Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Where would you be going without a bell on your bike!?!

«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,742 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    my going to work bike has one - never used it :)

    My weather

    https://www.ecowitt.net/home/share?authorize=96CT1F



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,386 ✭✭✭monkeypants


    Tape devices? Were their bikes made by DeLorean?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,742 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    Tape devices? Were their bikes made by DeLorean?

    My weather

    https://www.ecowitt.net/home/share?authorize=96CT1F



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    He said: “Any ideas to increase safety for pedestrians is welcome. I cycle a lot to get to work and for fitness, and you are going to come across people who are walking on trails and pathways. Bells would make them aware.

    I agree 100% - if pedestrians wore bells (like you put on a cat) they'd be easier to hear and you'd be more aware of them!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,625 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    Bells are infact not legal on bikes:

    Statue book
    http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1963/en/si/0190.html
    Audible warning device.

    28. (1) Every vehicle (other than a pedestrian-controlled vehicle) shall be fitted with an audible warning device complying with the provisions of sub-article (2) of this article, capable of giving sufficient warning of the approach or position of the vehicle.

    (2) The device referred to in sub-article (1) of this article shall not consist of—

    (a) a gong, siren or other strident-toned device except in the case of a vehicle used for fire brigade, ambulance or police purposes, or

    (b) a bell, except in the case of—

    (i) a vehicle used for fire brigade, ambulance or police purposes, or

    (ii) a bicycle—

    I. the engine of which does not exceed 50 cubic centimetres in cylinder capacity as calculated in accordance with article 27 of the Road Vehicles (Registration and Licensing) Regulations, 1958 ( S.I. No. 13 of 1958 ) and

    II. which is incapable of exceeding 24 miles per hour on a dry level road under normal atmospheric conditions.
    B (ii) II. clearly disallows a bell on a bike, 38k on a flat road is perfectly doable ;):)


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,617 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    Shouting "Look out!" is far more effective than any bell.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 514 ✭✭✭jinkypolly


    What if the pedestrian is wearing a personal stereo or one of dem ghetto blaster thingumybobs?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,283 ✭✭✭kenmc


    AlfaZen wrote: »
    Limerick Leader
    CYCLISTS in the city need to be more aware of pedestrians and stop listening to personal stereos when they are out cycling, according to community activist, Sean O’Neill.

    <Sherlocked>

    Lol, I read "communist".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,171 ✭✭✭buffalo


    Bells are infact not legal on bikes:

    Statue book
    http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1963/en/si/0190.html

    B (ii) II. clearly disallows a bell on a bike, 38k on a flat road is perfectly doable ;):)

    But they still need an "audible warning device" - so does that mean all road bikes must carry airhorns?

    Also, what's a "pedestrian-controlled vehicle" in this context?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,742 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    38k on a flat road is perfectly doable ;):)

    you missed this bit
    under normal atmospheric conditions.
    sorry you cant do that into the normal howling gale :D

    My weather

    https://www.ecowitt.net/home/share?authorize=96CT1F



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭dermur


    It actually reads as:

    "The device referred to in sub-article (1) of this article shall not consist of...a bell, except in the case of...a bicycle"

    Legal mumbo jumbo


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭dermur


    buffalo wrote: »
    But they still need an "audible warning device" - so does that mean all road bikes must carry airhorns?

    Friend of mine actually used to carry an air horn powered from a fizzy drink bottle on his bike in China - frightened the gick out of me whenever he used it behind me - I thought I was about to be mown down by a truck:

    213681.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    So, cyclists should not cycle on the path. But they should have bells so that they can warn pedestrians when they are cycling on the path...
    Mr O’Neill, a spokesman for Republicn Sinn Fein, also wants all cyclists to have bells, so that pedestrians can work out the distance a bike happens to be behind them.
    :confused:

    If I had a bell, I wouldn't use it. Ever. Not out of principle, but for the same reason I practically never use the horn on my car - if you have enough time to both avoid the incident and use it, then you probably don't need to use it.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,617 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    dermur wrote: »
    It actually reads as:

    "The device referred to in sub-article (1) of this article shall not consist of...a bell, except in the case of...a bicycle"

    "...which is incapable of exceeding 24 miles per hour on a dry level road under normal atmospheric conditions.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,969 ✭✭✭hardCopy


    I have a bell on my bike. Very useful for clearing peds out of the cycle track from Clontarf to Sutton. Also very useful in town, apparently non-cyclists can't see bikes so if you have a green light and no cars to accompany you through a junction pedestrians just emerge from the footpath to swarm the junction. A shout works just as well, but some times you get sick of shouting, and a bell sounds so much more civilised.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,617 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    hardCopy wrote: »
    ...a bell sounds so much more civilised.

    Agreed.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,141 ✭✭✭Doctor Bob


    The extract from the law posted above essentially says that a bike must have an audible warning device. If it is incapable of going over 24 mph, the device can be a bell.

    And the use of an Airzound is illegal.

    (Is that the same law that exempts bikes designed for racing from the obligation to have a bell? That line usually gets trotted out whenever there's a bell thread and roadies are falling over themselves looking for dispensations.)

    A lot of people (on Boards, at least) seem to have a problem with bells on their bikes, and I never understand why. Many of them (you) are the same people who will wear a helmet because even though you'll probably never need it, some day, some day, you might just be glad you wore it, but apparently the same doesn't apply to having bell. Or am I missing something?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,570 ✭✭✭Rovi


    If it's good enough for Peter Sagan...
    213682.jpg
    :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5 Ciannor


    good set of eyes and decent brakes are more important i reckon


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,680 ✭✭✭PhoenixParker


    seamus wrote: »
    So, cyclists should not cycle on the path. But they should have bells so that they can warn pedestrians when they are cycling on the path...

    :confused:

    If I had a bell, I wouldn't use it. Ever. Not out of principle, but for the same reason I practically never use the horn on my car - if you have enough time to both avoid the incident and use it, then you probably don't need to use it.

    A bell isn't really the equivalent of a horn though.

    Cars have engine noise which warns other road users of their approach. One of the big discussions you can see with electric vehicles is the problems associated with how quiet they are. There are proposals to add a noise to alert people to their approach. You see the same thing with the luas, Luas drivers have to use their bells frequently in part because they're so quiet, and that's in spite of the fact that they're on a very very clearly marked rail line. Compare how often a Luas driver needs to use his bell to how often a Taxi driver uses his horn.

    A bell falls somewhere between a horn and engine noise as an approach alert.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,318 ✭✭✭✭Raam


    I'm not putting a fúcking bell on my bike.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,824 ✭✭✭Qualitymark


    I have a gigantic Dutch bell (sold with a package covered in "Wow! It's loud!" and "Can be heard for 100 metres!" in Dutch); haven't put it on the bike yet, waiting to get a bike in my right frame size. But look forward to ringing it.

    If you don't want to put on a bell but do want to have a warning device, set your brake blocks at a slight angle so they screech when you brake.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 63 ✭✭nukin_futs


    Mr O’Neill, a spokesman for Republicn Sinn Fein, also wants all cyclists to have bells, so that pedestrians can work out the distance a bike happens to be behind them.
    Ah yes - a quick mental calculation using the speed of sound and taking account of the doppler effect and the pedestrian will know exactly where the cyclist is.
    On the other hand pedestrians could just keep out of cycle lanes and look before stepping out i.e. take some personal responsibility. Much the same as I look to see what cars are doing as I cycle.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,318 ✭✭✭✭Raam


    As a result of so much cycling, does anyone else here check behind them before changing line or direction when walking? Oh, just me, OK.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,969 ✭✭✭hardCopy


    Raam wrote: »
    As a result of so much cycling, does anyone else here check behind them before changing line or direction when walking? Oh, just me, OK.

    Not just you! Although the plus side is that I'm more observant than ever when I drive.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,617 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    As a result of so much driving I've been known to reach for the indicators when out walking.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,318 ✭✭✭✭Raam


    Walking cyclists be pointing out pavement cracks n' shít to the dudes behind 'em.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,110 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    Re headphones: This thread applies: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056699820

    seamus wrote: »
    If I had a bell, I wouldn't use it. Ever. Not out of principle, but for the same reason I practically never use the horn on my car - if you have enough time to both avoid the incident and use it, then you probably don't need to use it.

    Using that logic the Luas would never get anywhere in the city centre. :)

    The trams have bells and horns: The bell (as with a bicycle bell) is mostly an early warning system.

    And, as I've said here many times before, ringing a bell and pulling breaks is as easy as cycling a bike.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,526 ✭✭✭✭Darkglasses


    I frequently used my bell when I commuted in Dublin City Centre. Ok, it wasn't euro-cool, but it was very effective for politely warning pedestrians who might be crossing without looking or waiting for the green man that I'm on the way (especially when turning left onto George's Street from Dame Street.) Handier and more appropriate than shouting in my opinion.

    However, now that I'm commuting on country roads with practically no pedestrians, it'd be worthless to have the bell. I am on the look-out for a massive air-horn to indicate to cars that pass me dangerously that I am ****ing pissed off at them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,505 ✭✭✭macnab


    Bike safety: Republican Sinn Fein spokesman Sean O'Neill added: “If it is against the law for a motorist to use a mobile phone while driving, surely there is a equal danger posed by a cyclist who is listening to a tape device while cycling. This is an area that needs to be examined before some pedestrians are injured by careless cyclists in Limerick.”

    By this "logic" anybody who has impaired hearing ability either by choice or by accident of birth should not be legally allowed to cycle, or as the issue is road safety awareness, they should not be allowed use a public byway.
    So is Mr O'Neill suggesting that deaf people should not be allowed cycle or walk in public places??


Advertisement