Page 3 Boobs

smash · 16-02-2012 05:30PM

sbsquarepants wrote: »

Jen, can i call you jen? Great!
As luck would have it, I am a professional booboligist/talent scout. Whip them on out there and i'll give you an unbiased professional opinion. I'll even wave my usual fee in this one case, and also in the case of any of your friends or relatives who also want opinions.:D

If you snoop hard enough you'll see that she'd deffo get the seal of approval!

wonton · 16-02-2012 05:31PM

AnonoBoy wrote: »

Little known fact but 67% of Page 3 models actually go on to get Masters qualifications. And of those 47% go on to become doctors.

must be embarassing when they realised they didn't even need the masters to become doctors.

davet82 · 16-02-2012 05:40PM

wonton wrote: »

must be embarassing when they realised they didn't even need the masters to become doctors.

get your broadsheet humor out of my thread please! :rolleyes:

kryogen · 16-02-2012 05:42PM

smash wrote: »

If you snoop hard enough you'll see that she'd deffo get the seal of approval!

.

smash · 16-02-2012 05:45PM

kryogen wrote: »

.

Hey... do your own stalking!

kryogen · 16-02-2012 05:47PM

smash wrote: »

Hey... do your own stalking!

I dont have time! Just give me a clue and I'll creep on her later

On second thoughts, na, I have football to be watching!

syklops · 16-02-2012 05:56PM

xxxJennyxxx wrote: »

(I have big dreams about being a page 3 girl, but alas, my short stature and limited boob job fund worked against me :cool:)

If its a serious dream I would say go for it. Short stature doesnt matter because in a picture there is no point of reference that makes you short looking. And speaking as a great big pervy bloke, we dont just want big ones. little ones and medium ones are just as nice too.

I'd get on the phone to the Sun if I were you.

AnonoBoy · 16-02-2012 06:03PM

wonton wrote: »

must be embarassing when they realised they didn't even need the masters to become doctors.

Damn it! My lack of knowledge about third level qualifications once more proves to be my undoing when trying to propagate erroneous facts about the glamour model industry.

Big Nasty · 16-02-2012 06:11PM

We got the Irish Times in our house but on a Sunday we used to get the Sunday World. Dragged myself around the room to the page three girly pic in it when I was about ten. I don't think there was even full boobage on display!:o

Paparazzo · 16-02-2012 06:18PM

kylith wrote: »

I just find it hilarious that the Sun tends to go mad over the slightest issue of morality, but then has boobs on Page 3. Double standard FTW

Naked women on page 3, and they star out the word "shit" to "s***" in their articles.

mysteries1984 · 16-02-2012 06:24PM

rossie1977 wrote: »

the sun has had a policy of "natural boobs" only since the late 1990s......

No way! Has it really? I had no idea!

sbsquarepants wrote: »

Jen, can i call you jen? Great!
As luck would have it, I am a professional booboligist/talent scout. Whip them on out there and i'll give you an unbiased professional opinion. I'll even wave my usual fee in this one case, and also in the case of any of your friends or relatives who also want opinions.:D

Sponge, good call.

Jen, take him up on his offer. Or do indeed call The Sun. Height doesn't matter as much in glamour modelling...and big boobs aren't always a plus. Go forth, good lady.

TwoShedsJackson · 16-02-2012 06:31PM

Pffffft, ye kids today with your internet porn don't feckin know you're born. When I was twelve a grainy black and white picture of Sam Fox or Linda Lusardi with her tits out was the only way you were going to see tits anywhere.

smash · 16-02-2012 06:33PM

TwoShedsJackson wrote: »

Pffffft, ye kids today with your internet porn don't feckin know you're born.

???

Here Grandad... Learn how to type a coherent sentence will ya!

MyKeyG · 16-02-2012 06:33PM

TwoShedsJackson wrote: »

Pffffft, ye kids today with your internet porn don't feckin know you're born. When I was twelve a grainy black and white picture of Sam Fox or Linda Lusardi with her tits out was the only way you were going to see tits anywhere.

Ah they were better times. Because there was no easily available porn you made do with pictures of BB Baskin showing a bit of leg in the RTE guide. The world was a porn mag!!!

ComfyKnickers · 16-02-2012 07:05PM

mysteries1984 wrote: »

rossie1977 wrote: »

the sun has had a policy of "natural boobs" only since the late 1990s......

No way! Has it really? I had no idea!

sbsquarepants wrote: »

Jen, can i call you jen? Great!
As luck would have it, I am a professional booboligist/talent scout. Whip them on out there and i'll give you an unbiased professional opinion. I'll even wave my usual fee in this one case, and also in the case of any of your friends or relatives who also want opinions.:D

Sponge, good call.

Jen, take him up on his offer. Or do indeed call The Sun. Height doesn't matter as much in glamour modelling...and big boobs aren't always a plus. Go forth, good lady.

And if it works out well for you, I might go fifth!

mysteries1984 · 16-02-2012 09:05PM

ComfyKnickers wrote: »

And if it works out well for you, I might go fifth!

If you do, I will support you and buy the relevant publication

Seriously, I think more women should do this.

44leto · 16-02-2012 09:11PM

BooBs I remember when they meant a bit of titillation, now they are perpetually in your face from every magazine and off course the internet.

I say forget about the boobs and put gees on page three. That off course will depend on if there is a Sun after the leveson enquiry

gbee · 16-02-2012 09:11PM

mysteries1984 wrote: »

If you do, I will support you and buy the relevant publication Seriously, I think more women should do this.

Any program I've seen on this topic, the papers were fully booked up, the Sun if the only one left with Page 3 ~ I remember them in black n white and I had the special colour pinups in me van. Nostalgia.

Irish Guitarist · 16-02-2012 09:15PM

davet82 wrote: »

sounds like somethin ya say when tryin the 'sensitive approach' when trying to get into a girls knickers... good work

Not really. I just don't believe in pointless and risky operations.

kryogen wrote: »

Been a long time since I saw it but wasnt page 3's proudest thing that they would only have natural boobs in it?

You might be right. It may be another paper I'm thinking of that had women like I described.

Dudess · 16-02-2012 09:27PM

44leto wrote: »

BooBs I remember when they meant a bit of titillation, now they are perpetually in your face from every magazine and off course the internet.

I say forget about the boobs and put gees on page three. That off course will depend on if there is a Sun after the leveson enquiry

Gees don't look great though.

Gummy Panda · 16-02-2012 09:31PM

RichieC wrote: »

I'd be less embarrassed buying a gay porno mag in a shop than I would buying the sun.

Don't lie and try to be a special snowflake

previous user · 16-02-2012 09:55PM

Gotta give council dwelling scum something to read.

44leto · 16-02-2012 09:57PM

Dudess wrote: »

Gees don't look great though.

Ahh they grow on you, its an acquired taste.

SugarCoat · 16-02-2012 10:22PM

When it comes to tits ya can't bate page 3 of the farmer's journal

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b8/MonbeliardCattleCow_in_CantalMountains.JPG dhurty!

44leto · 16-02-2012 10:59PM

SugarCoat wrote: »

When it comes to tits ya can't bate page 3 of the farmer's journal http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b8/MonbeliardCattleCow_in_CantalMountains.JPG dhurty!

Oh Yeah

They sometimes do a centrefold of a Massey Ferguson.;

wardy2 · 16-02-2012 11:39PM

worst thing about sun is opening up the paper and find your mam on page 3:eek:

*starts to cry*

McChubbin · 16-02-2012 11:48PM

How about a nice cheeky ballsac?

Mint Sauce · 16-02-2012 11:52PM

Have nothing at all against page 3 boobs, its just the s*n newspaper I have a problem with.

Absolute rag of a paper, wouldn't use it to wipe my hole, and would not be disapointed if it disappeared along with the The NOTW.

Jesus Wept · 17-02-2012 12:23AM

Dudess wrote: »

Gees don't look great though.

Bit harsh.

44leto wrote: »

BooBs I remember when they meant a bit of titillation, now they are perpetually in your face from every magazine and off course the internet.

I say forget about the boobs and put gees on page three. That off course will depend on if there is a Sun after the leveson enquiry

Page gee.

Capt'n Midnight · 17-02-2012 12:47AM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_Three

The Sun and other British tabloids also provoked controversy by featuring girls as young as 16 as topless models, when it was legal to do so. Samantha Fox, Maria Whittaker, Debee Ashby, and others began their topless modelling careers in The Sun at the age of 16, while the Daily Sport was even known to count down the days until it could feature a teenage girl topless on her 16th birthday, as it did with Linsey Dawn McKenzie in 1994, amongst others. In 2003, the Sexual Offences Act 2003 raised the minimum legal age for topless modelling to 18.

Question is , were those issues sold here ?

And more importantly what are the statutes of limitations for what I assume would have been a breach of Irish law.

16, wouldn't have even finished school yet.

Page 3 Boobs

Comments