Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Savage bar attack leaves journalist terrified.

1246789

Comments

  • #92
    yop
    Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional West Moderators Posts: 16,716 Mod ✭✭✭✭yop


    mikom wrote: »
    I see the banned FlutterinBantam alt account is still going.........

    Good spot, seemed quite familiar indeed. Time to hit the "ignore" button :D


  • #93
    Biggins
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Fulton Crown wrote: »
    Sorry Buddy ..all that badly put together shite is above my head and unworthy of response ..
    By the way it's spelt "incedense"

    Aaa... ok! :confused:

    Back on topic - it truly is a terrible piece of journalistic reporting.

    There is no stating of any detail in it whatsoever, about a figure someone else went in and took a picture of.
    The reporter just writes a story that reads like it should be in a thriller novel!


  • #94
    Nodin
    Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Fulton Crown wrote: »
    Shower of smug cnunts posting here ?

    Sindo is to forefront in exposing these arse wipes...should be complimented for it.

    .......

    This is the same Sindo that was a cheer leader for the property "boom"? The same Sindo that cheered on Bertie via Harris and Brendan "ballsy" O'Connor?


  • #95
    mikom
    Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    Fulton Crown wrote: »
    Niver mentioned the word "illegal" pilgrim..jest statin my opinions...the cnunt in question has put a number of good decent hard working families out on the street while he swans out in Portugal.

    But ..hey !nothin illegal about that... mebby there should be ...?

    But wait........ there's more....

    FlutterinBantam wrote: »
    Now the auld Flutt can be a cantankerous cnunt betimes, and investigative too.

    s

    Total conjecture on your part pilgrim.

    I'll let you off the hook on this one, but don't go making definitive statements unless you can back them up.

    Focking amateur.
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=66239044&postcount=227


  • #96
    Princess Consuela Bananahammock
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    hardCopy wrote: »
    The guy was already a scumbag numerous times over, before he threatened a girl with a glass, **** him if he thinks he has a right to privacy or even a holiday.

    Fair play to her for getting the photo, even if her English is poor, if all journos were afraid of criminals we'd gave very little to read about.

    There's an awful lot of sympathy in here for this guy, I knew the Indo was unpopular here but can't believe it's fallen below violent, corrupt, cowboy builders.

    Has this actually been proven yet? I mean, the journalist in question has no idea who he is apparently.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Advertisement
  • #97
    goose2005
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,798 ✭✭✭goose2005


    Biggins wrote: »
    It may seem like a stupid question but...

    If she/they don't know who he is:

    1. How did she know who to take a picture of?
    2. How did she know he was a developer?
    3. Frankly, how did she know what bar to go to, to take a picture of a person she not knows his name?
    4. How did she identify him, by picture she carried with herself? And if so (or not), if she had some way of knowing who she was looking for - then surely she must know his name?
    5. How can they say in the article header "Notorious developer" - then ask who is he? :confused::confused::confused:

    DUH!

    I smell something totally fishy about her whole story!
    They know he's Tom McFeely, the Sindo really hates Shinners and probably wanted to provoke him into going mad.

    http://bocktherobber.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/90238610-200x200.jpg
    http://i828.photobucket.com/albums/zz209/What_Goes_Up_/Japlandic/GodSaveTheQueen.jpg

    Ex-IRA hunger striker who claimed British bankruptcy on failed Irish developments.

    I don't know why they're pretending not to know, how could they know he was a notorious developer and yet not know who he was? Maybe so they can have a follow-up next week crediting "Internet sleuths."


  • #98
    Biggins
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Ikky Poo2 wrote: »
    Has this actually been proven yet? I mean, the journalist in question has no idea who he is apparently.

    But... but... the reporter says he's "Notorious!" :eek:

    :confused:

    I'd say this article will haunt the reporter for some time to come.
    Very embarrassing if this is the best quality work she can do!

    I'd say other jorno's are laughing their heads off tonight at the piece, possibly closer to home, in another bar somewhere in Dublin and elsewhere!


  • #99
    Princess Consuela Bananahammock
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Biggins wrote: »
    But... but... the reporter says he's "Notorious!" :eek:

    :confused:

    I'd say this article will haunt the reporter for some time to come.
    Very embarrassing if this is the best quality work she can do!

    Thi hip-hop artist? Doesn't really look like him, but this IS the Sindo...

    EDIT - He's dead, apparently. Not him. Ms. Horan hasn't done her research.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • #100
    Biggins
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    goose2005 wrote: »
    They know he's Tom McFeely, the Sindo really hates Shinners and probably wanted to provoke him into going mad.

    http://bocktherobber.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/90238610-200x200.jpg
    http://i828.photobucket.com/albums/zz209/What_Goes_Up_/Japlandic/GodSaveTheQueen.jpg

    Ex-IRA hunger striker who claimed British bankruptcy on failed Irish developments.

    I don't know why they're pretending not to know, how could they know he was a notorious developer and yet not know who he was? Maybe so they can have a follow-up next week crediting "Internet sleuths."

    If he's a Shinner - and I'm not saying he's not - why (and I could be wrong) is he in those pics, got unionist gear on?
    Photoshop job?

    This gets more confusing! :confused:


  • #101
    Fuinseog
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,371 ✭✭✭Fuinseog


    crazygeryy wrote: »
    Who the hell does niamh horan think she is? she approaches a total stranger in a bar and takes his photo with her iphone and she expects him not to react.!!!!
    Then she goes and claims a savage attack and its front page news.
    Shes a fu&#ing clown imo.

    Nb :could someone link the article.i cant find it online.



    Source supplied by Biggings
    http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/9333/p1170452large.jpg

    I love Niamh Horn. she is designed for the sindo. she still looks as if she is on TY work experience and her opinions are equally naive. she is unintentionally hilarious. she wrote an article about some american rapper and was shocked when invited backstage as a groupie that the rapper wanted to have sex with her.


  • Advertisement
  • #102
    Carazy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 395 ✭✭Carazy


    It was like reading a fifth class student's creative writing homework. One of the worst journalists that I think has graced the pages of a national newspaper. Childish and poorly written articles every week.


  • #103
    Darwin
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,773 ✭✭✭Darwin


    girl in the striped socks wrote: »
    In fairness it's something I'd expect to see gracing the front page of a tabloid, not a so called "proper journalistic" paper.

    God you are completely deluded if you think the Independent/Gutter press is capable of producing any kind of balanced journalism to be taken seriously.


  • #104
    Boombastic
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,496 ✭✭✭Boombastic


    mikom wrote: »
    But wait........ there's more....

    That's better investigative journalism than the sindo article:pac:


  • #105
    Fulton Crown
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,493 ✭✭✭Fulton Crown


    BarackPyjama wrote: »
    If you find yourself 'out on the street' I would imagine it's down to the fact that you're barely literate rather than because of some evil developer bogeyman.

    Less of the bile Dude ...maybe you need to get your piles seen to ?

    Where did that "barely literate " shite come from....?


  • #106
    woodoo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,219 ✭✭✭woodoo


    goose2005 wrote: »
    They know he's Tom McFeely, the Sindo really hates Shinners and probably wanted to provoke him into going mad.

    http://bocktherobber.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/90238610-200x200.jpg
    http://i828.photobucket.com/albums/zz209/What_Goes_Up_/Japlandic/GodSaveTheQueen.jpg

    Ex-IRA hunger striker who claimed British bankruptcy on failed Irish developments.

    I don't know why they're pretending not to know, how could they know he was a notorious developer and yet not know who he was? Maybe so they can have a follow-up next week crediting "Internet sleuths."

    Don't think he is on hunger strike anymore :D


  • #107
    Colmustard
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,836 ✭✭✭Colmustard


    I hate getting my photo taken myself but I would not lash out at anyone for doing so.


  • #108
    girl in the striped socks
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 653 ✭✭✭girl in the striped socks


    Darwin wrote: »
    girl in the striped socks wrote: »
    In fairness it's something I'd expect to see gracing the front page of a tabloid, not a so called "proper journalistic" paper.

    God you are completely deluded if you think the Independent/Gutter press is capable of producing any kind of balanced journalism to be taken seriously.
    Which is why I posted "proper journalistic" paper.
    Your sarcasm detector may be faulty.


  • #109
    Biggins
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Darwin wrote: »
    God you are completely deluded if you think the Independent/Gutter press is capable of producing any kind of balanced journalism to be taken seriously.

    Thats why I always read The Catholic Press - God writes that - and he's always right! :D


  • #110
    Princess Consuela Bananahammock
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Fulton Crown wrote: »
    Less of the bile Dude ...maybe you need to get your piles seen to ?

    Where did that "barely literate " shite come from....?
    Fulton Crown wrote: »
    She suckin some Dudes cock over in Talbot street....is that what your insinuating ?

    ... Niamh...??

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • #111
    BarackPyjama
    Closed Accounts Posts: 974 ✭✭✭BarackPyjama


    Colmustard wrote: »
    I hate getting my photo taken myself but I would not lash out at anyone for doing so.

    How would you react to your photo being taken without your consent by a complete stranger in a sinister manner? Lash out, maybe not, but I can tell you that if someone did it to me, there would be a struggle to retrieve/delete those photos. An absolutely disgusting violation of someone's privacy.


  • Advertisement
  • #112
    Fulton Crown
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,493 ✭✭✭Fulton Crown


    BarackPyjama wrote: »
    How would you react to your photo being taken without your consent by a complete stranger in a sinister manner? Lash out, maybe not, but I can tell you that if someone did it to me, there would be a struggle to retrieve/delete those photos. An absolutely disgusting violation of someone's privacy.

    Can understand that Dude...were you up to the hilt in someones hole behind "The George".

    Bit of a "glare" off those assless chaps eh ? :D


  • #113
    Pantsface
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 449 ✭✭Pantsface


    Fulton Crown wrote: »
    Can understand that Dude...were you up to the hilt in someones hole behind "The George".

    Bit of a "glare" off those assless chaps eh ? :D


    hohoho


  • #114
    BarackPyjama
    Closed Accounts Posts: 974 ✭✭✭BarackPyjama


    Pantsface wrote: »
    hohoho

    No need to quote him. He's on my ignore list for a reason!


  • #115
    Pantsface
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 449 ✭✭Pantsface


    BarackPyjama wrote: »
    No need to quote him. He's on my ignore list for a reason!


    my bad, sorry about that!


  • #116
    SHOVELLER
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,654 ✭✭✭SHOVELLER


    The indo is a tabloid.

    Anybody who buys it is irretrievably stupid. Unfortunately there are a lot of stupid people in Ireland.


  • #117
    Pottler
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,073 ✭✭✭Pottler


    Fulton Crown wrote: »
    Can understand that Dude...were you up to the hilt in someones hole behind "The George".

    Bit of a "glare" off those assless chaps eh ? :D
    I preferred when you just wrote stuff about struggling to take a shit. Well, preferred is not really the right word. What's another word for "cared even less"?


  • #118
    Pantsface
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 449 ✭✭Pantsface


    Pottler wrote: »
    I preferred when you just wrote stuff about struggling to take a shit. Well, preferred is not really the right word. What's another word for "cared even less"?


    Link?


    :pac:


  • #119
    Fulton Crown
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,493 ✭✭✭Fulton Crown


    Pottler wrote: »
    I preferred when you just wrote stuff about struggling to take a shit. Well, preferred is not really the right word. What's another word for "cared even less"?

    Your "point" pilgrim ?

    Is clarity always such a difficult issue for you ?


  • #120
    Colmustard
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,836 ✭✭✭Colmustard


    BarackPyjama wrote: »
    How would you react to your photo being taken without your consent by a complete stranger in a sinister manner? Lash out, maybe not, but I can tell you that if someone did it to me, there would be a struggle to retrieve/delete those photos. An absolutely disgusting violation of someone's privacy.

    I agree but what can you do, it is the world we live in. It is not against the law to take anyones picture in a public place, but it is to hit them for doing so.


  • Advertisement
  • #121
    Pottler
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,073 ✭✭✭Pottler


    Pantsface wrote: »
    Link?


    :pac:
    The only link I can come up with is that they let him out of the secure facility every few weeks to see how he gets on. When he gets too carried away, they haul him back in.


Advertisement
Advertisement