Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Septic tank charges

Options
17810121335

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,163 ✭✭✭✭Liam Byrne


    A little off point, but

    Rural Gombeen politicians helped get us into the financial mess also and rural dwellers may find themselves being penalised now for poor planning and the costs racked up by politicians they voted in for years for pet project

    Seriously ? And if I mentioned Ahern and his pet Bertie Bowl project ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,163 ✭✭✭✭Liam Byrne


    Welease wrote: »

    Well that proves my point about the use of terms like Urban and Rural :)

    Scofflaw's point is that Urban refers only to the 4 major cities (I'm assume Dublin, Belfast, Cork and Galway?)

    So you list one outside the state and then skip the 3rd city of this state completely ?

    Strange assumption.


  • Registered Users Posts: 749 ✭✭✭waster81


    n97 mini wrote: »
    His points are conceptually quite simple, and also quite reasonable.


    Yeah that was my point, rather too simplistic but heh I guess its at your level


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭Welease


    Liam Byrne wrote: »
    Welease wrote: »

    Well that proves my point about the use of terms like Urban and Rural :)

    Scofflaw's point is that Urban refers only to the 4 major cities (I'm assume Dublin, Belfast, Cork and Galway?)

    So you list one outside the state and then skip the 3rd city of this state completely ?

    Strange assumption.

    Swap Belfast for Limerick.. no biggie.. completely irrelevant to the point, but thats for taking the time to chip in...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,163 ✭✭✭✭Liam Byrne


    Welease wrote: »
    Liam Byrne wrote: »
    Welease wrote: »

    Well that proves my point about the use of terms like Urban and Rural :)

    Scofflaw's point is that Urban refers only to the 4 major cities (I'm assume Dublin, Belfast, Cork and Galway?)

    So you list one outside the state and then skip the 3rd city of this state completely ?

    Strange assumption.

    Swap Belfast for Limerick.. no biggie.. completely irrelevant to the point, but thats for taking the time to chip in...

    I can only imagine the laugh I'd get if I'd left out Dublin making a similar claim.

    But re relevance - if the inspectors do the same as you and Google Maps and overlook us, I'll be happy out.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 33,963 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    I wonder are any of our 'we paid for your pipes' posters aware of the substantial charges of connecting to a public sewer? Paid for by the builder (development levies) and passed on to the buyer. See this thread.

    Life ain't always empty.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,476 ✭✭✭ardmacha


    I wonder are any of our 'we paid for your pipes' posters aware of the substantial charges of connecting to a public sewer? Paid for by the builder (development levies) and passed on to the buyer.

    There is a continuing cost of operation of these services, so this is not really relevant.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    ardmacha wrote: »
    There is a continuing cost of operation of these services, so this is not really relevant.

    Paid for out of business rates, more or less. Which is why, again, the urban areas tend to be self-funding in this respect, because businesses tend to cluster in urban areas.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Scofflaw wrote: »
    Paid for out of business rates, more or less. Which is why, again, the urban areas tend to be self-funding in this respect, because businesses tend to cluster in urban areas.
    Head offices do, disproportionatley in capital cities. So O2 Vodafone and UPC and eircom appear as economic activity in Dublin.

    Let me post _your_ table again Scofflaw.

    All Counties Sorted By Income of Recipients of CAP Agricultural Subsidies in that County. (descending) ...as it is column 4 that is a a 4d in the source.
    County|CAP|Recipients|Per Recipient|Pop|CAP/capita|Personal Tax/Capt|Total Tax €m|Transfers €m|Net €m|Net/Capita|Net + EU

    Carlow|37780624.3|2040|18519.91|45845|824.09|1355|190|244|54|1177.88|2001.98
    Cavan|67061232.83|5185|12933.7|56416|1188.69|1564|253|273|20|354.51|1543.2
    Clare|84633475.03|6689|12652.63|103333|819.04|1485|496|463|-33|-319.36|499.68
    Cork|237628799.9|14387|16516.91|448181|530.21|1676|2306|2205|(101)|-225.36|304.85
    Donegal|96295832.23|8777|10971.38|137383|700.93|620|461|733|272|1979.87|2680.8
    Dublin|23390165.7|869|26916.19|1122600|20.84|4289|7805|5404|-2401|-2138.78|-2117.95
    Galway|151082275.76|13403|11272.27|208826|723.48|1964|1009|1071|62|296.9|1020.38
    Kerry|110172226.36|8532|12912.83|132424|831.97|2447|499|612|113|853.32|1685.29
    Kildare|41508533.31|2355|17625.7|163995|253.11|1626|1131|735|-396|-2414.71|-2161.6
    Kilkenny|74607598.46|3651|20434.84|80421|927.71|1987|373|364|-9|-111.91|815.8
    Laois|51015041.05|2887|17670.61|58732|868.61|609|284|265|-19|-323.5|545.1
    Leitrim|39208803.34|3987|9834.16|25815|1518.84|2845|107|140|33|1278.33|2797.16
    Limerick|77978817.76|5754|13552.11|175529|444.25|1817|875|953|78|444.37|888.62
    Longford|33320587.99|2651|12569.06|31127|1070.47|944|135|177|42|1349.31|2419.78
    Louth|26880258.45|1679|16009.68|101802|264.04|1273|472|528|56|550.09|814.13
    Mayo|119112211.99|12312|9674.48|117428|1014.34|840|452|580|128|1090.03|2104.37
    Meath|64919345.69|3823|16981.26|133936|484.7|1204|935|557|-378|-2822.24|-2337.54
    Monaghan|54120148.48|4283|12636.04|52772|1025.55|865|217|246|29|549.53|1575.08
    Offaly|49969431.31|3012|16590.12|63702|784.42|1995|278|302|24|376.75|1161.18
    Roscommon|66381705.75|5924|11205.55|53803|1233.79|547|226|247|21|390.31|1624.1
    Sligo|44541636.53|4440|10031.9|58178|765.61|1681|262|284|22|378.15|1143.76
    Tipperary|144473163.12|7825|18463.02|140281|1029.88|927|613|699|86|613.06|1642.94
    Waterford|55091572.69|2661|20703.33|101518|542.68|1277|470|518|48|472.82|1015.5
    Westmeath|54058614.37|3521|15353.2|72027|750.53|6833|338|356|18|249.91|1000.44
    Wexford|84120094.78|4565|18427.18|116543|721.79|937|503|629|126|1081.15|1802.94
    Wicklow|38283190.87|2214|17291.41|114719|333.71|1274|717|512|-205|-1786.98|-1453.26


  • Registered Users Posts: 749 ✭✭✭waster81


    Scofflaw wrote: »
    Paid for out of business rates, more or less. Which is why, again, the urban areas tend to be self-funding in this respect, because businesses tend to cluster in urban areas.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


    Yet if a private dweller has something wrong with their water supply i.e. their own well its not repaired by the taxpayers

    Its paid for by the householder

    What we need is water rates based on how much it costs to actually get the water to the taps ( include the capital cost and the water consumption)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,336 ✭✭✭Mr.Micro


    waster81 wrote: »
    Yet if a private dweller has something wrong with their water supply i.e. their own well its not repaired by the taxpayers

    Its paid for by the householder

    What we need is water rates based on how much it costs to actually get the water to the taps ( include the capital cost and the water consumption)

    I do believe that water rates/meters are in the pipeline (excuse the pun), so things may well level out in the future, with everyone paying for water and water treatment one way or another.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,258 ✭✭✭Tora Bora


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    Head offices do, disproportionatley in capital cities. So O2 Vodafone and UPC and eircom appear as economic activity in Dublin.

    Let me post _your_ table again Scofflaw.

    All Counties Sorted By Income of Recipients of CAP Agricultural Subsidies in that County. (descending) ...as it is column 4 that is a a 4d in the source.

    You forgot to mention, that the cost of food today, as a proportion to the average industrial wage, is lower than at any point in recent history.
    The CAP, payments to farmers, are the key to this. Most food is produced at or below the cost of farm gate selling price. Without the CAP subsidies, food production would drop, prices would rice, the consumer would pick up the tab.
    The direct CAP subsidies, to Irish farmers, are infact indirect subsidies to urban consumers.
    You can rest assured, the "gurus", who run the global economies, including Europe and USA, who bless and allow these farm subsidies, do not do it, because of love for the rural populations. In fact they dont give a sh1tt about the rural population, simply because they dont make up the big portion of the votes cast at election time.
    Their overwhelming focus is to ensure cheap food for the masses, who are largely in the cities and large town. The most effective way to do that is through farm subsidies.
    When you say your prayers tonight, say one for the CAP, that keeps your steak and chips affordable.:cool:


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,463 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    Sponge Bob wrote: »

    All Counties Sorted By Income of Recipients of CAP Agricultural Subsidies in that County. (descending) ...as it is column 4 that is a a 4d in the source.

    Yes, because all septic tank owners are farmers and receive CAP payments into their pockets . . .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,163 ✭✭✭✭Liam Byrne


    ninja900 wrote: »
    I wonder are any of our 'we paid for your pipes' posters aware of the substantial charges of connecting to a public sewer? Paid for by the builder (development levies) and passed on to the buyer. See this thread.

    Equivalent to the people paying for installation of their own septic tanks, which no-one has objected to.

    The issue - we're being told - is ongoing inspection and maintenance to ensure that it's not polluting.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    Liam Byrne wrote: »
    Equivalent to the people paying for installation of their own septic tanks, which no-one has objected to.

    The issue - we're being told - is ongoing inspection and maintenance to ensure that it's not polluting.

    Which is something the urban areas fund for urban sewage systems out of the commercial rates paid by urban businesses.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,025 ✭✭✭Tipp Man


    Scofflaw wrote: »
    Which is something the urban areas fund for urban sewage systems out of the commercial rates paid by urban businesses.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw

    So businesses are subsidising the sewage treatment systems of private individuals in urban areas?!!

    and how many companies have their headquarters in Dublin so pay tax as a "Dublin" company but the majority of their work is done outside of Dublin and/or abroad.

    More than a couple i would say

    This notion that you can say urban areas are paying X tax which is higher than rural areas Y tax is just plain stupid


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,163 ✭✭✭✭Liam Byrne


    Scofflaw wrote: »
    Liam Byrne wrote: »
    Equivalent to the people paying for installation of their own septic tanks, which no-one has objected to.

    The issue - we're being told - is ongoing inspection and maintenance to ensure that it's not polluting.

    Which is something the urban areas fund for urban sewage systems out of the commercial rates paid by urban businesses.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw

    So urban dwellers get it free ? Whatever about getting it cheaper due to economies of scale or whatever, getting it free is not on (or so the urban-dwellers are telling us)


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    Tipp Man wrote: »
    So businesses are subsidising the sewage treatment systems of private individuals in urban areas?!!

    and how many companies have their headquarters in Dublin so pay tax as a "Dublin" company but the majority of their work is done outside of Dublin and/or abroad.

    More than a couple i would say

    This notion that you can say urban areas are paying X tax which is higher than rural areas Y tax is just plain stupid

    No, it's just meaningless for an urban dweller to claim that he/she is personally subsidising a rural dweller. The urban areas do subsidise the rural areas, and claims to the contrary fly in the face of the evidence.
    Liam Byrne wrote:
    So urban dwellers get it free ? Whatever about getting it cheaper due to economies of scale or whatever, getting it free is not on (or so the urban-dwellers are telling us)

    Since the abolition of domestic rates (1978) and domestic water charges (1997), neither urban nor rural dwellers pay for their local government services domestically - except where there are direct charges such as bin charges, parking charges, but those are all minor. Local government has been funded by commercial rates, rents, and primarily by the central government.

    The household charge, plus the existing rates and charges, will go to paying for local government services, which includes urban sewage systems in urban districts. If there were sufficient funding available through the household charge, I'm sure the government would be delighted to scrap the septic tank registration fee.

    Although I've drawn attention to the urban-rural transfer of funds in this country, this isn't an urban/rural issue. The reasons you're paying for septic tank registration has nothing to do with living in rural areas - you're paying for them because you have them, they need to be inspected, the inspection costs money over and above what the rural area local government level is already paying out, and there's not a ready pot of cash to pay that cost. Local authorities in urban areas already inspect urban sewage systems, there's no new cost, and those authorities are better funded because they can rely on commercial rates.

    If you like, though, you can pay my Dublin commercial rates, and I'll pay your septic tank charge and your rural commercial rates on an equivalently sized premises. I'll profit by the deal, I can guarantee.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,163 ✭✭✭✭Liam Byrne


    If you like, though, you can pay my Dublin commercial rates, and I'll pay your septic tank charge and your rural commercial rates on an equivalently sized premises. I'll profit by the deal, I can guarantee.

    Didn't expect strawmanning from you.

    Comparing commercial rates and domestic charges to support your argument is absolutely farcical, as is dismissing the point saying that "there's no extra cost".

    More sewage lines = more (time spent on) inspections = more cost.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Tipp Man wrote: »
    and how many companies have their headquarters in Dublin so pay tax as a "Dublin" company but the majority of their work is done outside of Dublin and/or abroad.

    More than a couple i would say

    eg Greencore, an Agribusiness company and Coillte a Forestry company. They all count :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    Coillte a Forestry company. They all count :D

    Headquarters
    Coillte,
    Dublin Road,
    Newtownmountkennedy,
    Co. Wicklow


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,025 ✭✭✭Tipp Man


    Scofflaw wrote: »
    No, it's just meaningless for an urban dweller to claim that he/she is personally subsidising a rural dweller. The urban areas do subsidise the rural areas, and claims to the contrary fly in the face of the evidence.

    The evidence is completly flawed as it takes no account of resources coming from rural areas without payment into urban areas or head offices whose main activities take place outside the urban area

    And this breakdown of urban/rural is pure bull anyway. Glanbia for instance gets its resources from rural areas of most counties in Leinster and Munster but the profits it makes are reported as Kilkenny. Do you class Kilkenny city as an urban or rural area? does it matter if you are inside or outside the ringroad in Kilkenny to be classed as urban or rural? What about the huge profits that Glanbia makes on its foreign operations which have practically nothing to do with urban or rural Ireland?

    that table provided earlier isn't worth the pixels it was written on quite frankly and proves practically nothing as it is an incomplete record of the movement of resources


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 805 ✭✭✭BeeDI


    Tipp Man wrote: »
    The evidence is completly flawed as it takes no account of resources coming from rural areas without payment into urban areas or head offices whose main activities take place outside the urban area

    And this breakdown of urban/rural is pure bull anyway. Glanbia for instance gets its resources from rural areas of most counties in Leinster and Munster but the profits it makes are reported as Kilkenny. Do you class Kilkenny city as an urban or rural area? does it matter if you are inside or outside the ringroad in Kilkenny to be classed as urban or rural? What about the huge profits that Glanbia makes on its foreign operations which have practically nothing to do with urban or rural Ireland?

    that table provided earlier isn't worth the pixels it was written on quite frankly and proves practically nothing as it is an incomplete record of the movement of resources

    And to make matters even worse, Glanbia, sponsor the Kilkenny hurling team:eek: They mop up resources from all over Leinster and parts of Munster, and feed them out to Henry S and the boys:cool:


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    Liam Byrne wrote: »
    Didn't expect strawmanning from you.

    Comparing commercial rates and domestic charges to support your argument is absolutely farcical, as is dismissing the point saying that "there's no extra cost".

    More sewage lines = more (time spent on) inspections = more cost.

    No, there's no new costs associated with the inspections of sewage systems generally, because they've been inspected all along. The septic tank inspections, on the other hand, are entirely new - that is, they haven't been done before (except in Cavan).

    In turn, that generates a new charge on the local authorities, who have to find that money somewhere. They could:

    (a) raise their commercial rates,
    (b) use the household charge,
    (c) get more money from central government
    (d) charge directly for septic tank registration

    Of those:

    (a) is difficult, because rural areas areas are the ones with septic tanks, while urban areas are the ones with businesses
    (b) the household charge appears to be already earmarked for other things
    (c) the central government doesn't have any spare money
    (d) generates a lot of whinging

    Now, of those options, (b) and (d) are obviously the most sensible, and (d) is obviously the fairer of the two.

    As to the commercial rates - mine have gone up another €300 this year to €1500 on a relatively small office, so I find the brughaha over a €50 septic tank registration fee rather laughable. Commercial rates are currently what pays for local authority spending, but I doubt commercial rates in your local authority area are anything like mine. I'd obviously welcome a return of domestic rates if it meant commercial rates went down, because overall I'd likely gain.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,025 ✭✭✭Tipp Man


    Scofflaw wrote: »
    No, there's no new costs associated with the inspections of sewage systems generally, because they've been inspected all along. The septic tank inspections, on the other hand, are entirely new - that is, they haven't been done before (except in Cavan).

    In turn, that generates a new charge on the local authorities, who have to find that money somewhere. They could:

    (a) raise their commercial rates,
    (b) use the household charge,
    (c) get more money from central government
    (d) charge directly for septic tank registration

    Of those:

    (a) is difficult, because rural areas areas are the ones with septic tanks, while urban areas are the ones with businesses
    (b) the household charge appears to be already earmarked for other things
    (c) the central government doesn't have any spare money
    (d) generates a lot of whinging

    Now, of those options, (b) and (d) are obviously the most sensible, and (d) is obviously the fairer of the two.

    As to the commercial rates - mine have gone up another €300 this year to €1500 on a relatively small office, so I find the brughaha over a €50 septic tank registration fee rather laughable. Commercial rates are currently what pays for local authority spending, but I doubt commercial rates in your local authority area are anything like mine. I'd obviously welcome a return of domestic rates if it meant commercial rates went down, because overall I'd likely gain.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw

    How about the bloody council cuts its costs (wages being a good starting point) or redeploys people to cover this new task

    What exactly has happened to all the people who worked in planning when building was booming? what are all of these people doing now exactly? are there none spare to be moved into a septic tank inspection division?

    Your closing your eyes to the reality by mentioning your rates increase (I am paying more on my water meter than your rates by the way) instead of questioning why they need a 25% increase in 1 year from you. You are accepting the increase but then laugh at others who dare quetion what the councils are doing to deserve to be paid this additional tax


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,025 ✭✭✭Tipp Man


    BeeDI wrote: »
    And to make matters even worse, Glanbia, sponsor the Kilkenny hurling team:eek: They mop up resources from all over Leinster and parts of Munster, and feed them out to Henry S and the boys:cool:

    For fear they aren't good enough as it is;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    Tipp Man wrote: »
    The evidence is completly flawed as it takes no account of resources coming from rural areas without payment into urban areas or head offices whose main activities take place outside the urban area

    And this breakdown of urban/rural is pure bull anyway. Glanbia for instance gets its resources from rural areas of most counties in Leinster and Munster but the profits it makes are reported as Kilkenny. Do you class Kilkenny city as an urban or rural area? does it matter if you are inside or outside the ringroad in Kilkenny to be classed as urban or rural? What about the huge profits that Glanbia makes on its foreign operations which have practically nothing to do with urban or rural Ireland?

    that table provided earlier isn't worth the pixels it was written on quite frankly and proves practically nothing as it is an incomplete record of the movement of resources

    I'd class Kilkenny as rural, myself. As to the rest of the points...the table shows what it shows. It makes very clear the pattern of transfers at a county level, and all of the points you make there are subsumed into that pattern already.

    I'm sorry you don't like the fact that rural Ireland is financially dependent on urban Ireland, but it's not surprising, given it's a situation replicated nearly everywhere in the world. Once you move from a primarily agrarian economy, cities become greater wealth generators than rural areas, which is why the long-term movement over history has been towards the cities.

    And I'm sorry the septic tank inspection charge isn't being paid for rural areas out of the surpluses from urban areas as most things are, but things are tight, and the urban surpluses are already needed just to keep the existing setup running.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    Tipp Man wrote: »
    How about the bloody council cuts its costs (wages being a good starting point) or redeploys people to cover this new task

    What exactly has happened to all the people who worked in planning when building was booming? what are all of these people doing now exactly? are there none spare to be moved into a septic tank inspection division?

    Your closing your eyes to the reality by mentioning your rates increase (I am paying more on my water meter than your rates by the way) instead of questioning why they need a 25% increase in 1 year from you. You are accepting the increase but then laugh at others who dare quetion what the councils are doing to deserve to be paid this additional tax

    They're demanding a rates increase to make up the shortfall from developer levies, primarily. Whether we want to make up that shortfall is a question of what council services we'd like to see cut. Because there's a pretty direct relationship between paying local authorities and getting local authority services.

    In the case of the septic tank inspections, though, I would have thought it was absolutely obvious what they're providing extra - they're providing septic tank inspections. I accept that you don't want septic tank inspections, but the argument as to their necessity is pretty watertight, unlike some of the tanks.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,025 ✭✭✭Tipp Man


    Scofflaw wrote: »
    They're demanding a rates increase to make up the shortfall from developer levies, primarily. Whether we want to make up that shortfall is a question of what council services we'd like to see cut. Because there's a pretty direct relationship between paying local authorities and getting local authority services.

    In the case of the septic tank inspections, though, I would have thought it was absolutely obvious what they're providing extra - they're providing septic tank inspections. I accept that you don't want septic tank inspections, but the argument as to their necessity is pretty watertight, unlike some of the tanks.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw

    You have completly avoided my point about reallocating the current resources in county councils to provide for inspections

    I have never said anything about wanting inspections or not - so not sure what you are accepting:confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,025 ✭✭✭Tipp Man


    Scofflaw wrote: »
    I'd class Kilkenny as rural, myself. As to the rest of the points...the table shows what it shows. It makes very clear the pattern of transfers at a county level, and all of the points you make there are subsumed into that pattern already.

    I'm sorry you don't like the fact that rural Ireland is financially dependent on urban Ireland, but it's not surprising, given it's a situation replicated nearly everywhere in the world. Once you move from a primarily agrarian economy, cities become greater wealth generators than rural areas, which is why the long-term movement over history has been towards the cities.

    And I'm sorry the septic tank inspection charge isn't being paid for rural areas out of the surpluses from urban areas as most things are, but things are tight, and the urban surpluses are already needed just to keep the existing setup running.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw

    No need to be patronising

    It is strange that 1 of Ireland's oldest cities is now classed as rural??

    I don't care whether you think rural ireland is financially dependant or not as I know that the methods used to show that the urban areas are subsidising the rural areas are completly flawed, the use of water being the most obvious example. You are unwilling to accept the flaws in the table and the meaningless of it

    What is worrying is that people might actually look at that table and believe it


Advertisement