Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Atheism causes creationism

1356724

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,718 ✭✭✭The Mad Hatter


    Newsite wrote: »
    So you have absolutely no idea what triggered it, no proof what caused it, no proof that it is not caused by God,

    Nor any proof that it is caused by any god, so why move away from "we don't know"?
    but yet you posit that belief in God, for which 'there is no material proof', is silly.

    You're the one making the leap here.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,458 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    There's this ludicrous idea that some religious people hold that because we understand a certain thing, we don't feel it.
    Feynman (again!):


    Just because we know that love is caused by chemical reactions in our brains doesn't mean we can't fall in love.
    Or indeed, just because we know that sound is just vibrating air, doesn't really mean that we can't appreciate a Bach fugue.

    This weird projected reductionism says far more about the fear of many people concerning the physical, chemical, biological and psychological worlds, than it does concerning the people who've made some effort to delve into them and comprehend what's there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    TQE and Newsite in one thread. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,132 ✭✭✭The Quadratic Equation


    Zombrex wrote: »
    So by calling those who merely enjoy it once, and do not "enjoy it doubly", the "living dead" you were merely making pleasant small talk?

    The question of eternal life is far from small talk.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,132 ✭✭✭The Quadratic Equation


    And what triggered the trigger?

    In other words, what was the first cause, i.e. the uncaused cause ? Or did something spring from nothing ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,629 ✭✭✭raah!


    I've never heard one plausible explanation for why creationists would exist if not for their having believed those unfortunate "you can't believe in evolution and God" arguments, and then reacting to them by making their own form of evolution... or whatever it is they make their own form of.

    Furthermore, I would put forward that it's not merely a catalyst, but the source of creationists. It's a very simple model, there are no competitors.

    Also, I made this argument a year ago on afterhours (I'm mad) and it was not beacuse I read so and so, it was because it's a patently obvious conclusion to come. And I worry for some of the people who are so ideologically entrenched that they can't make this very simple connection.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭Pete M.


    It's like saying god created the world...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,925 ✭✭✭aidan24326


    In other words, what was the first cause, i.e. the uncaused cause ? Or did something spring from nothing ?

    Nobody knows, but the default religious position i.e 'god did it', is a very very poor attempt at an explanation.

    Why? Because not one single religious person, be they christian, muslim, jew or otherwise, has even the faintest notion of what a god would be, nor have they any clue whatsover of what form such an entity might take, or why it would be concered about the sex lives of two gays in Oklohoma. This notion that a creator of the universe should be uncannily like us in all our foibles is pathetic.

    And yes, something could have sprang from nothing, nobody really knows what 'nothing' is anyway. So you're right in saying that there may be realities unavailable to our senses and that what we know may not be all there is. It's just that the mainstream religions have offered nothing by way of answering those questions, nor will they ever. In fact what answers they have offered by way of their holy texts have been embarrasingly naieve. In fairness those texts were a product of the times they were written in, but nowadays most people ought to know a little better.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 695 ✭✭✭yawha


    Newsite wrote: »
    What was the trigger of the cosmic accident?
    I don't know.

    What was the trigger that created God?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,739 ✭✭✭✭kylith


    Zombrex wrote: »
    And a sun set is "only" photons cascading through the atmosphere. A water fall is "only" water droplets being pulled to Earth by gravity.

    This constant need by (some) religious people to invent made up reasons to find something beautiful or wondrous other than because it is simply beautiful or wondrous is really quite distasteful. You can't enjoy something for what it is you have to make up a reason for why you should enjoy it as if you are embarrassed to simply find pleasure in things as they are.
    There's this ludicrous idea that some religious people hold that because we understand a certain thing, we don't feel it. Just because we know that love is caused by chemical reactions in our brains doesn't mean we can't fall in love.
    A man said it better than I even could

    Isn’t this enough?

    Just this world?

    Just this beautiful, complex
    Wonderfully unfathomable, NATURAL world?
    How does it so fail to hold our attention
    That we have to diminish it with the invention
    Of cheap, man-made Myths and Monsters?
    If you’re so into Shakespeare
    Lend me your ear:
    “To gild refined gold, to paint the lily,
    To throw perfume on the violet… is just ****ing silly”
    Or something like that.
    Or what about Satchmo?!
    I see trees of Green,
    Red roses too,
    And fine, if you wish to
    Glorify Krishna and Vishnu
    In a post-colonial, condescending
    Bottled-up and labeled kind of way
    Then whatever, that’s ok.
    But here’s what gives me a hard-on:
    I am a tiny, insignificant, ignorant lump of carbon.
    I have one life, and it is short
    And unimportant…
    But thanks to recent scientific advances
    I get to live twice as long
    As my great great great great uncleses and auntses.
    Twice as long to live this life of mine
    Twice as long to love this wife of mine
    Twice as many years of friends and wine
    Of sharing curries and getting ****ty
    With good-looking hippies
    With fairies on their spines
    And butterflies on their titties.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,834 ✭✭✭Mark Hamill


    raah! wrote: »
    I've never heard one plausible explanation for why creationists would exist if not for their having believed those unfortunate "you can't believe in evolution and God" arguments, and then reacting to them by making their own form of evolution... or whatever it is they make their own form of.

    Furthermore, I would put forward that it's not merely a catalyst, but the source of creationists. It's a very simple model, there are no competitors.

    Also, I made this argument a year ago on afterhours (I'm mad) and it was not beacuse I read so and so, it was because it's a patently obvious conclusion to come. And I worry for some of the people who are so ideologically entrenched that they can't make this very simple connection.

    Seeing as creationism is a literal interpretation of the book of Genesis (down to adding up the ages of every human decendant of Adam to get the age of the earth), your argument appears to assert that the bible itself was written in answer to evolution. This is probably why most people thinks its a crock.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,363 ✭✭✭nozzferrahhtoo


    Just as long as we agree with your opinon as to what is moral, what we should believe, how we should believe it, and how you think we should live.

    Nah that would be a desperate and quite disingenuous straw man. The issue most atheists have is not with people of differing beliefs. In fact life would be very boring if everyone believed the same things on everything.

    No the issue is with people who not just have, but espouse, entirely unsubstantiated beliefs… such as the idea there is a god. You can harp on about the “physical” all you like but at the end of the day some of us are asking for more than just the physical and STILL not getting any substantiation for god claims.

    For example I ask for any evidence, argument, data OR Reasons to lend even a modicum of credence to the idea such an entity exists and despite casting the net that much wider than most I still do not get any replies back except for… as you put it yourself… “tired old ad hominem arguments”... or the tactic of submitting open questions as if open questions are evidence for baseless conclusions.
    I have never seen anything else put forward to challenge them.

    Not surprising because it is impossible to challenge a position that is asserted without any substantiation. The best you can do is enter into a "Yes there is, no there is not, yes there is, no there is not" childish circular argument. As long as the claims of theists are asserted based on nothing, then there IS nothing to challenge. The position is unassailable.

    That is why theists go out of their way to NOT give any evidence, playing cards like "It is just faith" or "You have to go find the evidence for yourself" to cop out of presenting a shred of it. As long as they maintain a position of not substantiating their claims in any way, then the position is unassailable and un-falsifiable.

    As Christopher Hitchens says however "That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence". As long as you simply assert there is a god without substantiating your claim in any way, you will not see anything to "challenge" that claim because you are offering nothing to BE challenged. You just declare your own fantasy and head for the door.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,583 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    In other words, what was the first cause, i.e. the uncaused cause ? Or did something spring from nothing ?

    10 Something can't come from nothing
    20 Then where did God come from?
    30 God was always there.
    40 Well then let's say the Universe was always there.
    50 GOTO 10


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Newsite


    Dades wrote: »
    10 Something can't come from nothing
    20 Then where did God come from?
    30 God was always there.
    40 Well then let's say the Universe was always there.
    50 GOTO 10

    That also applies to your evolution theory.

    God is the 'alpha and the omega'.

    He transcends time and none of us can fully understand Him, much less than we can fully understand why we are here in the first place, right?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,583 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    Newsite wrote: »
    That also applies to your evolution theory.
    Evolutionary theory only works with the building blocks that already existed. It doesn't concern itself with the origins of matter or time.


  • Moderators Posts: 52,023 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    No it doesn't, as evolution doesn't claim that something came from nothing ;)

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,458 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Newsite wrote: »
    He transcends time and none of us can fully understand Him
    So you've no idea what your deity did, nor when, nor how, nor why?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    The question of eternal life is far from small talk.

    What does the question of eternal life have to do with appreciating a sun set?

    How about you stop back tracking and just apologize for your condescending remark, one you yourself don't even seem to agree with.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    Newsite wrote: »
    That also applies to your evolution theory.

    I think you mean it applies to theories that attempt to explain the Big Bang. It does which is why they make a serious attempt to understand the creation of the universe, rather than simply stories of gardens and talking snakes :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Newsite


    Zombrex wrote: »
    I think you mean it applies to theories that attempt to explain the Big Bang. It does which is why they make a serious attempt to understand the creation of the universe, rather than simply stories of gardens and talking snakes :P

    And this, is why you don't believe in God ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    Newsite wrote: »
    And this, is why you don't believe in God ;)
    I've many reasons for not believing in the existence of your god. But it doesn't help that the Bible reads like something made up by ancient middle eastern warlords and priests with no understand of the natural world around them, who were simply trying to justify and consolidate their own power and ancestry.

    Occam's Razor and all that :P

    Anyway, back to the thread. you accept that anything could have caused the big bang, there is no reason to suppose it was your god over anything else, correct?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,583 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    Newsite wrote: »
    And this, is why you don't believe in God ;)
    Just to point out that what you've done here is ignore all the posts refuting your point about evolutionary theory and picked one irrelevant line in the responses to respond to.

    That is all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    Dades wrote: »
    Just to point out that what you've done here is ignore all the posts refuting your point about evolutionary theory and picked one irrelevant line in the responses to respond to.

    That is all.

    Glad I'm not the only one noticing that some what annoying tendency.

    Newsite if you don't have any genuine interest in discussion and would prefer to simply repeat Christian dogma and sound bites, perhaps just declare this up front.

    Pretending to be interested in actual intellectual discussion but then only fake participating is really the only no-no on this forum.

    If all you have a blindly repeating Christian slogans I'm not sure there is much more to discuss with you.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,441 ✭✭✭old hippy


    Galvasean wrote: »
    TQE and Newsite in one thread. :)

    And not a word of sense between them. I know it's just a chemical reaction but I tend to despair at their increasingly desperate arguments for the existence of Mr God what made the universe...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,441 ✭✭✭old hippy


    robindch wrote: »
    So you've no idea what your deity did, nor when, nor how, nor why?

    Sounds like my missus complaining about some of those heavy nights out!

    I fail to see the mystery of this god chap; there is no mystery. Man used to worship the sun - it's one of the oldest deities there is in so many cultures - it was regarded as a provider, something to appreciate and worship.

    That's where it all kicked off. So away with your false deities; the warm organgey yellow orb in the sky is the one true creator etc ad nauseum :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,208 ✭✭✭fatmammycat


    Dades wrote: »
    Just to point out that what you've done here is ignore all the posts refuting your point about evolutionary theory and picked one irrelevant line in the responses to respond to.

    That is all.

    You're not going to get a straight answer, they can't give one that fully explains why a person living in this day and age should hold a belief in a supernatural deity. No one can really, despite all the wiggling and high falutin' theology waffle. The really really sad part – for me– is watching intelligent people move goal posts MILES apart to encompass wishful thinking. There's no shame in saying 'I don't know, perhaps we will know some day'. I have never understood the god of the gaps argument, ever.
    As to, 'oh you don't understand, you don't understand the bible.'

    Nonsense.

    The bible is a book, a pretty uncomplicated collection of stories; anyone with a luke-warm IQ can read it and understand it without taxing their mind fully. Certain sections of it no longer suit the 'oh, our god is an awesome loving father figure' so it's poured over ad nauseam and like looking at heavily patterned wall paper for long enough eventually all manner of patterns appear, when really it would be better if people stepped BACK and said, 'oh, it's just bloody wall paper.'


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,458 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    old hippy wrote: »
    I fail to see the mystery of this god chap; there is no mystery.
    The main mystery for me is why anybody could imagine that "my alleged deity did it/made it that way because" is a satisfactory answer for any question.

    Weird.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,441 ✭✭✭old hippy


    robindch wrote: »
    The main mystery for me is why anybody could imagine that "my alleged deity did it/made it that way because" is a satisfactory answer for any question.

    Weird.

    Reminds me of a spoilt child who just folds his arms and says "because I want to" :D

    How do you "transcend time" (as one of the faithful claimed) anyways? Does this involve going faster than the speed of light?

    Science fiction. Been with us since the beginning.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,458 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    old hippy wrote: »
    How do you "transcend time" (as one of the faithful claimed) anyways? Does this involve going faster than the speed of light?
    Hard to tell, since I've never heard a definition.

    "Transcend" is one of those mellifluous words like "ethos" which appear regularly within in religious discourse and whose only purpose is to lend a false air of erudition to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative.

    Imagine how many religious would feel silly saying "I can ignore that question about ultimate causality because I've endowed myself with the right to say that my deity of choice can ignore it". "God transcends time" is not only much easier on the ears, it's much easier to remember too!


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,441 ✭✭✭old hippy


    robindch wrote: »
    Hard to tell, since I've never heard a definition.

    "Transcend" is one of those mellifluous words like "ethos" which appear regularly within in religious discourse and whose only purpose is to lend a false air of erudition to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative.

    Imagine how many religious would feel silly saying "I can ignore that question about ultimate causality because I've endowed myself with the right to say that my deity of choice can ignore it". "God transcends time" is not only much easier on the ears, it's much easier to remember too!

    I'm waiting to hear "God transcends logic" next :D


Advertisement