Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Rangers FC lodge papers to go into administration

1…5556586061…150

Comments

  • #1712
    KeithAFC
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    bobbysands81 wrote: »
    Keith,

    Forget about Rangers' debt, any chance you're going to pay YOUR debt?
    It is a tainted title. I have already explained that. It wasn't a fair title challenge.


  • #1713
    Fuhrer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭Fuhrer


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    It is a tainted title. I have already explained that. It wasn't a fair title challenge.


    Your claim to be British is getting stronger, all that Welch in you


  • #1714
    Broxi_Bear_Eire
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭Broxi_Bear_Eire


    bobbysands81 wrote: »
    Keith,

    Forget about Rangers' debt, any chance you're going to pay YOUR debt?

    He is an embarrassment to every decent Rangers fan Bobby
    C'mon Keith its a charity bet pay up


  • #1715
    bobbysands81
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,229 ✭✭✭bobbysands81


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    bobbysands81 wrote: »
    Keith,

    Forget about Rangers' debt, any chance you're going to pay YOUR debt?
    It is a tainted title. I have already explained that. It wasn't a fair title challenge.

    That's seriously poor form mate.


  • #1716
    greendom
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,382 ✭✭✭✭greendom


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    It is a tainted title. I have already explained that. It wasn't a fair title challenge.

    As tainted as all the titles Rangers won in the last few years ?


  • Advertisement
  • #1717
    KeithAFC
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »
    He is an embarrassment to every decent Rangers fan Bobby
    C'mon Keith its a charity bet pay up
    How is it embarrassing? Wise up.

    It is a tainted title because it wasn't fair. When the bet was made, it was made on fair ground in the league. There was no points deduction. I know you don't want to piss them off Broxi but sometimes you need to be honest and call it as it is. It is a tainted title and everyone at Celtic park knows it.


  • #1718
    Leiva
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Leiva


    greendom wrote: »
    As tainted as all the titles Rangers won in the last few years ?


    Jezz yea .. can I have all my loosing bets back from all the seasons that Rangers won the title whilst being financial doped .

    :p


  • #1719
    Dempsey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,529 ✭✭✭✭Dempsey


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    It is a tainted title. I have already explained that. It wasn't a fair title challenge.

    You're as bitter as mark hateley
    KeithAFC wrote: »
    How is it embarrassing? Wise up.

    It is a tainted title because it wasn't fair. When the bet was made, it was made on fair ground in the league. There was no points deduction. I know you don't want to piss them off Broxi but sometimes you need to be honest and call it as it is. It is a tainted title and everyone at Celtic park knows it.

    Rangers failed to comply with the rules of the competition. Do you want one set of rules for Rangers and another for everyone else?

    Pathetic stuff, even for you.


  • #1720
    KeithAFC
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    Dempsey wrote: »
    You're as bitter as mark hateley



    Rangers failed to comply with the rules of the competition. Do you want one set of rules for Rangers and another for everyone else?

    Pathetic stuff, even for you.
    The points deduction made the bet null and void. It wasn't over 38 games and wasn't fair. It isn't getting paid based on those grounds.


  • #1721
    Dempsey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,529 ✭✭✭✭Dempsey


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    The points deduction made the bet null and void. It wasn't over 38 games and wasn't fair. It isn't getting paid based on those grounds.

    No it doesnt, they are the rules of the SPL competition. No bookie can make bets null and void on those grounds but Keith can because he is a snake. You are a pathetic individual.


  • Advertisement
  • #1722
    PauloMN
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional North East Moderators Posts: 10,887 Mod ✭✭✭✭PauloMN


    Keith, you're hunbelievable.


  • #1723
    KeithAFC
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    Dempsey wrote: »
    No it doesnt, they are the rules of the SPL competition. No bookie can make bets null and void on those grounds but Keith can because he is a snake. You are a pathetic individual.
    What can you do about it. Nothing. Get over it. It is a tainted title and makes the bet useless.


  • #1724
    Fuhrer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭Fuhrer


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    What can you do about it. Nothing. Get over it. It is a tainted title and makes the bet useless.


    x in the city tried to welch on a bet once as well.


    Have fun being hounded about it every single time you post from now on.


  • #1725
    KeithAFC
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    Fuhrer wrote: »
    x in the city tried to welch on a bet once as well.


    Have fun being hounded about it every single time you post from now on.
    There probably won't be a Rangers thread soon with the latest news coming out sadly.


  • #1726
    Dempsey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,529 ✭✭✭✭Dempsey


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    What can you do about it. Nothing. Get over it. It is a tainted title and makes the bet useless.

    Quite simply you're an oxygen thief. :pac:


  • #1727
    KeithAFC
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    Dempsey wrote: »
    Quite simply you're an oxygen thief. :pac:
    Don't make it personal Dempsey. The title is tainted to many thousands of people and even high profile people in the media and football.


  • #1728
    Dempsey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,529 ✭✭✭✭Dempsey


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    Don't make it personal Dempsey. The title is tainted to many thousands of people and even high profile people in the media and football.

    Just making an observation is all. The title is tainted in the eyes of idiots that dont understand or respect the rules of competition.


  • #1729
    KeithAFC
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    Dempsey wrote: »
    Just making an observation is all. The title is tainted in the eyes of idiots that dont understand or respect the rules of competition.
    Fact is it is tainted in the eyes of a lot of people. Celtic can make up for it next year when Rangers aren't in the SPL.


  • #1730
    PauloMN
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional North East Moderators Posts: 10,887 Mod ✭✭✭✭PauloMN


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    Fact is it is tainted in the eyes of a lot of people. Celtic can make up for it next year when Rangers aren't in the SPL.

    Fact is Celtic won the league, and that was the bet which you've decided not to pay, even though an excellent charity now won't get paid €50.

    Really, really low imo. I am 100% certain that Bobby would have paid up in similar circumstances, even with your choice of charity.


  • #1731
    KeithAFC
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    PauloMN wrote: »
    Fact is Celtic won the league, and that was the bet which you've decided not to pay, even though an excellent charity now won't get paid €50.

    Really, really low imo. I am 100% certain that Bobby would have paid up in similar circumstances, even with your choice of charity.
    Oh ffs.

    If I pay 50 quid, will you lot stop going on about it?


  • Advertisement
  • #1732
    PauloMN
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional North East Moderators Posts: 10,887 Mod ✭✭✭✭PauloMN


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    Oh ffs.

    If I pay 50 quid, will you lot stop going on about it?

    I will.

    Do we get to see a receipt? ;)


  • #1733
    Fuhrer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭Fuhrer


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    Oh ffs.

    If I pay 50 quid, will you lot stop going on about it?


    Did you really just ask if you pay what you are supposed to pay will people stop saying you wont pay what you're supposed to pay?


  • #1734
    KeithAFC
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    Fuhrer wrote: »
    Did you really just ask if you pay what you are supposed to pay will people stop saying you wont pay what you're supposed to pay?
    I meant about refusing to pay it. I have my reasons but because it is a charity and it is a good cause, I will pay up. But NOT because I feel I lost the bet legitimately. What is the charity again.


  • #1735
    PauloMN
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional North East Moderators Posts: 10,887 Mod ✭✭✭✭PauloMN


    Fuhrer wrote: »
    Did you really just ask if you pay what you are supposed to pay will people stop saying you wont pay what you're supposed to pay?

    Shhhhh...... it'll be a miracle to get him to pay, don't ruin it!!! :D:D:D


  • #1736
    Dempsey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,529 ✭✭✭✭Dempsey


    PauloMN wrote: »
    Shhhhh...... it'll be a miracle to get him to pay, don't ruin it!!! :D:D:D

    I'll have a bet with you that he'll photoshop the receipt but if he uses MS Paint, the bet will be null & void.


  • #1737
    El Horseboxo
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,354 ✭✭✭El Horseboxo


    If it was a personal bet between 2 people fair enough. I'd agree that given the circumstances it isn't quite fair to lose the bet. But it's for a fúcking charity. Just pay the fúcking thing.


  • #1738
    PauloMN
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional North East Moderators Posts: 10,887 Mod ✭✭✭✭PauloMN


    Dempsey wrote: »
    I'll have a bet with you that he'll photoshop the receipt

    :D

    Well the only reasonable suggestion would be that he pays online, and forwards the receipt by PM to Bobby. He made the bet with Bobby, I think he should show Bobby the receipt. Or give Bobby €50 cash and let him make the donation.


  • #1739
    KeithAFC
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    Right I will pay it. I need to get it sorted out next week with my card as it isn't debit. I got the website favoured. So I will do it.


  • #1740
    Blatter
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,832 ✭✭✭✭Blatter


    El Horseboxo wrote: »
    If it was a personal bet between 2 people fair enough. I'd agree that given the circumstances it isn't quite fair to lose the bet. But it's for a fúcking charity. Just pay the fúcking thing.

    Of course it would be. As long as the bet wasn't made with any special conditions, it should be honored.

    Tough titty that Rangers entered administration.
    Dempsey wrote: »
    I'll have a bet with you that he'll photoshop the receipt but if he uses MS Paint, the bet will be null & void.

    Keith should transfer the money to bobbysands81 via paypal, and then the charity should be payed by bobbysands81. Keith has already shown himself to be untrustworthy, it is the safest way to do things.


  • Advertisement
  • #1741
    Coillte_Bhoy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,961 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    Don't make it personal Dempsey. The title is tainted to many thousands of people and even high profile people in the media and football.

    Of course its personal, your behaviour on this issue is despicable. Despite whatever i may have said about you i fully expected you to pay up considering the charity. As for tainted you havent a clue what the word means. Whoa re these high profile people you talk about??

    To the other regular posters on here, how about we all make a donation to the same charity as well, say even just a tenner each would make a decent sum?


Advertisement