Arsenal Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 12/13 MOD POST #232

emergingstar · 27-09-2012 02:23PM

If terry starts I would put gervinho up front, terry will thrive on the physical battle with giroud

27-09-2012 02:25PM

emergingstar wrote: »

If terry starts I would put gervinho up front, terry will thrive on the physical battle with giroud

Whereas he won't need to do anything at all with Gervinho.:D
No seriously, Walcott might get a start so i'd stick Gervinho on the left, Walcott on the right and podolski up top.

DenMan · 27-09-2012 02:28PM

If Terry appeals the ban would he be eligible for Sunday? I think so!

tony1kenobi · 27-09-2012 02:31PM

DenMan wrote: »

If Terry appeals the ban would he be eligible for Sunday? I think so!

His ban doesn't start until either after his appeal period is up or after his appeal.Whichever occurs.

emergingstar · 27-09-2012 02:31PM

Bam Bam Mickey wrote: »

emergingstar wrote: »

If terry starts I would put gervinho up front, terry will thrive on the physical battle with giroud

Whereas he won't need to do anything at all with Gervinho.:D
No seriously, Walcott might get a start so i'd stick Gervinho on the left, Walcott on the right and podolski up top.

I would leave the podolski and Gibbs combo alone
Good call re Walcott, but if he is to start would drag put him on the right to pin Ashley cole back who will be afraid of his pace
And then gervinho up top his movement and pace would cause terry all sorts of problems hopefully more of an end product this time

emergingstar · 27-09-2012 02:33PM

We also released our finanical results
We're fcuking rich

Oregano_State · 27-09-2012 02:35PM

emergingstar wrote: »

We also released our finanical results
We're fcuking rich

Link please?

27-09-2012 02:35PM

emergingstar wrote: »

I would leave the podolski and Gibbs combo alone
Good call re Walcott, but if he is to start would drag put him on the right to pin Ashley cole back who will be afraid of his pace
And then gervinho up top his movement and pace would cause terry all sorts of problems hopefully more of an end product this time

I'm not so sure, Podolski and Cazorla will surely be earmarked more by the Chelsea manager.
Which could be a good thing for Gervinho.:)

emergingstar · 27-09-2012 02:36PM

Oregano_State wrote: »

emergingstar wrote: »

We also released our finanical results
We're fcuking rich

Link please?

http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-archive/arsenal-holdings-publishes-financial-results

emergingstar · 27-09-2012 02:37PM

Bam Bam Mickey wrote: »

emergingstar wrote: »

I would leave the podolski and Gibbs combo alone
Good call re Walcott, but if he is to start would drag put him on the right to pin Ashley cole back who will be afraid of his pace
And then gervinho up top his movement and pace would cause terry all sorts of problems hopefully more of an end product this time

I'm not so sure, Podolski and Cazorla will surely be earmarked more by the Chelsea manager.
Which could be a good thing for Gervinho.:)

I still think we beat them 2-1 very confident here

27-09-2012 02:37PM

Oregano_State wrote: »

Link please?

Arsenal Financial Earnings

emergingstar · 27-09-2012 02:39PM

no mention of wenger saying jack will play 60 mins on Monday

I can't be the only one excited by this, can I

everdead.ie · 27-09-2012 02:43PM

emergingstar wrote: »

We also released our finanical results
We're fcuking rich

You should check out the Swiss ramble on twitter he after saying that without player sales AFC lost 31m before tax

Oregano_State · 27-09-2012 02:46PM

emergingstar wrote: »

http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-archive/arsenal-holdings-publishes-financial-results

It's refreshing reading in terms of the attitude many clubc have this days towards money.

As a united fan, I wish we didn't have those two spongers sitting on the club like it's a magic cash cow that can eat debt all day long, and still smile for the cameras.

City and Chelsea are in completely different boats. I hope the FFP rules are enforced properly in the coming seasons, although I don't see it happening.

Anyway, it's good seeing that a very decent team can be put together with a sensible business model behind it!

emergingstar · 27-09-2012 02:58PM

everdead.ie wrote: »

emergingstar wrote: »

We also released our finanical results
We're fcuking rich

You should check out the Swiss ramble on twitter he after saying that without player sales AFC lost 31m before tax

Yeah I follow him, that post was more of a joke
We still have 150m cash reserve, excluding this summer profit and property sales

He said it looks like wenger have 40m to spend in jan taking everything into account

emergingstar · 27-09-2012 03:00PM

Oregano_State wrote: »

emergingstar wrote: »

http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-archive/arsenal-holdings-publishes-financial-results

It's refreshing reading in terms of the attitude many clubc have this days towards money.

As a united fan, I wish we didn't have those two spongers sitting on the club like it's a magic cash cow that can eat debt all day long, and still smile for the cameras.

City and Chelsea are in completely different boats. I hope the FFP rules are enforced properly in the coming seasons, although I don't see it happening.

Anyway, it's good seeing that a very decent team can be put together with a sensible business model behind it!

From what I read if FFP is introduced utd will by miles and miles ahead of everyone else with the brilliant commercial deals ye have

Oregano_State · 27-09-2012 03:16PM

emergingstar wrote: »

From what I read if FFP is introduced utd will by miles and miles ahead of everyone else with the brilliant commercial deals ye have

Yeah the clubs with the most fans and the best structures in place will be the ones that fare best I've heard. Arsenal will be fine anyway. It's clubs like Man City, who have money behind the club, but not enough fans or business deals worldwide who will be curtailed.

From being in the states last summer, Chelsea have a lot of fans over there. Drogba in particular was very popular!

Pepe LeFrits · 27-09-2012 06:21PM

We'll improve our commercial deals massively in the next few years. That should be a big help.

gosplan · 27-09-2012 07:32PM

Oregano_State wrote: »

It's clubs like Man City, who have money behind the club, but not enough fans or business deals worldwide who will be curtailed.

From being in the states last summer, Chelsea have a lot of fans over there. Drogba in particular was very popular!

Meh, business deals are easy to do once you've enough cash behind you.

12gauge dave · 27-09-2012 07:49PM

Its hard to see fair play rules being strongly enforced anytime soon doesnt it?

It would make transfer feadline days a bit more tame though?ha

danlen · 27-09-2012 08:43PM

TBH I don't see how FFP can be enforced in a strict enough fashion for it to make any noticeable impact. There are just too many loopholes and ways around directly violating the rules.

bad2dabone · 27-09-2012 09:28PM

danlen wrote: »

TBH I don't see how FFP can be enforced in a strict enough fashion for it to make any noticeable impact. There are just too many loopholes and ways around directly violating the rules.

have to agree with this. But I do think that there's trouble coming somewhere down the line with regards to finance within football and certain clubs - Arsenal due to prudent finances and United (due to their revenue generation - If only they could get rid of those leeches the Glazers) will be ok.

dfbemt · 27-09-2012 09:47PM

emergingstar wrote: »

no mention of wenger saying jack will play 60 mins on Monday

I can't be the only one excited by this, can I

+1

Will be great to see Jack back.

Arteta, Jack, Cazorla and one other from a decent pool is a great midfield.

C'mon Jack. With you all the way.

batistuta9 · 28-09-2012 04:34AM

did you ever wish you had a life lads instead if you just looking at this stupid thing day after day?

gosplan · 28-09-2012 06:00AM

batistuta9 wrote: »

did you ever wish you had a life lads instead if you just looking at this stupid thing day after day?

I often thing of what could have been accomplished if we had productively used all the man-hoursthathave been spent on boards.

The arsenal super thread alone probably could have cured cancer by now.

meriwether · 28-09-2012 09:10AM

gosplan wrote: »

I often thing of what could have been accomplished if we had productively used all the man-hoursthathave been spent on boards.

The arsenal super thread alone probably could have cured cancer by now.

We could have cured cancer, but then again, we wouldn't have a deadly Arsenal thread.

six of one, half a dozen of the other.

meriwether · 28-09-2012 09:12AM

Pepe LeFrits wrote: »

We'll improve our commercial deals massively in the next few years. That should be a big help.

There's room to generate about 30m per annum, when you consider we have sponsorship of the jersey, manufacture of jersey and stadium naming rights to auction.

Liverpool got 25m for the jersey deal (warrior?), United got 20m for the TRAINING KIT deal.

We're going to be rich. Rich I tell you.

28-09-2012 09:15AM

batistuta9 wrote: »

did you ever wish you had a life lads instead if you just looking at this stupid thing day after day?

Says the man on here before 6 in the morning.

meriwether · 28-09-2012 09:15AM

http://swissramble.blogspot.ie/search/label/Arsenal

Link here to our commercial income - we are way behind.

AnCapaillMor · 28-09-2012 09:16AM

I think we should start singing "you're not financially solvent anymore" to the city and chelsea fans; it will really affect them.

Arsenal Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 12/13 MOD POST #232

Comments