Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

On the Dole-A Deal Breaker

13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    I got a laid a lot more when i was working. My romantic activities when ive not been working have been non existent. I would say sub consciously a large percentage of women would not go out with somebody on the dole. In groups of female friends there is a large element of trying to outdo each other in all sorts of ways. If there is a group of 5 female friends, two have boyfriends with good jobs and the other 3 are single. Its very unlikely one of the single girls will go out with a lad on the dole.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,221 ✭✭✭A_Sober_Paddy


    I got a laid a lot more when i was working. My romantic activities when ive not been working have been non existent. I would say sub consciously a large percentage of women would not go out with somebody on the dole. In groups of female friends there is a large element of trying to outdo each other in all sorts of ways. If there is a group of 5 female friends, two have boyfriends with good jobs and the other 3 are single. Its very unlikely one of the single girls will go out with a lad on the dole.

    Is that not incredibly sad?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,349 ✭✭✭✭starlit


    Might have bothered me before but now It wouldn't as its harder to find employment regardless of what stage of your career you are in. Though for new grads is harder for them than for more experienced people, though those with work experience they have the option to change careers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,298 ✭✭✭✭later12


    I got a laid a lot more when i was working. My romantic activities when ive not been working have been non existent. I would say sub consciously a large percentage of women would not go out with somebody on the dole.

    It's not necessarily that.

    Most people in employment have a lot more networking opportunities both in work and in their leisure time. They may be better able to afford socialising and widening their circle of acquaintances in pubs/ nightclubs than the unemployed person who socialises at home with his existing circle of friends.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭IrishAm


    later12 wrote: »
    Actually I'm starting to date a girl who's unemployed at the moment (teacher on summer holidays) and I'm working for myself.

    Is she not just on holidays and still in receipt of a wage from teaching, i.e not in receipt of welfare?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,298 ✭✭✭✭later12


    IrishAm wrote: »
    Is she not just on holidays and still in receipt of a wage from teaching, i.e not in receipt of welfare?

    No, unfortunately she doesn't have a permanent job, so she doesn't get paid for the Summer.

    An awful lot of teachers are in this position actually,not all teachers have the luxury of 2 or 3 months' paid Summer Holidays.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    later12 wrote: »
    It's not necessarily that.

    Most people in employment have a lot more networking opportunities both in work and in their leisure time. They may be better able to afford socialising and widening their circle of acquaintances in pubs/ nightclubs than the unemployed person who socialises at home with his existing circle of friends.

    A very valid point. For me personally i dont think ive ever gone out with anyone from my workplace or friends of workmates. Ive always gone out with friends of friends/locals etc but what you have said is very valid.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,425 ✭✭✭Festy


    Poll:
    Yes(its a turn off):26
    No(its not a turn off):38

    The No side is higher I know but thought there'd be a bigger margin of difference


    Probably all the male voters.:pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 669 ✭✭✭Fizzlesque


    I would say sub consciously a large percentage of women would not go out with somebody on the dole. In groups of female friends there is a large element of trying to outdo each other in all sorts of ways. If there is a group of 5 female friends, two have boyfriends with good jobs and the other 3 are single. Its very unlikely one of the single girls will go out with a lad on the dole.

    This kind of broad brush false labelling of women irritates the hell out of me - as if women were one big homogeneous group, devoid of any variety regarding personality, outlook, taste, interests, wants, cares and desire.

    To blithely state "In groups of female friends there is a large element of trying to outdo each other in all sorts of ways" is ridiculous. I can't say it doesn't exist at all - maybe it does, in some sections of society - but I can say it doesn't exist in the many groups of female friends I know and am part of. Is it any wonder some men like a_sober_paddy thinks women are shallow little sh!ts, when blatant falsehoods about us are posted as fact on message boards. It's bad enough he felt he needed to start a poll to gauge a small section of women's views on romance and the dole on a message board - with an extremely basic yes/no style of questioning - but now he's being told women care more about what their friends think than how they personally feel when it comes to being attracted to a man.

    It's not very unlikely a woman would go out with one of the men on the dole. I didn't vote in this poll because it was oversimplified. I have dated a man who was on the dole. I had to stop dating him because the reason he was on the dole was because he couldn't keep a job. And the reason he couldn't keep a job was because when he was working he partied all his wages away every weekend and regularly missed work on Mondays, and when he was on the dole he partied even more. I stopped dating him because getting wasted every weekend wasn't what I wanted.

    I've also dated men who worked too much. One man, in particular, worked as a chef, and as well as his own long hours, he regularly covered when someone was missing. I hated that just as much because I never saw him. I'd have loved for him to go on the dole for a while.

    What attracted me to these men was them, not their jobs or lack of jobs. My friends didn't influence my decisions - just as I don't influence theirs. Maybe there are some circles of women, possibly even the kind of circles you are drawn to, whose choices and interests are dictated by trying to 'outdo' their so-called friends, but please, please, please don't (a) believe and (b) tell men whose opinion of women is already rather low that this is a generic watermark of all women.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,916 ✭✭✭shopaholic01


    I got a laid a lot more when i was working. My romantic activities when ive not been working have been non existent. I would say sub consciously a large percentage of women would not go out with somebody on the dole. In groups of female friends there is a large element of trying to outdo each other in all sorts of ways. If there is a group of 5 female friends, two have boyfriends with good jobs and the other 3 are single. Its very unlikely one of the single girls will go out with a lad on the dole.

    To be fair, if a guy is long term unemployed it does affect his self esteem and confidence. Lack of confidence is a bigger turn-off than the fact that he is unemployed.

    A lot of guys are now unemployed and are almost apolgetic for being on social welfare. It's a pity they feel like this - I'm lucky I've never been unemployed (fingers crossed), but would have no qualms in claiming benefits if needed. If somebody had a problem with it well tough, that would be their problem, not mine.

    I never expected a man to provide for me financially and would never give up my independance, so a guy being on social welfare, as long as he wasn't a bum would not be an issue.

    I think most women are saying the same - someone who has never worked and has no intention of doing so - no way, losing your job as a result of the recession is completely different.

    If a woman knocks back a guy because of his financial situation he has made a lucky escape.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,218 ✭✭✭Murt10


    The relationship goes on a bit further. You want to head off on a well deserved sun/adventure/foreign holiday. There is a briliant gig on in town. Tickets are expensive. You both want to go. Where is he going to get the money?

    Are you going to pay for him or resent the fact that he cannot afford to come with you.

    I take the point about someone who is between jobs, but someone who hasn't worked in years.... No way.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,916 ✭✭✭shopaholic01


    Murt10 wrote: »
    The relationship goes on a bit further. You want to head off on a well deserved sun/adventure/foreign holiday. There is a briliant gig on in town. Tickets are expensive. You both want to go. Where is he going to get the money?

    Are you going to pay for him or resent the fact that he cannot afford to come with you.

    I take the point about someone who is between jobs, but someone who hasn't worked in years.... No way.

    A lot of working people are struggling to pay mortgages etc. By that logic, you would only consider dating a working person with a pre-determined amount of disposable income.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,218 ✭✭✭Murt10


    A lot of working people are struggling to pay mortgages etc. By that logic, you would only consider dating a working person with a pre-determined amount of disposable income.

    Maybe, but I'd be slow to get involved in these circumstances. You cannot live on love. Chances are the relationship is going to go nowhere. Kill it now before I get hurt.

    Or maybe wait till a bit later in the relationship and then - "by the way, did I mention that I also have to pay child support and maintenance."

    No you didn't. Goodbye!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,559 ✭✭✭✭AnonoBoy


    If you're on the dole how could you afford the dozen red roses that is demanded by books such as The Rules or the fancy diamond necklace that every woman wants and wishes for using the method in The Secret?

    A man without a genuine Rolex and an expensive suit is not a man according to an ad I saw in GQ magazine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭herosa


    Mostly I think women make the decision in a very primitive part of their brains. Its all got to do with thinking you are emotionally stable and a good provider for future kids. I dont think its so much greed as fear that they will be left to cope alone at the most vulnerable times of their lives ie childbirth/early child rearing etc. If you watch the nature programs you will see that many of the female species do the same thing in one form or another.
    Blame God or evolution.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,221 ✭✭✭A_Sober_Paddy


    AnonoBoy wrote: »
    If you're on the dole how could you afford the dozen red roses that is demanded by books such as The Rules or the fancy diamond necklace that every woman wants and wishes for using the method in The Secret?

    A man without a genuine Rolex and an expensive suit is not a man according to an ad I saw in GQ magazine.

    Even if I won the lotto and had a girlfriend she wouldn't be getting a diamond off me...They are a scam and also the whole issue of blood diamonds is another consideration.

    To be honest the whole imagine thing is certainly not for me, I dress well and wear suits on occasion but they tend to be ones that aren't designer by any stretch. A mate of mine is the complete opposite, he won't wear a t-shirt if cost less than €50 or has a name(hollister, abecombe etc), women who are like that, or would expect it of me can pretty much hit the road.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 894 ✭✭✭filmbuffboy


    if someone decided they didnt want to pursue a relationship with me purely on the basis that I was in the unfortunate position of being unemployed I would say good riddance to them! what a shallow way to approach deciding who to put down roots with


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,933 ✭✭✭Logical Fallacy


    I got a laid a lot more when i was working. My romantic activities when ive not been working have been non existent. I would say sub consciously a large percentage of women would not go out with somebody on the dole. In groups of female friends there is a large element of trying to outdo each other in all sorts of ways. If there is a group of 5 female friends, two have boyfriends with good jobs and the other 3 are single. Its very unlikely one of the single girls will go out with a lad on the dole.

    Do you go out a lot while you are working, compared to when you were on the dole?

    Where do you tend to strike it lucky with the ladies?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 678 ✭✭✭ihsb


    It completely depends, if they are happy unemployed, getting "free" money and not willing to take any job just to keep busy then I couldn't date someone like that.

    I am the type of person that has to stay busy. So when I work part-time I volunteer the days I am not in work. It would be the attitude more then the money.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,919 ✭✭✭✭Gummy Panda


    But if she was on the dole, how would she buy me presents?


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,827 ✭✭✭christmas2012


    I dont think the dole is an issue , what would be a deal breaker would be attitude and personality,does he have a bad or borderline personality disorder etc..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,903 ✭✭✭Napper Hawkins


    What do the words "dole" or "social welfare" automatically say to some people on here?

    Seriously, is the first thing that enters your mind upon learning someone is on the dole either "unemployed...ok whatever, let's find out why" or is it "does nothing, loser, avoid"?

    I ask as there seems to be some notion that unemployment seems to automatically equal "does nothing" in some folks minds, which is a bit naive imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,024 ✭✭✭previous user


    I've heard stories of wife's taking they're kids and leaving their husband because he's lost his job and is on the dole.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,827 ✭✭✭christmas2012


    dreadful.there should be more solidarity with couples i notice theres **** all..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,039 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    Depends on the woman's age, many women in their late teens-mid twenties would place much more importance on how "cool" a fella is than whether he has a job or not. Their idea of cool could range from him being in a band to being a sports jock to being some macho violent arsehole.

    A few years later the same women often have very different priorities and have now become very demanding about a man's career eg only dating men who earn more than they do, pursuing "professionals" like solicitors and accountants etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    I got a laid a lot more when i was working. My romantic activities when ive not been working have been non existent. I would say sub consciously a large percentage of women would not go out with somebody on the dole. In groups of female friends there is a large element of trying to outdo each other in all sorts of ways. If there is a group of 5 female friends, two have boyfriends with good jobs and the other 3 are single. Its very unlikely one of the single girls will go out with a lad on the dole.

    Do you go out a lot while you are working, compared to when you were on the dole?

    Where do you tend to strike it lucky with the ladies?

    About the same in terms of going out (a sad indictment of the welfare system). The vast majority of girls I have met have been friends/friends of friends. I would never approach an unknown female unannounced or any other such ghastly behavior.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,916 ✭✭✭shopaholic01


    Murt10 wrote: »
    Maybe, but I'd be slow to get involved in these circumstances. You cannot live on love. Chances are the relationship is going to go nowhere. Kill it now before I get hurt.

    Or maybe wait till a bit later in the relationship and then - "by the way, did I mention that I also have to pay child support and maintenance."

    No you didn't. Goodbye!

    So you would have a problem with someone who paid child support? Would you prefer it if they abandoned their children?
    BrianD3 wrote: »
    Depends on the woman's age, many women in their late teens-mid twenties would place much more importance on how "cool" a fella is than whether he has a job or not. Their idea of cool could range from him being in a band to being a sports jock to being some macho violent arsehole.

    A few years later the same women often have very different priorities and have now become very demanding about a man's career eg only dating men who earn more than they do, pursuing "professionals" like solicitors and accountants etc.

    LMAO'd at that :D. So that's where I went wrong............
    About the same in terms of going out (a sad indictment of the welfare system). The vast majority of girls I have met have been friends/friends of friends. I would never approach an unknown female unannounced or any other such ghastly behavior.

    That might explain why you have trouble meeting women - relying on meeting friends of friends limits the number you will meet. Go out and meet new people - your approach doesn't have to be 'ghastly'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,957 ✭✭✭blindside88


    I think Jay z said it best about a man on the dole "I got 99 problems but a b*tch ain't one"

    In fairness anyone that thinks like that isn't worth seeing and would probably run out of intelligent conversation after the first date anyway


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,327 ✭✭✭Madam_X


    if someone decided they didnt want to pursue a relationship with me purely on the basis that I was in the unfortunate position of being unemployed I would say good riddance to them! what a shallow way to approach deciding who to put down roots with
    Agreed. It's great that pretty much nobody seems to think that way on this discussion.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,933 ✭✭✭Logical Fallacy


    About the same in terms of going out (a sad indictment of the welfare system). The vast majority of girls I have met have been friends/friends of friends. I would never approach an unknown female unannounced or any other such ghastly behavior.

    Not really in fairness, surely that would all depend on your personal situation? I could go out 7 nights a week and not spend a single penny tbh.


Advertisement
Advertisement