Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

French magazine to publish "fully topless" photos of Kate Middleton today

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,996 ✭✭✭mitosis


    If there was no market for pics there'd be no-one taking them. Don't blame the photographers, blame the tabloid buyers.

    The naivety of the Brit Royals is astounding. Do they really think they are not being watched and phtographed all the time? Hell, one of them was snapped in his nip at a party a couple of weeks ago.

    If they don't want "scandalous" pics taken, it behooves them to keep their kit on.

    Oh, and Kate and Pip are only hot in a world populated by horse-faced scrags. In Temple Bar on a Friday night they'd just be average.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,299 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Real Life wrote: »
    yea obviously of course im going to check out kate middletons tits if i get the chance but i dont agree with how they were taken.

    Hypocrite.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,123 ✭✭✭RikkFlair


    Not safe for anywhere really

    She has a bit of a gut on her...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,163 ✭✭✭✭danniemcq


    RikkFlair wrote: »
    Not safe for anywhere really

    She has a bit of a gut on her...

    still wou.......

    well after a few pints i woul....

    feck it any hole is a goal


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,147 ✭✭✭PizzamanIRL


    Soooo...where can i see them?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,810 ✭✭✭✭sbsquarepants


    Meh, kate shmate. She's an at best average looking bird with no tits as far as i can see. Give me rossana davison over kate any day of the week!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,298 ✭✭✭✭later12


    Nope, I'm not remotely interested in seeing her bits. That, and IMO she's too skinny, so can't imagine it'd be all that nice to look at.
    So basically what you're looking for is a... fat man?
    mitosis wrote: »
    The naivety of the Brit Royals is astounding. Do they really think they are not being watched and phtographed all the time? Hell, one of them was snapped in his nip at a party a couple of weeks ago.

    If they don't want "scandalous" pics taken, it behooves them to keep their kit on.
    It "behooves" them?
    Behooves.

    Come on.

    A woman should expect to enjoy privacy when she is in any state of undress in a private setting. Being a semi-public figure does is not a free pass for the paparazzi to photograph you in such a way. I hope she sues the arse of them.
    Meh, kate shmate. She's an at best average looking bird with no tits as far as i can see. Give me rossana davison over kate any day of the week!
    Kate has class, Roseanna has crass. :cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,836 ✭✭✭Colmustard


    I do think Kate is a classy and beautiful woman. But would you be bothered to find a half topless Kate.

    I mean Ehh my friends told me about lots of sites you can see a host of topless and bottomless women getting up to all sorts of stuff.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭summerskin


    summerskin wrote: »
    fuzzy pics but the wánk bank has been replenished. time to go and spill some man mayo in the jacks at work....

    mission accomplished.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,753 ✭✭✭davet82


    Colmustard wrote: »
    I mean Ehh my friends told me about lots of sites you can see a host of topless and bottomless women getting up to all sorts of stuff.

    PM me :cool:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 280 ✭✭Jenroche


    And this matters why?

    With all that's going on in the world, does it matter a damn if some one got their t*ts out? I'll never understand peoples obesssion with celebs or royalty. :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,810 ✭✭✭✭sbsquarepants


    later12 wrote: »
    A woman should expect to enjoy privacy when she is in any state of undress in a private setting. Being a semi-public figure does is not a free pass for the paparazzi to photograph you in such a way. I hope she sues the arse of them.

    Ah come on will you, if you're a world famous figure and you wander about in the great outdoors with your knockers on show, you may expect a papparazzi to catch you, end of story. It's not like she was in the shower or something, she was sunbathing topless - could she really be so stupid as to expect no one to notice? Them there's princess tits, good, bad, perky, saggy, who cares - they're still belonging to a princess and as such worth their weight in gold to a papparazzi (probably more in this case €39 doesn't sound like much for a shot like that:D)

    later12 wrote: »
    Kate has class, Roseanna has crass. :cool:

    Well at least we know if we ever meet the two of them on a hen do in temple bar, we won't fall out over who gets who!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,387 ✭✭✭✭rubadub


    later12 wrote: »
    A woman should expect to enjoy privacy when she is in any state of undress in a private setting. Being a semi-public figure does is not a free pass for the paparazzi to photograph you in such a way. I hope she sues the arse of them.
    If she can sue them I wonder would the prince have the same "suing rights", he was also 'topless'.

    i.e. I wonder if any laws on stuff like this specify a difference on exposed nipples depending on sex.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 937 ✭✭✭swimming in a sea


    mitosis wrote: »
    Oh, and Kate and Pip are only hot in a world populated by horse-faced scrags. In Temple Bar on a Friday night they'd just be average.

    There is a fair amount of average on a Friday night in Temple Bar, that's for sure:eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,298 ✭✭✭✭later12


    Ah come on will you, if you're a world famous figure and you wander about in the great outdoors with your knockers on show, you may expect a papparazzi to catch you, end of story.
    Yeah, if you're doing it on a public beach; not at "a private swimming pool area of a private hotel". This wasn't the great outdoors.

    I'm not going to say that I didn't look at the magazine cover, or that the media reaction isn't a little amusing. The pictures are out either way.

    But as a basic principle, yes; it is wrong to take pictures of an individual when they are undressed in a private setting where they believe themselves to be out of sight. That's not a very controversial point, I would have thought.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    The best approach would be to invite the snappers to an open session and the pix bidded for, the money raised would go to a child abuse charity. I suspect this would cause an outbreak of awkward shoe gazing.


  • Posts: 5,464 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Oh yesh!!!!
    Show me them royal puppies!!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,433 ✭✭✭✭Mr Benevolent


    Four pages of whining and no boobs. What has become of AH?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,836 ✭✭✭Colmustard


    mike65 wrote: »
    The best approach would be to invite the snappers to an open session and the pix bidded for, the money raised would go to a child abuse charity. I suspect this would cause an outbreak of awkward shoe gazing.

    It really is but would you let your misses do that.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 35,948 Mod ✭✭✭✭dr.bollocko


    There are other sites on the internet to fulfill the lust for boobs.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement