Homosexuals are as bad as rapists, Polish nurses taught

spurious wrote: »

paddyandy wrote: »

Being 'GAY' is'nt natural at all .The body is'nt designed for their behaviour but the 'gay' industry with money the prime consideration is behind it and supports them . The bum was'nt made for it .The sale of Anal preparations to 'qUEERS' sHOULD BE ENOUGH PROOF .

If this person gets banned whats the point in having a one sided thread???? Or are we even allowed an opinion???

paddyandy wrote: »

Being 'GAY' is'nt natural at all .The body is'nt designed for their behaviour but the 'gay' industry with money the prime consideration is behind it and supports them . The bum was'nt made for it .The sale of Anal preparations to 'qUEERS' sHOULD BE ENOUGH PROOF .

i probably would'nt have worded it the same but is his point not correct.the rectum does not produce a natural lubricant for this kind of activity,so how is it natural?

PucaMama wrote: »

If this person gets banned whats the point in having a one sided thread???? Or are we even allowed an opinion???

Of course you can have an opinion, you just need to express it in a decent manner.

Bring a reasonable structured argument to the thread and it will be entertained. Do a quick search of paddy posting history and you will see that reasonably structured arguments are not his strong suit.

fran17 wrote: »

i probably would'nt have worded it the same but is his point not correct.the rectum does not produce a natural lubricant for this kind of activity,so how is it natural?

Neither does the hand, yet I'm pretty sure that touching the penis with the hand during intercourse is a common enough practice.

Also, if we extend the argument regarding what is natural to the concept the procreation should be for conception (as many people will do), then a blowjob is unnatural despite the presence of a natural lubricant etc etc etc.

Basically your argument is fine in a limited sense, but the goalposts are too easy to move and it's easier to accept the the idea of what is "natural" tends to be a personal preference rather than some kind of iron clad rule.

btard wrote: »

You are not allowed to air this point of view on here. Only pc views and opinions are welcome. I'm sure someone will be along shortly to point out the error of your ways and silence you. If you want a balanced or reasoned debate go else where. Enjoy your day.

lol, you don't read AH much do you?

PucaMama wrote: »

Im not defending what he said. I just no from my own personal experience that anything said not in favour of gay people will be labelled homophobic and taken like a personal attack.

By a small number of posters, in exactly the same fashion that some small number of posters will label any pro-gay statement as being "PC" and "leftist".

apache wrote: »

lol i doubt very much spurious said that - what she was quoted as saying :P

Yeah, i fixed the quotes and assigned it to the proper poster.

Logical Fallacy wrote: »

btard wrote: »

You are not allowed to air this point of view on here. Only pc views and opinions are welcome. I'm sure someone will be along shortly to point out the error of your ways and silence you. If you want a balanced or reasoned debate go else where. Enjoy your day.

lol, you don't read AH much do you?

PucaMama wrote: »

Im not defending what he said. I just no from my own personal experience that anything said not in favour of gay people will be labelled homophobic and taken like a personal attack.

By a small number of posters, in exactly the same fashion that some small number of posters will label any pro-gay statement as being "PC" and "leftist".

No, I meant real,offline people. Like my sister. Some gay people think they deserve martyrdom.

PucaMama wrote: »

No, I meant real,offline people. Like my sister. Some gay people think they deserve martyrdom.

Well in that case you are bringing your own personal experience , which is fair enough, but I obviously don't know your or your sister so can't really comment.

Personally I would look at your argument based of it's own merit and your choice of language...I've yet to see a decent argument that makes me think homosexuality is "evil" or "unnatural" though, because as I already said, those two things tend to be based on personal preference.

Deleted User wrote: »

Exactly. Women also require lubrication. And I've read threads here before claiming that a huge percentage of women cannot orgasm from vaginal penetration, a woman's orgasm can play a part in conception, so surely if sex was only about procreating, all women would orgasm from penetrative sex? I could keep going with that argument, but I won't.

I always wonder how many of the people who are dead set against "the gays", enjoy a nice bit of lesbian porn.

Exactly. Once again, that just roles back to my personal preferences argument. It's not homosexuality that people are against, so much as things they themselves don't like.

You will even have cases of a straight male who watches a bit of lesbian porn, yet calls actual lesbians dykes etc. The porn doesn't interrupt the fantasy of him interacting with two women in a sexual manner, the reality of the lesbian obviously does.

People are retards basically.

Aquila wrote: »

Has any of you read this document?
Rather than taking a sindo reporters words as gospel?

i sure would like to read it for myself instead of shouting "discrimination" from the rooftops.

Pushtrak wrote: »

PucaMama wrote: »

No, I meant real,offline people. Like my sister. Some gay people think they deserve martyrdom.

mar·tyr·dom (märtr-dm)
n.
1.
a. The state of being a martyr.
b. The suffering of death by a martyr.
2. Extreme suffering of any kind.

VS

Human rights are commonly understood as "inalienable fundamental rights to which a person is inherently entitled simply because she or he is a human being." Human rights are thus conceived as universal (applicable everywhere) and egalitarian (the same for everyone). These rights may exist as natural rights or as legal rights, in both national and international law.

Which is more appropriate?

Im talking about people, who, when they hear one nasty comment think the whole world is out to get them and they are some brave soldier fighting against it.

Gummy Panda wrote: »

How does the orgasm play a part in conception?

I assume vagina walls spasm helps delivery

If sex didn't feel good, people wouldn't have it.

Do you really think so many people would have kids if the process of getting knocked up itself wasn't so enjoyable?

It's the same reason why peak physical enjoyment for a man comes with ejaculation, which is designed to occur in the sexually immature male sooner than the female, if the female peaks at all.

PucaMama wrote: »

Im talking about people, who, when they hear one nasty comment think the whole world is out to get them and they are some brave soldier fighting against it.

No offence, but is that not what you are doing in this thread?