Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

What does moving in with your partner mean to you ??

2

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    Maybe it depends on the age and cultural differences, but one thing I found weird about living in Ireland is how many young people do the whole moving in thing for several years, then get engaged for several years, and then kind of sink into this netherworld of neither here nor there until their 30s. Out of my circle of close friends from home in the US, I only had two friends who moved in with the OH before getting married, and in one case, they were already engaged and it made sense to move two months before the wedding because his lease was up.

    The way I look at it, either shit or get off the pot. But that's just me.

    Some sh*ts take a lot longer than others.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mikom viewpost.gif
    You want to know blow me?
    Come live with me.

    FYP

    Take note AngryBollix.
    Spread wrote: »
    Far fewer blow jobs!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,560 ✭✭✭southsiderosie


    Millicent wrote: »
    Tbh, I prefer our way. Get to know someone before you make one of the biggest commitments of your life. Don't understand the whole engaged-for-a-decade thing but the tendency towards short engagements in a lot of parts of the US is weirder to me than living together and getting to know the person you're going to (possibly) spend the rest of your life with.

    What would be considered 'short' though? I guess that's the crux of the difference.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭Millicent


    What would be considered 'short' though? I guess that's the crux of the difference.

    I've heard of people in the US being engaged within six months of meeting each other and married within a year of that. Have heard fewer but still a few stories of people meeting and marrying within a year. IMO that's bonkers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,515 ✭✭✭LH Pathe


    Millicent wrote: »
    What would be considered 'short' though? I guess that's the crux of the difference.

    I've heard of people in the US being engaged within six months of meeting each other and married within a year of that. Have heard fewer but still a few stories of people meeting and marrying within a year. IMO that's bonkers.

    then try this an Irish guy coaxes naive antipodean girl into marrying within mere months, 4 or thereabouts in dublin she having had his baby already. It; concieved under sketches of her fanny but anyhow only then do they move in.. can't even affort heating but for the gas in a lighter which heats the spoon thing's over in mere weeks :/ what did Shakespeare say again?

    "better to have loved and lost, than to have not loved at all.." mph.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,560 ✭✭✭southsiderosie


    Millicent wrote: »
    I've heard of people in the US being engaged within six months of meeting each other and married within a year of that. Have heard fewer but still a few stories of people meeting and marrying within a year. IMO that's bonkers.

    Hm, I'm probably the wrong person to have this conversation with; my OH and I knew we wanted to get hitched after three months. :o Granted, we're both in our mid 30s, and we weren't total strangers when we started dating, but that would probably be too big of a leap of faith for most people.

    I'm certainly an extreme case, but given that the average marriage in the US lasts eight years, the whole 'dating for 4 years, engaged for 3' thing seems kind of silly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,488 ✭✭✭celtictiger32


    a ****ing headache......... dont do it any advantages youve heard disregard them immediately. women are like a venus fly trap they look lovely and they lure you in and then snap!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭sarahbro


    More socks and towels to pick up off the floor


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    given that the average marriage in the US lasts eight years, the whole 'dating for 4 years, engaged for 3' thing seems kind of silly.

    It actually makes more sense in that case.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 22,424 CMod ✭✭✭✭Dravokivich


    Ironed shirts.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,296 ✭✭✭Frank Black


    Maybe it depends on the age and cultural differences, but one thing I found weird about living in Ireland is how many young people do the whole moving in thing for several years, then get engaged for several years, and then kind of sink into this netherworld of neither here nor there until their 30s. Out of my circle of close friends from home in the US, I only had two friends who moved in with the OH before getting married, and in one case, they were already engaged and it made sense to move two months before the wedding because his lease was up.

    The way I look at it, either shit or get off the pot. But that's just me.


    Yes, and divorce statistics from the US really back up that this is a better way of approaching things?

    Waiting until you're married before you live with someone would be one of the most incredibly reckless and risky things you could do imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭Feeona


    mikom wrote: »
    Some sh*ts take a lot longer than others.

    That brought tears to my eyes...you should get a job at Hallmark :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,911 ✭✭✭✭ShadowHearth


    I live with my misses together for the last 7 years. Since I was 19, she was 23. We share our budget 7 years too.

    I could not be happier. Newer put much though in to it. We were always happy together and we newer ever had any problems.

    Btw we don't have kids, so it wasn't like we have to live together becouse I have shadowhearth juniors etc.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 178 ✭✭Paddy Bateman


    Tweet0004 wrote: »
    Is it for convenience, stronger commitment, or are you using it as a trial marriage and what are the advantages and disadvantages.
    Having to stop blasting piss down the kitchen sink


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 77 ✭✭msbusterpuss


    having someone to light the fire:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭Feeona


    Tweet0004 wrote: »
    No seriously asking because we have moved in together, after been together a few years, and listening to friends saying it is good, and others saying it is bad.

    Living with your other half is all about patience. He/she show their best sides when you first start dating. Then small little nuances creep in. If you can take those early nuances with a pinch of salt, you're ready to move onto the next step, which may be becoming official/meeting parents etc. Followed shortly after that by 'moving in'. Here you will see more nuances you never noticed before, such as leaving boxers on the floor, hair from a hairbrush in the sink etc. Sometimes these things will drive you mad, but if you can remember all the nice/great things your other half does for you, picking up their boxers ain't so bad!

    You should know what your partner is like with regard to finances also. If he/she spends all around him while you're more careful, a compromise is in order where both sides are happy with the arrangements.

    Just because some of your friends have had bad experiences, doesn't mean you will. Maybe their personalities haven't adjusted to living with their other halves. Maybe they still expect to be wooed and charmed like they were in the initial stages of their relationships? I could be wrong, but I find that many people assume that living with your other half is just going to be an extension of the initial part of the relationship. The relationship does change to a certain extent in that you become more comfortable and understanding of each other.

    Best of luck with the moving in and getting to know each other much, much better!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15 Dial Square


    I would say moving in together is a good idea before getting married. One important thing though is to leave it until you are together at least 2 years. I moved in with my ex after only a year of going out. Everything was great as we were still in the honeymoon phase with each other. We got married within two years of moving in & soon after things (she) changed a lot and I realised I couldnt bear being in the same room as her....marriage ended after 4 years....BE CAREFUL, BE VERY CAREFUL! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,028 ✭✭✭✭--LOS--


    Tweet0004 wrote: »
    Is it for convenience, stronger commitment, or are you using it as a trial marriage and what are the advantages and disadvantages.

    I wouldn't necessarily say it's about any of those. I would just say you do it if it makes sense. In my experience it is not much different, if you've been going out for a good while, spend all your time together anyway then it is great and much nicer than living with housemates. You break up, you move on, simples assuming you don't have kids etc. You should not be breaking up because of difficulties that arose from living together, then you obviously didn't know each other well enough, didn't spend much time together.

    I'm currently about to move in with my OH, I'm excited coz I won't have to put up with annoying housemates that I dont get on with, I spend all my time with him anyway between both our houses, I can't remember the last time we had a night apart, we share everything and always have done, we've always done our food shopping together etc, we are not the type to be counting up who spent what. We are also more than ok with being together and doing our own thing at the same time, whether that means I'm studying and he's working on his computer. We could have moved in together a long time ago tbh but we were both happy in our respective houses, now that I'm in a position where it's not working out where I'm living at the moment, it is the ideal opportunity. We've also been through a lot together already, tough times so there is no issue as to the strength of our relationship.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭biko


    To see if you love the person enough to be able to have them around all the time.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,119 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tar.Aldarion


    About to move in with OH, going out nearly 2 years.

    We get ALL the cats. Gonna be like one of them cat cafes
    http://scs.viceland.com/int/v17n2/htdocs/meow-meow-meow-329/cafe-of-cats.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,536 ✭✭✭Stiffler2


    unable to masterbate as much to porn which is pretty annoying.
    I've had to get up into the attick just to knock one off alone


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,560 ✭✭✭southsiderosie


    Yes, and divorce statistics from the US really back up that this is a better way of approaching things?

    Waiting until you're married before you live with someone would be one of the most incredibly reckless and risky things you could do imo.

    To be honest, I don't think comparative divorce statistics mean much for Ireland. Not only is it relatively new, but it takes much longer to actually separate and divorce. It it took five years of separation to get a divorce in the US, more people would live together for 8-10 years first! TBH, from an outside perspective, it seems like living together forever in Ireland makes sense simply because the divorce process is so onerous. However, this creates a whole different layer of problems with family law and the like.

    There is also much less incentive in the US to wait for more practical reasons: most people get their health insurance through their employers rather than through the government, so there is a big incentive right there, especially if you have children and somebody wants to stay home with them.

    I guess my point is, I don't understand the point of essentially having what is a marriage without the papers - why not just have the marriage? Do you think if you could get divorced after six months rather than after five years that people would be less reluctant to take the plunge?

    As for not living with someone, well, that's a personal decision. I've made it clear to anyone I've dated that I wouldn't live with them before we got married, and it hasn't been a problem. Co-habitation is a relatively recent phenomenon, so I find it kind of odd that people are so adamant about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 486 ✭✭jackie1974


    mikom wrote: »
    Some sh*ts take a lot longer than others.

    And you want to be really sure you're finished before somebody else jumps on the pot.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 118 ✭✭Gilldog


    Tweet0004 wrote: »
    No seriously asking because we have moved in together, after been together a few years, and listening to friends saying it is good, and others saying it is bad.


    Hang on, isnt this the guy that you said cheated on you in another thread.... you're moving in with him???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,281 ✭✭✭Gmol


    Have actually never lived apart from the missus, moved into a house she was living in, got together after one month(ditched a girl in that time) started going out and got engaged after 10 days. did do a 5 yr engagement and finally got hitched. Been together 10 yrs in total and both of us still alive!!

    Personally think living together is a good idea as it is the only way I think you will know if you can really live with that person for life. Although each to their own


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,349 ✭✭✭✭starlit


    I think its important to do that to understand your other half more and to see if you have a future with them. Moving in together is the only way to find out other things about them and their habits without the lovey dovey ritual. Having a life outside a relationship is important too but spending time with your partner is a lot to take on unless you know each other really well and stayed over and gone away over night that's one way of knowing what they are like but you have to kind of think outside the relationship too. Is this the person you want to spend the rest of your life with spending most of your time and day with them?

    Things are bount to change for the better but can be bad too which could either spoil or enrich a relationship to make the couple grow together as one.
    Moving in together can either make or break a relationship. Its worth the risk in finding out if ye haven't been with each other long enough different if ye have been a couple a couple for years before moving in might be a bit better that way before going down the aisle then again most couples rather move in together than get married!

    Ye wouldn't move in together if ye didn't think there was a future whether its marriage and or kids or just spending the rest of yer lives together. Its worth moving in together so as to know in advance and in time down the line as things can change. Might turn out ye aren't as compatible as ye thought or the relationship run its course before marriage. So its good to know in advance if the risk ye are taking to move in together is the right choice!

    So definitely move in together before marriage is the best thing possible. You be a fool not to if you didn't think ye wanted to get married in the future, definitely move in together before marriage.

    Personally, if I had an OH and was to move in with them lets face it for me it be difficult as I like my own company but I do get on with people when sharing a place with but it hasn't always been hunky dory even with our habits. Its other things too, if you not getting on it can get tough living with someone and if communication breaks down then that's the end of it. If its like you are back in your parents house then you need to think twice, you've reached the end of the road of the relationship.

    Then again I wouldn't say no to moving in with someone but we would both have to know each other very very well, understand each other, know our faults and habits as it is not just the whole routine of the lovey dovey stuff but have shared other big things too, engaged with each others lives but each have a life of our own outside of the relationship too and been going out more than just a few months perhaps a year or more before I go down that road.

    So as I have said it make or break a relationship even friendship by moving in together. You need to think carefully, is it an equal partnership or is the relationship one sided?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,019 ✭✭✭Cool_CM




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,349 ✭✭✭✭starlit


    Living in sin my eye. Its not any more. If anything the church should be ok with it now. Its not taboo any more like it was 10 years ago.

    People have as much right to share a house together as anyone. If a group of friends boys and girls shared a place would that be sin? No cause they aren't couples?! Just cause they are a couple doesn't mean its a sin to live together maybe in the eyes of the church because of the whole marriage and kids thing.

    But by law, anyone can share a house together. Who gives a rats arse about the church who think its still a sin to live together. Most people are having sex before marriage and using contraception long before anyone move in together like so are they still considered a sin now?

    'Sins' are a load of bull to be honest just made up. No sooner are you out of confession you start cursing so no I don't go to confession any more cause It's ridiculous and as ridiculous as these made up 'sins'.

    It ain't the 1950's/60's any more like. Its the 21st century so god and his church has to face up to what ever human being wishes to do even its a sin according to the church so what. Its not a sin once you aren't breaking the law or be sent to jail for it like!

    It make more sense to move in together its not the dark ages.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,000 ✭✭✭✭opinion guy




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,349 ✭✭✭✭starlit


    That was awful that the grandmother cut her granddaughter out of her will like that. Just cause she is a devoted catholic doesn't mean her granddaughter had to be. Makes no sense just cause she lived with her boyfriend before getting married. She got married didn't she, shouldn't that have pleased the grandmother enough she wasn't living in sin according to her any more but fair enough her strong religious beliefs got the better of her.

    It was a silly thing to do really if it came down to that fair enough if she didn't want to give parts of her will to her youngest daughter's children.

    My grandparents wouldn't have treated each of their grandchildren differently.
    I'd be shocked if my mother ever did that to her grandchildren. I'd never forgive her. Every grand-child has a right to be treated the same what ever an outcome of the will is it's the grandmother's choice.

    For my grandmother and my mam its more to do with people going or not going to mass.


Advertisement
Advertisement