Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Clare Daly Wants an Answer

2»

Comments

  • #32
    ScumLord
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,787 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    That article makes it sound like any two people living in the same house will end up as good as married after two years?


  • #33
    Gee Bag
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,541 ✭✭✭Gee Bag


    ciarafem wrote: »
    Dear Gee Bag,

    When I read the Waters article I wondered why Clare Daly's question was not allowed in the Dáil.
    It could be possible that a 72 year old male was prejudiced at an uppity female TD.
    No one here has proven that this is not the case. So it is an 'After Hours' topic.

    Yours very cordially

    Ciarafem

    The reason her question can not be answered in the Dail is because of the doctrine of seperation of powers. The Dail can not review the workings of the courts. It has nothing to do with her being a woman.


  • #34
    Dravokivich
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 22,424 CMod ✭✭✭✭Dravokivich


    ciarafem wrote: »
    Dear Gee Bag,

    When I read the Waters article I wondered why Clare Daly's question was not allowed in the Dáil.
    It could be possible that a 72 year old male was prejudiced at an uppity female TD.
    No one here has proven that this is not the case. So it is an 'After Hours' topic.

    Yours very cordially

    Ciarafem

    Any time a man says no to a woman its sexist?


  • #35
    TheZohanS
    Closed Accounts Posts: 11,581 ✭✭✭✭TheZohanS


    ciarafem wrote: »
    Dear Gee Bag,

    When I read the Waters article I wondered why Clare Daly's question was not allowed in the Dáil.
    It could be possible that a 72 year old male was prejudiced at an uppity female TD.
    No one here has proven that this is not the case. So it is an 'After Hours' topic.

    Yours very cordially

    Ciarafem

    "it is an 'After Hours' topic", well if that's the case I hope you're posting from the kitchen. I jest


  • #36
    ilovelamp2000
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ilovelamp2000


    Dravokivich wrote: »
    Any time a man says no to a woman its sexist?

    It seems to be the case according to the OP.

    I don't know why we let women think they are our equals.


  • Advertisement
  • #37
    MagicSean
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,897 ✭✭✭MagicSean


    Dravokivich wrote: »
    Any time a man says no to a woman its sexist?

    I think he has to be an old man.


  • #38
    Dravokivich
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 22,424 CMod ✭✭✭✭Dravokivich


    TheZohan wrote: »
    "it is an 'After Hours' topic", well if that's the case I hope you're posting from the kitchen. I jest

    They have the internet on sandwich makers now? :pac:


  • #39
    Predalien
    Closed Accounts Posts: 946 ✭✭✭Predalien


    If the OP wants a serious answer she asked him a question relating to his actions in his capacity as a family law solicitor as a private citizen, something which he is under no obligation to discuss as part of Dail business.


  • #40
    super_furry
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,387 ✭✭✭✭super_furry


    ciarafem wrote: »

    When I read the Waters article I wondered why Clare Daly's question was not allowed in the Dáil.
    It could be possible that a 72 year old male was prejudiced at an uppity female TD.
    No one here has proven that this is not the case. So it is an 'After Hours' topic.

    No one here has proven that you're not made from chedar. Ja'cuse cheese face!


  • #41
    Uriel.
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,059 ✭✭✭Uriel.


    ciarafem wrote: »
    I don't see what she is 'grandstanding' about.

    She appears to have asked a legimate question about what the judges are at and she got nowhere. Sean Barrett is a 72 year old arch conservative who is in the same party as Alan Shatter.

    He may have a thing against wimmin as well as being a pal of Shatters.

    She asked a question on Dáil time to Deputy Shatter in his capacity as Minister that relates to him in a personal capacity. If a member of Government is guilty of any crime or conduct that reflects badly on their role then there are procedures for dealing with this. (Not that there is any shred of proof that the Minister in question has done anything wrong). Asking questions of this nature during Dáil question time is not allowed and not the correct procedure. Deputy Daly should know that. It was grandstanding because she was trying to put egg on the face of a Minister simply because he's a member of the Government.

    The fact that you allude to sexism being at play here is quite frankly ridiculous tripe.


  • Advertisement
  • #42
    Tiddlypeeps
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,103 ✭✭✭Tiddlypeeps


    ciarafem wrote: »
    Dear Gee Bag,

    When I read the Waters article I wondered why Clare Daly's question was not allowed in the Dáil.
    It could be possible that a 72 year old male was prejudiced at an uppity female TD.
    No one here has proven that this is not the case. So it is an 'After Hours' topic.

    Yours very cordially

    Ciarafem

    The burden of proof is always on the one making the claim. It could be possible he just doesn't like brunets is therefore prejudiced. Or maby he is actually racist against white people. Without any proof these claim is as pointless as yours.

    I ****ing hate seeing people like you crying sexist at every conceivable chance. The only reason there is any sexism left in the world is feminazis like you making the rest of us looking ****ing stupid.


Advertisement
Advertisement