Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

He's right on this....."scrap the childen allowance" says O'Leary.

  • 21-11-2011 07:40PM
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,734 ✭✭✭


    The CEO of Ryanair Michael O'Leary has said child benefit should be scrapped.

    O'Leary said it was ridiculous that he received the entitlement for his four children, given his income.

    Speaking today,he said the allowance should be scrapped for everyone, even those on lower incomes.

    "I think you scrap it for everybody...You need to channel children's allowance (to those who need it) through income support schemes, where you're trying to channel money to those on very low incomes," he said.


«13456711

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 95 ✭✭Stocking Drinks Whiskey


    You don't know how much it costs to raise a child, do you?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,159 ✭✭✭✭phasers


    I assume he donates his to a worthwhile charity so?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,751 ✭✭✭Saila


    he makes a fair point tbh


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    You don't know how much it costs to raise a child, do you?

    Obviously he does as he has 4 of them?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,418 ✭✭✭✭hondasam


    It should be means tested, I would not say abolish it all together but it needs to be reduced.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,256 ✭✭✭Ronin247


    Childrens allowance shouldn't be scrapped it should be means tested.Some people need that extra income to pay for sky tv and booze and some need it to feed the kids.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,339 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    He thinks he's too rich to get it, so he thinks it should be scrapped for everyone?

    He thinks he's too rich to get it, but he claims it anyway?

    He probably thinks he's too rich to buy a cheap seat on his airline, but he's not agitating for cheap seats to go for everyone.

    Rich right wingers always moan about excessive government-led regulation but he won't take a lead and eschew the allowance.

    Hook was mentioning the free bus pass in the same vein, but there's nothing to stop him paying his busfare if he wants to.

    Ouanquers like these always whine about the lack of leadership, but they won't lead by example.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,058 ✭✭✭✭Abi


    "I think you scrap it for everybody...
    Ignorant prick.

    O'Leary said it was ridiculous that he received the entitlement for his four children, given his income.
    You've said it pal.


    Cutting it for those on low incomes is the most ridiculous thing I've heard. Cutting it off for those of over a certain income bracket, I'd agree with.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Galtee


    It's not really a fair point, it's a typical point from someone who doesn't depend on it to make life bearable. If the government were increasing airport taxes for operators he'd be up in arms over it even though he has the option (and would use it as he has done in the past) of passing it onto the consumer which isn't an option that someone who's been stripped of their allowance has. He's being his typical ignorant self in this matter tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,038 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    I would like to see Mr O' Leary in charge of public sector reform


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    phasers wrote: »
    I assume he donates his to a worthwhile charity so?

    Hardly an effective solution. If all high income earners decide to donate their children's allowance to a charity working in Africa then it's not of much benefit to the Irish taxpayer. His suggestion is far more sensible.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,300 ✭✭✭✭Seaneh


    It should have a celling after which it isn't paid.
    Means tested like every other benefit/allowence.

    Why do Dr. Murphy and his wife, Mrs. Murphy who is principle of the local school with their joined income of well over 200k per year need it? They don't.

    Where as The Browns down the road who are scraping by each month as it is, both working fulltime and barely scraping 50k between them do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,583 ✭✭✭mconigol


    Yeah all well and good in theory.

    We'll still have the usual spongers taking their handouts financed by people who actually work for a living though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 321 ✭✭Bluefox21


    Galtee wrote: »
    It's not really a fair point, it's a typical point from someone who doesn't depend on it to make life bearable. If the government were increasing airport taxes for operators he'd be up in arms over it even though he has the option (and would use it as he has done in the past) of passing it onto the consumer which isn't an option that someone who's been stripped of their allowance has. He's being his typical ignorant self in this matter tbh.


    He's identified a serious flaw in how child benefit is distributed and suggested that a fairer system should be introduced. Please identify how this is in anyway ignorant.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,300 ✭✭✭✭Seaneh


    Just to point out, he did say the money should be channelled into other incom support schemes and still go to the less well off.

    The man wasn't sitting there with his wads of cash saying "sure **** the poor, let them starve" he give a genuine and possibly workable answer to what an obvious flaw.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,573 ✭✭✭pragmatic1


    Every benefit should be means tested. Its a no brainer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 469 ✭✭geetar


    Abi wrote: »
    Ignorant prick.



    :confused:

    why dont you read next time. he wants the less well off to only recieve it. he doesnt want means testing, he wants to scrap the idea of children allowance and aid families in need through other welfare schemes that are more beneficial to both the families and the tax payer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,626 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    I wish O'Leary would either run in an election or keep his mouth shut about how the country is run. People have been saying for years that the Children's Allowance should be restricted to those that need it. It's hardly a radical new idea.. just another chance for O'Leary to see his name printed all over the place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,494 ✭✭✭m.j.w


    Seaneh wrote: »
    Just to point out, he did say the money should be channelled into other incom support schemes and still go to the less well off.

    The man wasn't sitting there with his wads of cash saying "sure **** the poor, let them starve" he give a genuine and possibly workable answer to what an obvious flaw.

    Exactly, are people just reading the title and not the whole quote.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,736 ✭✭✭Irish Guitarist


    I'd like to see how willing he would be to give it up if he was on a lower income himself.

    By the way why is the CEO of Ryanair being interviewed about childrens allowance? :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,038 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    He chooses to live in the state and pays roughly 14m in tax a year

    He has the right to say where he thinks his money should go


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 95 ✭✭Stocking Drinks Whiskey


    Obviously he does as he has 4 of them?

    I was speaking to OP.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,418 ✭✭✭✭hondasam


    The reality is no one is going to say no to money if they can get it.They have to means test it and stop wealthy people getting it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Galtee


    Bluefox21 wrote: »
    He's identified a serious flaw in how child benefit is distributed and suggested that a fairer system should be introduced. Please identify how this is in anyway ignorant.

    He's ignorant to the fact that people need it and hence scrapping it altogther and making people go through 6mths of paperwork to get it back isn't a viable solution.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    MidlandsM wrote: »
    The CEO of Ryanair Michael O'Leary has said child benefit should be scrapped.

    O'Leary said it was ridiculous that he received the entitlement for his four children, given his income.

    Speaking today,he said the allowance should be scrapped for everyone, even those on lower incomes.

    "I think you scrap it for everybody...You need to channel children's allowance (to those who need it) through income support schemes, where you're trying to channel money to those on very low incomes," he said.


    Said on the day Ryanair announces four new routes from Knock airport.
    From next March, there will be over 20 flights a week to and from Milan, Paris, Frankfurt and Barcelona.
    They will be the first such direct flights in and out of the Western region.
    http://www.rte.ie/news/2011/1121/ryanair_knock.html

    Suckered again folks.
    Too easy Michael, too easy.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    I was speaking to OP.

    The OP didn't express an opinion so it's hardly a relevant question to be asking?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,125 ✭✭✭westendgirlie


    The only way you get childrens allowance is if you apply for it. Why are the rich putting their claims in if they say they don't need it?

    Don't bother applying if you don't want it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,751 ✭✭✭Saila


    hondasam wrote: »
    they have to means test it and stop wealthy people getting it.

    thats the thing though it costs time and resources and money to do this, probably as much as they end up saving too!

    like the man says take it away and make it like a community welfare allowance like payment, you have to show why you need it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,058 ✭✭✭✭Abi


    geetar wrote: »
    :confused:

    why dont you read next time.
    Oh I read it alright, if you don't understand my issue with it, it's not my fucking problem.
    he wants the less well off to only recieve it. he doesnt want means testing, he wants to scrap the idea of children allowance and aid families in need through other welfare schemes that are more beneficial to both the families and the tax payer.

    Who the fuck is he to be shouting about this shit?

    Does he think he's coming up with some new radical idea about cutting CB for the better off? *slow clap* More beneficial to families my arse. Re-naming so as to leave them even further out of pocket if you ask me.


    Did he hand back all the child benefit his family didn't need? I seriously doubt it. The hypocrisy is just delicious.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,424 ✭✭✭Storminateacup


    You don't know how much it costs to raise a child, do you?

    If you can't afford to raise a child, don't have them. :confused:


Advertisement
Advertisement