Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Gay Marriage/Marriage Equality/End of World?

12829313334324

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 348 ✭✭Actor


    Nodin wrote: »
    What crap is this?

    You mean the basis of moral government?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,827 ✭✭✭christmas2012


    Sin City wrote: »
    funny-gay-marriage-legalized-pie-chart.jpg

    1082d1328104214-my-post-my-psych-dr-friends-wall-re-equal-rights-gay-marriage-401346_3073186273785_1387504699_33177626_1980618134_n.jpg


    Ten million dollars and 72 days :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Actor wrote: »
    You mean the basis of moral government?

    Theres nothing "moral" about inequality.


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,037 ✭✭✭paddyandy


    What Homosexuals do is simply not natural and their bodies are obviously not designed for their particular types of behaviour .Disgusting is the Only word to describe their ways and 'Gay' relationships have never being time-tested for suitability in bringing up children .Men are not emotionally equipped for child nurturing and rearing .Women make far better Mothers as any Widower can tell you .Time will say in twenty years or so will see new stories in the press of homosexuals treatment of boy-children .........that will certainly happen if gay people get their way and how the Catholic Clergy were not recognised as Homosexuals is a real puzzle .They were but were called Paedophiles instead .Don't give me all this 'broadminded' hyperbolic nonsense either and many other such slippery and watery terms you people use to further your evil efforts .Some people are Amoral especially homosexuals and Criminals though they can recognise morality they sometimes don't have it as an inate part of their characters in some areas .They lack a sense of probity and may be stunted somehow but they cannot be regarded as normal by any means .......challenged maybe .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    paddyandy wrote: »
    What Homosexuals do is simply not natural and their bodies are obviously not designed for their particular types of behaviour .Disgusting is the Only word to describe their ways and 'Gay' relationships have never being time-tested for suitability in bringing up children .Men are not emotionally equipped for child nurturing and rearing .Women make far better Mothers as any Widower can tell you .Time will say in twenty years or so will see new stories in the press of homosexuals treatment of boy-children .........that will certainly happen if gay people get their way and how the Catholic Clergy were not recognised as Homosexuals is a real puzzle .They were but were called Paedophiles instead .Don't give me all this 'broadminded' hyperbolic nonsense either and many other such slippery and watery terms you people use to further your evil efforts .

    The day will come when comparing homosexuals to child molesters is a cardable offence, and I'll be glad of it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,090 ✭✭✭✭28064212


    paddyandy wrote: »
    What Homosexuals do is simply not natural
    Either is living in buildings, driving a car, or getting a surgical operation. I'm sure you don't do anything like that
    paddyandy wrote: »
    their bodies are obviously not designed for their particular types of behaviour
    They'd disagree. Btw, have you ever had your prostate stimulated? Why did God make it pleasurable?

    Your nonsensical rambling comparing homosexuals to paedophiles doesn't even warrant a response, and you should be ashamed of yourself

    Boardsie Enhancement Suite - a browser extension to make using Boards on desktop a better experience (includes full-width display, keyboard shortcuts, dark mode, and more). Now available through your browser's extension store.

    Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/boardsie-enhancement-suite/

    Chrome/Edge/Opera: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/boardsie-enhancement-suit/bbgnmnfagihoohjkofdnofcfmkpdmmce



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    It's all so obvious now. Actor et al. are dead set against people putting willies in their bums because they're afraid there won't be room for the massive stick already up there.


  • Posts: 4,630 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    paddyandy wrote: »
    What Homosexuals do is simply not natural and their bodies are obviously not designed for their particular types of behaviour .Disgusting is the Only word to describe their ways and 'Gay' relationships have never being time-tested for suitability in bringing up children .Men are not emotionally equipped for child nurturing and rearing .Women make far better Mothers as any Widower can tell you .Time will say in twenty years or so will see new stories in the press of homosexuals treatment of boy-children .........that will certainly happen if gay people get their way and how the Catholic Clergy were not recognised as Homosexuals is a real puzzle .They were but were called Paedophiles instead .Don't give me all this 'broadminded' hyperbolic nonsense either and many other such slippery and watery terms you people use to further your evil efforts .Some people are Amoral especially homosexuals and Criminals though they can recognise morality they sometimes don't have it as an inate part of their characters in some areas .They lack a sense of probity and may be stunted somehow but they cannot be regarded as normal by any means .......challenged maybe .

    One of the most disjointed, nonsensical rants I've ever seen.


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,037 ✭✭✭paddyandy


    Not a single good statement between the lot of you .Hyperbole and escape-hatch with perverse in vogue watery lines with no substance at all .Get help for it; you were not born that way and even if you were ....Would you remember which you fancied ? The Midwife or the Male doctor ????


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    gvn wrote: »
    One of the most disjointed, nonsensical rants I've ever seen.

    ...to be honest (and I can give examples) thats one of his better compositions.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    paddyandy wrote: »
    Not a single good statement between the lot of you .Hyperbole and escape-hatch with perverse in vogue watery lines with no substance at all .Get help for it; you were not born that way and even if you were ....Would you remember which you fancied ? The Midwife or the Male doctor ????

    The charter forbids me from resonding to you in the fashion I would prefer.

    Tell me, if male homosexuals are (as you imply) automatically attracted to young boys, wouldn't it follow that male heterosexuals are automatically attracted to young girls?


  • Posts: 4,630 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Nodin wrote: »
    ...to be honest (and I can give examples) thats one of his better compositions.

    Unfortunately I'm familiar with his particular ranting posting style.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    paddyandy wrote: »
    Not a single good statement between the lot of you .Hyperbole and escape-hatch with perverse in vogue watery lines with no substance at all .Get help for it; you were not born that way and even if you were ....Would you remember which you fancied ? The Midwife or the Male doctor ????

    So how do you know you weren't born gay and then turned heterosexual by some sick trick of nature? How?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    That's pretty much what happened. Live started off asexual. Most life on the planet still is, by a very large margin. Having any sexual orientation at all is way off the natural way of things.

    Paddyandy is just as sick and wrong as the gay people he hates. Isn't that just delicious?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,827 ✭✭✭christmas2012


    Tell me, if male homosexuals are (as you imply) automatically attracted to young boys, wouldn't it follow that male heterosexuals are automatically attracted to young girls?

    Why are you focusing just on the young boys and girls you do know a boy is young,but a young boy could be 8 or 9..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    I love the irony of the church warning people of homosexuals and their paedo tendencies when they were hiding the real peados all along!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    paddyandy wrote: »
    Not a single good statement between the lot of you .Hyperbole and escape-hatch with perverse in vogue watery lines with no substance at all .Get help for it; you were not born that way and even if you were ....Would you remember which you fancied ? The Midwife or the Male doctor ????

    The Doctor! Did you see his take home pay!!!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Why are you focusing just on the young boys and girls you do know a boy is young,but a young boy could be 8 or 9..

    What inane point are you failing to make now....?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 446 ✭✭Sponge25


    What gay people do behind closed doors is their own buisiness but when it comes to marriage I feel it should be between a man and a woman. Marriage is special!

    I don't object to civil unions but I just wish homosexual people would be happy with that. I'm not homophobic I just want marriage to between a man and a woman and civil unions to be between homosexuals. Am I wrong for thinking this?


  • Moderators Posts: 52,142 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    Sponge25 wrote: »
    What gay people do behind closed doors is their own buisiness but when it comes to marriage I feel it should be between a man and a woman. Marriage is special!

    I don't object to civil unions but I just wish homosexual people would be happy with that. I'm not homophobic I just want marriage to between a man and a woman and civil unions to be between homosexuals. Am I wrong for thinking this?

    why shouldn't homosexuals be allowed to avail of civil marriage?

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Sponge25 wrote: »
    ......... I'm not homophobic I just want marriage to between a man and a woman and civil unions to be between homosexuals. .........

    Why?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,940 ✭✭✭Corkfeen


    Sponge25 wrote: »
    What gay people do behind closed doors is their own buisiness but when it comes to marriage I feel it should be between a man and a woman. Marriage is special!

    I don't object to civil unions but I just wish homosexual people would be happy with that. I'm not homophobic I just want marriage to between a man and a woman and civil unions to be between homosexuals. Am I wrong for thinking this?

    If you can't give a reasonable reason why it shouldn't be allowed that would make you entirely wrong.... "I think marriage between a white man and a white woman is special and I don't think interracial marriages should be allowed. I can't explain why but this doesn't make me wrong. Marriage is special and i'm not racist." You can't inexplicably prevent equality because it doesn't fit with the narrative that you want the world to follow.

    For example it could easily be argued that people getting divorces could make marriage less special. But I can't see how same-sex couples who are in love and getting married make it less special.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 32,865 ✭✭✭✭MagicMarker


    Sponge25 wrote: »
    What gay people do behind closed doors is their own buisiness but when it comes to marriage I feel it should be between a man and a woman. Marriage is special!

    I don't object to civil unions but I just wish homosexual people would be happy with that. I'm not homophobic I just want marriage to between a man and a woman and civil unions to be between homosexuals. Am I wrong for thinking this?

    Yes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭ShooterSF


    Sponge25 wrote: »
    What gay people do behind closed doors is their own buisiness but when it comes to marriage I feel it should be between a man and a woman. Marriage is special!

    I don't object to civil unions but I just wish homosexual people would be happy with that. I'm not homophobic I just want marriage to between a man and a woman and civil unions to be between homosexuals. Am I wrong for thinking this?

    To answer your question I'll ask you one. How would you feel about people who felt it was their right to deny others happiness purely because they have a feeling on the subject? Because without actual reason that's what you're doing and I'd suggest that we should aim a little higher as human beings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,930 ✭✭✭Jimoslimos


    Actor wrote: »
    Are you familiar with natural law?
    Eh....this one?
    "Dem bones, dem bones need calcium"

    Yeah, but how does that relate to gay marriage?


    Personally speaking (as an unmarried, childless male), I'd be just as content if all heterosexual marriages were downgraded to civil unions/partnerships.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,594 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    paddyandy wrote: »
    What Homosexuals do is simply not natural and their bodies are obviously not designed for their particular types of behaviour .Disgusting is the Only word to describe their ways and 'Gay' relationships have never being time-tested for suitability in bringing up children .Men are not emotionally equipped for child nurturing and rearing .Women make far better Mothers as any Widower can tell you .Time will say in twenty years or so will see new stories in the press of homosexuals treatment of boy-children .........that will certainly happen if gay people get their way and how the Catholic Clergy were not recognised as Homosexuals is a real puzzle .They were but were called Paedophiles instead .Don't give me all this 'broadminded' hyperbolic nonsense either and many other such slippery and watery terms you people use to further your evil efforts .Some people are Amoral especially homosexuals and Criminals though they can recognise morality they sometimes don't have it as an inate part of their characters in some areas .They lack a sense of probity and may be stunted somehow but they cannot be regarded as normal by any means .......challenged maybe .

    Congratulations, you're a hate filled bigot. How does it feel?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 446 ✭✭Sponge25


    ShooterSF wrote: »
    To answer your question I'll ask you one. How would you feel about people who felt it was their right to deny others happiness purely because they have a feeling on the subject? Because without actual reason that's what you're doing and I'd suggest that we should aim a little higher as human beings.

    They have civil unions which is basically marriage. Marriage as an insitution has been around as long as mankind. Why can't they just be happy with civil unions? If I was gay i'd be happy with civil unions.

    Most people in the world aren't ready for gay marriage. They just got civil unions can't they give us a little time to adjust?

    Also; i'm not racist but i'm only attracted to white woman, I can't help what I like. Everyone else can marry green woman for all I care but I've always been mystified when my friends talked about Beyonce and Rihanna etc. I was just never attracted to them. I can see why others are but I'm only attracted to white girls. If that makes me racist, i'm racist. I didn't make a concious decision to only date white girls it's just what I like and I can't help that. I dated a Chinese girl for a short amount of time a few years ago and that put me off other races entirely. This is strictly about dating. I have many friends of other races and what other people do is entirely their own buisiness when it comes to dating other races.

    Just give us a little time to get used to the idea of gay marriage, untill then civil unions should suffice.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,944 ✭✭✭✭Links234


    Sponge25 wrote: »
    They have civil unions which is basically marriage.

    completely wrong!

    please, read this:

    http://www.marriagequality.ie/getinformed/mythbusters.html


  • Posts: 4,630 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Sponge25 wrote: »
    They have civil unions which is basically marriage. Marriage as an insitution has been around as long as mankind.

    Because something is traditional doesn't make it right.
    Why can't they just be happy with civil unions? If I was gay i'd be happy with civil unions.

    Most people in the world aren't ready for gay marriage. They just got civil unions can't they give us a little time to adjust?

    Just give us a little time to get used to the idea of gay marriage, untill then civil unions should suffice.

    Because they want equality. What difference will it make to you if gay marriage is allowed? Will it affect your life? No, not in the slightest.

    You still haven't given a reason; you've just stated that things have always been this way, so they should remain this way, or at least change should be gradual. That's not a reason.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,375 ✭✭✭Sin City


    hating homosexuality is gay


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement