Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 11/12 - Mod Note 4153

1106107109111112334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,759 ✭✭✭corcaigh07


    tommyhaas wrote: »
    They bought the club, of which Torres was an asset. Selling selling Torres was selling their asset, and so the Suarez and Carroll purchases were funded by the sale of their asset

    and babel dont forget. im still delighted we got suarez and carroll for those 2 wasters!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,337 ✭✭✭✭monkey9


    So because he scored 5 goals in 37 appearances 5 years ago when he was 19 we shouldn't spend money on him now despite him having scored 60 goals in 115 appearances since then?

    Who are we talking about here?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    monkey9 wrote: »
    Who are we talking about here?


    Cavani.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,016 ✭✭✭✭GBX


    tommyhaas wrote: »
    If there were signs of that in training, surely the Manager would be giving him more of a chance then he has been?

    True .. but they didnt spend the money on him to sit on the bench. Surely they have seen either in training/previous scouting vids etc enough to warrant signing.
    Dont forget Kenny has always said they didnt sign him for 1/2 seasons. Its a 5 year contract... I guess time will tell how much he is used.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭willmunny1990


    GBX wrote: »
    Given the chance, Carroll could turn into a Rush style player. While I dont forsee him breaking Rush's records, he could have the impact needed.

    Carroll still looks unfit to me, which is a disgrace. lets be honest, the signing of Andy was one of the biggest mistakes Liverpool have made. He has absolutely nothing about him.

    No pace, first touch is woeful, for his size he is weak and hes not clinical.

    He was a knee jerk signing by Kenny after Torres was sold.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭tommyhaas


    GBX wrote: »
    True .. but they didnt spend the money on him to sit on the bench. Surely they have seen either in training/previous scouting vids etc enough to warrant signing.
    Dont forget Kenny has always said they didnt sign him for 1/2 seasons. Its a 5 year contract... I guess time will tell how much he is used.

    He said that in reference to rushing him back from injury though. Right now what seem's apparent is that Dalglish doesn't feel he adds to the side. Be that because of his style, or because of his limited ability, but either way its not a good sign in terms of his prospects


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,759 ✭✭✭corcaigh07


    tommyhaas wrote: »
    There's one common factor in all of the above, and that's poor finishing which I would suggest is of far greater relevance then luck

    dont agree with that, the shots were of very decent quality, its hardly like those excellent saves were straight at the keeper or at a nice height. even just looking at yesterday, the way Cerny changed direction mid dive to help it onto the post was breathtaking.

    Ruddy, De Gea, Worm, Cerny and Hart were amazing at Anfield, I dont see it as unlucky, i see them as excellent performances by those players, its just also very annoying to be on the receiving end of all those amazing saves...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,224 ✭✭✭barone


    give the young lads a shout up front, the unknown aspect could help us


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭Iang87


    massive news from Kennys twitter account. He is in fact voting for Marcus tonight


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,016 ✭✭✭✭GBX


    Carroll still looks unfit to me, which is a disgrace. lets be honest, the signing of Andy was one of the biggest mistakes Liverpool have made. He has absolutely nothing about him.

    No pace, first touch is woeful, for his size he is weak and hes not clinical.

    He was a knee jerk signing by Kenny after Torres was sold.

    Yeah quite knee jerk.
    tommyhaas wrote: »
    He said that in reference to rushing him back from injury though. Right now what seem's apparent is that Dalglish doesn't feel he adds to the side. Be that because of his style, or because of his limited ability, but either way its not a good sign in terms of his prospects

    His fitness/enthusiasm isnt what it should be ..


    Im just trying to remain positive over his signing... I know its basically p**sing into the wind based on his recent showings .. but ya never know :o


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭tommyhaas


    corcaigh07 wrote: »
    dont agree with that, the shots were of very decent quality, its hardly like those excellent saves were straight at the keeper or at a nice height. even just looking at yesterday, the way Cerny changed direction mid dive to help it onto the post was breathtaking.

    Ruddy, De Gea, Worm, Cerny and Hart were amazing at Anfield, I dont see it as unlucky, i see them as excellent performances by those players, its just also very annoying to be on the receiving end of all those amazing saves...

    So is it a coincidence that all these keepers save so many shots against Liverpool, but not against other sides? I'm not disputing that keepers can often play out of their skin, but given the the stats that show that at present, Liverpool have the second worst shots to goals ratio (IIRC) in the league, I think its perfectly clear that a decent finisher/poacher is lacking


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,759 ✭✭✭corcaigh07


    Carroll still looks unfit to me, which is a disgrace. lets be honest, the signing of Andy was one of the biggest mistakes Liverpool have made. He has absolutely nothing about him.

    No pace, first touch is woeful, for his size he is weak and hes not clinical.

    He was a knee jerk signing by Kenny after Torres was sold.

    sad thing is, I think he wants to be Newcastle's Number 9 far more badly than Liverpool's Number 9. There was nothing wrong with his pace, touch or strength when he played for them and he fully merited his England call-up. Im not sure if he will ever be the player we want him to be...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,337 ✭✭✭✭monkey9


    corcaigh07 wrote: »
    sad thing is, I think he wants to be Newcastle's Number 9 far more badly than Liverpool's Number 9. There was nothing wrong with his pace, touch or strength when he played for them and he fully merited his England call-up. Im not sure if he will ever be the player we want him to be...


    Newcastle played to his strengths which we don't seem to be doing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,759 ✭✭✭corcaigh07


    tommyhaas wrote: »
    So is it a coincidence that all these keepers save so many shots against Liverpool, but not against other sides? I'm not disputing that keepers can often play out of their skin, but given the the stats that show that at present, Liverpool have the second worst shots to goals ratio (IIRC) in the league, I think its perfectly clear that a decent finisher/poacher is lacking

    i think to a degree, it is a coincidence. I've never seen such an amount of excellent saves against us in such a short period of time. I agree with you though, an in-form Torres would have made the final difference. The floodgates would have been opened in those games had we scored the important second goal and I include United in that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,832 ✭✭✭✭Blatter


    monkey9 wrote: »
    Newcastle played to his strengths which we don't seem to be doing.

    I think the 'we don't play to his strengths' card is used a bit too much. While it may have some merit, he had a decent first touch, good mobility, good shooting, good strength, decent pace, very enthusiastic etc. at Newcastle.

    You don't just lose those qualities because you're playing in a different system. There's another reason why Carroll isn't performing. Whether it's just his confidence or whether it's off the field problems, something else is very problematic. It's not all down to 'not playing to his strengths'. I think that's just a nice excuse for him tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 239 ✭✭bookie basher


    liverpool are trying to play pass & move football and it dosnt suit carroll,
    that speaks volumes about carrolls lack of ability


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭The Chessplayer


    The-Rigger wrote: »
    19 appearances, 4 goals

    It's 4 more goals than Crouch had scored after 19 games.

    Bellamy only managed 7 goals in 27.
    Keane scored 6 goals in 19.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,774 ✭✭✭redzerdrog


    Carroll hasnt been as bad as people like to make out

    but a problem I feel we have got wrong when using Carroll is not playing Downing iirc his last start was with bellamy and suarez either side both like to play quick tempo pass and move but this isnt Carrolls strenght yet and i feel if Carroll is starting it should automatically mean that downing also plays


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    liverpool are trying to play pass & move football and it dosnt suit carroll,
    that speaks volumes about carrolls lack of ability

    It speaks more of a rush to buy an inappropriate talent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭The Chessplayer


    mike65 wrote: »
    It speaks more of a rush to buy an inappropriate talent.

    The new owners appear to be rolling in it so maybe we can take the hit on Carroll. How much do people think Carroll would fetch if we flogged him in the summer?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,759 ✭✭✭corcaigh07


    Blatter wrote: »
    I think the 'we don't play to his strengths' card is used a bit too much. While it may have some merit, he had a decent first touch, good mobility, good shooting, good strength, decent pace, very enthusiastic etc. at Newcastle.

    You don't just lose those qualities because you're playing in a different system. There's another reason why Carroll isn't performing. Whether it's just his confidence or whether it's off the field problems, something else is very problematic. It's not all down to 'not playing to his strengths'. I think that's just a nice excuse for him tbh.

    completely agree, where has that all gone? he was largely up front on his own for Newcastle but he did fair more than "held the ball up well etc" that you constantly hear after one of his rare starts these days. People seem to forget he was a decent footballer with good ability on the ball as well as in the air. Now, he has neither.

    and his injury or sharpness should not be an excuse now either, he had a full pre-season this summer and its nearly christmas now. he is a professional after all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭willmunny1990


    The new owners appear to be rolling in it so maybe we can take the hit on Carroll. How much do people think Carroll would fetch if we flogged him in the summer?

    Who would have him?

    Liverpool would take a substantial loss anyway that's for sure.

    You'd be lucky to get 10 million for him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,759 ✭✭✭corcaigh07


    The new owners appear to be rolling in it so maybe we can take the hit on Carroll. How much do people think Carroll would fetch if we flogged him in the summer?

    up to 20 mill if newcastle were to want him back. half that if they don't. Complete Guesswork of course


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ilovelamp2000


    GBX wrote: »
    Given the chance, Carroll could turn into a Rush style player. While I dont forsee him breaking Rush's records, he could have the impact needed.

    What ?

    Did you ever see Ian Rush play ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,206 ✭✭✭✭amiable


    Who would have him?

    Liverpool would take a substantial loss anyway that's for sure.

    You'd be lucky to get 10 million for him.
    Maybe if he scores a few goals against Chelsea at Anfield Roman might get out the cheque book again


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,474 ✭✭✭Crazy Horse 6


    The new owners appear to be rolling in it so maybe we can take the hit on Carroll. How much do people think Carroll would fetch if we flogged him in the summer?

    Imo we'll see him back at Newcastle in January never mind the Summer. I'd say we'll get 20m for him. Big loss but imo Kenny has already made his mind up on him. After we sell him back he'll start banging in the goals again for Newcastle it's just the way of things.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭willmunny1990


    amiable wrote: »
    Maybe if he scores a few goals against Chelsea at Anfield Roman might get out the cheque book again

    Ya never no with ye being our feeder club and all;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,942 ✭✭✭missingtime


    I seriously doubt that Carroll will be sold,if anything we will buying more players to support him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,206 ✭✭✭✭amiable


    Ya never no with ye being our feeder club and all;)
    Well seeing as Liverpool are a much bigger club than Chelsea that's fine


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,386 ✭✭✭✭DDC1990


    Ya never no with ye being our feeder club and all;)
    Doesn't the "Bigger Club" have to beat the "Feeder Club"?

    You are just our Elephant graveyard, where we send players who dont have the bottle to be at Liverpool anymore.

    Benayoun, Meireles, Torres... Some purchases :/


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement