Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Deadline Day: Bring Out The Transfer Gimp!

11314161819149

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,625 ✭✭✭✭Johner


    Not sure if it is his real Twitter but it seems to be,

    https://twitter.com/#!/OficialHulk
    Givanildo V. Souza ‏@OficialHulk
    Thanks to all Chelsea fans, the beautiful messages of support! And I'm sorry for my english hahahah

    Then he followed Mata and Hazard!


  • Site Banned Posts: 26,456 ✭✭✭✭Nuri Sahin


    So Marin is a bench player effectively now, assuming the quotes are true of course.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭SlipperyPeople


    Johner wrote: »
    Not sure if it is his real Twitter but it seems to be,

    https://twitter.com/#!/OficialHulk



    Then he followed Mata and Hazard!

    yeah posted that earlier.

    the offical lucas twitter tweeted him the other day and today hulks tweeted david luiz so I'd say its a real account


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭G.K.


    I reckon Marin was only ever going to be a bench player. It's some step up from having Kalou on the bench.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,267 ✭✭✭✭GavRedKing


    Marin is a good option to have, he'll definetly push those ahead of him for a place in the starting 11.

    If we get Hulk we'll be laughing.


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 26,456 ✭✭✭✭Nuri Sahin


    G.K. wrote: »
    I reckon Marin was only ever going to be a bench player. It's some step up from having Kalou on the bench.

    True. But from an entirely football point of view, I was somewhat interested to see him play regularly in the EPL and how he'd get on, regularly as in start a fair few games. He's someone I've mentioned a few times in the LFC Superthread who I thought that in spite of his attitude was worth chancing and bringing in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,825 ✭✭✭Mikeyt086


    -Ade- wrote: »
    So Marin is a bench player effectively now, assuming the quotes are true of course.

    Why worry about minute details like squad harmony and player happiness, they will be absolute beasts on FIFA 13!

    :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,627 ✭✭✭Sgt Pepper 64


    -Ade- wrote: »
    True. But from an entirely football point of view, I was somewhat interested to see him play regularly in the EPL and how he'd get on, regularly as in start a fair few games. He's someone I've mentioned a few times in the LFC Superthread who I thought that in spite of his attitude was worth chancing and bringing in.

    So do I. I think he will get his chance alright
    had bags of promise, but got played out of position.
    Needs a strong coach and then he could be as good originally thought


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,577 ✭✭✭✭Frisbee


    G.K. wrote: »
    I reckon Marin was only ever going to be a bench player. It's some step up from having Kalou on the bench.

    Exactly, could Chelsea have a quality front 4 now.

    Torres
    Hazard
    Mata
    Hulk

    Mata and Hazard are interchangeable and you also have Marin, Malouda, De Bruyn, Lukaku etc to come in. Hulk can play on the left or as the striker too. Plety of options although, imo , the one above is the strongest despite plenty claiming Hazards strongest position is a #10. Give me Mata there any day of the week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,916 ✭✭✭Ormus


    Frisbee wrote: »
    Exactly, could Chelsea have a quality front 4 now.

    Torres
    Hazard
    Mata
    Hulk

    Mata and Hazard are interchangeable and you also have Marin, Malouda, De Bruyn, Lukaku etc to come in. Hulk can play on the left or as the striker too. Plety of options although, imo , the one above is the strongest despite plenty claiming Hazards strongest position is a #10. Give me Mata there any day of the week.

    That does look potent. Sturridge in reserve too, although I can see some of them causing trouble if not played.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,247 ✭✭✭what a day


    Lukaku De Bruyne etc will go on loan

    Our attacking players will be


    Hazard---Torres---Hulk

    with Mata behind Torres. If sturridge starts ahead of Torres the whole four players are able to switch positions. could be an awsom attack. Marin will be back up to either wide player but have to agree, Mata is a better player in the number ten role and Hazard out on the left.


    Mata
    Hulk
    Sturridge

    Hazard


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,302 ✭✭✭slingerz


    Where will lampard play, hardly in a holding centre mid role along with ramires?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,416 ✭✭✭Jimmy Iovine


    Anyone know if Sigurdsson's deal has been fully signed? If not then it wouldn't surprise me if he went to Liverpool. I presume Rodgers will implement the same style of play he favours in Liverpool. Sigurdsson would be a better fit than Henderson and others.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,763 ✭✭✭Jax Teller


    Anyone know if Sigurdsson's deal has been fully signed? If not then it wouldn't surprise me if he went to Liverpool. I presume Rodgers will implement the same style of play he favours in Liverpool. Sigurdsson would be a better fit than Henderson and others.

    Nothing signed yet .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,206 ✭✭✭✭amiable


    Anyone know if Sigurdsson's deal has been fully signed? If not then it wouldn't surprise me if he went to Liverpool. I presume Rodgers will implement the same style of play he favours in Liverpool. Sigurdsson would be a better fit than Henderson and others.

    Medical to complete yet


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,206 ✭✭✭✭amiable


    Rumours that Spurs will activate Demba Ba's release clause this summer


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,129 ✭✭✭✭Oranage2


    amiable wrote: »
    Rumours that Spurs will activate Demba Ba's release clause this summer

    Ba? Wasnt he bit crap second half of the season?


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 7,944 Mod ✭✭✭✭Yakult


    Oranage2 wrote: »
    Ba? Wasnt he bit crap second half of the season?

    Or Cisse was just unreal!
    I'd go with the latter, Ba would do well anywhere.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,116 ✭✭✭Professional Griefer


    Yeah, and he was played out of position quite a bit. Most games I seen, he was playing out the left.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,872 ✭✭✭Dickerty


    G.K. wrote: »
    I reckon Marin was only ever going to be a bench player. It's some step up from having Kalou on the bench.

    He is far too good to be just a bench player. He seems to blow hot and cold, but I think he's a steal at £6.5M. I'd see him starting in patches, and very definately an impact sub the rest of the time. He'll see the pitch most every game I'd say.

    Chelsea are worrying me (as a non-Chelasea fan) - Hazard, Marin and maybe Hulk, that's a hell of a start so far. And I'm expecting a RB and more to come...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,267 ✭✭✭✭GavRedKing


    Dickerty wrote: »
    He is far too good to be just a bench player. He seems to blow hot and cold, but I think he's a steal at £6.5M. I'd see him starting in patches, and very definately an impact sub the rest of the time. He'll see the pitch most every game I'd say.

    Chelsea are worrying me (as a non-Chelasea fan) - Hazard, Marin and maybe Hulk, that's a hell of a start so far. And I'm expecting a RB and more to come...

    We should sort our managerial problem first before spending hundreds of millions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,627 ✭✭✭Sgt Pepper 64


    gavredking wrote: »
    We should sort our managerial problem first before spending hundreds of millions.

    never stopped us before Gav!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,627 ✭✭✭Sgt Pepper 64


    Dickerty wrote: »
    He is far too good to be just a bench player. He seems to blow hot and cold, but I think he's a steal at £6.5M. I'd see him starting in patches, and very definately an impact sub the rest of the time. He'll see the pitch most every game I'd say.

    Chelsea are worrying me (as a non-Chelasea fan) - Hazard, Marin and maybe Hulk, that's a hell of a start so far. And I'm expecting a RB and more to come...

    Yep its the rebuild that has been promised for so long
    Spending the 100 mill CL cash.
    wants attractive winning football and Bruce Buck said "6th is not acceptable and the club will be taking steps to make sure that doesnt happen again

    That means either players or manager, or both. Looks like its players initally, the manager will be sorted later - its the Roman way (10 trophies later :D)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,872 ✭✭✭Dickerty


    gavredking wrote: »
    We should sort our managerial problem first before spending hundreds of millions.

    Except when the manager has little say in who is signed, then it's a moot point...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,916 ✭✭✭Ormus


    Dickerty wrote: »
    Except when the manager has little say in who is signed, then it's a moot point...

    Yeah its hard to imagine Guardiola would be too thrilled if he was about to sign for Chelsea only to be told "eh by the way the chairman already spent your 2012 transfer kitty, hope you like the signings he's made, if not we'll give you more next year".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,627 ✭✭✭Sgt Pepper 64


    Dickerty wrote: »
    Except when the manager has little say in who is signed, then it's a moot point...

    Chelsea, since Roman, have always operated a split scheme, with most of the transfers being done by the club - aka Roman who is advised by his scouting team - and then the manager gets 2 or 3.
    This is quite normal in a club owned by a single person - see RM and other such clubs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,627 ✭✭✭Sgt Pepper 64


    Ormus wrote: »
    Yeah its hard to imagine Guardiola would be too thrilled if he was about to sign for Chelsea only to be told "eh by the way the chairman already spent your 2012 transfer kitty, hope you like the signings he's made, if not we'll give you more next year".

    yeah, cos he is goning to be pissed if he's only got Hazard, Hulk and a few other "world class" signings to work with!

    Who's to say Pep isnt already fully aware of our targets and has even approved them? ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,916 ✭✭✭Ormus


    yeah, cos he is goning to be pissed if he's only got Hazard, Hulk and a few other "world class" signings to work with!

    Who's to say Pep isnt already fully aware of our targets and has even approved them? ;)

    Haha yeah it could be worse of course, not like they went and signed Downing, Henderson and Carroll. Still though, managers can be very very fussy and want players to fit their own style. For instance, I doubt Hulk would be the kinda player Guardiola woulda wanted to sign for Barca. I know that doesn't mean he wouldn't sign him for Chelsea but still.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,916 ✭✭✭Ormus


    Chelsea, since Roman, have always operated a split scheme, with most of the transfers being done by the club - aka Roman who is advised by his scouting team - and then the manager gets 2 or 3.
    This is quite normal in a club owned by a single person - see RM and other such clubs

    I thought Mourinho changed that by becoming the first RM manager to have total control?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,267 ✭✭✭✭GavRedKing


    Dickerty wrote: »
    Except when the manager has little say in who is signed, then it's a moot point...

    My point had nothing to do with transfers, but the task of either hiring RDM or getting in somebody else.


Advertisement