Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

"The Origin of Specious Nonsense"

1…249250252254255…328

Comments

  • #7532
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Doctor Jimbob wrote: »
    Saying cfsi is cfsi is more like saying a potato is a thing you find under the ground than saying a potato is like a potato. It doesnt differentiate it from other things you find under the ground. Just like saying something is cfsi doesnt actually define what cfsi is in the slightest. Its an extraordinarily vauge description.
    WHAT are you on about???!!!

    Your posting has a Gunning Fog Index ... approaching 'pea soup'!!!!:)


  • #7533
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    King Mob wrote: »
    And again...
    Wow, it's almost like you don't want to answer any of these questions at all...

    What could have been ambiguous about a yes or no question?

    And now another one, why if the answers where different did you only give the one answer after ignoring both questions for so long?

    I am sorry for all these off topic questions JC but I'm just trying to find out how ignoring questions and other dishonest behaviour doesn't make you a troll or a crank.

    JC, you seem to missed my post somehow.
    Could you address it please before people start getting the wrong idea that you are incapable of honest discussion.


  • #7534
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    koth wrote: »
    FYI here's a definition of a potato: A starchy plant tuber that is one of the most important food crops, cooked and eaten as a vegetable.
    ... AKA ... a potato ... to everyone except the very 'long-winded'!!!
    koth wrote: »
    See? a person who didn't know what a potato was now has a better understanding of the properties of a potato.
    ... that assumes that the person reading it knows the meaning of plain English words.
    ... for example, words like Complex, Functional, Specified and Information.

    koth wrote: »
    Yeah, silly me for accepting scientific evidence in preference to Christian parables. Whatever was I thinking?:rolleyes:
    What scientific evidence??


  • #7535
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    King Mob wrote: »
    JC, you seem to missed my post somehow.
    Could you address it please before people start getting the wrong idea that you are incapable of honest discussion.
    I looked at it ... and I decided that life is too short to bother engaging in such verbal 'tiddly winks'!!!!:)


  • #7536
    Delirium
    Moderators Posts: 52,107 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    J C wrote: »
    ... AKA ... a potato ... to everyone except the 'long-winded'!!!
    a truly daft response. someone doesn't know what a potato is, and you just respond with potato? Clearly you've never had to educate anyone. If a person has no understanding of something, to just repeat the word over and over is rude/ignorant.
    ... that assumes that the person reading it knows the meaning of plain English words.
    ... for example, words like Complex, Functional, Specified and Information.
    wow, you really aren't able to describe something that you support so vociferously?
    What scientific evidence??

    There has been an abundance of evidence for evolution posted on this thread. You should read it when you get a chance, seeing as you somehow missed it the first time round.

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • Advertisement
  • #7537
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    koth wrote: »
    FYI here's a definition of a potato: A starchy plant tuber that is one of the most important food crops, cooked and eaten as a vegetable.
    Why use one simple word ... when you can use 20 words ... and still not effectively describe the thing!!!:D;):):eek:


  • #7538
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    koth wrote: »
    There has been an abundance of evidence for evolution posted on this thread. You should read it when you get a chance, seeing as you somehow missed it the first time round.
    ... link please?


  • #7539
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    J C wrote: »
    I looked at it ... and I decided that life is too short to bother engaging in such verbal 'tiddly winks'!!!!:)
    And why is that JC?
    Why can't you explain your dishonest behaviour?

    And if you aren't interested in such 'tiddly winks' why did you dance around the subject for so long?

    And go back on topic, why are lipsomes impossible, but Micelles possible?

    At this point I will have to assume that if you ignore any questions that means you can't answer them honestly and you are infact a dishonest crank or a very sad troll.


  • #7540
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    King Mob wrote: »
    And go back on topic, why are lipsomes impossible, but Micelles possible?
    It is possible to create Liposomes artificially ... by the appliance of Human intelligence ... and lipid bicells can be spontaneously generated.


  • #7541
    Sarky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    He's not a troll. He might have been once, but if he was then his piss-poor timing and abysmal lack of understanding of people has him trapped in a loop of ad hominems, baseless waffle and stupidity for the last few years, and to be frank he doesn't look capable of escaping. Besides: while trolls can indeed evoke several emotions, pity isn't one of them.

    That reminds me, J C is long overdue for the customary labelling posters as the heralds of a new Holocaust because they point out he's talking bullsh*t.

    But give us a rigorous mathematical definition of cfsi before that, J C, ok? It's something you really need to show us. It'll for a long way to proving your claims are not as bloody stupid as you manage to make them sound.


  • Advertisement
  • #7542
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Doctor Jimbob wrote: »
    The 20 words certainly describes it a lot better.
    ... two words did the trick for me the other day ... 'Rooster Potatoes' ... and my greengrocer didn't give me a dead chicken with spuds stuffed up his 'transom'!!!:)


  • #7543
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Sarky wrote: »
    He's not a troll. He might have been once, but if he was then his piss-poor timing and abysmal lack of understanding of people has him trapped in a loop of ad hominems, baseless waffle and stupidity for the last few years, and to be frank he doesn't look capable of escaping. Besides: while trolls can indeed evoke several emotions, pity isn't one of them.

    That reminds me, J C is long overdue for the customary labelling posters as the heralds of a new Holocaust because they point out he's talking bullsh*t.

    But give us a rigorous mathematical definition of cfsi before that, J C, ok? It's something you really need to show us. It'll for a long way to proving your claims are not as bloody stupid as you manage to make them sound.
    Love you ... need you ... want you ... to Save yourself ... before it's too late!!:)


  • #7544
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    J C wrote: »
    It is possible to create Liposomes artificially ... by the appliance of Human intelligence ... and lipid bicells can be spontaneously generated.
    So first off, since you ignored the questions I asked and the warning I gave, you are admitting that you cannot explain your dishonest behaviour.

    And again I repeat the important point which you also failed to answer.
    Why specifically are Liposomes impossible while micelles are possible?

    Also why do you keep bringing up bicelles when I have been asking about micelles?

    Same rules apply JC, ignore any questions and you forfeit them, meaning you can't provide an answer.


  • #7545
    Sarky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    J C wrote: »
    Love you ... need you ... want you ...

    Flattering, I'll admit, and I hate hurting anyone's feelings, but I'm not gay. Don't give up though, I'm sure you'll find a nice man eventually. Keep reaching for that rainbow. Look to your "totally straight" kids for strength and inspiration, maybe.


  • #7546
    Delirium
    Moderators Posts: 52,107 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    J C wrote: »
    Why use one simple word ... when you can use 20 words ... and still not effectively describe the thing!!!:D;):):eek:

    Potato is the name of the object. It isn't a definition of the object. If you think it is, I'd suggest you sign up for a remedial English class.

    Maybe after a few classes you might finally be able to define what CFSI is.

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • #7547
    MrPudding
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,779 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    J C wrote: »
    Y

    The Holy Spirit has informed me that you will have a special corner in Heaven where you will never have to meet anybody else ... if you go and get Saved!!!!;):)
    This is a lie.

    MrP


  • #7548
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Doctor Jimbob wrote: »
    He only likes answering the posts he can make fun of :(:eek::eek::eek::(:D
    ... and I'm spoilt for choice!!!!:)


  • #7549
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    MrPudding wrote: »
    This is a lie.

    MrP
    Why? ... do you not think that God has thought of everything ... including giving Robin 'space' to avoid having to interact with people he doesn't like in Heaven ... if he gets Saved??:)

    I suspect that Robin and Ken will actually become friends if they meet here on Earth ... or in Heaven.


  • #7550
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    koth wrote: »
    ... I'd suggest you sign up for a remedial English class.
    Perhaps you should take your own advice ... if you don't know what the words Complex Functional Specified Information mean.


  • #7551
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    Doctor Jimbob wrote: »
    No one is questioning what the words mean. You're being asked to define them as a scientific term, which you clearly can't do :eek:
    Their scientific meaning is the same as their meaning.


  • Advertisement
  • #7552
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So since you've again ignored my questions JC, I take it that you can't explain your claim and therefore forfeit it.

    And so since you now agree that Lipid structures can form with out magic or intelligence, what happens to your CFSI bull****?


  • #7553
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    King Mob wrote: »
    So since you've again ignored my questions JC, I take it that you can't explain your claim and therefore forfeit it.

    And so since you now agree that Lipid structures can form with out magic or intelligence, what happens to your CFSI bull****?
    Unspecified and non-functional 'lipid structures' can form spontaneously ... but specified and biologically functional Liposomes require an intelligent input.


  • #7554
    Delirium
    Moderators Posts: 52,107 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    J C wrote: »
    Perhaps you should take your own advice ... if you don't know what the words Complex Functional Specified Information mean.

    still unable to define CFSI?

    you realise it can now be dismissed as no one but yourself knows what it is.

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • #7555
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    J C wrote: »
    Unspecified and non-functional 'lipid structures' can form spontaneously ... but specified and biologically functional Liposomes require an intelligent input.

    But you failed to explain this and ignored the question.
    I clearly stated that if you did this you would be admitting you can't.

    So why did you ignore that question? Can you answer it now?

    Or are you going to ignore it again, meaning that you again admit you can't address them and forfeit the questions?

    So why can micelles and Bilayers form but not liposomes?


  • #7556
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    koth wrote: »
    still unable to define CFSI?
    you realise it can now be dismissed as no one but yourself knows what it is.
    There are none so blind as he who will not see ... but Jesus still loves you none-the-less.


  • #7557
    Delirium
    Moderators Posts: 52,107 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    J C wrote: »
    There are none so blind as he who will not see ... but Jesus still loves you none-the-less.

    maybe you could ask him to explain what CFSI is since you seem to be struggling with defining what it is.

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • #7558
    Hotblack Desiato
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 38,580 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    J C wrote: »
    There are none so blind as he who will not see ... but Jesus still loves you none-the-less.

    Nope I'm just not feeling the luurve. Got 14 years of state funded indoctrination and compulsory Sunday practice, too... Could've put the time to better use, like having a wânk.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • #7559
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    koth wrote: »
    maybe you could ask him to explain what CFSI is since you seem to be struggling with defining what it is.
    It means exactly 'what it says on the tin'.

    I know this may be a bit hard for an Evolutionist to accept ...
    ... because 'evolution' can mean almost anything from the supposed transition from microbes to man, to the appearance of a white Blackbird ... or a grey moth!!!!


  • #7560
    J C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭J C


    ninja900 wrote: »
    Nope I'm just not feeling the luurve.
    You need to get out more!!:)
    ninja900 wrote: »
    Got 14 years of state funded indoctrination and compulsory Sunday practice, too... Could've put the time to better use, like having a wânk.
    Being indoctrinated into the mythology of Evolution can be a bit of a 'pain' allright ... but it's all part of a liberal education!!!:)

    Just think of it as preparatory training for a career in Creation Science!!!:D


  • Advertisement
  • #7561
    Hotblack Desiato
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 38,580 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    J C wrote: »
    I suppose that being indoctrinated into the mythology of Evolution is a bit of a 'pain' allright ... but it's all part of a liberal education!!!:)

    That's funny, it wasn't mentioned at all in primary, and in secondary only in science class.
    There were no statues of Charles Darwin in each classroom.
    Nobody ever told me that I would go to hell if I questioned evolution.
    Nobody ever said that evolution should influence all aspects of one's life.
    Nobody ever said that people who know about evolution are better or happier people.
    Nobody ever made me say daily evolution prayers from age 4, go to a church of evolution, or confess my sin of not believing in it fervently enough.
    Nobody ever used evolution as a reason to guilt me into giving them money.


    Weak post. There is a great deal of observable evidence to support evolution*, there is precisely zero to support the existence of a god.


    * but like any scientific theory, it's a best guess based on what we know so far. Science is not set in stone based on a 2000 year old book of riddles.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement