Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Racism - Mod Note on 1st Post - Read before posting.

1182183185187188222

Comments

  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,578 Mod ✭✭✭✭spockety


    Helix wrote: »
    it may be your first exposure to it, but it's certainly not liverpools

    Can only speak for myself :)

    Besides, we haven't heard Liverpool's appeal yet, if any


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 224 ✭✭Hedman


    You're gonna need that linguistics degree to dig your way outta this one Manuel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,267 ✭✭✭✭manual_man


    SantryRed wrote: »
    Sick of people seeing one thing and not the other on this thread.

    That link that opr put up is ABSOLUTE bollocks. Here at 2:50 you clearly see Suarez kick Evra, so go again manual_man


    My apologies. There is a kick. I don't, however, believe it is on Evra's knee. It looks like he kicks him on the shinguard, and Evra makes a complete and utter meal of it in an attempt to get Suarez booked. Blatant overreaction. There was a (light) kick on his shin. A free kick, nothing more, nothing less. Get up and stop rolling around like a wimp. Evra using this 'Oh he deliberately kicked me on my knee which he knew was injured before' line is complete nonsense, and suggests he is outright lying to try and gain some credence, or suffers from acute paranoia. He's not reliable!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,709 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Crinklewood


    FpmAY.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,267 ✭✭✭✭manual_man


    Hedman wrote: »
    You're gonna need that linguistics degree to dig your way outta this one Manuel.

    Manuel. I like that :)

    I'm from Barceloooooooooona :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,844 ✭✭✭carlcon


    manual_man wrote: »
    Suarez's foot was barely off the ground. Nowhere near high enough to have kicked Evra's knee.[/B] No other footage is needed to prove this, it is as clear as day from the clip. He stretched his leg across Evra, in an attempt to outmuscle him. [B]There was no kicking of anyone's knee, anyone who insists there was is totally and utterly kidding themselves[/B]

    captureyzm.png

    Now... can we move on from this petty argument, and go back to people struggling to make up new nonsense to defend the indefensible?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,661 ✭✭✭✭Helix


    manual_man wrote: »
    It looks like he kicks him on the shinguard

    it really doesnt


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,267 ✭✭✭✭manual_man


    Helix wrote: »
    manual_man wrote: »
    It looks like he kicks him on the shinguard

    it really doesnt

    Oh yes it does


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,289 ✭✭✭parker kent


    manual_man wrote: »
    My apologies. There is a kick. I don't, however, believe it is on Evra's knee. It looks like he kicks him on the shinguard, and Evra makes a complete and utter meal of it in an attempt to get Suarez booked. Blatant overreaction. There was a (light) kick on his shin. A free kick, nothing more, nothing less. Get up and stop rolling around like a wimp.

    Really?

    suarezevra.jpg

    Edit: Beaten to it...still may as be doubly sure :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Leiva


    Something doesn't add up ..,

    The evidence says the Evra believed that the word used by Suarez meant Niggger , but he now (retrospectively) believes it to mean black .

    Yet he then said in his written evidence that he walked up to the ref and said quote: " he just called me black "

    The three written statements by the UTD players about Evras state in the dressing room use the word "black" as what Evra said when telling them what had happened .
    Not one of them write the word "Niggger" ????

    I find that bizarre .

    At the time of the incident and directly afterwards (dressing room) Evra believed Suarez called him Niggger ... Yet all statements heard "black "

    They are either collaborated statements or Evra was lying about thinking it meant Niggger in the first place .

    But again that doesn't tally with his CANEL interview ???as he said he called me the "n" word .

    Weird hey ... And all can be read on page 27 section 90 all the way to page 36.

    Sorry on phone can't cut and paste .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,709 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Crinklewood


    manual_man wrote: »
    Oh yes it does

    Are you Suarez?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,267 ✭✭✭✭manual_man


    carlcon wrote: »
    manual_man wrote: »
    [SIZE="4"]Suarez's foot was barely off the ground. Nowhere near high enough to have kicked Evra's knee.[/B[/SIZE]] No other footage is needed to prove this, it is as clear as day from the clip. He stretched his leg across Evra, in an attempt to outmuscle him. [B[SIZE="4"]]There was no kicking of anyone's knee, anyone who insists there was is totally and utterly kidding themselves[/[/SIZE]B]

    captureyzm.png

    Now... can we move on from this petty argument, and go back to people struggling to make up new nonsense to defend the indefensible?

    It still looks like the shinguard to me. All the while noting that Evra's leg is on its way downward (ie considerably lower than his leg had been a split second earlier). We'll agree to differ on this one :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ilovelamp2000


    LuckyLloyd wrote: »
    Do you believe that the 8 match ban was justified though?

    I can see their basis for it, but I think we'll get it halved on appeal - mainly on the corroboration related to the amount of times negro was used.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,222 ✭✭✭✭Will I Amnt


    manual_man wrote: »
    Oh yes it does

    Are you Suarez?
    No he's just incredibly biased and sees things that aren't there to suit his agenda.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,289 ✭✭✭parker kent


    manual_man wrote: »
    It still looks like the shinguard to me. All the while noting that Evra's leg is on its way downward (ie considerably lower than his leg had been a split second earlier). We'll agree to differ on this one :)

    No we don't "all" agree to differ. It seems everybody else differs to you. Anyway, this is such a minuscule point being used to discredit Evra. First you say he didn't kick him. Then you said he is leg was not in the air. Now it is a debate about whether it was on the shinguard or just above it. It is getting ridiculous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ilovelamp2000


    spockety wrote: »
    Thanks for highlighting my naievety...

    But as I pointed out already, what Suarez is accused of is actually a criminal offense. He has not been given the benefit of a criminal trial however. That is the problem.

    This was no intentional foul, or off the ball head butt. The man has been tarred as a racist.

    He hasn't been charged with a criminal offence, he was charged with breaching an FA rule.

    A civil case, not a criminal case. So a civil standard of proof is used. There is no big conspiracy or injustice here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Leiva


    mixednuts wrote: »
    Something doesn't add up ..,

    The evidence says the Evra believed that the word used by Suarez meant Niggger , but he now (retrospectively) believes it to mean black .

    Yet he then said in his written evidence that he walked up to the ref and said quote: " he just called me black "

    The three written statements by the UTD players about Evras state in the dressing room use the word "black" as what Evra said when telling them what had happened .
    Not one of them write the word "Niggger" ????

    I find that bizarre .

    At the time of the incident and directly afterwards (dressing room) Evra believed Suarez called him Niggger ... Yet all statements heard "black "

    They are either collaborated statements or Evra was lying about thinking it meant Niggger in the first place .

    But again that doesn't tally with his CANEL interview ???as he said he called me the "n" word .

    Weird hey ... And all can be read on page 27 section 90 all the way to page 36.

    Sorry on phone can't cut and paste .

    Anybody ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,832 ✭✭✭✭Blatter


    mixednuts wrote: »
    Something doesn't add up ..,

    The evidence says the Evra believed that the word used by Suarez meant Niggger , but he now (retrospectively) believes it to mean black .

    Yet he then said in his written evidence that he walked up to the ref and said quote: " he just called me black "

    The three written statements by the UTD players about Evras state in the dressing room use the word "black" as what Evra said when telling them what had happened .
    Not one of them write the word "Niggger" ????

    I find that bizarre .

    At the time of the incident and directly afterwards (dressing room) Evra believed Suarez called him Niggger ... Yet all statements heard "black "

    They are either collaborated statements or Evra was lying about thinking it meant Niggger in the first place .

    But again that doesn't tally with his CANEL interview ???as he said he called me the "n" word .

    Weird hey ... And all can be read on page 27 section 90 all the way to page 36.

    Sorry on phone can't cut and paste .

    No. Evra was consistent that the word used was Negro, but initially thought it translated to nigg*r but now accepts that it translated to black. It's mostly irrelevant anyway because in the context Suarez was using Negro, it was derogative.

    It was not inconsistent evidence from Evra, it was simply a minor translation issue.

    This was Nani's account:
    Originally poster by Luis Nani

    "I cannot remember exactly what Evra said but he was complaining that Suarez had said something racist towards him. He said that Suarez had said that he wouldn't talk to him because he was black. When he said this in English I think he used the word "nigg*r" but in Spanish/Portuguese he used the word "negro" or "preto", I cannot remember exactly which. Evra was also angry that Suarez had not been booked for saying what he did. Evra said something like, "This is a joke. How is it possible that the referee does nothing when he knows what happened?" Evra said that he had told the referee what Suarez said to him."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,349 ✭✭✭✭J. Marston


    manual_man wrote: »
    It still looks like the shinguard to me. All the while noting that Evra's leg is on its way downward (ie considerably lower than his leg had been a split second earlier). We'll agree to differ on this one :)

    You've been proved wrong by videos and pictures. Now put down the spade and stop digging, man!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭Fuhrer


    manual_man wrote: »
    It still looks like the shinguard to me. All the while noting that Evra's leg is on its way downward (ie considerably lower than his leg had been a split second earlier). We'll agree to differ on this one :)


    Why dont you just agree you were wrong on it, apologise and move on?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,844 ✭✭✭carlcon


    mixednuts wrote: »
    Anybody ?

    The word he used was "negro". That's irrefutable now. When Evra first heard it, his own translation was "the N word". Later, he accepted that the actual transaltion may also be "blacky", "black man", or some other variation of that.

    Nobody heard "Black". The word was Negro, as spoken in Spanish. Suarez himself has accepted he said it "to calm Evra down", as if it was a term of endearment.

    I went over the exact events, as shown in the report, in fairly explicit detail here: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=76262118&postcount=5489

    It's a bit long, but in short; The language experts have said it is definitely a racist/negative term when spoken in an aggressive/antagonising/wind-up way. The video evidence shows that Suarez was trying to antagonise Evra by pinching him and pushing him in the back of the head during the period in which he admits to calling him the word... so that, along with Suarez changing his story 3 times, really helped push the conclusion against Suarez.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Leiva


    Blatter wrote: »
    No. Evra was consistent that the word used was Negro, but initially thought it translated to ****** but now accepts that it translated to black. It's mostly irrelevant anyway because in the context Suarez was using Negro, it was derogative.

    It was not inconsistent evidence from Evra, it was simply a minor translation issue.

    This was Nani's account:

    Ahh Blatter as much as you would like to think that it's not !

    I'm on my second read now of the evidence and it clearly states and quotes statements by Evra , Giggs and the Ref in which ;

    a.)Evra walks up to the ref and says "he just called me black". not Niggger black !

    b.)Giggs asks Evra what's wrong: "he just called me black". not Niggger black !

    c.) Evans , Valencia and other UTD written statements never use the word Niggger. bizarre !

    Yet you only conveniently paste Nanis statement which is probably the (IMO) honest of them all .

    All can be read in the evidence .. Not my words theirs .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,267 ✭✭✭✭manual_man


    manual_man wrote: »
    It still looks like the shinguard to me. All the while noting that Evra's leg is on its way downward (ie considerably lower than his leg had been a split second earlier). We'll agree to differ on this one :)

    No we don't "all" agree to differ. It seems everybody else differs to you. Anyway, this is such a minuscule point being used to discredit Evra. First you say he didn't kick him. Then you said he is leg was not in the air. Now it is a debate about whether it was on the shinguard or just above it. It is getting ridiculous.

    I based saying he didn't kick him on the only footage I saw. I quickly changed and apologized when I saw the different angle. Evra was half way on his way down when Suarez kicked him, I believe it was on the shin, others believe it was on the knee, either way I believe there was absolutely no intention on Suarez' part to damage Evra's knee, and I think Evra knows this. He's a player that has constantly made a meal out of situations in his career. He is the a-typical boy who cried wolf


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,224 ✭✭✭✭SantryRed


    mixednuts wrote: »
    Ahh Blatter as much as you would like to think that it's not !

    I'm on my second read now of the evidence and it clearly states and quotes statements by Evra , Giggs and the Ref in which ;

    a.)Evra walks up to the ref and says "he just called me black not Niggger black !

    b.)Giggs asks Evra what's wrong: "he just called me black not Niggger black !

    c.) Evans , Valencia and other UTD written statements never use the word Niggger. bizarre !

    Yet you only conveniently paste Nanis statement which is probably the (IMO) honest of them all .

    All can be read in the evidence .. Not my words theirs .

    I read the report earlier and Evra had a reason for not saying n*gger. I'll look for it now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭Fuhrer


    manual_man wrote: »
    I based saying he didn't kick him on the only footage I saw. I quickly changed and apologized when I saw the different angle. Evra was half way on his way down when Suarez kicked him, I believe it was on the shin, others believe it was on the knee, either way I believe there was absolutely no intention on Suarez' part to damage Evra's knee, and I think Evra knows this. He's a player that has constantly made a meal out of situations in his career. He is the a-typical boy who cried wolf


    What makes you think Suarez had no intention to damage him?


    You actually watch the footage?

    He doesnt trip him, or leave his foot in he swings his foot up into him, swinging nowhere near the ball it has to be added.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Leiva


    carlcon wrote: »
    The word he used was "negro". That's irrefutable now. When Evra first heard it, his own translation was "the N word". Later, he accepted that the actual transaltion may also be "blacky", "black man", or some other variation of that.

    Nobody heard "Black". The word was Negro, as spoken in Spanish. Suarez himself has accepted he said it "to calm Evra down", as if it was a term of endearment.

    I went over the exact events, as shown in the report, in fairly explicit detail here: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=76262118&postcount=5489

    It's a bit long, but in short; The language experts have said it is definitely a racist/negative term when spoken in an aggressive/antagonising/wind-up way. The video evidence shows that Suarez was trying to antagonise Evra by pinching him and pushing him in the back of the head during the period in which he admits to calling him the word... so that, along with Suarez changing his story 3 times, really helped push the conclusion against Suarez.

    Not what I'm on about but go on ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,507 ✭✭✭clubberlang12


    manual_man wrote: »
    I based saying he didn't kick him on the only footage I saw. I quickly changed and apologized when I saw the different angle. Evra was half way on his way down when Suarez kicked him, I believe it was on the shin, others believe it was on the knee, either way I believe there was absolutely no intention on Suarez' part to damage Evra's knee, and I think Evra knows this. He's a player that has constantly made a meal out of situations in his career. He is the a-typical boy who cried wolf


    That is the problem with alot of posts on here, non-researched and lacking any depth, and it has shown in even more consistancy over the last 24 hours.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭Fuhrer


    mixednuts wrote: »
    Not what I'm on about but go on ...



    Yet he then said in his written evidence that he walked up to the ref and said quote: " he just called me black "



    Eh, so?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Leiva


    SantryRed wrote: »
    I read the report earlier and Evra had a reason for not saying n*gger. I'll look for it now.

    And what would Giggs, Evans , Valancia reasons be ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 850 ✭✭✭SoulTrader


    manual_man wrote: »
    I based saying he didn't kick him on the only footage I saw. I quickly changed and apologized when I saw the different angle. Evra was half way on his way down when Suarez kicked him, I believe it was on the shin, others believe it was on the knee, either way I believe there was absolutely no intention on Suarez' part to damage Evra's knee, and I think Evra knows this. He's a player that has constantly made a meal out of situations in his career. He is the a-typical boy who cried wolf

    Definition of atypical: Not representative of a type, group, or class

    I see what you're trying to say but you have misunderstood the meaning of the word "atypical". You are basically trying to deflect attention from Suarez's actions and blame Evra. Par for the course now, unfortunately.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement