Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Denver Broncos Thread

1262729313273

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,067 ✭✭✭tallaghtoutlaws


    spiralism wrote: »

    Woody Paige is your source? :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,299 ✭✭✭spiralism


    Woody Paige is your source? :rolleyes:

    Well he's the Broncos ITK so yes, he's the one talking to the coaches/players and around the facilities reporting on it, it is after all his job to cover the Broncos for the Denver Post. :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,067 ✭✭✭tallaghtoutlaws


    spiralism wrote: »
    Well he's the Broncos ITK so yes, he's the one talking to the coaches/players and around the facilities reporting on it, it is after all his job to cover the Broncos for the Denver Post. :rolleyes:

    Woody Paige is one of the most bias reporters around and is also a clown no wonder he would report nonsense like that. Also where does it say Orton was lazy? Seems to me Paige is trying to make out that the lack of work ethic which Orton adapted this year after he was told he was being traded and then told he was staying and then told he is starting and then was dropped added with the Tebow stuff was enough to make any player not give a sh1t.

    Typical Paige writing. So far up the clubs hole he will say anything to make Denver and Tebow look better than Orton. And he isn't alone. Many in club reporters are knob ends. Pats have 1 or 2 also. They are paid to make the club they report on look good.

    Even players didn't like him. Brandon Marshal sums Woody up nicely:
    “Woody Paige is a columnist. He writes an opinion. He’s the same guy that’s telling me to grow up, that I’m a baby, but if you turn on ESPN every day, Around the Horn, he’s wearing wigs, he’s got crazy quotes behind him. Who wants the attention, me or Woody Paige? … Woody Paige is the same guy every day. If you turn on ESPN. you’re gonna see him muted out every time because everything that comes out of his mouth is a lot of baloney. And that’s the truth.”


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,395 ✭✭✭✭mikemac1


    Who you going to elect? Offensive tackles are not elected captains

    Jake Long in Miami, Jordon Gross in Carolina

    I was sure Andrew Whitworth was a captain in Cincinati but after checking it seems he isn't.
    Joe Thomas was a captain last year when McCoy was still a rookie. They gave it to McCoy this year

    There's a few anyway around the league anyway, this guy is a journalist and beat reporter?

    Bit offtopic


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,067 ✭✭✭tallaghtoutlaws


    mikemac1 wrote: »
    Jake Long in Miami, Jordon Gross in Carolina

    I was sure Andrew Whitworth was a captain in Cincinati but after checking it seems he isn't.
    Joe Thomas was a captain last year when McCoy was still a rookie. They gave it to McCoy this year

    There's a few anyway around the league anyway, this guy is a journalist and beat reporter?

    Bit offtopic

    Paige is a Journo and also a Columnist and has been a co presenter on different shows. Guy is nothing more than a bias hack that will say anything to make himself be heard. He is always on that Around the Horn show also. Dude is an idiot.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    so..............where would you rate Philip Rivers then ?

    I know this thread is about Tebow(rookie) v Orton(vet), Tebow won, ie. Orton had a string of losses, then Tebow took over and has a winning record. Orton has left the club now, & ironically they both now meet in the last game, so effectively this thread is over, it's unfair to compare them with different teams, otherwise it'll just go-on-&-on-&-on :rolleyes:


    Top 10 easily. He's in the second tier of QBs who can all make a case for being better than the other or can make a case based on potential.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,052 ✭✭✭poldebruin


    I would never have labelled, (nor have I ever heard it mentioned before that) Orton as lazy or a bad locker room guy.

    I know he was well liked by team mates in Chicago.

    My thinking is that when you, as a tem, are going through a rough patch, winning infrequently and there's a lot of clamour for an unproven rookie qb from the fans for your position, you could quickly become unmotivated - I'm sure Orton is no fool and could see the writing on the wall.

    In his final year, Orton spoke about not caring what the fans thought, or not being bothered to try and please them, it struck me as words from a guy who was feeling unappreciated and knew he would not be there much longer

    As a Denver fan I have no animosity towards Orton at all. He was the least of the teams problems really. He played hard, and with injuries (twisted ankle in Chicago/ bad chest injury at Denver). He just never seemed to get it done when it mattered, in the redzone, 3rd down or at the end of games. Maybe it's down to bad luck, or a lack of "clutchness" but after Sunday's game, I wish him well with KC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,299 ✭✭✭spiralism


    poldebruin wrote: »
    I would never have labelled, (nor have I ever heard it mentioned before that) Orton as lazy or a bad locker room guy.

    I know he was well liked by team mates in Chicago.

    My thinking is that when you, as a tem, are going through a rough patch, winning infrequently and there's a lot of clamour for an unproven rookie qb from the fans for your position, you could quickly become unmotivated - I'm sure Orton is no fool and could see the writing on the wall.

    In his final year, Orton spoke about not caring what the fans thought, or not being bothered to try and please them, it struck me as words from a guy who was feeling unappreciated and knew he would not be there much longer

    As a Denver fan I have no animosity towards Orton at all. He was the least of the teams problems really. He played hard, and with injuries (twisted ankle in Chicago/ bad chest injury at Denver). He just never seemed to get it done when it mattered, in the redzone, 3rd down or at the end of games. Maybe it's down to bad luck, or a lack of "clutchness" but after Sunday's game, I wish him well with KC.

    He's just very average. 34-34 as a starter in the NFL for one and all of his major stats have him just about middle of the pack. Tebow, for all his flaws, has at least the intangibles and leadership going for him as well as the ability just to pull a win out of his arse every other week. Give me him any time to lead the team, fwiw i expected a much steeper curve than what he's been faced with(i expected tebow to win at best half of his games after taking over and have quite a few horrow shows a la detroit/buffalo)

    Best of luck to Orton, whenever it doesn't affect us adversely. It was a lack of clutchness though, which i think stems from leadership. I've never heard any players vociferously defend Orton to the extent which they defend Tebow or heard of him inspiring the team. It's why the best QBs are the best leaders and they all tend to be well up there in game winning drives. The ones who don't excel in that but remain good passers will inherently draw criticism of their leadership. (one such example being Phillip Rivers getting angry, throwing tantrums and yelling at teammates when things go poorly)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,150 ✭✭✭Morrisseeee


    Top 10 easily. He's in the second tier of QBs who can all make a case for being better than the other or can make a case based on potential.

    But but but...............he's only average, no SB win, no SB appearance, no AFC championship win, and this year he's even worse than Tebow, mmmmm........scratches head :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,173 ✭✭✭✭kmart6


    He's had a bad year but he's still twice the QB Tebow is!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    But but but...............he's only average, no SB win, no SB appearance, no AFC championship win, and this year he's even worse than Tebow, mmmmm........scratches head :confused:


    So unless you make it to a superbowl you'll only ever be average? Give me the guy with the 85 QB rating over the guy with a 75 one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,224 ✭✭✭✭SantryRed


    But but but...............he's only average, no SB win, no SB appearance, no AFC championship win, and this year he's even worse than Tebow, mmmmm........scratches head :confused:

    The no SB appearance or championship win isn't really his fault considering he has Norv Turner as HC.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,067 ✭✭✭tallaghtoutlaws


    But but but...............he's only average, no SB win, no SB appearance, no AFC championship win, and this year he's even worse than Tebow, mmmmm........scratches head :confused:

    Worse than Tebow how? He has a better Passing rating, Completed rating, Yards and TD in the air. His int are high but lets be fair the Chargers offense have been muck all year and it isnt just because of Rivers. Turner and all the offensive players are to blame.

    But are you trying to say because the Chargers are sh1t this year that this makes Rivers worse than Tebow? Pass first offense run by Norv "I am a useless Coach" Turner versus a run first Offense designed specifically for Tebow.

    Don't confuse what Tebow has done with the Broncos as being a better QB than someone like Rivers. Chargers offload Turner and bring in someone who knows how to get the best out of that offense then you will see huge improvement in a guy like Rivers.

    Oh and pinning AFC Championship games and Super bowls on one man is pathetic at best especially when the guy you say he is worse than has never got to one and the fact a team loses is down to the whole team not just one man. Dan Marino never won a bowl so I guess that makes Tebow better than him right?

    Plenty of amazing players in the NFL that will never make a Championship game or Super Bowl. Judging said players on these games is stupid and annoys me. Top Tier players are for the most part only as good as the guys around them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,150 ✭✭✭Morrisseeee


    I'll start of my repeating my previous point, this thread is over, Tebow won, easily. Both are at different teams now, so the comparison is over.

    I mentioned Rivers initially because I wanted to move onto the point that this is Elway's and the Broncos dilema, do they invest in Tebow or invest in a college QB (that might only end up like Rivers/Romo etc, ie. struggling to win championships/SBs), it's a 50-50 call, damned-if-you do & .....etc............../insert other known idioms.
    Worse than Tebow how?
    Simples:
    1) Rivers 7-8, Tebow 7-3
    2) Tebow beat Rivers (away)

    ............and I'm going to ignore ALL those excuses ye gave ;)

    No, wait, I won't, I'll respond........
    But are you trying to say because the Chargers are sh1t this year that this makes Rivers worse than Tebow?
    No & yes, ie. the Chargers aren't exactly sh1t, they looked like a SB contender against the Ravens, and secondly Tebow took over an even sh1tier Broncos, and brought them from 1-4 to 8-7, and now have a chance to win Div and go to playoffs.
    Don't confuse what Tebow has done with the Broncos as being a better QB than someone like Rivers. Chargers offload Turner
    I never said Tebow was a better QB than Rivers, meerly that his winning record is better than his this year, Rivers is a much better passer than most in the league, but...........he hasn't won a major trophy.........yet. As regards offloading Turner, this has been spoken about for years.
    Oh and pinning AFC Championship games and Super bowls on one man is pathetic at best especially when the guy you say he is worse than has never got to one and the fact a team loses is down to the whole team not just one man. Dan Marino never won a bowl so I guess that makes Tebow better than him right?
    In the quote above this one you're pinning all the Chargers losses & Rivers failures on one man,............Turner, but now it's 'pathetic' to suggest pinning SBs etc on one man.................Rivers, do you see the irony ?! As for team losses being a team loss, where does Tebow's 4 Int's count in their loss last weekend? On the 'one man' point, where are Indy this year, how are they doin? The same can be said of all the good teams, take their QB out, and they loose. And finally, to make an inference that I said that Tebow is better than Marino is bordering on libel.
    Plenty of amazing players in the NFL that will never make a Championship game or Super Bowl.
    ............and one of them is Tebow, he's been amazing this year, just look at the hype, you don't get that for being normal or below average.......right?!
    Judging said players on these games is stupid and annoys me.
    I agree.
    Top Tier players are for the most part only as good as the guys around them.
    So.................Brady=P.Manning=Rodgers=Brees ?!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,067 ✭✭✭tallaghtoutlaws



    I never said Tebow was a better QB than Rivers, meerly that his winning record is better than his this year, Rivers is a much better passer than most in the league, but...........he hasn't won a major trophy.........yet. As regards offloading Turner, this has been spoken about for years.

    This still doesn't prove how Tebow is doing better than Rivers as individuals. All it proves is that one team has a better record than the other. Sure if you want to say Tebow's is on a team that has playoff shot and thus making him in a better position to have a better season overall as a team member I would agree. But to say he is having a better season as individuals is wrong especially as QBs let me quote what you said that you really should have clairfied:
    he's only average, no SB win, no SB appearance, no AFC championship win, and this year he's even worse than Tebow, mmmmm........scratches head

    This 100% smacks of saying one guy is better than the other because...... I mean you even said Rivers was average.
    In the quote above this one you're pinning all the Chargers losses & Rivers failures on one man,............Turner, but now it's 'pathetic' to suggest pinning SBs etc on one man.................Rivers, do you see the irony ?! As for team losses being a team loss, where does Tebow's 4 Int's count in their loss last weekend? On the 'one man' point, where are Indy this year, how are they doin? The same can be said of all the good teams, take their QB out, and they loose. And finally, to make an inference that I said that Tebow is better than Marino is bordering on libel.

    Are you for real? Of course you can pin the faults of a team on a Head Coach. It is his system and he is the one who selects the players. Comparing the one man thing to a QB and Head Coach is on two very different levels. Head Coaches have the ability to destroy teams and players have to follow their orders. In fact bad performance can 100% come down to the faults of bad play design and bad play calling and not putting your unit in a position to get the best of their abilities. Saying its the QBs fault is fooking ridiculous unless he did actually fook the game up and this is where I come to Tebow 4 ints.

    No it wasn't all his fault. See unlike others I don't pin faults of a loss on one guy unless he went out there and threw 1-20 and 0 Tds and 5 Ints where he quite literally made a dogs dinner of a game and gave his Defense no chance to survive. But both Rivers and Tebow have played to the best of their abilities this season in the systems they are given. The problem is that Rivers forces a lot of passes because he has in a pass first offense but he has always thrown a high % of Ints. Tebow on the other hand is not in any position to win games using his passing 100% in the sense that if it comes down to having to claw his way back his bad passing i.e Bills game he wont get it done. But as bad as Rivers and Tebow have been neither of them can be singled out for losing games on their own. I never bought into a QB taking the blame for a loss based on Ints in a game. Too easy to pick on them when there is plenty of other reasons out there also.
    ............and one of them is Tebow, he's been amazing this year, just look at the hype, you don't get that for being normal or below average.......right?!

    Amazing my arse. What he has done is good I will give him that. The belief and determination he gave to the rest of the team and give them the confidence and belief but as I said before that will only get you so far. I never buy into hype for that reason.
    So.................Brady=P.Manning=Rodgers=Brees ?!

    you clearly missed my point on this. Take Brady. There have been times in his career where his WR have stunk the place out or his linemen have not blocked for him. In this case he is only as good as those guys. Even Rodgers struggled recently against the Chiefs and the guys around him couldn't get it done also. It all ties into you are only as good as the guy around you. So even if you are having an amazing game you can only perform to the standard around you. That is pretty much common sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,150 ✭✭✭Morrisseeee


    My point is that Tebow's record this season is better than Rivers, the Chargers season is over, the Broncos have a game left to win the Div and go to the playoffs, in my eyes Tebow has done better than Rivers.
    I'll stand by my opinion, and say that what he has achieved this season has been amazing, and has been very exciting to watch aswell.
    Will you agree with my point that this thread is over, Tebow v Orton, and that Tebow won ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,067 ✭✭✭tallaghtoutlaws


    Will you agree with my point that this thread is over, Tebow v Orton, and that Tebow won ?

    Why does this bother you so much? Who cares about whether the discussion is Orton V Tebow at this point. This thread is serving well as discussion for Tebow and everything related to him and the Broncos. But I will say as Orton's character has come into question in this thread which relates to him as a QB no harm still discussing him and making slight comparisons to Tebow. And in fact no harm comparing Tebow to any starting NFL QB. Should we close down discussions just because you think they are over though? Maybe a slight mod adjustment to the title might be more pleasing to you if it bothers you that much I guess? Report the original post and see if the mods will change it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,150 ✭✭✭Morrisseeee


    Why does this bother you so much?
    Em, it doesn't bother me at all :p,
    Who cares about whether the discussion is Orton V Tebow at this point.
    ............eh, that's the whole point of the thread. Actually I did propose to change it to: The Denver Broncos thread, and some people agreed.
    This thread is serving well as discussion for Tebow and everything related to him and the Broncos.
    Spot on there, it's been mainly about Tebow.
    Should we close down discussions just because you think they are over though?
    ...........absolutely ;)

    So, back to my Q, and I'll re-phrase it: do you believe that Tebow won the debate ? Yes or No answer, please and thanks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,067 ✭✭✭tallaghtoutlaws



    So, back to my Q, and I'll re-phrase it: do you believe that Tebow won the debate ? Yes or No answer, please and thanks.

    Won what debate though? There are more than one debates about Orton and Tebow in here. But Im guessing you are talking about the overall trend as in who is better for the Broncos even though that was not the original question put by the OP. The original question by Steve O was :
    Stev_o wrote: »
    Probably the only decent QB controversy so far this year pits Orton vs Tebow in a battle of who will be Denver's number one.

    Then the Debate went in all direction and in fact this debate as you say was answered the minute Tebow started. So if you are asking did Tebow answer the original question? Yes he did the minute he got the starting role. Did he deserve it well thats another can of worms. Hindsight would say yes etc etc

    As for the ability stuff I have already said what I had to say comparing the two and Im not about to open a can of worms on it.

    I believe this thread can live on though and don't think it should be closed down as guys like Tebow and Andrew Luck and Cam Newton are guys who carry hype and guys who in my mind will take a lot of discussion so it makes sense having a whole discussion thread about them to keep it out of other threads and de-railing other threads i.e weekly threads etc etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,052 ✭✭✭poldebruin


    Rivers vs Tebow eh? No competition - definitely Rivers, bad season and all.

    On the topic of "do better team mates make a good player great, or does his greatness elevate the players around him?" - the answer is obviously that both are true to some degree.

    Of all the team sports, I do believe you are more reliant on your colleagues in football....there's no denying that Manning going down had a huge impact on his team - but I also remember Cutler looking very average in Chicago in his first year, with a bad OL and poor WR options. All of a sudden he was trying to squeeze passes into ridiculously small windows and making terrible decisions. (I'd trade Tebow for Cutler any day too!)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,150 ✭✭✭Morrisseeee


    Won what debate though? There are more than one debates about Orton and Tebow in here. But Im guessing you are talking about the overall trend as in who is better for the Broncos even though that was not the original question put by the OP. The original question by Steve O was :



    Then the Debate went in all direction and in fact this debate as you say was answered the minute Tebow started. So if you are asking did Tebow answer the original question? Yes he did the minute he got the starting role. Did he deserve it well thats another can of worms. Hindsight would say yes etc etc

    As for the ability stuff I have already said what I had to say comparing the two and Im not about to open a can of worms on it.

    I believe this thread can live on though and don't think it should be closed down as guys like Tebow and Andrew Luck and Cam Newton are guys who carry hype and guys who in my mind will take a lot of discussion so it makes sense having a whole discussion thread about them to keep it out of other threads and de-railing other threads i.e weekly threads etc etc.

    ^^ You should give up the day job and become o politician :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,173 ✭✭✭✭kmart6


    All he did was question your point with some very valid comments and you tried to back away from it as soon as possible and turn it back to Tebow beat Orton!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,150 ✭✭✭Morrisseeee


    All he did was question your point with some very valid comments and you tried to back away from it as soon as possible and turn it back to Tebow beat Orton!
    I'm not sure why you felt the need to post this ^^
    1. Please clarify the 'point' I was making.
    2. Show me where I backed away asap.
    3. Turned it back...............from what exactly ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    I'm not sure why you felt the need to post this ^^
    1. Please clarify the 'point' I was making.
    2. Show me where I backed away asap.
    3. Turned it back...............from what exactly ?



    The point you were making was that Tebow was a better quarterback than Rivers because he had more wins, comical really. Then when Tallaght rightly took you to the cleaners on that one you avoided answering it and just tried to bring it back to an Orton vs Tebow dicussion again by claiming Tebow "won".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,150 ✭✭✭Morrisseeee


    The point you were making was that Tebow was a better quarterback than Rivers because he had more wins, comical really
    I never said Tebow was a better QB, so it's comical that you picked out this inference, as tallagh also picked out that I was infering that Tebow was better than Marino :(
    I said: "and this year he's even worse than Tebow", and I was talking about their seasons, their wins, their head-to-head. To say I was 'taken to the cleaners' or that 'I backed down asap' or 'I changed the subject' on those facts/points is pure folly. I further went on to outline the Rivers (or Romo) point, and how it applied to the Broncos dilemma as they searched for a QB for next season.
    by claiming Tebow "won"
    The debate as to which of them 'won' was over......even tallagh admitted that (in a round-about way). That doesn't mean I think Tebow is the best QB in the league or that he will deliver championships/SBs, I'm a realist, I know his flaws, I know the teams flaws, the system that they currently have is there to be 'shut-down', and there's an article in NFL.com atm describing how to do it. The Q is, can Tebow & the team improve enough during the off-season to challenge again next year. Some of ye will say 'absolutely not', the same way this thread started when people said 'he will never make a starting QB', but he proved those people wrong and became a starting QB, and he and the team got the wins. Some people will say 'yes he can improve' the same way they said he would make a starting QB.
    To say that he was a below average QB or that he is a horrible passer then his (and the teams) results are all the more remarkable.
    Also, I've no problem keeping this thread open, I simply asked (in a non-confrontational way) that the thread title be changed (to reflect the current situation). I was actually going to start a Quarterback thread, and have a discussion about the most important/influential position on the field, and the various athletes that fill that position.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,339 ✭✭✭me-skywalker


    The emergence of Tim Tebow as the starting quarterback in Denver has led to all sorts of controversy. Mostly, it has made the Broncos into contenders, at least for the short-term.


    Since he entered the starting lineup, Tebow led Denver into playoff contention. Yeah, the Broncos’ defense played a more consistent role in that run, but Tebow made an awful lot of big plays along the way and silenced many critics (including yours truly) in the process. In the backdrop of that is the overarching Christianity angle with the evangelical Tebow, creating plenty of fodder for some very strong feelings on all sides.


    For such a nice young man (and that is meant with complete seriousness), Tebow is perhaps the most polarizing figure in the NFL today. It’s an amazing social phenomenon. Critiquing him as a football player is nearly impossible without it bleeding into a social discussion. The situation is so stunning that John Elway – the greatest Broncos player ever, who led the team to five Super Bowls, including two titles, and is now the executive vice president of the team in charge of running football operations – has been getting ripped by some fans for not fully supporting Tebow. Moreover, Tebow’s play has started to make people take a second look at the moves of deposed coach Josh McDaniels. Could it be that McDaniels wasn’t a complete train wreck?

    http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=AjOLO_uwOf3aiZMofi6KBk1DubYF?slug=jc-top-nfl-stories-2011-122711


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,966 ✭✭✭Syferus


    To be fair, I always thought McDaniels had alot of potential as a head coach and that he made some bold moves - if the Broncos were going to allow him to make the moves they did they had to give him the time to develop those ideas, but sports can be maddeningly short-sighted at times.

    Clearly he left the Broncos in alot better shape than most Broncos fans wanted to believe, and it'd have obviously benefited Tebow's development considerably.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 4,149 Mod ✭✭✭✭bruschi


    the whole thing with Tebow and McDaniels seems really weird to me. He was absolutley slated by the Denver fans over it, and made a huge scapegoat for wasting their future, yet it was the same fans who were screaming for Tebow to be put in this season. Just seems really fickle or something. Its like Tebow has this aura about him that just creates arguments! whether it be first round pick or not, causing a manager to be sacked (granted, there was a whole load of other stuff with McDaniels than Tebow, but that was seen as his death bed), whether he is a starter or not, whether he is the reason for their turnaround or not.

    Personally, I dont think I have ever seen a player like Tebow in any sort of sport ever. There is no comparisons with former NFL players or any other type of sport I can think of. His whole persona is rarley seen, and the debate and hype about him is completley unprecedented. If anything else, its great for American Football. Its been said earlier how people who dont watch it are hearing about him and tuning in. Even Sky are hopping on the Tebow bandwagon to publicise things. He creates such an amount of discussion, and people are on completely differing sides to him.

    I think its great stuff altogether! I also think he is shíte! :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    I never said Tebow was a better QB, so it's comical that you picked out this inference, as tallagh also picked out that I was infering that Tebow was better than Marino :(
    I said: "and this year he's even worse than Tebow", and I was talking about their seasons, their wins, their head-to-head. To say I was 'taken to the cleaners' or that 'I backed down asap' or 'I changed the subject' on those facts/points is pure folly. I further went on to outline the Rivers (or Romo) point, and how it applied to the Broncos dilemma as they searched for a QB for next season.

    The debate as to which of them 'won' was over......even tallagh admitted that (in a round-about way). That doesn't mean I think Tebow is the best QB in the league or that he will deliver championships/SBs, I'm a realist, I know his flaws, I know the teams flaws, the system that they currently have is there to be 'shut-down', and there's an article in NFL.com atm describing how to do it. The Q is, can Tebow & the team improve enough during the off-season to challenge again next year. Some of ye will say 'absolutely not', the same way this thread started when people said 'he will never make a starting QB', but he proved those people wrong and became a starting QB, and he and the team got the wins. Some people will say 'yes he can improve' the same way they said he would make a starting QB.
    To say that he was a below average QB or that he is a horrible passer then his (and the teams) results are all the more remarkable.
    Also, I've no problem keeping this thread open, I simply asked (in a non-confrontational way) that the thread title be changed (to reflect the current situation). I was actually going to start a Quarterback thread, and have a discussion about the most important/influential position on the field, and the various athletes that fill that position.


    You said Tebow is better than rivers this year because he has more wins. That's just not the case. As for Tebow, he's still not proven he's a starting QB or that he has improved to be one.
    Syferus wrote: »
    Clearly he left the Broncos in alot better shape than most Broncos fans wanted to believe, and it'd have obviously benefited Tebow's development considerably.


    I wouldn't be so sure of that. They are still quite a poor team in terms of talent and depth. Edit: Depends what you mean really. Broncos had some excellent players already before he arrived, his terrible attitude had some of those replaced though. However with his draft and FA he never added to the quality significantly. He was a terrrible head coach, and you see how they've imrpoved without only goes to highlight it was the right decision(unfortunatly they made it).


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,287 ✭✭✭davyjose


    bruschi wrote: »
    the whole thing with Tebow and McDaniels seems really weird to me. He was absolutley slated by the Denver fans over it, and made a huge scapegoat for wasting their future, yet it was the same fans who were screaming for Tebow to be put in this season. Just seems really fickle or something. Its like Tebow has this aura about him that just creates arguments! whether it be first round pick or not, causing a manager to be sacked (granted, there was a whole load of other stuff with McDaniels than Tebow, but that was seen as his death bed), whether he is a starter or not, whether he is the reason for their turnaround or not.

    Personally, I dont think I have ever seen a player like Tebow in any sort of sport ever. There is no comparisons with former NFL players or any other type of sport I can think of. His whole persona is rarley seen, and the debate and hype about him is completley unprecedented. If anything else, its great for American Football. Its been said earlier how people who dont watch it are hearing about him and tuning in. Even Sky are hopping on the Tebow bandwagon to publicise things. He creates such an amount of discussion, and people are on completely differing sides to him.

    I think its great stuff altogether! I also think he is shíte! :pac:

    I don't think they were. His was the biggest selling Jersey prior to the 2010 season, for instance. I'm sure a number of those were sold in Northern Florida, but I remember the cheers, when TT took the field in his first preseason game, and all the number 15 jerseys in the crowd.


Advertisement