The moon was towed here (supportive evidence)

Cú Giobach wrote: »

Duke Leonal Felmet wrote: »

You obviously have never quaffed the milk of the cows of Ceres. I was shining for months afterwards...

If this is the cow you are talking about, I think at least one study done at MIT showed that due to the nose to leg ratio of the imaged ruminant being inconsistent, the picture was declared a fake. The Sun is also behind the camera because the moon is apparently full, but the cow's shadow is at the top of the moon, therefore the picture must have been taken in a studio. The colour I have to begrudgingly admit, does leave the cheese hypothesis open, but only if the MIT study can be proven flawed and the image inconsistencies explained.

Clearly only a cow of such great mass could produce enough milk for a moon sized ball of cheese. It is also possible that the flash from the camera (or cameras) cast the cows shadow on the moon. Also, it is a little known fact that the lead researcher on that MIT paper is the son of the president of the WCC (World Cheese Council), who fear the arrival of the Ceres Cow, whose legendary dairy production would flood the market with cheese, crushing the monopoly enjoyed by the WCC.

wildefalcon wrote: »

Shame we spent all that money on bailing out Anglo Irish Bank, we should have spent it on a rocket program to check this theory out. And set up a moon base!

I can see the protesters in Dame Street: Moon Base NOW!, Moon Base NOW!

We could have called it the Noonan Moon Base.

Or better still, TWO moon bases - one on the far side of the moon, called the Noonan Nite Moon Base and one on the side facing earth - called the the Morning Noonan Moon Base.

Claim the Moon for IRELAND!

Ireland already has a giant mass floating around we dont need another......

MarkR wrote: »

No NO NO! It's Turtles! Turtles all the way down.

Who towed the turtles then?

The King of Moo wrote: »

The reason the moon rang when it was hit is because the interior is mostly hollow, consisting of a network of caves.

But inside those caves are the precious stuffing mines

A MrStuffins posting here, coincidence? I think not.

As someone said to me in another thread today "There are none so blind as those who will not see".

Logical Fallacy wrote: »

Dude111 wrote: »

1. Coincidence? - It is suspicious to me that the moon perfectly eclipses the sun. If the moon was any closer to the earth or any farther away,this would not be the case.

The moon has been closer to the earth than it is now, and is slowly moving further away from the earth.

The only coincidence is that you happen to be alive during a time where the moon is almost a perfect distance between the earth and the sun to occasionally cover it perfectly during an eclipse.

Moving? Pah! The 'moon' is merely shrinking due to dogs eating the cheese (you know, the ones the Russians sent up there).

I have 'supportive' evidence!

geetar wrote: »

1st point coincidence.


2nd point is false, because theres no noise in space.

/thread

If you put your ear down on the ground of the moon you would hear it, granted not for very long though. Also if you listen through the ground at the moon ringing and lift your head so you can't hear it, is it still ringing? If not, then when you ring a bell in a vacuum, because you can't hear it you haven't rang the bell, and if you didn't do something that you did do that is a paradox and the universe will collapse, therefore to prevent the collapse of reality as we know it, the moon rang like a bell.

It would have been very difficult for higher life to evolve without our humble moon. The OP is right in that it is a strange moon in its size is about 1 quarter the diameter of the Earth which makes it proportionally the biggest moon in the solar system.

It also has magnetised metals yet it has no magnetic field, there is some evidence that some of the craters where formed internally yet it is to small ever to be hot enough to form a volcano.

It was formed by the debris thrown up from a collision with another planet (current to accepted theory) as it is to big to have been captured by the Earth's gravitational field.

There are other strange unexplained properties of our moon which are not fully explained by current theory. But I am sure one day they will will be.

But bad news people we will lose our moon sometime, I for one will miss it.

But my question to the OP,Why would someone be arsed to tow a moon into the Earth's orbit 3 to 4 billion years ago when the Earth was a molten mess???

Here is evidence

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_-e_iSFE6g