Worked well with his so called underwear bombers.

    Only those with a bit of cop on would understand these executive orders, the rest of his followers would be only have their minds set on getting his free cell phones. :)


    When you consider that according to you the antichrist and the NWO cant fake a birth cert why do you believe that they could organize a false flag?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    gibraltar wrote: »
    When you consider that according to you the antichrist and the NWO cant fake a birth cert why do you believe that they could organize a false flag?
    Put it another way, they have yet to produce an authentic birth certificate.

    Fake birth certs and false flags have one thing in common. IE They are both lies. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 330 ✭✭gibraltar


    Put it another way, they have yet to produce an authentic birth certificate.

    Fake birth certs and false flags have one thing in common. IE They are both lies. :)

    Put it this wayy ou have stated that faking a birth cert would be simple for Obama and his NWO buddies yet you also state that Obama and the NWO have been unable to fake a birth cert, so which is it simple or impossible?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    gibraltar wrote: »
    Put it this wayy ou have stated that faking a birth cert would be simple for Obama and his NWO buddies yet you also state that Obama and the NWO have been unable to fake a birth cert, so which is it simple or impossible?
    Yes it would be simple for them to produce a fake to fool the mainstream media and your average American, but when it is put to the correct acid test the fake will always reveal itself.

    Ill put it another way, they have all the resources to deceive the masses and stall the truth on this important matter.


  • Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Yes it would be simple for them to produce a fake to fool the mainstream media and your average American, but when it is put to the correct acid test the fake will always reveal itself.

    Ill put it another way, they have all the resources to deceive the masses and stall the truth on this important matter.
    What about birth certs are so impossible to fake that the entire weight of your supposed global conspiracy couldn't over come it?

    So what happens in 2016 when Obama leaves office?
    Will it be like you other failed predictions where you try some pathetic hand waving, pretend you never made the predictions in the first place and then go on to claim the next guy is the real antichrist?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 330 ✭✭gibraltar


    Yes it would be simple for them to produce a fake to fool the mainstream media and your average American, but when it is put to the correct acid test the fake will always reveal itself.

    Ill put it another way, they have all the resources to deceive the masses and stall the truth on this important matter.

    Ok you think its impossible for Obama and the NWO to create a passable fake birth cert, if they cant do something you consider simple then why are you worried about them... why did they make such silly mistakes with the faking of the birth cert?

    I'm curious do you have your own opinions of why the birth cert must be fake or do you just accept what the Koch brothers have told you to believe?

    Well only a few weeks until Obama is almost killed and installs marshal law - you are still continuing with this prediction aren't you?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    gibraltar wrote: »
    I'm curious do you have your own opinions of why the birth cert must be fake or do you just accept what the Koch brothers have told you to believe?
    I think you have your answer. But the funny thing is that people who believe this horsesh!t think they arrived at this belief independently.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    gibraltar wrote: »
    Ok you think its impossible for Obama and the NWO to create a passable fake birth cert, if they cant do something you consider simple then why are you worried about them... why did they make such silly mistakes with the faking of the birth cert?
    A good forensic laboratory should detect error in any fake document. Would you see main stream American media quizzing the authenticity of Obama's credentials? You must be joking
    gibraltar wrote: »

    I'm curious do you have your own opinions of why the birth cert must be fake or do you just accept what the Koch brothers have told you to believe?
    If a question did arise about the authenticity of Obama's birth cert in my first Antichrist thread four years ago I would have doubted it. I don't need any republican follower to tell me that he is a fake. :)
    gibraltar wrote: »
    Well only a few weeks until Obama is almost killed and installs marshal law - you are still continuing with this prediction aren't you?

    Something has to give, the pot is starting to boil over. Either a major false flag, an assassination attempt or Martial Law. Either one of these would be enough to usher in a state of emergency and all his fascist EO's to stall the election and buy him more time.

    An assassination attempt will not only gain him sympathy votes at home, it will also gain him support from his former arch enemies which would no doubt place him on a global pedistal. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    If a question came up about his birth cert in my first Antichrist thread on Obama four years ago I would have doubted it. I don't need any republican follower to tell me that it is fake. :)
    The odd thing is that the only person in a position to know for sure says it is genuine. But you ignore what they say, for some reason.
    An assassination attempt will not only gain him sympathy votes at home, it will also gain him support from his Americas former arch enemies which would no doubt place him on a global pedistal. :)
    Presumably come December you will be claiming that posts like yours prevented the assassination attempt and martial law.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,940 ✭✭✭Corkfeen


    A good forensic laboratory should detect error in any fake document. Would you see main stream American media quizzing the authenticity of Obama's credentials? You must be joking
    Erm, are you really trying to claim that the mainstream media have never taken down a government or president through a scandal being exposed as a result of investigative journalism? You're rewriting history. Presidents are as fair game as anyone else and there is no evidence to support your theory, as a result it is ignored.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭hooradiation


    Jenners! wrote: »
    What does democratic mean? Then the 'un' prefix obviously means the opposite of the word democratic.

    fascinating.
    However context is also important. Your use of the phrase undemocratic makes no goddamn sense.
    And given an opportunity to explain it further you decided to squander it and my time.

    Jenners! wrote: »
    The point of linguistics, any language, is to speak/type with the least amount of necessary words to create context.

    Actually, the point is to communicate your intention in a manner that can be understood.
    So far, not so good.


    Jenners! wrote: »
    I didn't realise you would be needing foot notes for each statement in my point. Is that what your referring to??

    Maybe you should try using words properly rather than lamenting that your misuse of words is other peoples fault?
    Jenners! wrote: »
    Im sorry you don't have your own thought-provoking opinion on Kissingner,

    The unfortunate implication here is that you do - self praise is no praise and all that.
    Jenners! wrote: »
    but making irrelevant comments to dissect my view doesn't change your situation.

    Sadly, what would seem to be the case. Pointing out your shitty misuse of words apparently has very little chance of preventing you from doing it in future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 Jenners!


    Your entitled to your opinion, but anyone who resorts to profanity to explain their view instead of a suitable word, should not be lecturing others on their choice of words!

    I find your view invalid and I don't think it's my job to help you while you struggle with language.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭hooradiation


    Jenners! wrote: »
    Your entitled to your opinion, but anyone who resorts to profanity to explain their view instead of a suitable word, should not be lecturing others on their choice of words!

    Hiding behind feigned outrage at such salty language won't get you very far.
    People swear, deal with it.
    Jenners! wrote: »
    I find your view invalid and I don't think it's my job to help you while you struggle with language.

    It is, however, your job to explain yourself when what you have previously written is called into question.
    If you want to be taken seriously, that is.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 330 ✭✭gibraltar


    A good forensic laboratory should detect error in any fake document.

    Please explain how a lab would determine that a US birth cert is fake.
    Would you see main stream American media quizzing the authenticity of Obama's credentials? You must be joking

    To be fair mainstream America would also not question that fact that hes black, not because they are sheep but because of the evidence to prove its a fact.
    If a question did arise about the authenticity of Obama's birth cert in my first Antichrist thread four years ago I would have doubted it. I don't need any republican follower to tell me that he is a fake. :)

    Four years ago you believed him to be the antichrist and yet you made no mention of the apparently laughable fake that is his birth cert... your research might be weak.
    Something has to give, the pot is starting to boil over. Either a major false flag, an assassination attempt or Martial Law. Either one of these would be enough to usher in a state of emergency and all his fascist EO's to stall the election and buy him more time.

    And in a few weeks when this does not happen what are you going to say? will it be like your olympics claim that you prevented a false flag by posting about it on boards?

    Do you have any other excuses ready?, if not I recommend you start working on some now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 Jenners!


    Do you not see how hypocritical you are? Giving out about my use of language, when you clearly do not know how to express yourself. People swear when they lack words for the correct expression. Im not stating it wrong to use expressions, but when your splitting imaginary hairs on the use of language, you defeat your own argument.
    I have stated in previous posts why it was undemocratic. Read subsequent posts of mine. And for you are still struggle with a dictionary ..
    democratic (adjective)
    of, relating to, or supporting democracy or it principles.

    I stated un democratic, thus the opposite.

    East Timor was granted it's own right to self determination.
    Kissinger (and Ford) supported the Invasion of Indonesia. That is against, by definition, the meaning of democracy.

    Do you wish to keep digging a hole into your stupidity ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    gibraltar wrote: »
    Please explain how a lab would determine that a US birth cert is fake.
    Several labs have already proven it a fake and has been discussed at length in previous threads.
    gibraltar wrote: »


    To be fair mainstream America would also not question that fact that hes black, not because they are sheep but because of the evidence to prove its a fact.
    There is a difference between a birth cert and the color of his skin, one can be faked while the other one can't.
    gibraltar wrote: »

    Four years ago you believed him to be the antichrist and yet you made no mention of the apparently laughable fake that is his birth cert... your research might be weak.
    One thing I did prove four years ago is that Obama is a great deceiver which is one of the characteristics of the Antichrist.

    He managed to fool the whole nation into handing over their bill of rights in exchange for so called protection against boogymen terrorists that he and his agent godfathers invented themselves.
    gibraltar wrote: »
    And in a few weeks when this does not happen what are you going to say? will it be like your olympics claim that you prevented a false flag by posting about it on boards?

    Do you have any other excuses ready?, if not I recommend you start working on some now.
    He may well crash the country into martial law by hacking into the banking system. (Whether done through his Zionist Godfathers or his own agents) Anything is possible. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    He managed to fool the whole nation into handing over their bill of rights in exchange for so called protection against boogymen terrorists that he and his agent godfathers invented themselves.
    In fact, he was so deceptive that he managed to get the Bush administration to pass the Patriot Act years before he even got into power. :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    In fact, he was so deceptive that he managed to get the Bush administration to pass the Patriot Act years before he even got into power. :rolleyes:

    Obama put the icing on the cake. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Obama put the icing on the cake. :)
    I bet your right-wing blogs don't point out that it was the Bush administration that eroded civil liberties in the US.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    I bet your right-wing blogs don't point out that it was the Bush administration that eroded civil liberties in the US.

    Yes and I have no problems admitting that Bush is perhaps one of the greatest war criminal in US history and yes he was part and parcel of 9/11 and the follow up Patriot & REAL ID act. Obama simply took over where Bush left off. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    Seriously; Will you video that moment where a little piece of you dies inside after Obama leaves office without any of the crap you've predicted coming to pass?

    I bet it'll be delicious.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Sarky wrote: »
    Seriously; Will you video that moment where a little piece of you dies inside after Obama leaves office without any of the crap you've predicted coming to pass?

    I bet it'll be delicious.
    But if it doesn't come to pass what will Obama do with all his millions of hollow point bullets? :confused:

    I wonder will he get a refund?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    But if it doesn't come to pass what will Obama do with all his millions of hollow point bullets? :confused:

    I wonder will he get a refund?
    I'm pretty sure that Obama does not run every single department, quango and governmental organisation in the US, even if that does put the kybosh on some of your speculations. Even the Anti-Christ only has 24 hours in the day.


Advertisement
Advertisement