Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 11/12 (End of March 2012 onwards)

1135136138140141338

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    amiable wrote: »
    Read my posts on him again. Ive said I dont care what he does. I cant be clearer

    What who does?

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭Pete M.


    After seeing Ngog's goal tonight just what we are missing

    Him and Warnock!

    Within 4 minutes of each other :eek:

    And a peno in between. Mad stuff going on on football pitches from Birmingham to Barcelona.

    Bring back Fernando :pac:

    and ngog and warnock too, but not owen...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,921 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    joe123 wrote: »
    And do you honestly believe we didn't ask him to see out 5 more months and wait till the summer?

    Why would Liverpool have needed to ask him to see out 5 more months? He was under contract. All they had to do was turn down the offer, just like they turned down plenty of previous offers, and he'd have stayed. Instead, the club saw an opportunity to make what they thought was a worthwhile amount of money, and decided to take it. At the end of the day, in that move, LFC were the ones in the driving seat - as evidenced by the terms of the sale.

    Yes, he wanted to leave to "challenge for things", but under the circumstances, LFC were clearly more than happy to sell.

    As for naivety, I think it's far more likely that Torres was made by LFC to submit a transfer request to make the move so that a) he foregoes what he would have been owed from a contract breaking sale, and b) so fans wouldn't be so mad with LFC.

    I'm disappointed that he wanted to go, but I'm grudgingly pleased for him tonight after the last 18 months.

    My feelings for him really are like those for an ex whom I had some really good times with before she broke my heart. At first I was happy to see her fall on hard times after we broke up, but ultimately, with the passage of time, enough of the old feelings are still there that I can be pleased for her when she gets back on her feet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,655 ✭✭✭El Inho


    can i just say its a breath of fresh air to finally have something new to ta......

    ah not the f*****g torres debate again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,517 ✭✭✭Daemonic


    Gbear wrote: »
    I want Bayern to win the CL. :confused:
    It could be argued Chelsea winning it would be better for Liverpool. Chelsea will always have the cash to compete so them missing out on next years CL is not a big deal. But if they win and prevent whoever finishes 4th (most likely Spurs or Newcastle) from getting into next years CL it means one less team with a big influx of cash and the allure of CL football.
    While Liverpool need to improve quite a bit to be in the race for 4th next season, a setback for Spurs or Newcastle can only help.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,905 ✭✭✭✭Handsome Bob


    Oliver Holt shows his anti-pool and pro-cockney bias yet again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    I can understand why Torres left - I would wish he had given us a bit more time with things looking up considerably on the pitch, but he'd seen so many false dawns & had so many broken promises made to him he obviously felt he didn't want to take the chance.

    However, his comments after he left means that there was a sour taste in the mouth for quite a while.

    I don't hate him, but I don't wish him well either tbh. I actually think it's a bit of a sad case. Any interviews he has given since he left for Chelsea quite clearly show he is a man who has entirely fallen out of love with the game. He sounds like a different person to the man who joined us & tbh I think that's a part of the reason he looks like a different player to the one who joined us.

    One thing I find quite amusing is those making out his goal last night is some sort of big deal either for him personally or for Chelsea. He was on against a team that literally didn't have a single player in their own half they were pressing so much for a goal. Ultimately, his goal meant nothing with only a minute or so left in the tie they were already winning and ultimately he'll be back on the bench for the final. If people think when he made his move he envisaged himself being a bit part player & warming the bench for a club that is unlikely to be in the CL next year, they're sorely mistaken.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,942 ✭✭✭missingtime


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    I don't hate him, but I don't wish him well either tbh. I actually think it's a bit of a sad case. Any interviews he has given since he left for Chelsea quite clearly show he is a man who has entirely fallen out of love with the game. He sounds like a different person to the man who joined us & tbh I think that's a part of the reason he looks like a different player to the one who joined us.

    I've felt this as well. He became somewhat bitter over the whole experience.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,655 ✭✭✭El Inho




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    One thing I find quite amusing is those making out his goal last night is some sort of big deal either for him personally or for Chelsea. He was on against a team that literally didn't have a single player in their own half they were pressing so much for a goal. Ultimately, his goal meant nothing with only a minute or so left in the tie they were already winning and ultimately he'll be back on the bench for the final. If people think when he made his move he envisaged himself being a bit part player & warming the bench for a club that is unlikely to be in the CL next year, they're sorely mistaken.

    Well Barca might have scored and then would have won the tie but Torres goal made sure that didn't matter, and clearly he didn't foresee his career at Chelsea being as its turned out but he is in a CL final for the first (and probably last) time and could score the winning goal yet.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    eldwaro wrote: »

    Good. I'd take him back into the squad in a heartbeat.

    I've no idea why we let both him & Meireles go. One, fair enough. But both was stupid & was basically us taking a gamble on Gerrard being fit for the whole season, which was never going to happen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,655 ✭✭✭El Inho


    and on another note...

    is anyone else actually a little excited to be playing europa league again?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,244 ✭✭✭Sappy404


    Oliver Holt shows his anti-pool and pro-cockney bias yet again.
    Ah yes JT's best mate in the media backing him as usual

    Pretty sure missingtime's post was satirical, based on Holt's defence of Terry's racist remark. I hope, anyway.

    As for his assertion that Chelsea's draw at the Camp Nou was more dramatic than the 05 final, I couldn't care less. I can't think of anything more pointless to argue about, and everyone's going to have their own opinions anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,905 ✭✭✭✭Handsome Bob


    Sappy404 wrote: »
    Pretty sure missingtime's post was satirical, based on Holt's defence of Terry's racist remark. I hope, anyway.

    As for his assertion that Chelsea's draw at the Camp Nou was more dramatic than the 05 final, I couldn't care less. I can't think of anything more pointless to argue about, and everyone's going to have their own opinions anyway.

    That is what I was referring to. If he genuinely believes that last night was more epic than Istanbul then he is absolutely deluded.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭mormank


    Daemonic wrote: »
    It could be argued Chelsea winning it would be better for Liverpool. Chelsea will always have the cash to compete so them missing out on next years CL is not a big deal. But if they win and prevent whoever finishes 4th (most likely Spurs or Newcastle) from getting into next years CL it means one less team with a big influx of cash and the allure of CL football.
    While Liverpool need to improve quite a bit to be in the race for 4th next season, a setback for Spurs or Newcastle can only help.

    I definitely agree with this train of thought. Although I think it is unlikely Chelsea will win the CL I hope they do for the reasons mentioned above, plus I think Roman is more likely to lose interest in Chelsea once he has finally won the Champion's League. The sooner the sugar daddy's all leave their respective clubs the better it is for the likes of us.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,560 ✭✭✭✭Kess73


    After seeing Ngog's goal tonight just what we are missing


    Nah we don't need N'Gog. We have Carroll to provide roughly the same amount of goals that N'Gog got us per season.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    eldwaro wrote: »
    and on another note...

    is anyone else actually a little excited to be playing europa league again?

    :pac:

    Its only of real interest to me for how the competition might be used to develop the youth, that said if Liverpool progress and draw nice teams in the knockout rounds it'll suddenly seem quite important!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,244 ✭✭✭Sappy404


    mormank wrote: »
    I definitely agree with this train of thought. Although I think it is unlikely Chelsea will win the CL I hope they do for the reasons mentioned above, plus I think Roman is more likely to lose interest in Chelsea once he has finally won the Champion's League. The sooner the sugar daddy's all leave their respective clubs the better it is for the likes of us.

    Chelsea aren't likely to invest heavily this summer though, are they?

    By the way, Abramovich wants his team to win the Champions League. No owner doesn't want his club to do the same. The idea that he'd sell the club as soon as they've won it once is mental. If I bought a yacht in Monaco and nailed Kelly Brook at the weekend, I wouldn't sell the thing and retire from sex.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,655 ✭✭✭El Inho


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    Good. I'd take him back into the squad in a heartbeat.

    I've no idea why we let both him & Meireles go. One, fair enough. But both was stupid & was basically us taking a gamble on Gerrard being fit for the whole season, which was never going to happen.

    id have him back too, but thats probably not going to happen.

    he'll have his preseason with us, we'll pay his wages, and then he'll feck off to his next italian port of call.
    mike65 wrote: »
    :pac:

    Its only of real interest to me for how the competition might be used to develop the youth, that said if Liverpool progress and draw nice teams in the knockout rounds it'll suddenly seem quite important!

    well its the squad depth i always liked about europe...

    it forces you to have a bigger squad. this year we would have been shagged in europe, and quite frankly, some positives can be drawn from not being in champions league next year. we would have been ridden side ways by the majority of clubs.

    next year in europa league can build up a squad, an improvement on what we got this year with no european football.

    i think i feel the end of season optimism about next year coming in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭mormank


    eldwaro wrote: »
    and on another note...

    is anyone else actually a little excited to be playing europa league again?

    It's a bit meh...If we use it as an opportunity to play some of the young talent we have at the club then it can be a very positive experience for us next season, however if it detracts from our league form then it could very well be a hinderance.

    There has been alot of discussion in here the past few days about the priorities and what they should be. A few people seem to think that winning the domestic cup double is better than champion's league qualification and some people seem to think the opposite.

    Well to add my 2cents, I dunno about you guys but for me the Ultimate goal and trophy that i would like to win more than any other is the Premier League. At this point I would almost say that all the other trophies are irrelevant to me persnoally. (of course they are not but I'm using hyperbole to help get my point across). I am not old enough to remember any of the glory years. I have experienced winning every trophy as a Liverpool fan bar winning the League. That for me is the ultimate goal and for that reason I see Champion's league qualification as far more important than any domestic cup wins. The reason being that it is only through Champion's league qualification that we can stay competitive in the league. The longer we stay out of the Champion's league, with all the money and ability to attract better players that goes with that, the further and further we get from winning the league. Plain and simple. You guys can argue the semantics of it all but that for me is what it boils down to right now in my 'career' as a fan of this (once) great club! ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭mormank


    Sappy404 wrote: »
    Chelsea aren't likely to invest heavily this summer though, are they?

    By the way, Abramovich wants his team to win the Champions League. No owner doesn't want his club to do the same. The idea that he'd sell the club as soon as they've won it once is mental. If I bought a yacht in Monaco and nailed Kelly Brook at the weekend, I wouldn't sell the thing and retire from sex.

    I'm not suggesting that Roman will sell the club once they win the champion's league, rather that he won't until they did. Slightly different.

    As for the question regarding chelsea's plans to invest this summer, I hve no idea but I do know that chelsea's idea of a quiet transfer window is very different to ours.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,655 ✭✭✭El Inho


    mormank wrote: »
    It's a bit meh...If we use it as an opportunity to play some of the young talent we have at the club then it can be a very positive experience for us next season, however if it detracts from our league form then it could very well be a hinderance.

    There has been alot of discussion in here the past few days about the priorities and what they should be. A few people seem to think that winning the domestic cup double is better than champion's league qualification and some people seem to think the opposite.

    Well to add my 2cents, I dunno about you guys but for me the Ultimate goal and trophy that i would like to win more than any other is the Premier League. At this point I would almost say that all the other trophies are irrelevant to me persnoally. (of course they are not but I'm using hyperbole to help get my point across). I am not old enough to remember any of the glory years. I have experienced winning every trophy as a Liverpool fan bar winning the League. That for me is the ultimate goal and for that reason I see Champion's league qualification as far more important than any domestic cup wins. The reason being that it is only through Champion's league qualification that we can stay competitive in the league. The longer we stay out of the Champion's league, with all the money and ability to attract better players that goes with that, the further and further we get from winning the league. Plain and simple. You guys can argue the semantics of it all but that for me is what it boils down to right now in my 'career' as a fan of this (once) great club!

    ive never hummed and hawed over thanking a post so much.... and it came down to this...history doesnt change, whether we were around for the glory days or not. i also wasnt!

    consider yourself thanked in gesture for everything else though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭mormank


    eldwaro wrote: »
    ive never hummed and hawed over thanking a post so much.... and it came down to this...history doesnt change, whether we were around for the glory days or not. i also wasnt!

    consider yourself thanked in gesture for everything else though.

    :D I threw that part in on purpose as a bit of a curveball but forgot the smiley face which I've since put in. Dunno if that changes anything but it was very much tongue in cheek, to provoke a reaction but not in a trolly way...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭mormank


    Although to be honest, I do feel some people on here do need to realise where we are as a club in the modern era. Some people seem to think that simply because we are Liverpool football club we should be handed things, that we deserve to be in a certain position in the league and that anything short of that is unacceptable.

    We fell behind alot throughout the 90's. Our owner and board, it seems, were out of their depth. They run the club like it was still the dark ages and failed to maximise it's potential. By the time Hicks and Gillette even arrived we were so far behind the other top teams on the field and off it. In fairness to them it would appear they got the ball rolling and partially brought us into the modern era of football in terms or sponsorship and other things. Then all that went tits up as we all know and we were once again set even further back.

    We had it good under Benitez, but just like kids with short memories or attention spans alot of us turned on Benitez and thought it was best for him to go. But don't it always seem to go, you don't know what you've got till it's gone. Then came Roy, just like with alot of things in life it takes a bad experience to make you appreciate the good. Now we have Kenny and again there are plenty of voices wanting him out. Sure, i can understand why people would want him out and to get a new manager in and what not...To what end is my question?

    We havent won the league in 20 years. We have a whole generation of fans that have never experienced the glory of winning the league. Do people honestly believe that another manager can just arrive and win us the league, or guarantee us 4th? Do people honestly think that's all it takes? That we are that close to really challenging? I have experienced one title challenge. We ended up 4 points behind with a points total that would have won us the league on numerous other occasions. I guess my point is that people need to wake up to the reality that Liverpool are not the dominant force anymore. Going through managers at this rate is not going to help us in any way shape or form. It is not meant to be the way we conduct ourselves as a club. This attitude of entitlement probably cost us our best manager in the last 20 years. Kenny has had one full season as manager since he has been back. Is it gonna be the case that if he goes and whoever replaces him doesn't get 4th that he then gets sacked and so on and so forth??

    Part of what attracted me to this club growing up was that we didn't behave this way. We had a reputation of holding onto managers for too long if anything. Remember the ridiculous joint managers for example. But having said that it kind of led to a mentality that we lose together or we win together. We are all in this together kind of an attitude. If you don't constantly sack managers then the players also know they have to play for the manager and can't contribute towards the sacking of a manager like what may have happened at chelsea this season and many other seasons.

    Anyway, I'm rambling at this point so i'll stop randomly pushing keys on my keyboard now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭The Chessplayer


    Great to hear that Aquilani and Cole are probably on their way back to Liverpool. This will surely lead to less gametime for Downing and Adam, regardless of whether they are direct replacements. For all the stick we gave Cole, he would've been handy to have this season when you look at some of the jokers we have in attacking midfield positions.

    What's the story with Maxi? Is he on his bike or what? Any other exits expected in the close season? Dirk Kuyt on way to Holland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭The Chessplayer


    mormank wrote: »
    Anyway, I'm rambling at this point
    You most certainly are.


    Anyone got a link for the Chelsea highlights? Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,347 ✭✭✭✭Grayditch


    After seeing Ngog's goal tonight just what we are missing

    Anytime I see any goal, I remember what we are missing.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,591 Mod ✭✭✭✭spockety


    mormank wrote: »
    Although to be honest, I do feel some people on here do need to realise where we are as a club in the modern era. Some people seem to think that simply because we are Liverpool football club we should be handed things, that we deserve to be in a certain position in the league and that anything short of that is unacceptable.

    We fell behind alot throughout the 90's. Our owner and board, it seems, were out of their depth. They run the club like it was still the dark ages and failed to maximise it's potential. By the time Hicks and Gillette even arrived we were so far behind the other top teams on the field and off it. In fairness to them it would appear they got the ball rolling and partially brought us into the modern era of football in terms or sponsorship and other things. Then all that went tits up as we all know and we were once again set even further back.

    We had it good under Benitez, but just like kids with short memories or attention spans alot of us turned on Benitez and thought it was best for him to go. But don't it always seem to go, you don't know what you've got till it's gone. Then came Roy, just like with alot of things in life it takes a bad experience to make you appreciate the good. Now we have Kenny and again there are plenty of voices wanting him out. Sure, i can understand why people would want him out and to get a new manager in and what not...To what end is my question?

    We havent won the league in 20 years. We have a whole generation of fans that have never experienced the glory of winning the league. Do people honestly believe that another manager can just arrive and win us the league, or guarantee us 4th? Do people honestly think that's all it takes? That we are that close to really challenging? I have experienced one title challenge. We ended up 4 points behind with a points total that would have won us the league on numerous other occasions. I guess my point is that people need to wake up to the reality that Liverpool are not the dominant force anymore. Going through managers at this rate is not going to help us in any way shape or form. It is not meant to be the way we conduct ourselves as a club. This attitude of entitlement probably cost us our best manager in the last 20 years. Kenny has had one full season as manager since he has been back. Is it gonna be the case that if he goes and whoever replaces him doesn't get 4th that he then gets sacked and so on and so forth??

    Part of what attracted me to this club growing up was that we didn't behave this way. We had a reputation of holding onto managers for too long if anything. Remember the ridiculous joint managers for example. But having said that it kind of led to a mentality that we lose together or we win together. We are all in this together kind of an attitude. If you don't constantly sack managers then the players also know they have to play for the manager and can't contribute towards the sacking of a manager like what may have happened at chelsea this season and many other seasons.

    Anyway, I'm rambling at this point so i'll stop randomly pushing keys on my keyboard now

    Nail on the head. Football is nowhere near as black and white or short term as people think.

    When I think about my support of Liverpool, I don't always think about the here and now, I think about the past, and I think up to 30 or 40 years into the future. There is plenty left to be won in my lifetime, and I have no doubt we will win the league before I die. Fans of most other clubs cannot say that. There's a future hero who will bang in 30 goals a season for us who has not even been born yet.

    I'm in for the long haul.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,560 ✭✭✭✭Kess73


    Great to hear that Aquilani and Cole are probably on their way back to Liverpool. This will surely lead to less gametime for Downing and Adam, regardless of whether they are direct replacements. For all the stick we gave Cole, he would've been handy to have this season when you look at some of the jokers we have in attacking midfield positions.

    What's the story with Maxi? Is he on his bike or what? Any other exits expected in the close season? Dirk Kuyt on way to Holland.


    Whatever about Aquilani as he is a big step up on the likes of Adam, Henderson etc in CM, but Cole was bloody awful for us and he has not been that impressive in the French league either despite some of the London media trying to big him up.

    Cole brought nothing of worth to the club when he moved to LFC almost two years ago, and he certainly brings nothing of worth now. Just a big earner who is just as ineffective as the worst of our underperformers this season. No point adding another waste of a squad number to the ranks if there is any chance of off loading him on a club dumb enough to want him.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,560 ✭✭✭✭Kess73


    mormank wrote: »
    Although to be honest, I do feel some people on here do need to realise where we are as a club in the modern era. Some people seem to think that simply because we are Liverpool football club we should be handed things, that we deserve to be in a certain position in the league and that anything short of that is unacceptable.

    We fell behind alot throughout the 90's. Our owner and board, it seems, were out of their depth. They run the club like it was still the dark ages and failed to maximise it's potential. By the time Hicks and Gillette even arrived we were so far behind the other top teams on the field and off it. In fairness to them it would appear they got the ball rolling and partially brought us into the modern era of football in terms or sponsorship and other things. Then all that went tits up as we all know and we were once again set even further back.

    We had it good under Benitez, but just like kids with short memories or attention spans alot of us turned on Benitez and thought it was best for him to go. But don't it always seem to go, you don't know what you've got till it's gone. Then came Roy, just like with alot of things in life it takes a bad experience to make you appreciate the good. Now we have Kenny and again there are plenty of voices wanting him out. Sure, i can understand why people would want him out and to get a new manager in and what not...To what end is my question?

    We havent won the league in 20 years. We have a whole generation of fans that have never experienced the glory of winning the league. Do people honestly believe that another manager can just arrive and win us the league, or guarantee us 4th? Do people honestly think that's all it takes? That we are that close to really challenging? I have experienced one title challenge. We ended up 4 points behind with a points total that would have won us the league on numerous other occasions. I guess my point is that people need to wake up to the reality that Liverpool are not the dominant force anymore. Going through managers at this rate is not going to help us in any way shape or form. It is not meant to be the way we conduct ourselves as a club. This attitude of entitlement probably cost us our best manager in the last 20 years. Kenny has had one full season as manager since he has been back. Is it gonna be the case that if he goes and whoever replaces him doesn't get 4th that he then gets sacked and so on and so forth??

    Part of what attracted me to this club growing up was that we didn't behave this way. We had a reputation of holding onto managers for too long if anything. Remember the ridiculous joint managers for example. But having said that it kind of led to a mentality that we lose together or we win together. We are all in this together kind of an attitude. If you don't constantly sack managers then the players also know they have to play for the manager and can't contribute towards the sacking of a manager like what may have happened at chelsea this season and many other seasons.

    Anyway, I'm rambling at this point so i'll stop randomly pushing keys on my keyboard now


    Enjoyed that read.


    It this post is what you come up with when randomly pushing keys, then I suggest you pop on a blindfold and attack the keyboard with a vengence.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement