Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

David Fincher's Version - The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo

123578

Comments

  • Posts: 15,814 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    But it's also hard to view it in complete isolation having seen the previous films and read the book.

    Still think the inherent familiarity of the material, and its proximity to the Swedish version, is a problem. While I certainly appreciate Fincher's more intense take on the story (and would have loved if this was adaptation number one), could have personally used a longer gap between adaptations to avoid oversaturation.

    It's far too soon after the Swedish version but when you have a property as successful as it is and a cinema audience who seem to despise subtitles it makes sense to jump on it now.

    I was really looking forward to Fincher's latest but after watching the Swedish versions a few weeks back and receiving the extended versions for Christmas I think that this is one film I may wait for the Blu before watching.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,592 ✭✭✭Tristram


    livlondon wrote: »
    Ok,

    I'm afraid to read most of the prior posts but I need to know.

    I'm having an arguement with my partner because from the trailer she thinks that its basically nearly a shot for shot remake of the original including the story etc..

    My point is that Fincher wouldn't be bothered doing that and it is all a rouse that the trailer looks exactly the same as the original. Whereas he has made a very different film content and style wise.

    So is it a very different film or are we going the see the same thing but a 'bit' better?

    Saw it last night. Very similar to the original.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 31,417 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    I think the danger is that a majority of the people who have actually read the Millennium trilogy are more than capable of sitting through a subtitled movie. So I'm curious to see if the potential 'new' audience for this is indeed as large as the studios clearly hope it is. There's the potential for a backlash of sorts, because if anything is in danger of overexposure, it's this franchise.


  • Posts: 15,814 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think the danger is that a majority of the people who have actually read the Millennium trilogy are more than capable of sitting through a subtitled movie. So I'm curious to see if the potential 'new' audience for this is indeed as large as the studios clearly hope it is. There's the potential for a backlash of sorts, because if anything is in danger of overexposure, it's this franchise.

    Clearly from it's box office so far the audience the Studios seems to think that exists out there really isn't that big. I know that Christmas is a bad time to release and R rated thriller but I don't see this being anything but a moderate success. Fans of the books will have seen the Swedish films/TV versions and with reviewers stating how similar they both are most will be happy to wait for the home release.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭JennyBurke101


    Renn wrote: »
    The Bond-esque credits? That was totally out of place imo!

    Oh and apologies for being annoying but this isn't a remake :)

    I think that was the problem ...I went to see this with my sister and she said when she seen the Bond-esque credits it set her up for something so different (I still maintain they were amazing though)...she didnt like the film at all! I myself was like wow maybe it is going to be really different from the Swedish one ...but it was kinda the same...

    Oh sorry ...an "alternative version then" :P


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 15,814 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Renn wrote: »
    The Bond-esque credits? That was totally out of place imo!

    Oh and apologies for being annoying but this isn't a remake :)

    I think that was the problem ...I went to see this with my sister and she said when she seen the Bond-esque credits it set her up for something so different (I still maintain they were amazing though)...she didnt like the film at all! I myself was like wow maybe it is going to be really different from the Swedish one ...but it was kinda the same...

    Oh sorry ...an "alternative version then" :P

    Just call it an adaptation. To me an alternative version would be something like Donner's cut of Superman 2 or Helgeland's recutting of Payback.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭Fishooks12


    Saw this last night and was very impressed, worth noting that I had not read the book or seen the original Swedish adaptation



    Rooney was absolutely mesmerising as Sallandar, lifted the film every time she was on screen.

    Craig was pretty good too, good chemistry with Rooney .

    Opening sequence blew me away and should really be seen in a cinema to be fully appreciated, very bond-esque, with a dark twist.

    For the most part Fincher got the pacing spot on, although things started to get a little sloppy towards the end.

    It looked great too, wonderfully macabre.

    Overall well worth the price of admission, looking forward to reading the books now too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,485 ✭✭✭Mr. K


    I thought Fincher's version was better than the Swedish one. I like his work and Craig thought, so that might be it. It was better shot and the characters seemed deeper. I haven't read the book, but I might do now!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,200 ✭✭✭Mindkiller


    I didn't think the Swedish movie was particularly good. This one more or less improved on every aspect. It's more cinematic, for a start. The chemistry between the two leads was better while it felt a little unconvincing in the Swedish movie. I like that it made a little room for moments of levity (like with the cat). It's a simple enough thriller but a very good one. Don't plan on bothering with the books though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,719 ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    I thought it was excellent, if perhaps not as quite as good as I was hoping for. After the book and the Swedish original, this is the third version of the story that I've seen and I do feel a bit of fatigue with it. The best thing about the source material is the character of Lisbeth; everything else in the book is very ho-hum. I wish Zaillian had fleshed out the more interesting aspects, but it seems he and Fincher were content with a straight-forward adaptation. This is definitely lesser Fincher and not up to the standards of Zodiac and Se7en. However, I'd still consider it far superior to the Swedish version. The Rapace vs Mara question will be debated for sometime to come. I thought they were both excellent in the role, but Mara is much closer to how I imagined Lisbeth in the book.

    Overall I really enjoyed it. Although I'm not sure I want to see Fincher do another two of these. I haven't read the other two books in the series, but from I'd have heard they weren't great.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,330 ✭✭✭niallon


    Never read the book or saw the original, went to see this as a fan of Fincher and in that regard I felt fairly satisified with it, even though it's not as mentioned above anywhere near Zodiac or Se7en. Don't really know if I'd be all that bothered with the sequels though, I'll probably get slated for this but if this features the main aspects of the novel's story then I don't see what the big deal was when the Millenium Trilogy hit bookshelves, fairly average murder mystery stuff to me I though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 545 ✭✭✭WatchWolf


    Just saw it.



    THE RAPE SCENES. MY GOD THE RAPE SCENES O_O


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,464 ✭✭✭e_e


    Better to have a rape scene that is repugnant and disgusting rather than one that glamorizes or trivializes it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,200 ✭✭✭Mindkiller


    I winced when she kicked the big metal doohickey up your man's arse


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,730 ✭✭✭Bullseye1


    I've watched the original trilogy and while the first movie is a stand alone story I was very interested in how Fincher would make this film. Have to say I loved it even the opening titles which were a kind of Bond S&M.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 31,417 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 545 ✭✭✭WatchWolf


    I loved the film, but this scene annoyed me. It reminded me so much of Reservoir Dogs.

    Guy 1 plays an ironic pop song while he goes to torture Guy 2. Guy 1 does an obscene act of torture to Guy 2 (Reservoir Dogs = cutting off the ear, TGWTDT = suffocating with a plastic bag). Guy 3 then comes along (Mr. Orange/Lisbeth) and saves Guy 2, shortly killing Guy 1 afterwards.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭Kinski


    WatchWolf wrote: »
    I loved the film, but this scene annoyed me. It reminded me so much of Reservoir Dogs.

    Me too. But the difference was that Tarantino handled that scene very well, striking a tone that was consistent with the rest of the film. In Dragon Tattoo, the scene just lurched from the horrific to the comic, and the overall effect was to make the whole thing appear pretty silly...which was apt, because it's a very silly movie!

    Aside from Lisbeth's entertaining revenge scene, this was pretty bad. I haven't seen the Swedish original, or read the source novel, but I can't imagine either is any better, assuming that the same dumb plot is common to all three.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,259 ✭✭✭✭Melion


    Watched it the other night, really enjoyed it apart from Daniel Craigs accent, it was all over the place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,719 ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    I thought he just used his normal accent, no?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭Fishooks12


    Melion wrote: »
    Watched it the other night, really enjoyed it apart from Daniel Craigs accent, it was all over the place.


    It was just his own accent


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 31,417 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Yeah Craig's was far from the worst accentuation on display here.

    I still can never quite get past actors speaking English but in a foreign accent. Just a little pet peeve of mine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,802 ✭✭✭✭Zero-Cool


    Just saw it, brilliant. Preferred it to the original. Anyone have a link to the intro, was class. Can't see it on Youtube, prob only cam versions out if asny


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 77 ✭✭gravity12


    Here's the intro on pitchfork that was put up a few weeks ago, it doesn't look like the complete finished version.

    http://pitchfork.com/news/44843-video-trent-reznor-and-karen-o-cover-led-zeppelins-immigrant-song/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭Ellian


    Saw it yesterday and thought it was better than the original. I thought Mara was amazing in it. One bit that did annoy me
    The scene where Martin gets up from dinner to close the door after they heard the screaming - which Bloomkvist assumes to be the wind. This super careful serial killer who later makes a point of stating how his father was careless leaving bodies all over the country and who built a sound proof murder dungeon in his house - which is hidden behind a security door and a fake wall, just accidentally leave the door open on the same night that he has a guest over. Not buying that for a second and it really annoyed me

    My favourite bit was
    when Lisbeth asked "May I kill him?"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,719 ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    Ellian wrote: »
    Saw it yesterday and thought it was better than the original. I thought Mara was amazing in it. One bit that did annoy me
    The scene where Martin gets up from dinner to close the door after they heard the screaming - which Bloomkvist assumes to be the wind. This super careful serial killer who later makes a point of stating how his father was careless leaving bodies all over the country and who built a sound proof murder dungeon in his house - which is hidden behind a security door and a fake wall, just accidentally leave the door open on the same night that he has a guest over. Not buying that for a second and it really annoyed me
    I'm pretty sure that actually was the wind. Although from the look on Martin's face, he was probably wondering if he really did a leave a door open.
    That was just a little nudge to the book readers in the audience from Fincher.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭Ellian


    I'm pretty sure that actually was the wind. Although from the look on Martin's face, he was probably wondering if he really did a leave a door open.
    That was just a little nudge to the book readers in the audience from Fincher.

    You might be right. I'll check it again on DVD


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 7,925 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Aris


    I found it generally enjoyable.
    In the first hour with the (kind of) parallel stories I found the Lisbeth story far more interesting. And Rooney Mara is absolutely amazing!!!

    Upcoming gigs and events: Dry Cleaning, The Shawshank Redemption, Sprints, These Charming Men, Sasha Velour, Disorder Festival, David Byrne, The Cure, Garbage, Bob The Drag Queen, Sigur Ros, Olafur Arnalds, Cabaret Voltaire, Angine de Poitrine, Cardinals



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,568 ✭✭✭candy-gal1


    went to see this last week, really really loved it.
    id only read the first book, and not long ago either so wasnt entirely sure what to expect from the movie, but i couldnt fault it tbh, by far the best movie ive seen in a long time.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,512 ✭✭✭SK1979


    Went to see this last week and really really enjoyed it. I hadn't read the books or seen the Swedish versions and for some reason sort of had an impression that the books were chick books, but my god the film was impressive. Some incredibly rough scenes in it too.

    As others have said, Rooney Mara is amazing.

    Is Fincher signed up to direct the next two as well?


Advertisement
Advertisement