Most disliked plot holes in movies you like?

don ramo wrote: »

he got the cop to attak him and got the upper hand, held a kinfe to his throat and asked to make a phone call, he had a phone bomb put into one of the insane guys, so he blew up the station and went to try get the ferries to blow each other up,

did you skip that part

Earlier in the film at the fundraiser is what hes talking about

Mickeroo wrote: »

Does it actually say that in the film though? THey don't specify anything about his outer layer when mimicing/in default robert patrick mode iirc. We never see him arrive, but it seems likely he looked like robert patrick when he arrived as he is a naked robert patrick before he kills the cop which means he had to be in human form to time travel which means his human form protects his metal insides in much the same way arnie's outer layer does.

Perhaps. I'd love to find an answer somewhere because i'm almost certain that T-1000 is just liquid metal and can shift his shape into things he comes into contact with but doesn't change on a molecular level.

Mickeroo wrote: »

I reckon he woudn't have to change at a molecular level, he would just have the raw materials built in, he just pulls the outer layer inside the liquid metal when he needs to change etc. Pure speculation of course

Lol

Anyway, at one point John Connor asks The Terminator why he doesn't just become a bomb and blow himself up.

A good question (answered accordingly) but if the movie had've been made post 9/11 surely it would've been only 20 mins long.

T-1000 would've only had to strap a sh*t load of TNT to himself and blow himself up on one of the numerous times he's in he same room as JC!

Scrawny71 wrote: »

^ Now that you mention it, surely the T-800 could have used his spare power source to blow the cr@p out of Sarah Connor at some point in the first movie. In T3 the same model is shown to have two extremely volatile batteries, one of which explodes pretty violently when removed.

True but I tend to think of T1 and T2 as completely seperate from the others. T3 and Salvation had no James Cameron involvement so they were just hacks manipulating the characters to make big bucks at the Box office.

T3 was a disgusting piece of trash!

Here's a kind-of plot hole in Back To The Future: what happened after Marty went "back to the future" at the end? His mother got married, and before long she had a kid who looked just like a young version of the Marty who disappeared. Wouldn't that be seen as just a little bit suspicious ..?

in Jurassic Park, where does that giant drop inside the T-Rex paddock come from? it strolls out of the pen then when the jeep is being pushed over the side theres a massive chasm, it makes no sense.

Sad Professor wrote: »

That's the least of BTTF's problems. None of the time travel in the film makes any sense. It's just a fun film that isn't meant to be thought about too much.

The major one is in number 2. Biff in 2015 or whatever year it was, steals the almanac goes back to 1955 and gives book to younger version of himself. He then leaves Delorean back to 2015 so Doc and Marty pick it up. Unaware that anything is wrong they go back to 1985 which they then discover has dramatically altered because of Biff having the almanac and becoming rich. But then of course if that timeline was created by Old Bifgf giving young Biff the book, then how was Old Biff able to get back to the correct unaltered timeline to leave the DeLorean back in the correct place to be picked up by Marty and Doc. But I agree with the Prof about not taking it seriously.

paddy kerins wrote: »

What happened to the Joker after Batman jumped out to save Rachel in TDK?

The scene was cut where The Joker was talking to one of his goons about Harvey Dent in the back of the car they leave in:



Nolan isn't one for showing deleted scenes so it could be unlikely we'd ever see this scene........unless some mega-trilogy collector's edition comes out in about 2 years