Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Should James Holmes, Colorado Shooter, Get The Death Penalty??

1457910

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,047 ✭✭✭JJayoo


    Which ever is the cheapest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,804 ✭✭✭oranbhoy67


    I believe we should learn what we can from him also....




    Then dispose of him like the piece of sub-human garbage that he is, perhaps keep his abnormal brain for more research as they did with Ted bundy?.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,836 ✭✭✭Sir Gallagher


    Exactly what could they learn from him?
    What could they learn that could prevent another lunatic from doing the same?

    Or is it about helping to rehabilitate people?????? Studying him to find out to help others? But who? other murderes? other killers? other evil mad men?

    I doubt it would help anybody in any tangible way but i would imagine studying somebody like this would be of great use to Psychologists studying psychotic human behaviour or whatever.

    Treat him like a lab rat on sundays and let him into general population for the rest of the week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,353 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    By the sound of things, OranBhoy would flick the switch himself if given the chance!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,386 ✭✭✭Killer Wench


    davyjose wrote: »
    Locking him up for life will cost the taxpayer money. He doesn't deserve that. Throw him in a pit and let him starve to death. I'm not going to get all faux indignant about how taking a life for a life makes us just as bad etc, etc.

    He shot a 6 year old girl dead. Kill the prick.

    It is cheaper to imprison someone for life than it is to execute them.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29552692/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/t/execute-or-not-question-cost/#.UBHynu6-WSo


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,804 ✭✭✭oranbhoy67


    NIMAN wrote: »
    By the sound of things, OranBhoy would flick the switch himself if given the chance!!

    It would be a pleasure to do so actually!




    I believe that the gung-ho attitude to guns in the US is crazy and the law needs to be changed there completely, but I also believe that guys who go on rampages like this should be executed with the up most of haste.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 the mer


    NIMAN wrote: »
    I cannot understand a nation of people who suffer so much at the hands of high powered weapons yet they seem happy enough for any Tom, Dick or Harry to be able to own them with next to no checks.

    Unless they change their laws and drop this 'right to bear arms' bull****, then this will continue, and probably get worse in years to come as more people become more and more disillusioned.
    dont talk about americas ****,the gun laws are almost fine most gun crime is done by unlicenced weapons and its just one event name 4 more??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 the mer


    a lethal injection doesnt cost the same as life in prison, if he killed your family would you pay for his prison stay


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 the mer


    sup_dude wrote: »
    Couldn't agree less...

    It's not a case of it being "trendy" to say otherwise, it's a case of it being common f***ing sense and having a bit of humanity. How are we any better than him for killing him? Who are we to choose who gets to live and who gets to die?
    Just because it's happens to be a particular persons' natural reaction to retaliate, it does not make it just especially since it may not be everyone's natural reaction.
    how do we have the right to deside death or not how does he have the right though???


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,822 ✭✭✭sunflower27




  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭hooradiation


    NIMAN wrote: »
    By the sound of things, OranBhoy would flick the switch himself if given the chance!!

    The hell he would, he's just an internet blowhard who puts no thought into his position.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 121 ✭✭Lord of the Bongs


    There is no suitable punishment for this guy. Some would say stick him in the prison showers for life and that will learn him, others say bring back the firing squad, like for like and all that. me personally I think the only way to bring some sort of closure and be consistent with this particular crime in question, being it America and all, would be to create a weekly TV show, for the sake of argument lets call it the running man, where criminals tried for mass murder and are hunted for fun by ex-wrestlers live on TV. Its the only solution for what is the most violent country on the face of the planet.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,052 ✭✭✭Matt_Trakker


    the mer wrote: »
    dont talk about americas ****,the gun laws are almost fine

    Yankie constitution

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
    As ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State:
    “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

    this right to bear arms is obviously bull****....you only have the right to bear arms if you're a member of a well-regulated militia necessary for the security of 'merika.
    GunRunner wrote: »
    I often dye my hair bright colours, does that mean that I'm badly raised?
    pics? :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 the mer


    Yankie constitution

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
    As ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State:
    “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”



    owning guns is a hobby in america and as you all know the redneck tree dwellers goto far and own 84 weapons stock pile them and start their own tea party miltia ,but i dont want my right to own my hunting rifles taken away because of some nut job ,
    ireland is afraid of weapons because it has become a pussy state , look the fraud bankers got away


  • Posts: 5,464 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    the mer wrote: »
    ireland is afraid of weapons because it has become a pussy state , look the fraud bankers got away

    Compared to Wall street they are only bacteria.
    Ireland doesn't need weapons because we don't need to kill each other and say it is our god given right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 the mer


    RVP 11 wrote: »
    the mer wrote: »

    Compared to Wall street they are only bacteria.
    Ireland doesn't need weapons because we don't need to kill each other and say it is our god given right.
    have you not read what i posted guns are a hobby in america not tools of self destruction , why dont you give up your beer as you drink your self to death, its the same as you said using a stereotype to make some nation look stupid , its child like same tactics as mit rommneys politics


  • Posts: 5,464 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    the mer wrote: »
    have you not read what i posted guns are a hobby in america not tools of self destruction , why dont you give up your beer as you drink your self to death, its the same as you said using a stereotype to make some nation look stupid , its child like same tactics as mit rommneys politics

    I don't drink.:p
    And America is a stupid place, any excuse for guns and war.p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,094 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I saw that picture of him sitting in court. He looks like someone gazing at the enormity of the mistake he made. I don't think he was a psychopath or a sociopath, he's someone who went through a severe mental episode which had tragic consequences for all concerned and he should be made to live with that mistake, eventually fading into anonymity in the public consciousness. His playacting as someone who's mentally unbalanced is only covering for someone who is actually very scared of whatever awaits him. I would be against a hasty execution and the perverse martyrdom that would follow.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭miller50841


    Yes to death penalty.

    This piece of sh** must be made suffer look at all the lives he took and ruined.

    Prisoners should be made do hard labour and I mean hard that they will be worn into the ground and suffer for the absolute devastation they cause for been selfish.

    This Dumb A** should be made example of.
    P.S not looking for any smart comments thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 121 ✭✭Lord of the Bongs


    not being smart but prison is supposed to be a place for 'rehabilitation' whenever possible.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,295 ✭✭✭✭Duggy747


    I'd prefer to see him suffer more rotting in prison, isolated away, than get a quick and painless death from execution.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭miller50841


    not being smart but prison is supposed to be a place for 'rehabilitation' whenever possible.

    From what I've seen and hear doesn't seem to change how the criminals were because most just pick up where they left off


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,804 ✭✭✭oranbhoy67


    The hell he would, he's just an internet blowhard who puts no thought into his position.



    Nice addition to the debate, how do you know me again?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,940 ✭✭✭Corkfeen


    Many posters seem to be missing the fact that the death penalty costs more in the long run than sending a person to jail for life. It's a barbaric practice to think it's acceptable to kill (or torture depending on the poster) a person to gain some sort of vengeance against those who have already died. I still don't understand fully why America is such a hotbed for such massacres and I don't think it is entirely to do with gun ownership. People like Holmes need to be studied so that there may at least be some chance of spotting people who have the potential to become dangerous and to take preventative measures against them becoming a threat (therapy, medical treatment etc).

    Also the death penalty shows no indications of acting as a deterrent.
    the mer wrote: »
    dont talk about americas ****,the gun laws are almost fine most gun crime is done by unlicenced weapons and its just one event name 4 more??
    The guns that are used for spree killings are generally licensed...
    the mer wrote: »

    owning guns is a hobby in america and as you all know the redneck tree dwellers goto far and own 84 weapons stock pile them and start their own tea party miltia ,but i dont want my right to own my hunting rifles taken away because of some nut job ,
    ireland is afraid of weapons because it has become a pussy state , look the fraud bankers got away
    When you start referring to a nation as 'a pussy state' because we don't all bare arms, it is a worrying reflection upon some of the people who own guns in America. Can you explain to me why it should be legal to own an assault rifle or purchase tear gas?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,822 ✭✭✭sunflower27


    314million people in the US

    Stands to reason that there is going to be more crime there (on all levels) than other places.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 357 ✭✭fearcruach


    the mer wrote: »
    a lethal injection doesnt cost the same as life in prison, if he killed your family would you pay for his prison stay


    Yes it does. Read the article again. It's not the actual method of death that racks up the costs, it's the appeals process which can take up to 20 years (California).

    No matter what your thoughts on Capital Punishment, it has been shown to be far more expensive than imprisonment, so economics should not be an argument.

    Also as previously mentioned, my thoughts on paying for him to be imprisoned etc if he killed my family are never going to bring my family back. You can't change the past, only what you feel about it. Killing him won't change that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭danslevent


    I'm only for death penalty in extreme cases like this, where they know for definite that he did it. I would say yes, why waste tax payers money keeping him alive? He is young and will cost society even more through keeping him in prison.


  • Posts: 4,630 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    danslevent wrote: »
    I'm only for death penalty in extreme cases like this, where they know for definite that he did it. I would say yes, why waste tax payers money keeping him alive? He is young and will cost society even more through keeping him in prison.

    It amazes me how many times this has been said in this thread. Are some people blind? Read the post right above yours, for example. It costs more to kill a prisoner than it does it keep them alive in prison for life. Let's see how many more times this silly argument for the death penalty will be brought up again in this thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    not being smart but prison is supposed to be a place for 'rehabilitation' whenever possible.

    not being smart but it is'nt.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭hooradiation


    oranbhoy67 wrote: »
    Nice addition to the debate, how do you know me again?

    By your words, how else.


Advertisement
Advertisement