Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"The Origin of Specious Nonsense"

1…265266268270271…328

Comments

  • #8012
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    dlofnep wrote: »
    Slavery, murder and selling children is pretty outdated to be fair. All promoted in the Bible.
    'Do onto others as you would have them do onto you' ... and 'love one another as I have loved you' ... would exclude slavery, murder and the selling children for all Saved Christians.:)

    ... 'survival of the fittest' ... doesn't exclude any of these horrors ... for somebody who thinks of themselves as 'the fittest'.:(


  • #8013
    joseph brand
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,540 ✭✭✭joseph brand


    J C wrote: »
    What 'outdated Christian morals' are you talking about?

    Loyalty, Love and Faithfulness never go out of fashion ... and I can confirm that being married to a Christian woman increases the 'fun' ... but without the clinical and sub-clinical 'disease loading' that inevitably results from having multiple partners ... even if you do cover 1% of your body surface in micro-thin latex!!!

    For me it's about 5%. "Zzzzzzziiiipppp, BAADUMM!" :pac:


  • #8014
    Sarky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    Heh, 1%. J C must have a tiny cock.


  • #8015
    dlofnep
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    J C wrote: »
    'Do onto others as you would have them do onto you' ... and 'love one another as I have loved you' ... would exclude slavery, murder and the selling children for all Saved Christians.:)

    Don't argue with me man, argue with the bible. It's the one that promotes slavery, murder and selling of children. Or have you read the Bible yet?
    J C wrote: »
    ... 'survival of the fittest' ... doesn't exclude any of these horrors ... for somebody who thinks of themselves as 'the fittest'.:(

    Survival of the fittest isn't an atheist doctrine I'm afraid.


  • #8016
    Genghiz Cohen
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,182 ✭✭✭Genghiz Cohen


    Sarky wrote: »
    Heh, 1%. J C must have a tiny cock.

    In other news, Sarky, your new avatar actually made me laugh out loud.


  • Advertisement
  • #8017
    joseph brand
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,540 ✭✭✭joseph brand


    Sarky wrote: »
    Heh, 1%. J C must have a tiny cock.

    He has a sensible little willy. Awww bless.


  • #8018
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    dlofnep wrote: »
    A flood doesn't neatly organise different species into different layers. Don't be absurd.
    We don't find them 'neatly organised' ... we find them strewn all over the place and in drowning contortions.
    ... and we find them together largely with other creatures that occupied the same locations and ecological niches.
    ... we find fossilised creatures that are identical to current living species alongside creatures that are supposedly hundreds of millions of years extinct.

    We find creatures that are perfectly preserved (and therefore had to be instantly entombed) with polystrate fossils sticking up through metres of sediment that Evolutionists claim to have been gradually laid down over millions of years.

    ... none of this makes any sense using a 'long ages' Evolutionist interpretation ... but it is perfectly in line with what would be expected if the rocks and their fossils were laid down raidly by Noah's Flood


  • #8019
    Sarky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    That's bollocks, J C. Yore posting bollocks again. Stop posting bollocks.


  • #8020
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    dlofnep wrote: »
    Don't argue with me man, argue with the bible. It's the one that promotes slavery, murder and selling of children. Or have you read the Bible yet?
    I'm not arguing ... I'm telling you that Christians don't engage in such activities.
    dlofnep wrote: »
    Survival of the fittest isn't an atheist doctrine I'm afraid.
    Never said it was ... but Evolution 'red in tooth and claw' it isn't rejected by them either!!!


  • #8021
    beerbuddy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 131 ✭✭beerbuddy


    Doctor Jimbob wrote: »
    Then why does the bible promote these things?


    :confused:

    Please give an example


  • Advertisement
  • #8022
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    joseph brand wrote: »
    For me it's about 5%. "Zzzzzzziiiipppp, BAADUMM!" :pac:
    You should go to a doctor to get it checked out ... if its hanging down around your knees, like that!!!!:):D:)


  • #8023
    dlofnep
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    J C wrote: »
    We don't find them 'neatly organised' ... we find them strewn all over the place and in drowning contortions.

    No we don't.
    J C wrote: »
    ... we find fossilised creatures that are identical to current living species alongside creatures that are supposedly hundreds of millions of years extinct.

    No we don't. It is true that some species have not seen much evolution over millions of years like the crocodile, but they are not 'identical' to crocodiles that exist today. Your wordplay is dishonest, and we don't like dishonesty around these parts.
    J C wrote: »
    We find creatures that are perfectly preserved (and therefore had to be instantly entombed) with polystrate fossils sticking up through metres of sediment that Evolutionists claim to have been gradually laid down over millions of years.

    No evolutionist ever claimed that. Stop reading from answers in genesis again. Polystrate fossils are perfectly understood, and perfectly explained. Here for example:



    As I said, you just parrot off AiG claims without actually understanding anything. Try reading a real scientific text sometime. You might actually learn something valid.


  • #8024
    dlofnep
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    J C wrote: »
    I'm not arguing ... I'm telling you that Christians don't engage in such activities.

    Why subscribe to a book and not adhere to it's practices? Do you cherrypick what aspects of the Bible you subscribe to? Are you now accepting that the book is inaccurate in many places? Well done J C - You're maturing! We're ever-so proud of you.


  • #8025
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Sarky wrote: »
    Heh, 1%. J C must have a tiny cock.
    You fixation with relative size ... sounds like you are trying to compensate for something yourself!!!

    I never think about it myself ... as I have never had any complaints!!:)


  • #8026
    Sarky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    Maybe your boyfriend just has a really tight arse?


  • #8027
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    dlofnep wrote: »
    Why subscribe to a book and not adhere to it's practices? Do you cherrypick what aspects of the Bible you subscribe to? Are you now accepting that the book is inaccurate in many places? Well done J C - You're maturing! We're ever-so proud of you.
    The Old Testament laws were written to regulate the relationships amongst the Israelites themselves ... and between them and their neighbours ... while the New Testament is for people under God's Grace.


  • #8028
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Sarky wrote: »
    Maybe your boyfriend just has a really tight arse?
    I don't know about you ... but I've never been sexually interested in boys myself!!!:(


  • #8029
    Sarky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    Sure. You just want Jesus inside you in a purely platonic sense.


  • #8030
    dlofnep
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    J C wrote: »
    The Old Testament laws were written to regulate the relationships amongst the Israelites themselves ... and between them and their neighbours ... while the New Testament is for people under God's Grace.

    What about Rocky 4?


  • #8031
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Doctor Jimbob wrote: »
    Sometimes we do find them neatly organised. There's quite a bit of variety in fossil preservation.
    Of course we find them together with outher creatures which occupied the same locations, why on earth wouldn't we?
    Yes ... its a record of Flood Burial.


    Doctor Jimbob wrote: »
    Yes, we do. This does not however mean that all fossils were preserved in one flood. It means some fossils were preserved in floods.
    ... go on ... and stop looking through your fingers ... and 'man up' ... and face the fact that fossiliferous sedimentary rocks were practically all laid down under water ... in a worldwide flood.


  • Advertisement
  • #8032
    dlofnep
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    J C wrote: »
    ... I've never been sexually interested in boys myself!!!:(

    And this saddens you. That's ok - there are groups that can help you with this.


  • #8033
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    dlofnep wrote: »
    And this saddens you. That's ok - there are groups that can help you with this.
    It was a frown of disapproval.
    ... and the fact that you thought that it was a sad smiley tells us more about you ... than you might want people to know!!!


  • #8034
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Doctor Jimbob wrote: »
    ... go on ... and stop looking through your fingers ... and 'man up' ... and face the fact that fossiliferous sedimentary rocks were practically all laid down under water ... in a worldwide flood.

    Agreed.
    ... you're getting there ... slowly ... but you're getting there nonetheless!!!:)

    ... so it was laid down under water ... that inundated ... flowed ... eh ... em ... and flooded ... worldwide!!!!:eek:

    ... you can now 'come out' as a Creationist to yourself ... but unfortunately you cannot tell anybody else, that knows you ... because it's a love that dare not speak it's name!!!:eek:


  • #8035
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Doctor Jimbob wrote: »
    It was clearly a sad smiley face.
    It's ok J C. You don't need to hide your true feeling from us. We don't judge.

    xxx
    It was a frown smiley ... fact ...
    You guys seem to have a serious problem with facts.

    Perhaps that's why ye don't know where you Evolutionist facts stop ... and your Evolutionist fantasies begin.:)


  • #8036
    dlofnep
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    J C wrote: »
    It was a frown of disapproval.
    ... and the fact that you thought that it was a sad smiley tells us more about you ... than you might want people to know!!!

    Hey it's ok.. We're here for you.


  • #8037
    Sarky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    Perhaps we're just mocking your embarrassing lack of knowledge on every subject that has ever been raised in this thread.

    Seriously. Read a book that wasn't written by an ignorant, fraudulent creationist hack.


  • #8038
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Sarky wrote: »
    Seriously. Read a book that wasn't written by an ignorant, fraudulent creationist hack.
    Never met an ignorant Creationist ...
    ... but, when it comes to Evolutionist novels ... I have a whole library full of them!!!!:)


  • #8039
    Sarky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    J C wrote: »
    Sarky wrote: »
    Seriously. Read a book that wasn't written by an ignorant, fraudulent creationist hack.
    Never met an ignorant Creationist ...

    Ha. You haven't met any at all, then. Or you aren't being entirely truthful. Shock horror.
    ... but, when it comes to Evolutionist novels ... I have a whole library full of them!!!!:)

    Perhaps you could try reading one? Because you obviously know nothing about it.

    But that robust Mathematical definition of cfsi still hasn't been presented. You should probably do that first.


  • #8040
    Sarky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    Never met an ignorant Creationist ...

    Ha. You haven't met any at all, then. Or you aren't being entirely truthful. Shock horror.
    ... but, when it comes to Evolutionist novels ... I have a whole library full of them!!!!:)

    Perhaps you could try reading one? Because you obviously know nothing about evolution. There are kid's books that could correct most of the nonsense you've posted. They have pictures and everything.

    But that robust Mathematical definition of cfsi still hasn't been presented. You should probably do that first.


  • Advertisement
  • #8041
    Teg Veece
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭Teg Veece


    J C wrote: »
    If they are true rock-bound fossils then they probably were killed by the Flood ... but if they are found as bones in caves, then they are likely to be post-diluvian (and possibly quite recent) in origin.

    Thanks for answering.

    I didn't realise that Creationists believed in the Flood and Ark theory.
    Does it stand up to much scrutiny though? Lets ignore the logistics of getting 2 of every creature in existance into the ark for a bit. How did Kangaroos end up in Australia if the species effectively restarted with just 2 specimens roughly 4000 years ago at some place in the Middle East.

    Wouldn't there be evidence of their migration across Asia? What did they do when they got to the Indian Ocean. I know they can jump quite a distance but an over an ocean?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement