Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"The Origin of Specious Nonsense"

1…262263265267268…328

Comments

  • #7922
    dead one
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,320 ✭✭✭dead one


    J C wrote: »
    ... produced after millions of years of selected mistakes ... don't you know!!!!:):D:eek:
    Jc, Evolutionists can't explain sh!t. ;)


  • #7923
    dlofnep
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    dead one wrote: »
    Jc, Evolutionists can't explain sh!t. ;)

    Except the 500+ pages in this thread where we've explained a wide variety of things, backed up by scientific evidence. I'll take my scientific books, over a book that promotes child rape (Quran) any day of the week.


  • #7924
    Sarky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    I suspect it's a defence mechanism that shoots out of the mouth when an incorrect person's claims are proven time and again to be rubbish.

    Personally, I think it's a bit of an evolutionary dead end.


  • #7925
    dead one
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,320 ✭✭✭dead one


    dlofnep wrote: »
    Except the 500+ pages in this thread where we've explained a wide variety of things, backed up by scientific evidence. I'll take my scientific books, over a book that promotes child rape (Quran) any day of the week.
    i like it, the evolution of anger in your genes, that's why you can't explain sh!t ;)

    9601.gif


  • #7926
    Sarky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    Oh J C, I noticed you edited a post again about half an hour after it was made, after a dozen or so posts had moved the whole thread on. It's a pretty big edit, and didn't include the massive wall of text before.

    You wouldn't be attempting to retcon in an attempt to claim nobody addresses your claims now, would you? Holy spirit inspiring you to lie, perhaps? Have you checked recently to make sure it's not Satan whispering in your ear? With the kind of arrogance and ignorance you display on a daily basis, I'd say it would be pretty easy for him to replace what you thought was the voice of truth.

    Not that we haven't answered all your claims so far. It's really easy when all you post is horsesh*t.


  • Advertisement
  • #7927
    dlofnep
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    dead one wrote: »
    i like it, the evolution of anger in your genes, that's why you can't explain sh!t ;)

    9601.gif

    Do I have to repeat myself? We've spent 500 pages explaining a vast array of topics. You've obviously ignored it, because your Quran does not permit you to studying reality.


  • #7928
    Sarky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    robindch wrote: »
    JC's posts, on the other hand, haven't changed in the slightest. What I believe is his/her first one was seven years and four days ago, here, and other than the evolution of the trivially discreditable IFSC nonsense, I don't see any evidence of JC having learned a thing.

    Blimey, ok I was wrong, J C's posts have always been batsh*t crazy.

    It's actually kind of impressive though, in a twisted way, how consistent he's has been for 7 years. Consistently wrong and totally incapable of learning from his glaring mistakes, but consistent nonetheless.


  • #7929
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Sarky wrote: »
    I couldn't be sure without trawling through most of this thread, but does anyone else get the feeling that the more real science we post, the more batsh*t crazy J C's posts get in response?
    You should try posting some real science that supports M2M Evolution ... rather than just talking about doing so.


  • #7930
    Sarky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    1. There is no such evidence.

    2. That's because m2m evolution is a bullsh*t term you invented in a feeble attempt to look clever.


  • #7931
    dlofnep
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    J C wrote: »
    You should try posting some real science that supports M2M Evolution ... rather than just talking about doing so.

    M2M Evolution is a term you came up with. So why don't you come up with evidence for it, since you created the term?


  • Advertisement
  • #7932
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Teg Veece wrote: »
    J C, this question was probably asked of you at some stage during the thread, but I haven't quite read through all of it yet.

    Can you tell me why I have an appendix?
    There once were over 100 so-called vestigial organs that were supposed to be 'left-overs' from Evolution with no function - but practically all are now know to have useful functions.
    The Appendix is now thought to have a role in protecting and producing 'good' gut bacteria ... and this role is especially important in vulnerable babies and young children
    http://www.physorg.com/news110864235.html

    ... and here is further news of 'evolution' going around in circles ... and ending up back where it started ... which isn't what is required to support the idea the Microbes evolved into Man.
    http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-02-evolutionary.html


  • #7933
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    dlofnep wrote: »
    There you go lying again. The dishonesty train continues.

    Evolutionists have never used is as an argument in support of Evolution. I challenge you to provide me evidence of an evolutionary biologist putting forward a Crocoduck as an example of evolution in action.
    There you go lying about me again ... the point I made was that Evolutionists have used the Crocoduck to scoff at real objections to Evolution by Creation Scientists.


  • #7934
    Delirium
    Moderators Posts: 52,076 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    J C wrote: »
    There once were over 100 so-called vestigial organs that were supposed to be 'left-overs' from Evolution with no function - but practically all are now know to have useful functions.
    The Appendix is now thought to have a role in protecting and producing 'good' gut bacteria ... and this role is especially important in vulnerable babies and young children
    http://www.physorg.com/news110864235.html

    ... and here is further news of 'evolution' going around in circles ... and ending up back where it started ... which isn't what is required to support the idea the Microbes evolved into Man.
    http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-02-evolutionary.html

    thanks for the interesting article about moths and evolution. Not sure why you poted something that doesn't help your argument though.

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • #7935
    dlofnep
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    J C wrote: »
    There you go lying about me again ... the point I made was that Evolutionists have used the Crocoduck as a 'strawman' to scoff at real objections to Evolution by Creation Scientists.

    It is not a Strawman, because it was an argument put forward by two prominent Creationists against Evolution. It, along with every other Creationist argument demonstrates a complete lack of understanding as to what Evolution is, and what processes dictate it. You included.


  • #7936
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    wrote:
    Originally Posted by J C
    You should try posting some real science that supports M2M Evolution ... rather than just talking about doing so.

    Sarky
    1. There is no such evidence.

    2. That's because m2m evolution is a bullsh*t term you invented in a feeble attempt to look clever.
    I agree that there is no evidence that unicellular microbes evolved into anything ... except more microbes.
    ... so I guess that just leaves Creation as the origins reason for mankind.:)

    Thanks.


  • #7937
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Doctor Jimbob wrote: »
    Or maybe it was, you know, that thing that actually happened. What's it called again?
    Direct Divine Creation.


  • #7938
    Sarky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    That's a stupid alternative. Got anything else?


  • #7939
    Sarky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    Eh, it's about as solid as cfsi I guess.


  • #7940
    dlofnep
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    J C wrote: »
    I agree that there is no evidence that unicellular microbes evolved into anything ... except more microbes.
    ... so I guess that just leaves Creation as the origins reason for mankind.:)

    Thanks.

    HNJ7y.jpg


  • #7941
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Doctor Jimbob wrote: »
    I personally have this theory we came into existance in the middle of a giant baked potato. My evidence is ALGR, a nonsensical thing I made up which nonsensical science I made up shows can be found in the hair follicles of all living organisms. The first human was called brian, and he reproduced asexually. ALGR also proves this, just because.
    ... yet another one ... of the many variants on the 'just so' Evolution Story!!!:);)


  • Advertisement
  • #7942
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    koth wrote: »
    thanks for the interesting article about moths and evolution. Not sure why you poted something that doesn't help your argument though.
    It's very interesting allright ... but grey moths that evolve into black moths ... and back to grey moths again ... is the 'kiss of death' for the evolution of anything into Mankind (other than Mankind).:)


  • #7943
    Sarky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    No it isn't, and claiming otherwise is very stupid. We've been over this. You're lying again.


  • #7944
    sephir0th
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 390 ✭✭sephir0th


    Evolution can't explain this!!! :(:P:):rolleyes:;):cool::pac::confused::(:)

    a3bff135-1029-41b6-8ff0-8e262154987b_thumb.jpg


  • #7945
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Sarky wrote: »
    No it isn't, and claiming otherwise is very stupid. We've been over this. You're lying again.
    Stop lying about me.

    It is a fact that the grey moths evolved into black ones ... and then back to grey ones again, as the environment changed.

    So it just went around in one big circle ... and it has ended up where it started.


  • #7946
    Sarky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    And you're trying to argue that adding and then removing a selective pressure results in evolution being false. That is a disgraceful dishonest and idiotic thing to claim, J C. We've gone over why before, si you can't claim ignorance. It is pure dishonesty on your part.

    Yore either ignorant of evolution or lying about it. Either way, you're wrong. Be honest, and admit it, or continue to make a fool of yourself with stupid arguments and lies. I suspect you'll choose the latter. By all means J C, prove me wrong.


  • #7947
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Doctor Jimbob wrote: »
    Whether it's a fact or not is entirely irrelevant, it doesn't prove what you're claiming it does.
    Which part of going around in a circle are you arguing with?


  • #7948
    robindch
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Sarky wrote: »
    No it isn't, and claiming otherwise is very stupid. We've been over this. You're lying again.
    J C wrote: »
    Stop lying about me.
    Kids - yizzr both on the brink of starting the "pants-on-fire" thing.

    Can you please both drop the accusations of lying towards each other, and other posters in A+A, and address some arguments, plz?

    kthxl8r.


  • #7949
    Sarky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    It's not going around in a circle. It's more like going up a hill and then down on a long journey.

    Claiming otherwise is displaying a profound ignorance of evolution.


  • #7950
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Sarky wrote: »
    It's not going around in a circle. It's more like going up a hill and then down on a long journey.
    ... and ending up exactly where you have started!!!
    Sarky wrote: »
    Claiming otherwise is displaying a profound ignorance of evolution.
    Its not a claim that the grey-black-grey moth thing is circular ... its a fact.

    Claiming otherwise is just wishful thinking ... on your part.;)


  • Advertisement
  • #7951
    robindch
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Sarky wrote: »
    a profound ignorance of evolution.
    Creationism is a profound ignorance of just about everything and a willful disdain towards informing oneself.

    Nonetheless everybody - please drop the accusations of lying towards fellow-posters.

    thanks.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement